SB 372 — AN ACT CONCERNING A WORKING GROUP TO STUDY PAYMENTS BY INSURANCE COMPANIES FOR DEPOSIT INTO THE INSURANCE FUND.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 07, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Ned Lamont (Democratic) on June 05, 2024.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
2 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (2 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
40 added · 337 removed40 line(s) added, 337 removed.
Senate GeneralBill Assembly File No.
570372 FebruarySpecial Session,Act 2024 Senate Bill No.
37224-15 Senate,AN AprilACT 22,CONCERNING 2024A TheWORKING CommitteeGROUP onTO AppropriationsSTUDY reportedPAYMENTS throughBY SEN.INSURANCE COMPANIES FOR DEPOSIT INTO THE INSURANCE FUND.
OSTEN of the 19th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING PAYMENTS BY INSURANCE COMPANIES FOR DEPOSIT INTO THE INSURANCE FUND.
Section(Effective 38a-47from passage) (a) The chairpersons of the generaljoint statutesstanding iscommittee repealedof the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to appropriations and the followingbudgets isof substitutedstate inagencies lieushall thereofconvene (Effectivea Julyworking 1,group 2024):to study payments by insurance companies for deposit into the Insurance Fund.
(a)(b) AllThe domesticworking insurancegroup companiesshall andinclude, otherbut domesticneed entitiesnot subjectbe tolimited taxationto, under chapter 207 shall, in accordance with section 38a-48, as amended by this act, annually pay to the Insurancefollowing Commissioner,members: for deposit in the Insurance Fund established under section 38a-52a, an amount equal to:
(1) The actualchairpersons expendituresand maderanking bymembers of the Insurancejoint Departmentstanding duringcommittees eachof fiscalthe year;General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to appropriations and the budgets of state agencies and insurance, or their designees;
[,(2) andThe theInsurance actualCommissioner, expendituresor made by the Officecommissioner's ofdesignee; the Healthcare Advocate, including the cost of fringe benefits for department and office personnel as estimated by the Comptroller;] (2) [The] For only domestic insurance companies, including domestic SB372 / File No.
570(3) 1One SB372representative Fileof No.an association of property and casualty insurers;
570and healthSenate careBill centers,No. that have written policies of health insurance, as defined in section 38a-469, in this state during the preceding calendar year, the actual expenditures made by the Office of the Healthcare Advocate, including the cost of fringe benefits for department andoffice personnel as estimated by the Comptroller;
(3)372 For(4) onlyOne domesticrepresentative insuranceof companies,an includingassociation domestic health care centers, that have written policies of health insurance,plans. as defined in section 38a-469, in this state during the preceding calendar year, the amount appropriated to the Office of Health Strategy from the Insurance Fund for the fiscal year, including the cost of fringe benefits for office personnel as estimated by the Comptroller, which shall be reduced by the amount of federal reimbursement received for allowable Medicaid administrative expenses;
[(3)](c) (4) The expenditureschairpersons madeof onthe behalfjoint standing committee of the departmentGeneral andAssembly saidhaving officescognizance fromof thematters Capitalrelating Equipmentto Purchaseappropriations Fundand pursuantthe tobudgets sectionof 4a-9state foragencies suchshall year,schedule butthe excludingfirst suchmeeting estimatedof expendituresthe madeworking ongroup, behalfwhich ofshall thebe Healthheld Systemsnot Planninglater Unitthan ofsixty days after the Officeeffective date of Healththis Strategy;section.
and(d) [(4)] (5) The amountmembers appropriated to the Department of Aging and Disability Services for the fallworking preventiongroup programshall establishedselect intwo sectioncochairpersons 17a-859 from among the Insurancemembers Fundof for the fiscalworking year.group.
(b)(e) The expendituresadministrative andstaff amountsof specifiedthe injoint subdivisionsstanding (1)committee toof [(4)]the (5),General inclusive,Assembly ofhaving subsectioncognizance (a) of thismatters sectionrelating shallto exclude expenditures paid for by fraternal benefit societies, foreign and alien insurance companiesshall andserve otheras foreignadministrative andstaff alienof entitiesthe underworking sectionsgroup. 38a-49 and 38a-50.
(c)(f) PaymentsNot later than January 1, 2025, the working group shall besubmit madea byreport assessmenton its findings and recommendations to the joint standing committees of allthe suchGeneral domesticAssembly insurancehaving companiescognizance of matters relating to appropriations and otherthe domesticbudgets entitiesof calculatedstate agencies and collectedinsurance, in accordance with the provisions of section 38a-48,11-4a asof amendedthe bygeneral thisstatutes. act.
AnyThe suchworking domesticgroup insuranceshall companyterminate oron otherthe domesticdate entitythat aggrievedit becausesubmits ofsuch anyreport assessmentor leviedJanuary under1, this2025, sectionwhichever mayis appeallater. therefrom in accordance with the provisions of SB372 / File No.
570Approved 2June SB3725, File2024 Special Act No.
57024-15 section2 38a-52.of 2
Sec.
2.
Subsections (a) to (c), inclusive, of section 38a-48 of the general statutes are repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2024):
(a) (1) On or before June thirtieth, annually, the Commissioner of Revenue Services shall render to the Insurance Commissioner a statement certifying the amount of taxes or charges imposed on each domesticinsurance companyorotherdomesticentityunderchapter 207 on business done in this state during the preceding calendar year.
The statement for local domestic insurance companies shall set forth the amount of taxes and charges before any tax credits allowed as provided in subsection (a) of section 12-202.
(2) Upon receipt of the statement described in subdivision (1) of this subsection,theInsurance Commissioner shallprepare astatementofthe amount of taxes or charges imposed on each domestic insurance company or other domestic entity under chapter 207 that wrote policies of health insurance, as defined in section 38a-469, in this state.
Such amount shall be that as certified by the Commissioner of Revenue Services in accordance with subdivision (1) of this subsection.
(b) On or before July thirty-first, annually, the Insurance Commissioner and the Office of the Healthcare Advocate shall render to each domestic insurance company or other domestic entity liable for payment under section 38a-47, as amended by this act:
(1) A statement that includes, as separate line items, for the fiscal year beginning July first of the year such statement is rendered:
(A) [the] The amount appropriated to the Insurance Department [,] from the Insurance Fund established under section 38a-52a, (B) the amount appropriated to the Office of the Healthcare Advocate [and] from the Insurance Fund, (C) the amount appropriated to the Office of Health Strategy from the Insurance Fund, [established under section 38a-52a for the fiscal year beginning July first of the same year, (B)] (D) the cost of fringe benefits for department and office personnel, [for such year,] SB372 / File No.
570 3 SB372 File No.
570 as estimated by the Comptroller, [(C)] (E) the estimated expenditures on behalf of the department and the offices from the Capital Equipment Purchase Fund pursuant to section 4a-9, [for such year,] not including such estimated expenditures made on behalf of the Health Systems Planning Unit of the Office of Health Strategy, and [(D)] (F) the amount appropriated to the Department of Aging and Disability Services for the fall prevention program established in section 17a-859 from the Insurance Fund;
[for the fiscal year;] (2) [a] A statement of (A) (i) the total taxes imposed on all domestic insurance companies and domestic insurance entities under chapter 207 on business done in this state during the preceding calendar year, and (ii) each such company's or entity's proportionate share of such total, and (B) (i) the total taxes imposed under chapter 207 on only those domestic insurance companies and entities that provided health insurance, as defined in section 38a-469, in this state during the preceding calendar year, and (ii) each such company's or entity's proportionate share of such total;
and (3) [the] The proposed assessment against that company or entity, calculated in accordance with the provisions of subsection (c) of this section, provided for the purposes of this calculation the amount appropriated to the Insurance Department, the Office of the Healthcare Advocate and the Office of Health Strategy from the Insurance Fund plus the cost of fringe benefits for department and office personnel and the estimated expenditures on behalf of the department and the office from the Capital Equipment Purchase Fund pursuant to section 4a-9, not including such expenditures made on behalf of the Health Systems Planning Unit of the Office of Health Strategy shall be deemed to be the actual expenditures of the department and the office, and the amount appropriated to the Department of Aging and Disability Services from the Insurance Fund for the fiscal year for the fall prevention program established in section 17a-859 shall be deemed to be the actual expenditures for the program.
(c) (1) The proposed assessments for each domestic insurance SB372 / File No.
570 4 SB372 File No.
570 company or other domestic entity shall be calculated by (A) allocating twenty per cent of the amount to be paid under section 38a-47, as amended by this act, among the domestic entities organized under sections 38a-199 to 38a-209, inclusive, and 38a-214 to 38a-225, inclusive, in proportion to their respective shares of the total taxes and charges imposed under chapter 207 on such entities on business done in this state during the preceding calendar year, and (B) allocating eighty per cent of (i) the amount to be paid under subdivisions (1), (4) and (5) of subsection (a) of section 38a-47, as amended by this act, among all domestic insurance companies and domestic entities, and (ii) the amount to be paid under subdivisions (2) and (3) of subsection (a) of section 38a-47, as amended by this act, among only those domestic insurance companies and entities that provided health insurance in this state during the preceding calendar year, in each case other than those organized under sections 38a-199 to 38a-209, inclusive, and 38a-214 to 38a-225, inclusive, in proportion to their respective shares of the total taxes and charges imposed under chapter 207 on such domestic insurancecompaniesanddomesticentitiesonbusinessdoneinthisstate during the preceding calendar year, provided if there are no domestic entities organized under sections 38a-199 to 38a-209, inclusive, and 38a- 214to38a-225,inclusive,atthetimeofassessment,onehundredpercent of the amount to be paid under section 38a-47, as amended by this act, shall be allocated among such domestic insurance companies and domestic entities.
(2) When the amount any such company or entity is assessed pursuant to this section exceeds twenty-five per cent of the actual expenditures of the Insurance Department, the Office of the Healthcare Advocate and the Office of Health Strategy from the Insurance Fund, such excess amount shall not be paid by such company or entity but rather shall be assessed against and paid by all other such companies and entities in proportion to their respective shares of thetotaltaxes and chargesimposedunderchapter207onbusinessdoneinthisstateduring the preceding calendar year, except that for purposes of any assessment made to fund payments to the Department of Public Health to purchase vaccines, such company or entity shall be responsible for its share of the SB372 / File No.
570 5 SB372 File No.
570 costs, notwithstanding whether its assessment exceeds twenty-five per cent of the actual expenditures of the Insurance Department, the Office of the Healthcare Advocate and the Office of Health Strategy from the Insurance Fund.
The provisions of this subdivision shall not be applicable to any corporationwhichhas convertedto adomesticmutual insurance company pursuant to section 38a-155 upon the effective date of any public act which amends said section to modify or remove any restriction on the business such a company may engage in, for purposes of any assessment due from such company on and after such effective date.
Show all 94 changed lines (54 more)
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section 1 July 1, 2024 38a-47 Sec.
2 July 1, 2024 38a-48(a) to (c) APP Joint Favorable SB372 / File No.
570 6 SB372 File No.
570 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ Various Municipalities Potential See Below See Below Cost Explanation The bill has no fiscal impact to the state because it does not change the total amount of revenue being collected by the Insurance Fund general assessment.
To the extent the shift of assessment costs onto health insurers is passed on in the form of higher health insurance premiums, the bill results in a potential cost to municipalities that purchase commercial health insurance in the fully-insured market beginning as early as FY 25.
The bill specifies that only domestic insurers and other entities (e.g., HMOs) that wrote policies of health insurance in the preceding calendar year be assessed to fund the Office of the Healthcare Advocate (OHA) and Insurance Fund portion of the Office of Health Strategy (OHS).
2 Together, those budgets equal approximately $17.8 million in FY 25.
Currently, alltypes ofdomestic insurers and other domestic entities pay 1The general assessment funds the budgets of the Insurance Department, Office of the Healthcare Advocate, part of the Office of Health Strategy, and various other accounts that have appropriations totaling approximately $58.2 million for FY 25.
An exception to this would occur if the assessment on a single entity is greater than a quarter of the expenditures of the Insurance Department, Office of the Healthcare Advocate, and Office of Health Strategy from the Insurance Fund.
SB372 / File No.
570 7 SB372 File No.
570 a share of the total assessment based on their Connecticut tax liability in the preceding calendar year.
For context, an Office of Fiscal Analysis examination of 2018 tax filings estimated that approximately 79 percent of the FY 19 general assessment was paid by domestic entities writing any accident or health policies.
To theextent that that percentagereflectstheshare ofOHAand OHS costs health insurers already pay, the bill would shift the remaining 21 percent (approximately $3.7 million in FY 25) of the part of the assessment that funds the OHA and OHS budgets onto health carriers instead of other types of domestic insurers.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into thefuture subject to inflation andchanges intheInsurance Fund budgets of OHA and OHS.
SB372 / File No.
570 8 SB372 File No.
570 OFA Bill Analysis SB 372 AN ACT CONCERNING PAYMENTS BY INSURANCE COMPANIES FOR DEPOSIT INTO THE INSURANCE FUND.
SUMMARY:
This bill limits the type of domestic insurance entities required to pay the portion of the Insurance Fund general assessment that supports the budgets of the Office of the Healthcare Advocate (OHA) and the Office of Health Strategy (OHS).
Under the bill, this portion of the general assessment applies only to domestic insurance companies and entities that have written policies of health insurance in the state in the preceding calendar year, except in one circumstance.
The bill also makes related technical and conforming changes to the statutory requirements for determining and notifying insurers of their annual assessment amounts.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
July 1, 2024 New Assessment Methodology Assessment to Fund OHA and OHS Existing law requires domestic insurance companies as well as hospital and medical service corporations (i.e., HMOs) to annually pay the Insurance Commissioner an assessed amount equal to:
(1) the actual expenditures, including fringe benefits, of the Insurance Department, (2) the actual expenditures, including fringe benefits, of OHA, (3) OHS Insurance Fund appropriations, as reduced by the amount SB372 / File No.
570 9 SB372 File No.
570 of federal reimbursement received for allowable Medicaid administrative expenses, (4) the expenditures made on behalf of the Insurance Department, OHA, and OHS from the Capital Equipment Purchase Fund, excluding expenditures made on behalf of the Health Systems Planning Unit of OHS, and (5) an amount that covers the Department of Aging and Disability Services’ fall prevention Insurance Fund program appropriation.
Under the bill, items (2) and (3) above will only be assessed on insurance companies and HMOs that wrote health insurance policies in the state in the preceding calendar year (see Background).
Other types of domestic insurers will not be responsible for paying a share of the OHA expenditures and OHS budget in the Insurance Fund.
As under existing law, the bill requires the Insurance Commissioner to deposit these payments in the Insurance Fund.
Calculating Insurer Liability Existing law and the bill require the Commissioner of Revenue Services, on or before June 30th annually, to provide the Insurance Commissioner with a statement of the Connecticut insurance premium taxes imposed on domestic insurance companies and entities during the preceding calendar year.
The bill requires the Insurance Commissioner to use that statement to prepare an additional statement of the amount of insurance premium taxes imposed on those domestic companies and entities that specifically wrote policies of health insurance in the state in the preceding year.
Currently, the Insurance Commissioner then provides a statement to each domestic entity liable under the general assessment that lists:
(1) the amounts being funded through the assessment, (2) a statement of the total insurance premium taxes imposed on domestic insurance SB372 / File No.
570 10 SB372 File No.
570 companies and entities on Connecticut business in the preceding calendar year, and (3) the proposed assessment against that company or entity.
Under the bill, the Insurance Commissioner’s statement to each liable domestic entity must include:
(1) the accounts supported by the Insurance Fund to be funded as separate line items and for the fiscal year beginning July 1 of the year the statement is sent and the corresponding appropriations, (2) the total insurance premium taxes and subscriber charges imposed on all domestic companies and entities, and each company’s or entity’s share of that total amount, (3) the total insurance premium taxes and subscriber charges imposed on companies and entities providing health insurance, and each company’s or entity’s share of that total amount, and (4) the proposed assessment against each company or entity.
Under the bill, the portion of the assessment related to the budgets of OHA and OHS is divided only among those domestic companies or entities that provided health insurance in the state, in accordance with their share of the insurance premium taxes imposed on that group.
The remaining portion of the assessment that funds the Insurance Department and other accounts is divided among all domestic insurers and entities in proportion to the entity’s share of the total insurance premiumtaxes,asthewholeassessmentiscalculatedunder currentlaw.
Unchanged by the bill, when the amount any such company or entity would be assessed exceeds 25 percent of the actual expenditures of the Insurance Department, OHA, and OHS (from the Insurance Fund), the excess amount is assessed against and paid by all other domestic companies and entities in proportion to their respective shares of the total insurance premium taxes imposed.
The bill appears to require entities that did not write health insurance in the preceding year to partially support the budgets of OHA and OHS under this scenario.
SB372 / File No.
570 11 SB372 File No.
570 BACKGROUND Health Insurance Definition Existing law (§§ 38a-469) defines “health insurance” as insurance providing benefits due to illness or injury, resulting in loss of life, loss of earnings, or expenses incurred.
It includes long-term care insurance, coverages of several types (e.g., disability income protection, travel health and accident-only, stand-alone dental and vision, and Medicare and TriCare supplemental), as well as the hospital and medical expense or services coverages most commonly associated with the term.
COMMITTEE ACTION Appropriations Committee Joint Favorable Yea 50 Nay 2 (04/04/2024) SB372 / File No.
570 12
Show all 94 changed rows (54 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Chaptered Special Act No. 24-15 Current pdf
- File No. 570 View text pdf
- APP Joint Favorable View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text pdf
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
SPECIAL ACT 24-15
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
HOUSE PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 442
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 570
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 347
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/22/24
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0315
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Appropriations
Sponsors
- Jorge Cabrera · Primary
- Catherine A. Osten · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 185 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Jorge Cabrera Democratic
- Catherine A. Osten Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (185)
185 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 185 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 78 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 146 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (151)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arnone | — | Not Voting |
| Khanna | — | Yea |
| Michel | — | Yea |
| Conley | — | Yea |
| Chaleski | — | Yea |
| Currey | — | Yea |
| Cheeseman | — | Yea |
| D'agostino | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dancho | — | Yea |
| Palm | — | Yea |
| Denning | — | Yea |
| Porter | — | Yea |
| Ferraro | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Ryan | — | Yea |
| Harrison | — | Yea |
| Figueroa | — | Yea |
| Hayes | — | Yea |
| Labriola | — | Yea |
| Tercyak | — | Yea |
| Sanchez, R. | — | Yea |
| Mccarthy Vahey | — | Yea |
| Mccarty, K. | — | Yea |
| Morrin Bello | — | Yea |
| Sanchez, J. | — | Yea |
| Aimee Berger-Girvalo | Democratic | Yea |
| Alphonse Paolillo | Democratic | Yea |
| Andre F. Baker | Democratic | Yea |
| Anne M. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Anthony L. Nolan | Democratic | Yea |
| Antonio Felipe | Democratic | Yea |
| Aundre Bumgardner | Democratic | Yea |
| Bob Godfrey | Democratic | Yea |
| Bobby G. Gibson | Democratic | Yea |
| Brandon Chafee | Democratic | Yea |
| Christopher Poulos | Democratic | Yea |
| Christopher Rosario | Democratic | Yea |
| Corey P. Paris | Democratic | Yea |
| Derell Wilson | Democratic | Yea |
| Dominique Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Eleni Kavros DeGraw | Democratic | Yea |
| Emmanuel Sanchez | Democratic | Yea |
| Farley Santos | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Fred Gee | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Turco | Democratic | Yea |
| Geoff Luxenberg | Democratic | Yea |
| Geraldo C. Reyes | Democratic | Yea |
| Gregory Haddad | Democratic | Yea |
| Hector Arzeno | Democratic | Yea |
| Henry J. Genga | Democratic | Yea |
| Hilda E. Santiago | Democratic | Yea |
| Hubert D. Delany | Democratic | Yea |
| Jaime S. Foster | Democratic | Yea |
| Jane M. Garibay | Democratic | Yea |
| Jason Doucette | Democratic | Yea |
| Jason Rojas | Democratic | Yea |
| Jennifer Leeper | Democratic | Yea |
| Jill Barry | Democratic | Yea |
| Jillian Gilchrest | Democratic | Yea |
| John-Michael Parker | Democratic | Yea |
| Jonathan Fazzino | Democratic | Yea |
| Jonathan Steinberg | Democratic | Yea |
| Joseph P. Gresko | Democratic | Yea |
| Josh Elliott | Democratic | Yea |
| Joshua M. Hall | Democratic | Yea |
| Juan R. Candelaria | Democratic | Yea |
| Julio A. Concepcion | Democratic | Yea |
| Kadeem Roberts | Democratic | Yea |
| Kai J. Belton | Democratic | Yea |
| Kara Rochelle | Democratic | Yea |
| Kate Farrar | Democratic | Yea |
| Kerry S. Wood | Democratic | Yea |
| Kevin Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Larry B. Butler | Democratic | Yea |
| Liz Linehan | Democratic | Yea |
| Lucy Dathan | Democratic | Yea |
| Marcus Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria P. Horn | Democratic | Yea |
| Mary Fortier | Democratic | Yea |
| Mary M. Mushinsky | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Mary Welander | Democratic | Yea |
| Maryam Khan | Democratic | Yea |
| Matt Blumenthal | Democratic | Yea |
| Matthew Ritter | Democratic | Yea |
| Melissa Osborne | Democratic | Yea |
| Michael D. Quinn | Democratic | Yea |
| Michael DiGiovancarlo | Democratic | Yea |
| Mike Demicco | Democratic | Yea |
| Minnie Gonzalez | Democratic | Yea |
| Moira Rader | Democratic | Yea |
| Patricia A. Dillon | Democratic | Yea |
| Patrick S. Boyd | Democratic | Yea |
| Raghib Allie-Brennan | Democratic | Yea |
| Robin E. Comey | Democratic | Yea |
| Roland J. Lemar | Democratic | Yea |
| Ronald A. Napoli | Democratic | Yea |
| Sarah Keitt | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephen R. Meskers | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Stafstrom | Democratic | Yea |
| Susan M. Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Tammy R. Exum | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Toni E. Walker | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Travis Simms | Democratic | Yea |
| Trenee McGee | Democratic | Yea |
| William Heffernan | Democratic | Yea |
| Anne Dauphinais | Republican | Yea |
| Ben McGorty | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Buckbee | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Lanoue | Republican | Yea |
| Cara Christine Pavalock-D'Amato | Republican | Yea |
| Carol Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Aniskovich | Republican | Yea |
| Christie M. Carpino | Republican | Yea |
| Craig C. Fishbein | Republican | Yea |
| Dave W. Yaccarino | Republican | Yea |
| David Rutigliano | Republican | Yea |
| Devin R. Carney | Republican | Yea |
| Donna Veach | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Dubitsky | Republican | Yea |
| Gale L. Mastrofrancesco | Republican | Yea |
| Greg S. Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Irene M. Haines | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Perillo | Republican | Yea |
| Jay M. Case | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Hoxha | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Polletta | Republican | Yea |
| John E. Piscopo | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph H. Zullo | Republican | Yea |
| Karen Reddington-Hughes | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Kennedy | Republican | Yea |
| Kurt Vail | Republican | Yea |
| Lezlye Zupkus | Republican | Yea |
| Mark DeCaprio | Republican | Yea |
| Mark W. Anderson | Republican | Yea |
| Martin Foncello | Republican | Yea |
| Mitch Bolinsky | Republican | Yea |
| Nicole Klarides-Ditria | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick E. Callahan | Republican | Yea |
| Seth Bronko | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Weir | Republican | Yea |
| Tami Zawistowski | Republican | Yea |
| Tammy Nuccio | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Ackert | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Delnicki | Republican | Yea |
| Tom O'Dea | Republican | Yea |
| Tony J. Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Tracy Marra | Republican | Yea |
| Vincent J. Candelora | Republican | Yea |
| William Pizzuto | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 21 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 34 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 94% | 6% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kevin C. Kelly | — | Yea |
| Lisa Seminara | — | Yea |
| Marilyn Moore | — | Yea |
| Bob Duff | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine A. Osten | Democratic | Yea |
| Ceci Maher | Democratic | Yea |
| Christine Cohen | Democratic | Yea |
| Derek Slap | Democratic | Yea |
| Douglas McCrory | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Winfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Herron Gaston | Democratic | Yea |
| James J. Maroney | Democratic | Yea |
| Jan Hochadel | Democratic | Yea |
| Joan V. Hartley | Democratic | Yea |
| John W. Fonfara | Democratic | Yea |
| Jorge Cabrera | Democratic | Yea |
| Julie Kushner | Democratic | Yea |
| MD Rahman | Democratic | Yea |
| Mae Flexer | Democratic | Nay |
| Martha Marx | Democratic | Yea |
| Martin M. Looney | Democratic | Yea |
| Matthew L. Lesser | Democratic | Nay |
| Norman Needleman | Democratic | Yea |
| Patricia Billie Miller | Democratic | Yea |
| Rick Lopes | Democratic | Yea |
| Saud Anwar | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric C. Berthel | Republican | Yea |
| Heather S. Somers | Republican | Yea |
| Henri Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Gordon | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Kissel | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Cicarella | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Sampson | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Fazio | Republican | Yea |
| Stephen G. Harding | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Hwang | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 372?
- SB 372 is sponsored by Jorge Cabrera (Democratic) and Catherine A. Osten (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 372?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced March 07, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 372?
- Track SB 372 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 372
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 372
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →