HB 5390 — AN ACT CONCERNING TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES.
Last action — SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 453
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
824 added · 382 removed824 line(s) added, 382 removed.
House of Representatives General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
5390237 February Session, 2024 LCOSubstitute House Bill No.
645390 ReferredHouse toof Representatives, April 3, 2024 The Committee on PLANNINGPlanning ANDand DEVELOPMENTDevelopment Introducedreported by:through REP.
(PD)KAVROS ANDEGRAW ACTof CONCERNINGthe TRANSIT-ORIENTED17th COMMUNITIES.Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES.
Subsection (b) of section 8-1a of the general statutes is repealed andthefollowing issubstitutedis substituted inlieuthereof(EffectiveOctober 1, 2024):
(2) "Affordable accessory apartment" means an accessory apartment that is subject to binding recorded deeds which contain covenants or restrictions that require such accessory apartment be sold or rented at, orsHB5390 below,/ pricesFile that will preserve the unit as housing for which, for a periodofnot lessthantenyears,personsandfamiliespay thirty per cent or less of income, where such income is less than or equal to eighty per LCO No.
64237 1 ofsHB5390 13File RaisedNo. Bill No.5390 cent of the median income;
237 or below, prices that will preserve the unit as housing for which, for a periodofnot lessthantenyears,personsandfamiliespay thirty per cent or less of income, where such income is less than or equal to eighty per cent of the median income;
(1) "Coordinator""Discretionary infrastructure funding" means theany Responsiblegrant, Growthloan Coordinatoror withinother financial assistance program administered by the Officestate under the provisions of Policysections 4-66c, 4-66h and Management;8-13m to 8-13x, inclusive, of the general statutes, or any grant, loan or financial assistance program sHB5390 / File No.
(2)237 "Discretionary2 infrastructuresHB5390 funding"File means any grant, loan or other financial assistance program administered by the state under the provisions of section 4-66c, section 4-66h, sections 8-13m to 8-13x, inclusive, subsection(g)ofsection32-763orsection32-765ofthegeneral LCO No.
64237 2 of 13 Raised Bill No.5390 statutes, or any grant, loan, or financial assistance program managed by the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management for the purpose of transit-oriented development, as defined in section 13b-79o13b- 79o of the general statutes;
(3)(2) "Downtown area" means a central business district or other commercial neighborhood area of a municipality that serves as a center of socioeconomic interaction in the municipality, characterized by a cohesive core of commercial and mixed-use buildings, often interspersed with civic, religious and residential buildings and public spaces, that are typically arranged along a main street and intersecting side streets and served by public infrastructure;
(4)(3) "Middle housing development" means a residential building containing not fewer than two dwelling units but not greater than nine such units, including, but not limited to, townhomes, duplexes, triplexes, perfect sixes and cottage clusters;
(5)"Perfectsix"meansathree-storyresidentialbuildingwithacentral(4)"Perfectsix"meansathree-storyresidentialbuildingwithacentral entrance containing two dwelling units per story;
(6)(5) "Qualifying bus transit community" means any municipality that has not less than one regular bus service station operating not less than five days a week within a transit-oriented district adopted by such municipality, provided such transit-oriented district is of reasonable size,asdeterminedbythecoordinatorinaccordancewiththeprovisionssize, as determined by the secretary in accordance with the provisions of subsection (e) of this section, and (A) includes land of such municipality located within a one-half-mile radius of any such station, or (B) is located within a reasonable distance, as determined by the coordinator,secretary, of any other transit service, a commercial corridor or a downtown area of such municipality;
(7)(6) "Qualifying rapid transit community" means any municipality that has not less than one rapid transit station or a planned rapid transit station, contained within a transit-oriented district adopted by such municipality, provided such transit-oriented district is of reasonable size, as determined by the coordinatorsecretary in accordance with subsection (e) LCOof this section, and (A) includes land of such municipality located within a sHB5390 / File No.
64237 3 ofsHB5390 13File RaisedNo. Bill No.5390 ofthissection,and(A)includeslandofsuchmunicipalitylocatedwithin a one-half-mile radius of any such station, or (B) is located within a reasonable distance, as determined by the coordinator, of any other transit service, a commercial corridor or the downtown area of such municipality;
(8)237 "Qualifyingone-half-mile transit-orientedradius community"of means any municipalitysuch thatstation, or (B) is located within a qualifyingreasonable rapiddistance, as determined by the secretary, of any other transit communityservice, a commercial corridor or qualifyingthe busdowntown transitarea community;of such municipality;
(9)(7) "Rapid"Qualifying transittransit-oriented station"community" means any publicmunicipality transportationthat stationis servinga railqualifying rapid transit community or rapidqualifying bus routes;transit community;
(10)(8) "Regular"Rapid bustransit service station" means any fixedpublic locationtransportation wherestation aserving busany willrail regularly stop for the loading or unloadingrapid ofbus passengersroute; along a defined route operating on a fixed schedule;
(11)(9)"Regularbusservicestation"meansanyfixedlocationwhereabus "Transit-orientedregularly district"stops meansfor athe collectionloading ofor parcelsunloading of landpassengers inalong a municipalitydefined designatedroute byoperating suchon municipalitya andfixed subjectschedule; to zoning criteria designed to encourage increased density of development, including mixed-use development and concentration of discretionary infrastructure funding;
(10) "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management, or the secretary's designee;
(11) "Transit-oriented district" means a collection of parcels of land in a municipality designated by such municipality and subject to zoning criteria designed to encourage increased density of development, including mixed-use development, and concentration of discretionary infrastructure funding;
(b) Any qualifying transit-oriented community shall be eligible for prioritized discretionary infrastructure funding.
To receive such funding,funding on a priority basis, any such community, or any municipality that is not a qualifying transit-oriented community but has adopted a resolution pursuant to subsection (c) of this section, shall submit an application for such funding to the coordinatorsecretary in a form developed by the coordinator.secretary.
The coordinatorsecretary shall make recommendations to the state agency responsible for administering such funding andand, suchif agencypriority maysHB5390 prioritize/ anyFile qualifying transit-oriented community for the receipt of such funding LCO No.
64237 4 ofsHB5390 13File RaisedNo. Bill No.5390 over any municipality that is not a qualifying transit-oriented community or has not adopted a resolution pursuant to subsection (c) of this section.
(c)237 Anyfunding municipality that is notpermitted afor qualifyingsuch transit-orientedfunding, communitysuch shallagency bemay eligibleprioritize forany discretionaryqualifying infrastructuretransit-oriented fundingcommunity pursuantor tomunicipality thisthat sectionhasadopted ifsuch thea municipality,resolution actingfor through the zoningreceipt commission of such municipality,funding adoptsover aany resolutionmunicipality stating that suchis commissionnot intendsa toqualifying enacttransit-oriented zoningcommunity regulationsor that enablehas not adopted such municipalitya toresolution, becomebased aon qualifyingthe transit-orientedsecretary's community.recommendations.
Such(c) commissionAny municipality that is not a qualifying transit-oriented community shall enactbe sucheligible zoningfor regulationsdiscretionary notinfrastructure laterfunding thanon eighteena monthspriority afterbasis pursuant to this section if the adoptionlegislative body of the municipality adopts a resolution stating that such resolution.municipality intends to enact zoning regulations that enable such municipality to become a qualifying transit-oriented community.
IfSuch suchmunicipality commissionshall does not enact such zoning regulations withinnot later than eighteen months after the adoption of such resolution,resolution. unless the coordinator grants an extension to such commission at the coordinator's discretion, such municipality shall return any discretionary infrastructure funding received and shall not be eligible for discretionary infrastructure funding until the zoning commission of such municipality enacts zoning regulations that enable the municipality to become a qualifying transit-oriented community.
If such municipality does not enact such regulations within eighteen months after the adoption of such resolution, unless the secretary grants an extension to such municipality at the secretary's discretion, such municipality shall return any discretionary infrastructure funding provided to such municipality on a priority basis pursuant to this section and such municipality shall be ineligible for discretionary infrastructure funding on a priority basis until such municipality enacts zoning regulations that enable the municipality to become a qualifying transit-oriented community.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to make a municipality that is not a qualifying transit-oriented community ineligible for discretionary infrastructure funding.
If any portion of any such proposed district is located in an area over which such agency exercises its authority, such commission shall collaborate with such agency to determine whether any portionportionof of such proposed district shall allow for the as-of-right development of middle housing and mixed-use developments.
(e) In determining whether a transit-oriented district is of reasonable size,sHB5390 the/ coordinator,File inNo. consultation with the zoning commission, shall (1) determine whether the area of such district is adequate to support greater density of development in an equitable manner, as determined by the coordinator, considering the geographic characteristics of the municipality;
237 5 sHB5390 File No.
237 size, the secretary, in consultation with the zoning commission of the municipality, shall (1) determine whether the area of such district is adequate to support greater density of development in an equitable manner, as determined by the secretary, considering the geographic characteristics of the municipality;
LCO(A) No.Special flood hazard areas designated ona flood insuranceratemappublishedbytheNationalFloodInsuranceProgram, (B)wetlands,asdefinedinsection22a-29ofthegeneralstatutes,(C)land designated for use as a public park, (D) land subject to conservation or preservation restrictions, as defined in section 47-42a of the general statutes, (E) coastal resources, as defined in section 22a-93 of the general statutes, (F) areas necessary for the protection of drinking water supplies, and (G) areas designated as likely to be inundated during a thirty-year flood event by the Marine Sciences Division of The University of Connecticut pursuant to the division's responsibilities to conduct sea level change scenarios pursuant to subsection (b) of section 25-68o of the general statutes.
64If 5deemed ofnecessary 13 Raised Bill No.5390 (A) Special flood hazard areas designated on a flood insurance rate map published by the Nationalzoning Floodcommission Insuranceto Program,determine (B)whether wetlands, as defined in section 22a-29 of the general statutes, (C) land designated for use as a publictransit-oriented park,district (D)is land subject to conservation or preservation restrictions, as defined in section 47-42a of thereasonable generalsize, statutes,suchcommissionshallconsult (E)withtheinland coastalwetlands resources,agency as defined in section 22a-93 of the generalmunicipality statutes, (F) areas necessary for the protection of drinking water supplies, and (G)any areasother designatedmunicipal asagency likelydeemed tonecessary be inundated during a thirty-year flood event by thesuch Marinecommission Sciences Division of The University of Connecticut pursuant to thedetermine division'swhether responsibilitiessuch todistrict conductis sea level change scenarios pursuant to subsection (b) of sectionreasonable 25-68osize. of the general statutes.
If deemed necessary by the zoning commission to determine whether a transit-oriented district is of reasonable size, such commission shall consult with the inland wetlands agency of the municipality and any other municipal agency deemed necessary by such commission.
Show all 288 changed lines (248 more)
(1) Middle housing developments,developments; if such development contains nine or fewer dwelling units;
and (3) developments on land owned by (A) the municipality in which such land is located, (B) the state, (C) any public housing authority, (D) any not-for-profit entity, and (E) any religious organization, as defined in section 49-31k of the general statutes, if such development is composed entirely of units that qualify as a set-aside development pursuant to section 8-30g of the general statutes and not less than fifty per cent of such units shall be sold or rented at, or below, prices which will preserve the units as housingsHB5390 for/ whichFile personsNo. and families pay thirty per cent or less of their annual income, where such income is less than or equalto sixty per cent of the area median income established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
Notwithstanding237 the6 provisionssHB5390 ofFile this subsection, if a proposed development is required to LCO No.
64237 6housing offor 13which Raisedpersons Billand No.5390families havepay athirty publicper hearingcent inor theless inlandwetlandsagencyof ofthemunicipality,their annual income, where such proposedincome developmentis mustless receivethan suchor publicequalto hearingsixty priorper tocent suchof development'sthe approval.area median income established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development.
(g)Notwithstanding Eachthe qualifyingprovisions transit-orientedof communitythis shallsubsection, requireif thata any proposed development thatis containsrequired ten or more dwelling units that are not allowed as of right under subsection (f) of this section be subject to (1)have a deedpublic restrictionhearing thatby requires, for not less than forty years after the initialinland occupationwetlands ofagency the proposed development, that a percentage of dwelling units, as set forth in subsection (h) of this section, shall be sold or rented at, or below, prices which will preserve the unitsmunicipality, assuch housingproposed fordevelopment whichmust personsreceive and families that pay thirty per cent or less of their annual income and where such incomepublic ishearing lessprior than or equal to eightysuch perdevelopment's centapproval. of the area median income established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development;
(g) Each qualifying transit-oriented community shall require that any proposed development that contains ten or more dwelling units that are not allowed as of right under subsection (f) of this section be subject to (1) a deed restriction that requires, for not less than forty years after the initial occupation of the proposed development, that a percentage of dwelling units, as set forth in subsection (h) of this section, shall be sold or rented at, or below, prices which will preserve the units as housing for which persons and families will pay thirty per cent or less of their annual income and where such income is less than or equal to eighty per cent of the area median income established by the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development;
and (4)sHB5390 Five/ perFile centNo. for any municipality designated Low Opportunity/Cooling Market.
(i)237 Any7 qualifyingsHB5390 transit-orientedFile community may establish a fund into which the developer of a proposed development that is not allowed LCO No.
64237 7(4) ofFive 13per Raisedcent Billfor No.5390any asmunicipality ofdesignated rightLow underOpportunity/Cooling subsectionMarket. (f) of this section may contribute funds to qualify for such as-of-right approval.
The(i) amountAny andqualifying durationtransit-oriented ofcommunity suchmay contributionsestablish shalla befund determinedinto bywhich the coordinatordeveloper andof anya contributionproposed agreementdevelopment enteredthat intois not allowed as of right under subsection (f) of this section may contribute funds in lieu of granting a deed restriction required pursuant to thissubdivision subsection(1) shallof besubsection approved(g) byof thethis coordinator.section.
The amount and duration of such contributions shall be determined by the secretary and any contribution agreement entered into pursuant to this subsection shall be approved by the secretary.
(j) The coordinatorsecretary shall determine any municipality's compliance with the provisions of this section.
The coordinatorsecretary may consult with the Commissioner of Housing to determine such compliance.
Any municipality that is not a qualifying rapid transit community or qualifying bus transit community may be deemed a qualifying transit- oriented community if the coordinatorsecretary determines that such municipality has adopted a transit-oriented district that contains any rapid transit station or regular bus service station and is of a reasonable size on or before October 1, 2025.
(k) Each qualifying transit-oriented community shall be eligible for additional funding pursuant to any program administered by the coordinatorsecretary if such community implements additional zoning criteria, including, but not limited to, higher density development, greater affordability of housing units than is required by subsection (h) of this section, the development of public land or public housing, the implementation of programs to encourage homeownership opportunities within such community and any additional criteria determined by the coordinator.secretary.
(l) No qualifying transit-oriented community shall adopt regulations concerning any transit-oriented district that conflict with any guidelines adopted by the coordinatorsecretary concerning parking requirements, lot size, lot coverage,sHB5390 setback/ requirements,File floor area ratio, height restrictions, inclusionary zoning requirements, development impact fees or other guidelines adopted by the coordinator concerning the development of housing in any such district, unless the coordinator, in collaboration with the qualifying transit-oriented community, approves such LCO No.
64237 8 ofsHB5390 13File RaisedNo. Bill No.5390 conflicting regulations based on local factors identified by such community.
(m)237 Notwithstandingcoverage, thesetback provisionsrequirements, offloor subsectionarea (b)ratio, ofheight thisrestrictions, section,inclusionary transit-orientedzoning districtsrequirements, locateddevelopment inimpact priorityfees fundingor areas,other asguidelines definedadopted inby sectionthe 16a-35csecretary ofconcerning the generaldevelopment statutes,of shallhousing bein awardedany discretionarysuch infrastructuredistrict, fundingunless by the agencysecretary, administeringin anycollaboration suchwith fundingthe onqualifying atransit-oriented prioritycommunity, basisapproves uponsuch theconflicting requestregulations ofbased aon qualifyinglocal transit-orientedfactors identified by such community.
(m) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (b) of this section, any qualifying transit-oriented community with one or more transit- oriented districts that are located in priority funding areas, as defined in section 16a-35c of the general statutes, shall be awarded discretionary infrastructure funding by the agency administering any such funding at a higher priority than a qualifying transit-oriented community without such district located in such funding areas.
(b)The councilshallconsistofthefollowingregularmembers:(1)councilshallconsistofthefollowingregularmembers:(1)The The State Responsible Growth Coordinator;
(d)sHB5390 The/ chairpersonFile ofNo. the council shall be the State Responsible Growth Coordinator.
(e)237 The9 councilsHB5390 shallFile convene not later than July 1, 2024, and meet not LCO No.
64237 9(d) ofThe 13chairperson Raisedof Billthe No.5390council lessshall thanbe once every six months and more often upon the callState ofResponsible theGrowth chairperson,Coordinator. to:
(e) The council shall convene not later than July 1, 2024, and meet not less than once every six months and more often upon the call of the chairperson, to:
and (6) Develop guidelines concerning the adoption and development of transit-oriented districts,which shall include, but need not belimited to, (A) prioritizing mixed-use and mixed-income developments, (B) increasingsHB5390 the/ availabilityFile of affordable housing, (C) ensuring proper environmental considerations in the development of such districts, with an emphasis on the analysis of any potential impacts on environmental LCO No.
64237 10 ofsHB5390 13File RaisedNo. Bill No.5390 justicecommunities,asdefinedinsection22a-20aofthegeneralstatutes, (D) increasing ridership on mass transit systems, (E) increasing the feasibility of walking, biking andutilizing other meansof mobility other thanmotor vehicle travel,(F)reducing theneedfor motor vehicle travel, (G) maximizing developable land, (H) increasing the economic viability of development projects, and (I) reducing the length of time necessary to approve applications for development.
237 increasing the availability of affordable housing, (C) ensuring proper environmental considerations in the development of such districts, with an emphasis on the analysis of any potential impacts on environmental justicecommunities,asdefinedinsection22a-20aofthegeneralstatutes, (D) increasing ridership on mass transit systems, (E) increasing the feasibility of walking, biking andutilizing other meansof mobility other thanmotor vehicle travel,(F)reducing theneedfor motor vehicletravel, (G) maximizing developable land, (H) increasing the economic viability of development projects, and (I) reducing the length of time necessary to approve applications for development.
Moneys in the account shall be expended by the StateSecretary Responsibleof Growththe CoordinatorOffice of Policy and Management for the purposes of rehabilitating or expanding public water and sewerage infrastructure for any transit-oriented district established by a municipality pursuant to section 2 of this act.
Proceeds fromsHB5390 such/ accountFile may be provided to any qualifying rapid transit community, a bus transit community or any owner of real property in a development approved for such funding at the discretion of the coordinator located LCO No.
64237 11 ofsHB5390 13File RaisedNo. Bill No.5390 within a transit-oriented district.
237 from such account may be provided to any qualifying rapid transit community, qualifying bus transit community or any owner of real property in a development approved for such funding at the discretion of the secretary located within a transit-oriented district.
(NEW)(Effective(NEW) October1,2024)The(Effective StateOctober Responsible1, Growth2024) CoordinatorThe Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management may establish, within available appropriations, a program to provide grants to any regional council of governments for the development of projects related to public transit infrastructure, bicycle infrastructure or pedestrian infrastructure.
(1) First holds a public hearing in accordance with the provisions of section 8-7d on such proposed opt- out, (2) affirmatively decides to opt out of the provisions of said subsections within the period of time permitted under section 8-7d, (3) states [upon its] in the records of such commission the reasons for such decision,sHB5390 and/ (4)File publishesNo. notice of such decision in a newspaper having a substantial circulation in the municipality not later than fifteen days after such decision has been rendered.
Thereafter,237 the12 LCOsHB5390 File No.
64237 12decision, and (4) publishes notice of 13such Raiseddecision Billin No.a newspaper having a substantial circulation in the municipality not later than fifteen days after such decision has been rendered.
5390Thereafter, the municipality's legislative body or, in a municipality where the legislative body is a town meeting, [its] such municipality's board of selectmen, by a two-thirds vote, may complete the process by which such municipality opts out of the provisions of subsections (a) to (d), inclusive, of this section, except that, on and after January 1, 2023, no municipality may opt out of the provisions of said subsections.
(g)Sec. Notwithstanding any prior action of the municipality to opt out of the provisions of subsections (a) to (d), inclusive, of this section, pursuant to subsection (f) of this section, any owner of real property located within a transit-oriented district, as defined in section 2 of this act, who has owned real property in the municipality for not fewer than three years may construct an accessory apartment as of right on such real property.
8.
Section 8-2o of the general statutes is amended by adding subsection (g) as follows (Effective October 1, 2024):
(NEW) (g) Notwithstanding any prior action of the municipality to opt out of the provisions of subsections (a) to (d), inclusive, of this section, pursuant to subsection (f) of this section, any owner of real property located within a transit-oriented district, as defined in section 2 of this act, who has owned real property in the municipality for not fewer than three years may construct an accessory apartment as of right on such real property.
7 October 1, 2024 8-2o(f) StatementSec. of Purpose:
To8 (1)October provide1, financial2024 incentives8-2o(g) forStatement municipalities that adopt certain transit-oriented development policies and to coordinate related state funds through the Office of ResponsibleLegislative Growth,Commissioners: (2) establish the interagency council on housing development, (3) direct the State Responsible Growth Coordinator to establish a fund for the expansion of water and sewerage infrastructure, (4) to allow the coordinator to provide additional funding for certain infrastructure projects, and (5) to include transit-oriented districts in the definition of housing growth zones.
[ProposedIn deletionsSection are2(a)(9), enclosed"will inregularly brackets.stop" was changed to "regularly stops" for accuracy;
Proposedin additionsSection are2(b), indicated"on bya underline,priority exceptbasis" thatwas whenadded theafter entire"funding" textfor ofaccuracy, a"or billmunicipality orthat resolutionhas oradopted such a sectionresolution" ofwas aadded billafter or"community" resolutionfor isclarity, new,and itin isthe notlast underlined.]two LCOlines No."pursuant to subsection (c) of this section" was deleted for clarity;
64sHB5390 13/ ofFile 13No.
237 13 sHB5390 File No.
237 in Section 2(e), in the first sentence, "of the municipality" was added after "commission" for clarity, and in the final sentence, "to determine whether such district is of reasonable size" was added after "commission" for clarity;
in Section 2(f)(1), ", if such development contains nine or fewer dwelling units" was deleted for consistency with a defined term;
in Section 2(f), in the final sentence, "in" was changed to "by" for accuracy;
in Section 2(g), "that pay" was changed to "will pay" for clarity;
in Section 2(i), "required" was added before "pursuant to" for clarity;
in Section 2(m), "communities" was changed to "community" and "that are" was added before "located" for clarity;
in Section 4, "a bus transit community" was changed to "qualifying bus transit community" for consistency with a defined term;
in Section 7, Subsec.
(g) was deleted for consistency with standard drafting conventions;
and Section 8 was added for consistency with standard drafting conventions.
PD Joint Favorable Subst.
sHB5390 / File No.
237 14 sHB5390 File No.
237 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ Policy & Mgmt., Off.
GF - Cost 173,000 170,000 Policy & Mgmt., Off.
GF - Cost See Below See Below State Comptroller - Fringe GF - Cost 70,000 70,000 Benefits1 Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ Various Municipalities Potential See Below See Below Revenue Gain Explanation The bill results in a potential revenue gain to various municipalities, a cost to the Office of Policy and Management (OPM), and a cost to the Office of the State Comptroller (OSC), beginning in FY 25 related to transit-oriented communities described below.
Office of Policy and Management The bill requires OPM to:
(1) determine if transit-oriented communities (TOCs) are compliant with certain requirements and meet the restrictions on reasonable size, (2) establish a separate, non-lapsing, public water and sewer rehabilitation or expansion account, and (3) The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts administered by the Comptroller.
The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes is 41.25% of payroll in FY 25.
sHB5390 / File No.
237 15 sHB5390 File No.
237 establish a grant program for regional councils of government for certain transit-related infrastructure.
This results in a cost of approximately $173,000 in FY 25 and $170,000 in FY 26 to OPM for two additional staff and associated training and supplies to meet these requirements.
There is also a corresponding cost of $70,000 in both FY 25 and FY 26 to OSC for associated fringe benefits.
There is an additional cost to OPM beginning in FY 25 to fund both the public water and sewer rehabilitation or expansion account and potentially the grant program for regional councils of government.
The bill does not specify a source of funds for the grants.
Municipalities The bill:
(1) establishes requirements for TOCs, (2) requires the communities to be prioritized for discretionary infrastructure funding, and (3) makes TOCs that adopt additional zoning criteria eligible for additional funding that OPM administers.
This may result in a potential revenue gain to various municipalities beginning in FY 25 to the extent they qualify for, or are prioritized for, discretionary infrastructure funding as a result of TOCs.
Municipalities that adopt a resolution stating they intend to enact zoning regulations that would qualify them for a TOC may still be prioritized for discretionary infrastructure funding.
This may result in a potential revenue gain beginning in FY 25 to the extent that municipalities adopt this resolution.
There is also a potential revenue gain to municipalities beginning in FY 25 to the extent that they receive funds from the public water and sewer rehabilitation or expansion account.
The bill also requires developments with ten or more units located Discretionary infrastructure funding includes, but is not limited to, any source of funding that a state agency administers through a competitive process.
This may include:
the Urban Action Program, Small Town Economic Assistance Program, Main Street Investment Fund, and Incentive Housing Zone Program.
sHB5390 / File No.
237 16 sHB5390 File No.
237 withinaTOCtoeitherdeedrestrictapercentageoftheunitsforacertain time period or make payments to an affordable housing development fund established by the TOC.
This results in a potential revenue gain to municipalities beginning in FY 25 to the extent developers choose to make payments to the fund.
These funds must be used to develop affordable housing within the municipality.
Municipal Redevelopment Authority The bill has no fiscal impact by modifying the definition of “housing growth zone” to include transit-oriented districts.
As the Municipal Redevelopment Authority (MRDA) is tasked with stimulating and supporting transit-oriented developments under current law, there is not anticipated to be an increase in funding necessary for this provision.
Currently, MRDA has an unallocated bond balance of $60 million available.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to grants and funding awarded, and the amount of housing developer payments in lieu of deed restricted units.
sHB5390 / File No.
237 17 sHB5390 File No.
237 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 5390 AN ACT CONCERNING TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES.
SUMMARY This bill creates a framework in which a municipality’s priority for receiving certain discretionary state funding may be tied to its designation as a qualifying transit-oriented community (TOC).
A municipalitygenerallybecomesaTOCbyestablishingatransit-oriented district (or “district”) that meets certain requirements, including containing a rapid transit station or bus station.
TOCs must, among other requirements, allow certain multifamily and deed-restricted (i.e., affordable) housing developments throughout the municipality “as of right” (see BACKGROUND).
The bill also:
1.
establishes an interagency council on housing development to advise and assist the Office of Responsible Growth coordinator;
2.
establishes a public water and sewer rehabilitation or expansion account to fund water and sewer infrastructure projects for transit-oriented districts;
3.
requires the Office of Policy and Management (OPM) secretary to establish, within available funding, a program providing grants to regional councils of government for public transit, bicycle, or pedestrian infrastructure projects (§ 5);
and 4.
makes transit-oriented districts, as established under the bill, housing growth zones for the purposes of the Connecticut Municipal Redevelopment Authority (under existing law, municipalitiescannotreceivecertainfinancialassistance fromthe sHB5390 / File No.
237 18 sHB5390 File No.
237 authority until they enact approved housing growth zone regulations;
see BACKGROUND) (§ 6).
The bill also makes conforming and technical changes.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1,2024, except the provision establishing the interagency council is effective upon passage.
§§ 1, 2 & 8 — PRIORITIZED FUNDING FOR TRANSIT-ORIENTED COMMUNITIES The bill makes qualifying TOCs eligible for prioritized discretionary infrastructure funding (“discretionary funding”), which includes certain state grants, loans, and other financial assistance.
A municipality generally becomes a TOC by establishing a transit-oriented district meeting certain requirements, as described below.
Additionally, the bill requires TOCs to allow certain housing developments as of right and establish deed-restriction requirements for other developments not allowed as of right.
It also restricts TOCs from adopting certain regulations for their districts.
The OPM secretary determines a municipality’s compliance with the bill’s requirements and, in doing so, may consult with the Department of Housing commissioner.
Discretionary Infrastructure Funding Under the bill, to receive prioritized discretionary funding, TOCs (and municipalities that have adopted a resolution stating their intent to become one;
see below), must apply to the OPM secretary in a form he sets.
The secretary then makes recommendations to the agency that administers the funding.
If the funding type is permitted to be prioritized, the agency may give these municipalities priority status over other applicants that are not TOCs (or have not adopted a resolution).
Additionally, the bill requires administering agencies to give higher priority for discretionary funding to TOCs with a transit-oriented district located in a priority funding area (i.e., areas designated in the sHB5390 / File No.
237 19 sHB5390 File No.
237 state Plan of Conservation and Development within which certain state- funded growth-related projects may generally be undertaken).
In other words, it requires agencies to prioritize these priority funding area TOCs above other TOCs as well as municipalities that are not TOCs.
Under the bill, “discretionary infrastructure funding” means any grant, loan, or other financial assistance that (1) the state administers under the Urban Act Grant Program, Main Street Investment Fund, and Incentive Housing Zone Program or (2) OPM manages for transit- oriented development purposes (see BACKGROUND).
The bill specifies that it does not make any municipalities ineligible for discretionary funding, even if they are not TOCs eligible for prioritized funding.
Bonus Funding.
The bill makes TOCs eligible for additional funding under any program the OPM secretary administers if the TOC adopts additional zoning criteria (in addition to meeting all other TOC requirements discussed below), including (1) higher density development, (2) requiring greater housing unit affordability in certain larger proposed developments not allowed as of right than what the bill specifically requires, (3) developing public land or public housing, (4) implementing programs to encourage homeownership, and (5) other criteria the OPM secretary may set.
Qualifying for Prioritized Funding Under the bill, a municipality is eligible for prioritized discretionary funding if it qualifies as a TOC or adopts a resolution stating its intent to become one.
However, the OPM secretary may also deem a municipality a qualifying TOC if he determines that the municipality has a reasonably sized transit-oriented district containing a rapid transit station or regular bus service station by October 1, 2025.
Qualifying as a TOC.
TOCs are generally municipalities that have adopted a reasonably sized, as determined by the OPM secretary, transit-oriented district (see Transit-Oriented Districts), containing at least one of the following:
sHB5390 / File No.
237 20 sHB5390 File No.
237 1.
a regular bus service station (i.e., bus stop) operating no less than five days per week or 2.
a rapid transit station or a planned station (i.e., any public transportation station serving any rail or rapid bus route).
Additionally, the district must (1) encompass all the land within a one-half mile radius of these stations or (2) be located within a reasonable distance, as determined by the secretary, of any other transit service, a commercial corridor, or the municipality’s downtown area (i.e., a central business district or other commercial area that, among other things, serves as a center of socioeconomic interaction).
Adopting a Resolution.
A municipality that is not a qualifying TOC is still eligible for prioritized discretionary funding if its legislative body adopts a resolution stating it intends to enact zoning regulations enabling it to qualify.
It must actually enact the regulations within 18 months after adopting the resolution.
A municipality that fails to do so must return any prioritized discretionary funding it received, unless the OPM secretary grants an extension at his discretion, and is also ineligible for additional prioritized funding until it enacts these zoning regulations.
Requirements for Developments in TOCs As-of-Right Developments.
Qualifying TOCs must allow the following developments as of right (after an inland wetlands public hearing, if one is required) anywhere in the municipality:
1.
middle housing developments with up to nine units;
2.
developments with 10 or more units, at least 30% of which qualify as an 8-30g set-aside development (see BACKGROUND);
and 3.
developments, with any number of units, if they are (a) built on land owned by the municipality, the state, a public housing authority, a nonprofit, or a religious organization and (b) sHB5390 / File No.
237 21 sHB5390 File No.
237 composed entirely of units that qualify as 8-30g set-aside developments, with at least half the units priced affordably for renters or buyers earning 60% or less of the federally determined area median income (AMI) (i.e., for which these households would pay no more than 30% of their annual income).
Under the bill, “middle housing developments” generally include duplexes, triplexes, townhomes, and perfect sixes (three-story buildings with two units per story).
Developments Not Allowed As-of-Right.
TOCs must require developers proposing developments with 10 or more units (unless allowedasofrightasdescribedabove)toeither(1)deedrestrictacertain percentage of the units for 40 years after initial occupancy (see the table below) so they are affordable for renters or buyers earning no more than 80% of the AMI or (2) enter into a contribution agreement to make payments to a fund that the TOC may establish under the bill and use only to develop affordable housing in the municipality (“affordable housing development fund”).
Under the bill, the percentage of units that a developer must deed restrict varies with the strength of the area’s housing market and its quality of life (“opportunity”), as determined by the Connecticut Housing Finance Authority’s (CHFA) most recent Housing Needs Assessment.
The table below shows the classifications and corresponding percentage of units that must be restricted under the bill.
Table:
Deed-Restriction Requirements CHFA’s Census Tract Designation Restricted Units High Opportunity/Heating Market 15% High Opportunity/Cooling Market 15% Low Opportunity/Heating Market 10% Low Opportunity/Cooling Market 5% If a town has established an affordable housing development fund, developers subject to these deed-restriction requirements can make payments to the fund instead of deed restricting units.
The OPM sHB5390 / File No.
237 22 sHB5390 File No.
237 secretary determines the payment amounts and duration and must also approve the contribution agreements.
Accessory Apartments.
Under the bill, a person who owns real property in a transit-oriented district, and has owned property in the municipality for at least three years, may build an accessory apartment as of right on his or her property.
These owners may do so even if the municipality voted to opt out of the state law generally allowing accessory apartments as of right on lots with single-family homes in all municipalities.
(It is unclear whether the property owner can build the accessory apartment only in the district or anywhere in the municipality.) Under existing law, “accessory apartment” means a separate dwelling unit that (1) is located on the same lot as a principal dwelling unit of greater square footage;
(2) has cooking facilities;
and (3) complies with or is otherwise exempt from any applicable building code, fire code, and health and safety regulations.
Transit-Oriented Districts Under the bill, a transit-oriented district is an area the municipality designates that is subject to zoning criteria designed to encourage increased development density (including mixed-use development) and a concentration of discretionary state investments.
Inland Wetlands Agency Consultation.
A municipality’s zoning commission must consult with its inland wetlands agency when establishing the district’s boundaries.
If the proposed district includes an area over which the agency has authority (e.g., wetlands), the commission must collaborate with the agency to determine whether as- of-right middle housing and mixed-use developments should be allowed in any part of the district.
The zoning commission may also consult with the agency, and other town agencies, to determine whether the district is a reasonable size (see below).
Reasonable Size.
To qualify as a TOC, a municipality’s transit- oriented district must be a reasonable size.
Under the bill, the OPM sHB5390 / File No.
237 23 sHB5390 File No.
237 secretary, inconsultationwiththezoning commission,isresponsiblefor determining whether a district meets this requirement.
To do so, the secretary must (1) determine whether the area can equitably support greater development density, based on the municipality’s geographic characteristics, and (2) consider the municipality’s and region’s housing needs.
When making its determination, the OPM secretary cannot require the following land types to be included in the transit-oriented district:
1.
special flood hazard areas on the National Flood Insurance Program’s flood insurance rate map;
2.
wetlands, as defined in state law;
3.
existing or planned public park land;
4.
land subject to conservation or preservation restrictions (e.g., an easement);
5.
coastal resources protected by the Coastal Management Act;
6.
areas needed to protect drinking water supplies;
and 7.
areas likely to be inundated during a 30-year flood event, as showninthesea levelchange scenariosUConn’sMarine Sciences Division publishes.
Prohibited Regulations.
The bill generally prohibits TOCs from adopting any regulations for their transit-oriented districts that conflict with any OPM guidelines on developing housing in these districts (e.g., parking and setback requirements, lot size and coverage, inclusionary zoning requirements, and development impact fees).
However, the OPM secretary may approve conflicting regulations based on local factors the TOC identifies.
§ 3 — INTERAGENCY COUNCIL ON HOUSING DEVELOPMENT The bill establishes an interagency housing development council to advise the Office of Responsible Growth (ORG) coordinator and help sHB5390 / File No.
237 24 sHB5390 File No.
237 her review regulations, develop guidelines, and establish programs to support responsible housing growth in the state.
Purpose The council must first meet by July 1, 2024, and then at least every six months to:
1.
evaluate state and quasi-public agencies’ plans, programs, regulations, and policies for opportunities to combine their efforts and resources to increase housing development;
2.
develop methods to consistently report and document housing development data;
3.
developapproachestohousing growththat balance conservation needs (e.g., naturalresources protection) anddevelopment needs (e.g., housing, economic growth, and infrastructure);
4.
review whether discretionary state grant programs adhere to the state Plan of Conservation and Development’s goals and make recommendations to agencies and quasi-public agencies, including on ways to increase deed-restricted developments in transit-oriented districts and middle housing;
5.
recommend zoning and land use policies for municipalities to increase housing (e.g., model ordinances, regulations, and bylaws);
and 6.
create guidelines on adopting and developing transit-oriented districts, including prioritizing mixed-use and mixed-income developments, increasing affordable housing availability, environmental (particularly environmental justice) considerations, increasing mass transit ridership and other means of mobility (e.g., walking and biking) while reducing the need for motor vehicles, maximizing developable land, increasing developments’ economic viability, and reducing the time needed to approve development applications.
sHB5390 / File No.
237 25 sHB5390 File No.
237 Reporting Requirements Beginning by October 1, 2025, the ORG coordinator must annually submit the council’s recommendations to the Planning and Development and Housing committees.
By the same date, the coordinator must also submit the council’s zoning and land use policy recommendations and transit-oriented district guidelines, described above, to these legislative committees and post this information on OPM’s website.
Members In addition to the ORG coordinator (who serves as the chairperson), and any ad hoc members she determines are needed, the council consists of the following ex officio members or their designees:
1.
OPM secretary, 2.
Department of Housing commissioner, 3.
Department of Economic and Community Development commissioner, 4.
Department of Energy and Environmental Protection commissioner, 5.
Department of Public Health commissioner, 6.
Department of Transportation commissioner, and 7.
CHFA chief executive officer.
§ 4 — PUBLIC WATER AND SEWER REHABILITATION OR EXPANSION ACCOUNT The bill establishes a public water and sewer rehabilitation or expansion account within the General Fund.
This separate, nonlapsing account must befundedwithany moneysthelawrequiresandtheOPM secretary must use it to rehabilitate or expand public water and sewer infrastructure for transit-oriented districts established under the bill.
The account’s proceeds may go to TOCs or certain other property sHB5390 / File No.
237 26 sHB5390 File No.
237 owners in transit-oriented districts at the OPM secretary’s discretion (presumably, property developers in transit-oriented districts that receive OPM approval for this funding).
BACKGROUND As-of-Right Developments By law, “as of right” means able to be approved without requiring (1) a public hearing;
(2) a variance, special permit, or special exception;
or (3) other discretionary zoning action, other than a determination that a site plan conforms with applicable zoning regulations.
MRDA Housing Growth Zones The Municipal Redevelopment Authority (MRDA) is a quasi-public agency authorized to stimulate economic development and transit- oriented development, including by giving financial support and technical assistance to municipalities to develop “housing growth zones.” These are areas around a central business district or passenger transit station in which local zoning regulations facilitate substantial new housing development (CGS § 8-169hh et seq., as amended by PA 23-204).
Transit-Oriented Development By law, transit-oriented development is defined as developing residential, commercial, and employment centers within one-half mile or walking distance ofpublic transportation facilities (including rail and bus rapid transit and services) that meet transit supportive standards for land uses, built environment densities, and walkable environments, in order to facilitate and encourage the use of transit services (CGS § 13b-79o).
8-30g Set-Aside Development Under the affordable housing land use appeals procedure (referred to as “8-30g”), a set-aside development means a development in which, for at least 40 years after initial occupancy, at least 30% of the units are deed restricted.
Specifically, at least (1) 15% of the units must be deed restricted to households earning 60% or less of the AMI or state median income (SMI), whichever is less, and (2) 15% of the units must be deed restricted to households earning 80% or less of the AMI or SMI, sHB5390 / File No.
237 27 sHB5390 File No.
237 whichever is less.
COMMITTEE ACTION Planning and Development Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 12 Nay 8 (03/15/2024) sHB5390 / File No.
237 28
Show all 288 changed rows (248 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- File No. 237 View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text Current pdf
- Substitute PD Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
Action History
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 453
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
IMMEDIATE TRANSMITTAL TO THE SENATE
-
HOUSE PASSED, HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
AMENDMENT WITHDRAWN HOUSE AMEND. SCH. B
-
HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 237
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 178
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/02/24
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0306
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Planning and Development
Sponsors
- Saud Anwar · Primary
- Josh Elliott · Primary
- Geoff Luxenberg · Primary
- Kate Farrar · Primary
- Mary M. Mushinsky · Primary
- Christine Palm · Primary
- Jason Rojas · Primary
- Christopher Rosario · Primary
- MD Rahman · Primary
- Anthony L. Nolan · Primary
- Antonio Felipe · Primary
- Jane M. Garibay · Primary
- Peter A. Tercyak · Primary
- Roland J. Lemar · Primary
- Aundre Bumgardner · Primary
- Julie Kushner · Primary
- Geraldo C. Reyes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →17 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 170 not signed on · 53 voted No
Sponsors (17)
- Saud Anwar Democratic
- Josh Elliott Democratic
- Geoff Luxenberg Democratic
- Kate Farrar Democratic
- Mary M. Mushinsky Democratic
- Christine Palm
- Jason Rojas Democratic
- Christopher Rosario Democratic
- MD Rahman Democratic
- Anthony L. Nolan Democratic
- Antonio Felipe Democratic
- Jane M. Garibay Democratic
- Peter A. Tercyak
- Roland J. Lemar Democratic
- Aundre Bumgardner Democratic
- Julie Kushner Democratic
- Geraldo C. Reyes Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (170)
170 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 170 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 73 | 8 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 44 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 9 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 90 | 61 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 60% | 40% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (151)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arnone | — | Yea |
| Khanna | — | Yea |
| Michel | — | Nay |
| Conley | — | Yea |
| Chaleski | — | Yea |
| Currey | — | Yea |
| Cheeseman | — | Nay |
| D'agostino | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Nay |
| Dancho | — | Nay |
| Palm | — | Yea |
| Denning | — | Yea |
| Porter | — | Yea |
| Ferraro | — | Nay |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Ryan | — | Yea |
| Harrison | — | Nay |
| Figueroa | — | Yea |
| Hayes | — | Nay |
| Labriola | — | Nay |
| Tercyak | — | Yea |
| Sanchez, R. | — | Yea |
| Mccarthy Vahey | — | Yea |
| Mccarty, K. | — | Nay |
| Morrin Bello | — | Yea |
| Sanchez, J. | — | Yea |
| Aimee Berger-Girvalo | Democratic | Yea |
| Alphonse Paolillo | Democratic | Yea |
| Andre F. Baker | Democratic | Yea |
| Anne M. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Anthony L. Nolan | Democratic | Yea |
| Antonio Felipe | Democratic | Yea |
| Aundre Bumgardner | Democratic | Yea |
| Bob Godfrey | Democratic | Yea |
| Bobby G. Gibson | Democratic | Yea |
| Brandon Chafee | Democratic | Yea |
| Christopher Poulos | Democratic | Nay |
| Christopher Rosario | Democratic | Yea |
| Corey P. Paris | Democratic | Yea |
| Derell Wilson | Democratic | Yea |
| Dominique Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Eleni Kavros DeGraw | Democratic | Yea |
| Emmanuel Sanchez | Democratic | Yea |
| Farley Santos | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Smith | Democratic | Nay |
| Fred Gee | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Turco | Democratic | Yea |
| Geoff Luxenberg | Democratic | Yea |
| Geraldo C. Reyes | Democratic | Yea |
| Gregory Haddad | Democratic | Yea |
| Hector Arzeno | Democratic | Yea |
| Henry J. Genga | Democratic | Yea |
| Hilda E. Santiago | Democratic | Yea |
| Hubert D. Delany | Democratic | Yea |
| Jaime S. Foster | Democratic | Nay |
| Jane M. Garibay | Democratic | Yea |
| Jason Doucette | Democratic | Yea |
| Jason Rojas | Democratic | Yea |
| Jennifer Leeper | Democratic | Yea |
| Jill Barry | Democratic | Nay |
| Jillian Gilchrest | Democratic | Yea |
| John-Michael Parker | Democratic | Yea |
| Jonathan Fazzino | Democratic | Yea |
| Jonathan Steinberg | Democratic | Yea |
| Joseph P. Gresko | Democratic | Yea |
| Josh Elliott | Democratic | Yea |
| Joshua M. Hall | Democratic | Yea |
| Juan R. Candelaria | Democratic | Yea |
| Julio A. Concepcion | Democratic | Yea |
| Kadeem Roberts | Democratic | Yea |
| Kai J. Belton | Democratic | Yea |
| Kara Rochelle | Democratic | Yea |
| Kate Farrar | Democratic | Yea |
| Kerry S. Wood | Democratic | Nay |
| Kevin Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Larry B. Butler | Democratic | Yea |
| Liz Linehan | Democratic | Yea |
| Lucy Dathan | Democratic | Yea |
| Marcus Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria P. Horn | Democratic | Nay |
| Mary Fortier | Democratic | Yea |
| Mary M. Mushinsky | Democratic | Yea |
| Mary Welander | Democratic | Yea |
| Maryam Khan | Democratic | Yea |
| Matt Blumenthal | Democratic | Yea |
| Matthew Ritter | Democratic | Yea |
| Melissa Osborne | Democratic | Yea |
| Michael D. Quinn | Democratic | Yea |
| Michael DiGiovancarlo | Democratic | Yea |
| Mike Demicco | Democratic | Yea |
| Minnie Gonzalez | Democratic | Yea |
| Moira Rader | Democratic | Yea |
| Patricia A. Dillon | Democratic | Yea |
| Patrick S. Boyd | Democratic | Nay |
| Raghib Allie-Brennan | Democratic | Yea |
| Robin E. Comey | Democratic | Yea |
| Roland J. Lemar | Democratic | Yea |
| Ronald A. Napoli | Democratic | Yea |
| Sarah Keitt | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephen R. Meskers | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Stafstrom | Democratic | Yea |
| Susan M. Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Tammy R. Exum | Democratic | Yea |
| Toni E. Walker | Democratic | Yea |
| Travis Simms | Democratic | Nay |
| Trenee McGee | Democratic | Yea |
| William Heffernan | Democratic | Yea |
| Anne Dauphinais | Republican | Nay |
| Ben McGorty | Republican | Nay |
| Bill Buckbee | Republican | Nay |
| Brian Lanoue | Republican | Nay |
| Cara Christine Pavalock-D'Amato | Republican | Nay |
| Carol Hall | Republican | Nay |
| Chris Aniskovich | Republican | Nay |
| Christie M. Carpino | Republican | Nay |
| Craig C. Fishbein | Republican | Nay |
| Dave W. Yaccarino | Republican | Nay |
| David Rutigliano | Republican | Nay |
| Devin R. Carney | Republican | Nay |
| Donna Veach | Republican | Nay |
| Doug Dubitsky | Republican | Nay |
| Gale L. Mastrofrancesco | Republican | Nay |
| Greg S. Howard | Republican | Nay |
| Irene M. Haines | Republican | Nay |
| Jason Perillo | Republican | Nay |
| Jay M. Case | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Hoxha | Republican | Nay |
| Joe Polletta | Republican | Nay |
| John E. Piscopo | Republican | Nay |
| Joseph H. Zullo | Republican | Nay |
| Karen Reddington-Hughes | Republican | Nay |
| Kathy Kennedy | Republican | Nay |
| Kurt Vail | Republican | Nay |
| Lezlye Zupkus | Republican | Nay |
| Mark DeCaprio | Republican | Nay |
| Mark W. Anderson | Republican | Nay |
| Martin Foncello | Republican | Nay |
| Mitch Bolinsky | Republican | Nay |
| Nicole Klarides-Ditria | Republican | Nay |
| Patrick E. Callahan | Republican | Nay |
| Seth Bronko | Republican | Nay |
| Steve Weir | Republican | Nay |
| Tami Zawistowski | Republican | Nay |
| Tammy Nuccio | Republican | Nay |
| Tim Ackert | Republican | Nay |
| Tom Delnicki | Republican | Nay |
| Tom O'Dea | Republican | Nay |
| Tony J. Scott | Republican | Nay |
| Tracy Marra | Republican | Nay |
| Vincent J. Candelora | Republican | Nay |
| William Pizzuto | Republican | Nay |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HB 5390?
- HB 5390 is sponsored by Saud Anwar (Democratic), Josh Elliott (Democratic), Geoff Luxenberg (Democratic), Kate Farrar (Democratic), Mary M. Mushinsky (Democratic), Christine Palm, Jason Rojas (Democratic), Christopher Rosario (Democratic), MD Rahman (Democratic), Anthony L. Nolan (Democratic), Antonio Felipe (Democratic), Jane M. Garibay (Democratic), Peter A. Tercyak, Roland J. Lemar (Democratic), Aundre Bumgardner (Democratic), Julie Kushner (Democratic), and Geraldo C. Reyes (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HB 5390?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 5390?
- Track HB 5390 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 5390
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 5390
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →