SB 416 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE CONVERSION OF COMMERCIAL REAL PROPERTY FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.
Last action — HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 460
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
86 added · 9 removed86 line(s) added, 9 removed.
Senate General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
416394 February Session, 2024 LCOSenate Bill No.
1461416 ReferredSenate, toApril 10, 2024 The Committee on PLANNINGPlanning ANDand DEVELOPMENTDevelopment Introducedreported by:through SEN.
(PD)RAHMAN ANof ACTthe CONCERNING4th THEDist., CONVERSIONChairperson OFof COMMERCIALthe REALCommittee PROPERTYon FORthe RESIDENTIALpart USE.of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE CONVERSION OF COMMERCIAL REAL PROPERTY FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.
and LCOSB416 1461/ 1File of 2 Bill No.
416394 (5)1 "ResidentialSB416 development"File meansNo. a structure or structures, or a portion of a structure, that contains one or more dwelling units.
394 (5) "Residential development" means a structure or structures, or a portion of a structure, that contains one or more dwelling units.
Section 1 October 1, 2024 New section PD Joint Favorable LCOSB416 1461/ 2File ofNo. 2
394 2 SB416 File No.
394 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
See Below Explanation The bill requires municipalities that exercise their zoning powers under the statutes to allow developers to convert commercial buildings into residential developments as of right.
This may result in a grand list increase or decrease.
Any impact to municipalities is dependent on how these buildings are valued before and after a conversion from commercial to residential.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None SB416 / File No.
394 3 SB416 File No.
394 OLR Bill Analysis SB 416 AN ACT CONCERNING THE CONVERSION OF COMMERCIAL REAL PROPERTY FOR RESIDENTIAL USE.
SUMMARY This bill requires municipalities that exercise their zoning powers under state statute (rather than a special act) to allow developers to convert commercial buildings fully or partially into residential developments as of right (see BACKGROUND) under their zoning regulations.
It prohibits municipalities from requiring the developer to correct any nonconforming use, structure, or lot (see BACKGROUND).
However, the bill does not exempt converted buildings from any applicable building, fire safety, or fire prevention codes.
Under the bill, the applicable zoning commission must decide on a conversion application within 65 days after receiving it.
The applicant may consent to one or more extensions of up to 65 days, or may withdraw its application.
Under the bill, commercial buildings are buildings that are primarily designed or used for nonresidential purposes (e.g., hotels, retail space, and offices), but do not include industrial buildings (e.g., warehouses, factories, storage facilities, or other buildings that generally exclude the public).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2024 BACKGROUND As-of-Right Development Bylaw,anas-of-rightapprovalmeansthemunicipalitymustapprove a proposal if it complies with normal zoning regulations.
It cannot SB416 / File No.
394 4 SB416 File No.
394 require(1)apublichearing,(2)aspecialpermitorexception (seebelow), or (3) any other discretionary zoning action, other than a determination a site plan conforms with applicable zoning regulations.
Special Permit or Exception “Special permit” and “special exemption” are synonymous and the designated land use agency may grant one under the Zoning Enabling Act (CGS § 8-2) or special act, as applicable.
They allow people to use a property in a way explicitly allowed by the zoning regulations but subject to conditions not applicable to other uses in the same district.
Nonconforming Use and Lots A nonconforming use is a property use that was lawful at the time a zoning restriction prohibiting or limiting the use is adopted.
(The term may also be used to refer to lots and structures that do not comply with zoning regulations.) For example, if a municipality adopts zoning regulations that permit only dwellings and schools in a particular zone, a restaurant that already operates in that zone would become a nonconforming use.
By law, regulations cannot prohibit the continuance of any nonconforming use, building, or structure existing at the time of the adoption of the regulations (CGS § 8-2(a)).
COMMITTEE ACTION Planning and Development Committee Joint Favorable Yea 13 Nay 8 (03/22/2024) SB416 / File No.
Show all 41 changed lines (1 more)
394 5
Show all 41 changed rows (1 more)
Action History
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 460
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
SENATE PASSED
-
FILE NO. 394
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 256
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/09/24
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0313
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Planning and Development
Sponsors
- MD Rahman · Primary
- Geoff Luxenberg · Primary
- Gary A. Winfield · Primary
- Matthew L. Lesser · Primary
- Patricia Billie Miller · Primary
- Jason Doucette · Primary
- Herron Gaston · Primary
- James J. Maroney · Primary
- Martha Marx · Primary
- Saud Anwar · Primary
- Jorge Cabrera · Primary
- Derek Slap · Primary
- Douglas McCrory · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →13 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 174 not signed on · 12 voted No
Sponsors (13)
- MD Rahman Democratic
- Geoff Luxenberg Democratic
- Gary A. Winfield Democratic
- Matthew L. Lesser Democratic
- Patricia Billie Miller Democratic
- Jason Doucette Democratic
- Herron Gaston Democratic
- James J. Maroney Democratic
- Martha Marx Democratic
- Saud Anwar Democratic
- Jorge Cabrera Democratic
- Derek Slap Democratic
- Douglas McCrory Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (174)
174 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 174 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 21 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 12 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 33% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kevin C. Kelly | — | Nay |
| Lisa Seminara | — | Nay |
| Marilyn Moore | — | Yea |
| Bob Duff | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine A. Osten | Democratic | Yea |
| Ceci Maher | Democratic | Yea |
| Christine Cohen | Democratic | Yea |
| Derek Slap | Democratic | Yea |
| Douglas McCrory | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Winfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Herron Gaston | Democratic | Yea |
| James J. Maroney | Democratic | Yea |
| Jan Hochadel | Democratic | Yea |
| Joan V. Hartley | Democratic | Not Voting |
| John W. Fonfara | Democratic | Yea |
| Jorge Cabrera | Democratic | Yea |
| Julie Kushner | Democratic | Yea |
| MD Rahman | Democratic | Yea |
| Mae Flexer | Democratic | Yea |
| Martha Marx | Democratic | Yea |
| Martin M. Looney | Democratic | Yea |
| Matthew L. Lesser | Democratic | Yea |
| Norman Needleman | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Patricia Billie Miller | Democratic | Yea |
| Rick Lopes | Democratic | Yea |
| Saud Anwar | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric C. Berthel | Republican | Nay |
| Heather S. Somers | Republican | Nay |
| Henri Martin | Republican | Nay |
| Jeff Gordon | Republican | Nay |
| John A. Kissel | Republican | Nay |
| Paul Cicarella | Republican | Nay |
| Rob Sampson | Republican | Nay |
| Ryan Fazio | Republican | Nay |
| Stephen G. Harding | Republican | Nay |
| Tony Hwang | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 416?
- SB 416 is sponsored by MD Rahman (Democratic), Geoff Luxenberg (Democratic), Gary A. Winfield (Democratic), Matthew L. Lesser (Democratic), Patricia Billie Miller (Democratic), Jason Doucette (Democratic), Herron Gaston (Democratic), James J. Maroney (Democratic), Martha Marx (Democratic), Saud Anwar (Democratic), Jorge Cabrera (Democratic), Derek Slap (Democratic), and Douglas McCrory (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 416?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 416?
- Track SB 416 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 416
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 416
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →