Connecticut 2024 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 13 D cosponsors

SB 416 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE CONVERSION OF COMMERCIAL REAL PROPERTY FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.

Last action — HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 460

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

86 added · 9 removed

86 line(s) added, 9 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
Senate General Assembly File No.
416 February Session, 2024 LCO No.
394 February Session, 2024 Senate Bill No.
1461 Referred to Committee on PLANNING AND DEVELOPMENT Introduced by:
416 Senate, April 10, 2024 The Committee on Planning and Development reported through SEN.
(PD) AN ACT CONCERNING THE CONVERSION OF COMMERCIAL REAL PROPERTY FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.
RAHMAN of the 4th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE CONVERSION OF COMMERCIAL REAL PROPERTY FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.
and LCO 1461 1 of 2 Bill No.
and SB416 / File No.
416 (5) "Residential development" means a structure or structures, or a portion of a structure, that contains one or more dwelling units.
394 1 SB416 File No.
394 (5) "Residential development" means a structure or structures, or a portion of a structure, that contains one or more dwelling units.
Section 1 October 1, 2024 New section PD Joint Favorable LCO 1461 2 of 2
Section 1 October 1, 2024 New section PD Joint Favorable SB416 / File No.
394 2 SB416 File No.
394 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
See Below Explanation The bill requires municipalities that exercise their zoning powers under the statutes to allow developers to convert commercial buildings into residential developments as of right.
This may result in a grand list increase or decrease.
Any impact to municipalities is dependent on how these buildings are valued before and after a conversion from commercial to residential.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None SB416 / File No.
394 3 SB416 File No.
394 OLR Bill Analysis SB 416 AN ACT CONCERNING THE CONVERSION OF COMMERCIAL REAL PROPERTY FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.
SUMMARY This bill requires municipalities that exercise their zoning powers under state statute (rather than a special act) to allow developers to convert commercial buildings fully or partially into residential developments as of right (see BACKGROUND) under their zoning regulations.
It prohibits municipalities from requiring the developer to correct any nonconforming use, structure, or lot (see BACKGROUND).
However, the bill does not exempt converted buildings from any applicable building, fire safety, or fire prevention codes.
Under the bill, the applicable zoning commission must decide on a conversion application within 65 days after receiving it.
The applicant may consent to one or more extensions of up to 65 days, or may withdraw its application.
Under the bill, commercial buildings are buildings that are primarily designed or used for nonresidential purposes (e.g., hotels, retail space, and offices), but do not include industrial buildings (e.g., warehouses, factories, storage facilities, or other buildings that generally exclude the public).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2024 BACKGROUND As-of-Right Development Bylaw,anas-of-rightapprovalmeansthemunicipalitymustapprove a proposal if it complies with normal zoning regulations.
It cannot SB416 / File No.
394 4 SB416 File No.
394 require(1)apublichearing,(2)aspecialpermitorexception (seebelow), or (3) any other discretionary zoning action, other than a determination a site plan conforms with applicable zoning regulations.
Special Permit or Exception “Special permit” and “special exemption” are synonymous and the designated land use agency may grant one under the Zoning Enabling Act (CGS § 8-2) or special act, as applicable.
They allow people to use a property in a way explicitly allowed by the zoning regulations but subject to conditions not applicable to other uses in the same district.
Nonconforming Use and Lots A nonconforming use is a property use that was lawful at the time a zoning restriction prohibiting or limiting the use is adopted.
(The term may also be used to refer to lots and structures that do not comply with zoning regulations.) For example, if a municipality adopts zoning regulations that permit only dwellings and schools in a particular zone, a restaurant that already operates in that zone would become a nonconforming use.
By law, regulations cannot prohibit the continuance of any nonconforming use, building, or structure existing at the time of the adoption of the regulations (CGS § 8-2(a)).
COMMITTEE ACTION Planning and Development Committee Joint Favorable Yea 13 Nay 8 (03/22/2024) SB416 / File No.
Show all 41 changed rows (1 more)
Previous
Latest
394 5
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 460

  2. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  3. SENATE PASSED

  4. FILE NO. 394

  5. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 256

  6. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  7. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  8. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/09/24

  9. FILED WITH LCO

  10. Joint Favorable

  11. PUBLIC HEARING 0313

  12. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Planning and Development

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

13 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 174 not signed on · 12 voted No

Sponsors (13)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (174)

174 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 174 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Senate Roll Call Vote

Passed 22 Yea · 12 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 21002
Unaffiliated 1200
Republican 01000
Total 221202
% of votes cast 61%33%0%6%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Kevin C. Kelly — Nay
Lisa Seminara — Nay
Marilyn Moore — Yea
Bob Duff Democratic Yea
Catherine A. Osten Democratic Yea
Ceci Maher Democratic Yea
Christine Cohen Democratic Yea
Derek Slap Democratic Yea
Douglas McCrory Democratic Yea
Gary A. Winfield Democratic Yea
Herron Gaston Democratic Yea
James J. Maroney Democratic Yea
Jan Hochadel Democratic Yea
Joan V. Hartley Democratic Not Voting
John W. Fonfara Democratic Yea
Jorge Cabrera Democratic Yea
Julie Kushner Democratic Yea
MD Rahman Democratic Yea
Mae Flexer Democratic Yea
Martha Marx Democratic Yea
Martin M. Looney Democratic Yea
Matthew L. Lesser Democratic Yea
Norman Needleman Democratic Not Voting
Patricia Billie Miller Democratic Yea
Rick Lopes Democratic Yea
Saud Anwar Democratic Yea
Eric C. Berthel Republican Nay
Heather S. Somers Republican Nay
Henri Martin Republican Nay
Jeff Gordon Republican Nay
John A. Kissel Republican Nay
Paul Cicarella Republican Nay
Rob Sampson Republican Nay
Ryan Fazio Republican Nay
Stephen G. Harding Republican Nay
Tony Hwang Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 416?
SB 416 is sponsored by MD Rahman (Democratic), Geoff Luxenberg (Democratic), Gary A. Winfield (Democratic), Matthew L. Lesser (Democratic), Patricia Billie Miller (Democratic), Jason Doucette (Democratic), Herron Gaston (Democratic), James J. Maroney (Democratic), Martha Marx (Democratic), Saud Anwar (Democratic), Jorge Cabrera (Democratic), Derek Slap (Democratic), and Douglas McCrory (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 416?
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 416?
Track SB 416 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 416

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 416

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →