SB 373 — AN ACT CONCERNING PARKS INCLUDED IN THE PASSPORT TO THE PARKS PROGRAM.
Last action — FILE NO. 573
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
131 added · 10 removed131 line(s) added, 10 removed.
Senate General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
373573 February Session, 2024 LCOSenate Bill No.
1823373 ReferredSenate, toApril 22, 2024 The Committee on APPROPRIATIONSAppropriations Introducedreported by:through SEN.
(APP)OSTEN ANof ACTthe CONCERNING19th PARKSDist., INCLUDEDChairperson INof THEthe PASSPORTCommittee TOon THEthe PARKSpart PROGRAM.of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING PARKS INCLUDED IN THE PASSPORT TO THE PARKS PROGRAM.
Such account shall contain all moneysSB373 required/ byFile lawNo. to be deposited in such account.
Such573 account LCO 1823 1 ofSB373 2File Bill No.
373573 maymoneys receiverequired fundsby fromlaw privateto orbe publicdeposited sources,in including,such butaccount. not limited to, any municipal government or the federal government.
Such account may receive funds from private or public sources, including, but not limited to, any municipal government or the federal government.
Section 1 July 1, 2024 Section 1 23-15h APP Joint Favorable LCOSB373 1823/ 2File ofNo. 2
573 2 SB373 File No.
573 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ Department of Energy and Passport to Parks At least At least Environmental Protection - Cost 474,500 724,500 Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ Farmington;
Groton;
Hartford;
Potential Less than Less than New Britain;
New London Savings 20,000 each 20,000 each Explanation The bill results in an annual cost to the Passport to Parks account, beginning in FY 25, to pay for the care, operation, and maintenance of BattersonPark andThames River Heritage Park (TRHP).
The cost to the account is expected to be at least $474,500 in FY 25 and at least $724,500 in FY 26 (and annually thereafter).
Costs may vary depending on the scale of Batterson Park operations and which costs are covered for TRHP, as described below.
The bill may also result in savings to the municipalities involved with these parks.
Batterson Park The cost associated with Batterson Park's operation is anticipated to be at least $250,000 in FY 25 and at least $500,000 in FY 26 (and annually thereafter).
The park is owned by Hartford while located in Farmington SB373 / File No.
573 3 SB373 File No.
573 and New Britain.
1 The magnitude of the cost depends on the extent of operations and maintenance performed at the park.
The annual cost to operate Batterson Park is estimated to be at least $500,000 but costs may be higher, depending on park activities, use, staffing levels, and decisions made by Hartford as the property owner.
It is assumed that costs in FY will be approximately half of the annual costs as park operations will rampupover time.
Thisestimate assumesa relatively passive-use park, similar to the state park model described in the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection's (DEEP's) January 2024 report on Batterson Park.
2 Staffing including fringe benefits may cost an estimated $350,000 per year for approximately four permanent staff (a supervisor, two maintainers, and an Environmental Conservation officer) and two seasonal staff, assuming these are not state employees except the officer.
Utilities and routine dam maintenance add approximately $150,000 annually.
If Hartford decides to resolve property encroachment issues, then an additional $800,000 per year in staffing and other costs may be required, according to DEEP's report.
These cost estimates do not include capital improvements that would be needed to reopen the park (approximately $6.4 million to $9.6 million depending on desired amenities), or major repairs to or replacement of the dam (an estimated $600,000 annually for ten years).
There is approximately $9 million remaining of a $10 million carryforward General Fund allocation to Hartford for Batterson Park, which could be used for some of this work.
The park has been minimally used over the last several years, with annual expenses of approximately $26,000 by the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection associated with the state-owned boat launch, and $15,000 by the town of Farmington.
2Department of Energy and Environmental Protection.
Batterson Park Study.
Show all 69 changed lines (29 more)
January 15,2024.
https://portal.ct.gov/-/media/deep/public_notice_attachments/batterson- park/final-batterson-park-study-for-cga-1-15-24.pdf 3The personnel and other expenses estimates assume that swimming will not be offered at the park.
If swimming is offered, costs will be higher.
SB373 / File No.
573 4 SB373 File No.
573 Thames River Heritage Park The Passport to Parks cost associated with TRHP's operation is anticipated to range from approximately $224,500 to $450,000 annually, beginning in FY 25.
The extent of the cost to the Passport to Parks account depends on which expenses are determined to be associated with the park's care, maintenance, and operation.
The park consists of numerous historic sites along the Thames River, connected by water taxisthat are runby thepark'sfoundation.
The sites are in New London and Groton, which provide grants totaling approximately $37,500 annually.
The park's expenses directly associated with the operation of the water taxis are expected to total $224,500 in FY 25, including repairs, fuel, maintenance, the subcontractor who operates the water taxis, and insurance.
The foundation's expenses in FY 25 are projected to total approximately $450,000, including costs for the water taxis, staff, rent, utilities, advertising, and other expenses.
The bill does not define which of these expenses will be covered by the Passport to Parks account.
If all costs are covered, then:
(1) the cost to the account will be approximately $450,000 annually, and (2) New London, the Town of Groton, and the City of Groton will each have an estimated savings of $12,500 annually.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation, decisions regarding Batterson Park amenities, and the determination of which TRHP expenses qualify for support from the Passport to Parks account.
SB373 / File No.
573 5 SB373 File No.
573 OFA Bill Analysis SB 373 AN ACT CONCERNING PARKS INCLUDED IN THE PASSPORT TO THE PARKS PROGRAM.
SUMMARY:
This bill provides funding for Batterson Park and Thames River Heritage Park from the Passport to the Parks account.
Batterson Park is a municipal park owned by Hartford and located in Farmington and New Britain.
Thames River Heritage Park consists of numerous historic sites along the Thames River.
The park's foundation operates three water taxis to sites in New London and Groton.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
July 1, 2024 BACKGROUND Passport to the Parks Account The Passport to the Parks account is funded by a fee paid on motor vehicle registrations.
The fee is currently $15 for a triennial registration, $10 for a biennial registration, and $5 for an annual registration.
The account revenues fund the operation and maintenance of state parks, soil and water conservation districts (along with a council), an environmentalreviewteam,andtheCouncil onEnvironmentalQuality.
COMMITTEE ACTION Appropriations Committee Joint Favorable Yea 36 Nay 16 (04/04/2024) SB373 / File No.
573 6
Show all 69 changed rows (29 more)
Action History
-
FILE NO. 573
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 348
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/22/24
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0315
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Appropriations
Sponsors
- Anthony L. Nolan · Primary
- Christine Conley · Primary
- Martha Marx · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 184 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Anthony L. Nolan Democratic
- Christine Conley
- Martha Marx Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (184)
184 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 184 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 373?
- SB 373 is sponsored by Anthony L. Nolan (Democratic), Christine Conley, and Martha Marx (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 373?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 373?
- Track SB 373 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 373
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 373
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →