AN ACT CONCERNING PROBATE COURT OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 324 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 324.
You're tracking SB 324
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 324 — AN ACT CONCERNING PROBATE COURT OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION.
Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 29, 2024. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Ned Lamont (Democratic) on June 04, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
106 added · 308 removedPlain-language change summary
The updated version of SB 324 specifies that certain important legal documents, such as wills, healthcare instructions, and powers of attorney, cannot be acknowledged remotely. This change means that individuals will need to be physically present to have these documents officially recognized, effective October 1, 2024. This matters because it helps ensure the authenticity and integrity of critical legal documents, which can have significant implications for personal rights and estate management.
Substitute Senate GeneralBill Assembly File No.
525324 FebruaryPublic Session,Act 2024 Substitute Senate Bill No.
32424-97 Senate,AN AprilACT 17,CONCERNING 2024PROBATE TheCOURT CommitteeOPERATIONS onAND JudiciaryADMINISTRATION. reportedthrough SEN.
WINFIELD of the 10th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING PROBATE COURT OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION.
(i) No record shall be acknowledged remotely pursuant to subsection (b) of this section in (1) the making and execution of a will, codicil, trust or trust instrument, (2) the execution of health care instructions pursuant to section 19a-575a, (3) the execution of a designation of a standby guardian pursuant to section 45a-624, (4) the execution of a designation of a person for decision-making and certain rights and obligations pursuant to section 1-56r, (5) the execution of a living will, as defined in section 19a-570, (6) the execution of a power of attorney, as defined in section 1-350a, (7) the execution of a self-proving affidavit for an appointment of health care representative or for a living will under sections 1-56r and 19a-578, (8) the execution of a mutual sSB324distribution /agreement Fileunder No.section 45a-433, (9) the execution of an agreement as to the division of an estate under section 45a-434, (10) the execution of a disclaimer under section 45a-479 or 45a-583, or [(10)] (11) a real estate closing, as defined in section 51-88a.
525The 1performance sSB324of FileSubstitute Senate Bill No.
525324 distributionany agreementsuch underacknowledgment sectionin 45a-433,connection (9)with theany execution of an agreement as to the divisionacts ofdescribed anin estatethis undersubsection sectionshall 45a-434,be (10)ineffective thefor executionany ofpurpose aand disclaimershall underconstitute section 45a-479 or 45a-583, or [(10)] (11) a realviolation estateof closing, as defined in section 51-88a.51-88.
The performance of any such acknowledgment in connection with any of the acts described in this subsection shall be ineffective for any purpose and shall constitute a violation of section 51-88.
(a) In any involuntary proceeding in [a state court] the Superior Court, wherethecourtknowsor hasreasontoknowthat anIndianchild is involved, the party seeking the foster care placement of, or termination of parental rights to, an Indian child shall notify the parent orIndiancustodianandtheIndianchild'stribe,byregisteredorcertifiedorIndiancustodianandtheIndianchild'stribe, byregisteredorcertified mail with return receipt requested, of the pending proceedings and of their right of intervention.
If the identity or location of the parent or Indian custodian and the tribe cannot be determined, such notice shall be given, in like manner, to the Secretary or Bureau of Indian Affairs Regional Director in the case of an Indian child of a federally recognized Indian tribe, or the Commissioner of Children and Families in the case of an Indian child of an Indian tribe recognized by the state of sSB324Connecticut, /who Fileshall have fifteen days after receipt of such notice to Public Act No.
52524-97 2 sSB324of File4 Substitute Senate Bill No.
525324 Connecticut, who shall have fifteen days after receipt of such notice to provide the requisite notice to the parent or Indian custodian and the tribe.
(b) In any involuntary proceeding in aProbate Court in which a party is seeking adoption or termination of parental rights where the party knows or has reason to know that an Indian child is involved, the court shall notify the parent in accordance with the provisions of section 45a- 716 of the pending proceedings, which shall include notice of the right of intervention by the Indian custodian and the Indian child's tribe.
(2) (A) The court shall direct that personal service of the citation be made, by a state marshal, constable or an indifferent person, upon the [following:Public Act No.
24-97 3 of 4 Substitute Senate Bill No.
324 [following:
[, except that] Notwithstanding the sSB324provisions /of Filethis No.subparagraph, in cases where the application is for involuntary representation pursuant to section 17b-456, and there is no spouse or the whereabouts of the spouse is unknown, the court shall order notice by certified mail to the children of the respondent and if none, the parents of the respondent and if none, the brothers and sisters of the respondent or their representatives, and if none, the next of kin of such respondent.
525 3 sSB324 File No.
525 provisions of this subparagraph, in cases where the application is for involuntary representation pursuant to section 17b-456, and there is no spouse or the whereabouts of the spouse is unknown, the court shall order notice by certified mail to the children of the respondent and if none, the parents of the respondent and if none, the brothers and sisters of the respondent or their representatives, and if none, the next of kin of such respondent.
Sec.Approved June 4, 2024 Public Act No.
5.24-97 4 of 4
Subsections (b) to (e), inclusive, of section 45a-715 of the general statutes are repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective October 1, 2024):
(b) A petition for termination of parental rights shall be entitled "In the interest of ....
(Name of child), a person under the age of eighteen years", and shall set forth with specificity:
(1) The name, sex, date and place ofbirth,andpresent addressofthechild;(2)thename andaddress of the petitioner, and the nature of the relationship between the petitioner and the child;
(3) the names, dates of birth and addresses of the parents of the child, if known, including the name of any [putative father] alleged genetic parent named by the [mother] birth parent, and the tribe and reservation of an American Indian parent;
(4) if the parent of the child is a minor, the names and addresses of the parents or guardian of the person of such minor;
(5) the names and addresses of:
(A) The guardian of the person of the child;
(B) any guardians ad litem appointed in a prior proceeding;
(C) the tribe and reservation of an American Indian child;
and (D) the child-placing agency which placed sSB324 / File No.
525 4 sSB324 File No.
525 the child in his current placement;
(6) the facts upon which termination is sought, the legal grounds authorizing termination, the effects of a termination decree and the basis for the jurisdiction of the court;
(7) the name of the persons or agencies which have agreed to accept custody or guardianship of the child's person upon disposition.
(c) If the information required under subdivisions (2) and (6) of subsection(b)ofthissectionisnotstated,thepetitionshallbedismissed.
If any other facts required under subdivision (1), (3), (4), (5) or (7) of subsection (b) of this section are not known or cannot be ascertained by the petitioner, he shall so state in the petition.
If the whereabouts of either parent or the [putative father] alleged genetic parent named under subdivision (3) of subsection (b) of this section are unknown, the petitioner shall diligently search for any such parent or [putative father] the alleged genetic parent.
Show all 116 changed lines (76 more)
The petitioner shall file an affidavit with the petition indicating the efforts used to locate the parent or [putative father] the alleged genetic parent.
(d) If a petition indicates that either or both parents consent to the termination of their parental rights, or if at any time following the filing of a petition and before the entry of a decree a parent consents to the termination of [his] their parental rights, each consenting parent shall acknowledge such consent on a form promulgated by the Office of the Chief Court Administrator evidencing to the satisfaction of the court that the parent has voluntarily and knowingly consented to the termination of [his] their parental rights.
No consent to termination by a [mother] birth parent shall be executed within forty-eight hours immediately after the birth of [her] the child.
A parent who is a minor shall have the right to consent to termination of parental rights and such consent shall not be voidable by reason of such minority.
A guardian ad litem shall be appointed by the court to assure that such minor parent is giving an informed and voluntary consent.
(e) A petition under this section shall be filed in the Probate Court for the district in which (1) the petitioner resides, (2) the child resides, is domiciled or is located at the time of the filing of the petition, or (3) in sSB324 / File No.
525 5 sSB324 File No.
525 the case of a minor who is under the guardianship of any child care facility or child-placing agency, in the Probate Court for the district in which any office of the agency is located.
If the petition is filed with respect to a child born [out of wedlock] to a birth parent unmarried to the alleged genetic parent, the petition shall state whether there is [a putative father] an alleged genetic parent to whom notice shall be given under subdivision (3) of subsection (b) of section 45a-716.
This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
Section 1 October 1, 2024 3-95b(i) Sec.
2 October 1, 2024 45a-112 October 1, 2024 Sec.
3 46b-116d Sec.
4 October 1, 2024 45a-649(a)(2) Sec.
5 October 1, 2024 45a-715(b) to (e) JUD Joint Favorable Subst.
sSB324 / File No.
525 6 sSB324 File No.
525 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill, which makes various technical changes to the Probate Court statutes and codifies current practices, is not anticipated to result in a fiscal impact to the state or to municipalities.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None sSB324 / File No.
525 7 sSB324 File No.
525 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 324 AN ACT CONCERNING PROBATE COURT OPERATIONS AND ADMINISTRATION.
SUMMARY This bill makes changes in laws governing probate court operations and related matters.
It prohibits using remote notarization to execute an agreement to divide a testate estate (i.e., an estate under a will).
Existing law prohibits using remote notarization for agreements to divide an intestate estate (i.e., estates without a will) (§ 1).
The bill extends to the U.S.
Department of Veterans Affairs Connecticut Healthcare Systemthesame requirementsthat apply under existing law to state agencies for paying probate court fees.
Under this law, if a state agency files a probate court matter or is otherwise liable for probate fees or expenses, the court must accept the matter without the filing fee and bill the agency for later payment, with the bill due upon receipt (§ 2).
The bill changes certain notice requirements for involuntary proceedings under the state’s Indian Child Welfare Act (ICWA), including setting different requirements for probate court and Superior Court cases and making minor changes to related provisions (for cases in either court) (§ 3).
The bill specifies the procedures to notify the non-petitioning spouse of an involuntary conservatorship petition if the spouse is out-of-state, cannot be located, or cannot be served in the state.
It also requires notice to be sent by certified mail to specified other family members if the spouse’s location is unknown in certain cases involving elderly persons sSB324 / File No.
525 8 sSB324 File No.
525 (§ 4).
Lastly, the bill updates terminology in a law on the termination of parental rights (TPR), primarily by removing certain gender-specific references to conform to the Connecticut Parentage Act (§ 5).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2024 § 3 — NOTICES UNDER INDIAN CHILD WELFARE ACT PA 23-113 generally codified into state law the federal ICWA, which governs jurisdiction over American Indian children’s removal from their families in custody, foster care, and adoption cases.
The act gives exclusive jurisdiction to Indian tribes over certain proceedings involving Indian children and preferred jurisdiction in some others.
Under current law, for involuntary proceedings in state court (either probate court or Superior Court), the party seeking the foster care placement of,or TPR to, anIndian childmust notify theparent or Indian custodian and the child’s tribe about the pending proceedings and their right to intervene.
The bill sets different notice requirements for probate court cases (specifically, those in which a party is seeking an adoption or TPR) and makes a few changes to the underlying requirements for cases in either court.
Principally, the bill does the following:
1.
specifically requires the probate court to notify the parent, and the notice to include the Indian custodian’s or tribe’s right to intervene, under existing notice procedures (outside of the ICWA) on TPR hearings (see BACKGROUND);
2.
requirestheprobatecourttonotifytheIndiancustodianandtribe by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested;
3.
for Superior Court cases, allows the notice (to the parent, custodian, or tribe) to be sent by certified mail, in addition to registered mail as under current law;
4.
in probate court cases where the person’s and tribe’s identity or location cannot be determined, requires the probate court to send sSB324 / File No.
525 9 sSB324 File No.
525 the required notices to certain officials;
and 5.
for both Superior and probate court, where the person’s and tribe’s identity or location cannot be determined, allows the notice (for children from federally-recognized tribes) to be sent to the Bureau of Indian Affairs Regional Director instead of the U.S.
Secretary of the Interior and makes a conforming change.
§ 4 — INVOLUNTARY CONSERVATORSHIP NOTICES By law, the probate court may appoint a conservator of the person or a conservator of the estate, or both, after finding that a person (“the respondent”) is incapable of (1) managing his or her affairs or (2) caring for himself or herself.
If someone other than the respondent’s spouse files a petition to appoint an involuntary conservator, current law requires the spouse (in addition to the respondent) to receive personal (i.e., in-hand) service about the hearing.
The bill specifies the required notice process if the spouse is out of state, his or her address is unknown, or if personal service or service at the spouse’s usual residence cannot reasonably be done in the state.
In these cases, the judge or court clerk must order the notice to be sent by registered or certified mail, return receipt requested, or by newspaper publication at least 10 days before the hearing.
If the latter, the notice must be in a newspaper of general circulation in the area of the person’s last known address (in Connecticut or elsewhere), or in the place where the petition was filed if that address is unknown.
For allinvoluntary conservatorshipcases, the court must order notice to certain relatives of the respondent, as follows:
the children;
if none, the parents;
if none, the siblings or their representatives;
or if none, the next of kin.
But existing law requires this notice to be sent by certified mail if the respondent is unmarried and the conservatorship application was brought by the Department of Social Services (DSS) commissioner for an elderly person who is being abused, neglected, exploited, or abandoned and lacks the capacity to consent to protective services.
For these cases brought by DSS, the bill also requires the notices to relatives sSB324 / File No.
525 10 sSB324 File No.
525 to be sent by certified mail if the respondent’s spouse cannot be located.
BACKGROUND Notice of TPR hearings By law, at least 10 days before a hearing on a TPR petition, notice generally must be served on the (1) parents, and in some cases, other people, by personal service or service at the person’s usual residence (different requirements apply if the address is unknown or out of state) and (2) Department of Children and Families commissioner and attorney general by first class mail (CGS § 45a-716).
COMMITTEE ACTION Judiciary Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 25 Nay 11 (03/28/2024) sSB324 / File No.
525 11
Show all 116 changed rows (76 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- Chaptered Public Act No. 24-97 Current pdf
- File No. 525 View text pdf
- Raised Bill View text pdf
- Substitute JUD Joint Favorable Substitute pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill updates multiple sections regarding probate court operations and remote acknowledgments, as well as procedures involving Indian children in legal matters.
-
Section 3-95b
[(10)] (11) a real estate closing, as defined in section 51-88a.→ (10) the execution of a disclaimer under section 45a-479 or 45a-583, or [(10)] (11) a real estate closing, as defined in section 51-88a.The bill clarifies the list of documents that cannot be acknowledged remotely.
-
Section 45a-112
the filing fee accompanying the filing thereof, and shall bill the filing fee or other fee or expense to the appropriate agency for subsequent payment, which payment shall be due and payable upon receipt of such bill.→ without the filing fee accompanying the filing thereof, and shall bill the filing fee or other fee or expense to the appropriate agency for subsequent payment, which payment shall be due and payable upon receipt of such bill.The bill allows the state or certain federal agencies to file in probate court without upfront filing fees.
-
Section 46b-116
In any involuntary proceeding in [a state court] the Superior Court, where the court knows or has reason to know that an Indian child is involved,→ In any involuntary proceeding in the Superior Court, where the court knows or has reason to know that an Indian child is involved,The bill specifies that such proceedings occur in the Superior Court rather than just any state court.
-
Section 46b-116
such notice shall be given, in like manner, to the Secretary or Bureau of Indian Affairs Regional Director in the case of an Indian child of a federally recognized Indian tribe,→ such notice shall be given to the Secretary or Bureau of Indian Affairs Regional Director in the case of an Indian child of a federally recognized Indian tribe,The bill eliminates redundancy and clarifies notification protocols for Indian children in involuntary proceedings.
-
Section 45a-649
the following: The→ the following:The bill removes unnecessary wording from the instruction for personal service of citation.
Action History
-
SIGNED BY GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR
-
TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE
-
PUBLIC ACT 24-97
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
HOUSE PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 468
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RULES SUSPENDED,TRANS.TO HOUSE
-
SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 525
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 301
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/16/24
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable Substitute
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0306
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →0 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 187 not signed on
Sponsors (0)
None.
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (187)
187 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 187 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 76 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Republican | 44 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 23 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Total | 143 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (151)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Arnone | — | Not Voting |
| Khanna | — | Yea |
| Michel | — | Yea |
| Conley | — | Yea |
| Chaleski | — | Yea |
| Currey | — | Yea |
| Cheeseman | — | Yea |
| D'agostino | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dancho | — | Yea |
| Palm | — | Yea |
| Denning | — | Yea |
| Porter | — | Yea |
| Ferraro | — | Not Voting |
| Cook | — | Yea |
| Ryan | — | Yea |
| Harrison | — | Yea |
| Figueroa | — | Yea |
| Hayes | — | Yea |
| Labriola | — | Yea |
| Tercyak | — | Yea |
| Mccarthy Vahey | — | Yea |
| Mccarty, K. | — | Yea |
| Morrin Bello | — | Yea |
| Sanchez, J. | — | Yea |
| Sanchez, R. | — | Not Voting |
| Aimee Berger-Girvalo | Democratic | Yea |
| Alphonse Paolillo | Democratic | Yea |
| Andre F. Baker | Democratic | Yea |
| Anne M. Hughes | Democratic | Yea |
| Anthony L. Nolan | Democratic | Yea |
| Antonio Felipe | Democratic | Yea |
| Aundre Bumgardner | Democratic | Yea |
| Bob Godfrey | Democratic | Yea |
| Bobby G. Gibson | Democratic | Yea |
| Brandon Chafee | Democratic | Yea |
| Christopher Poulos | Democratic | Yea |
| Christopher Rosario | Democratic | Yea |
| Corey P. Paris | Democratic | Yea |
| Derell Wilson | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Dominique Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Eleni Kavros DeGraw | Democratic | Yea |
| Emmanuel Sanchez | Democratic | Yea |
| Farley Santos | Democratic | Yea |
| Frank Smith | Democratic | Yea |
| Fred Gee | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Turco | Democratic | Yea |
| Geoff Luxenberg | Democratic | Yea |
| Geraldo C. Reyes | Democratic | Yea |
| Gregory Haddad | Democratic | Yea |
| Hector Arzeno | Democratic | Yea |
| Henry J. Genga | Democratic | Yea |
| Hilda E. Santiago | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Hubert D. Delany | Democratic | Yea |
| Jaime S. Foster | Democratic | Yea |
| Jane M. Garibay | Democratic | Yea |
| Jason Doucette | Democratic | Yea |
| Jason Rojas | Democratic | Yea |
| Jennifer Leeper | Democratic | Yea |
| Jill Barry | Democratic | Yea |
| Jillian Gilchrest | Democratic | Yea |
| John-Michael Parker | Democratic | Yea |
| Jonathan Fazzino | Democratic | Yea |
| Jonathan Steinberg | Democratic | Yea |
| Joseph P. Gresko | Democratic | Yea |
| Josh Elliott | Democratic | Yea |
| Joshua M. Hall | Democratic | Yea |
| Juan R. Candelaria | Democratic | Yea |
| Julio A. Concepcion | Democratic | Yea |
| Kadeem Roberts | Democratic | Yea |
| Kai J. Belton | Democratic | Yea |
| Kara Rochelle | Democratic | Yea |
| Kate Farrar | Democratic | Yea |
| Kerry S. Wood | Democratic | Yea |
| Kevin Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Larry B. Butler | Democratic | Yea |
| Liz Linehan | Democratic | Yea |
| Lucy Dathan | Democratic | Yea |
| Marcus Brown | Democratic | Yea |
| Maria P. Horn | Democratic | Yea |
| Mary Fortier | Democratic | Yea |
| Mary M. Mushinsky | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Mary Welander | Democratic | Yea |
| Maryam Khan | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Matt Blumenthal | Democratic | Yea |
| Matthew Ritter | Democratic | Yea |
| Melissa Osborne | Democratic | Yea |
| Michael D. Quinn | Democratic | Yea |
| Michael DiGiovancarlo | Democratic | Yea |
| Mike Demicco | Democratic | Yea |
| Minnie Gonzalez | Democratic | Yea |
| Moira Rader | Democratic | Yea |
| Patricia A. Dillon | Democratic | Yea |
| Patrick S. Boyd | Democratic | Yea |
| Raghib Allie-Brennan | Democratic | Yea |
| Robin E. Comey | Democratic | Yea |
| Roland J. Lemar | Democratic | Yea |
| Ronald A. Napoli | Democratic | Yea |
| Sarah Keitt | Democratic | Yea |
| Stephen R. Meskers | Democratic | Yea |
| Steven J. Stafstrom | Democratic | Yea |
| Susan M. Johnson | Democratic | Yea |
| Tammy R. Exum | Democratic | Yea |
| Toni E. Walker | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Travis Simms | Democratic | Yea |
| Trenee McGee | Democratic | Yea |
| William Heffernan | Democratic | Yea |
| Anne Dauphinais | Republican | Yea |
| Ben McGorty | Republican | Yea |
| Bill Buckbee | Republican | Yea |
| Brian Lanoue | Republican | Yea |
| Cara Christine Pavalock-D'Amato | Republican | Yea |
| Carol Hall | Republican | Yea |
| Chris Aniskovich | Republican | Yea |
| Christie M. Carpino | Republican | Yea |
| Craig C. Fishbein | Republican | Yea |
| Dave W. Yaccarino | Republican | Yea |
| David Rutigliano | Republican | Yea |
| Devin R. Carney | Republican | Yea |
| Donna Veach | Republican | Yea |
| Doug Dubitsky | Republican | Yea |
| Gale L. Mastrofrancesco | Republican | Yea |
| Greg S. Howard | Republican | Yea |
| Irene M. Haines | Republican | Yea |
| Jason Perillo | Republican | Yea |
| Jay M. Case | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Hoxha | Republican | Yea |
| Joe Polletta | Republican | Yea |
| John E. Piscopo | Republican | Yea |
| Joseph H. Zullo | Republican | Yea |
| Karen Reddington-Hughes | Republican | Yea |
| Kathy Kennedy | Republican | Yea |
| Kurt Vail | Republican | Yea |
| Lezlye Zupkus | Republican | Yea |
| Mark DeCaprio | Republican | Yea |
| Mark W. Anderson | Republican | Yea |
| Martin Foncello | Republican | Yea |
| Mitch Bolinsky | Republican | Yea |
| Nicole Klarides-Ditria | Republican | Yea |
| Patrick E. Callahan | Republican | Yea |
| Seth Bronko | Republican | Yea |
| Steve Weir | Republican | Yea |
| Tami Zawistowski | Republican | Yea |
| Tammy Nuccio | Republican | Yea |
| Tim Ackert | Republican | Yea |
| Tom Delnicki | Republican | Yea |
| Tom O'Dea | Republican | Yea |
| Tony J. Scott | Republican | Yea |
| Tracy Marra | Republican | Yea |
| Vincent J. Candelora | Republican | Yea |
| William Pizzuto | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (36)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Kevin C. Kelly | — | Yea |
| Lisa Seminara | — | Yea |
| Marilyn Moore | — | Yea |
| Bob Duff | Democratic | Yea |
| Catherine A. Osten | Democratic | Yea |
| Ceci Maher | Democratic | Yea |
| Christine Cohen | Democratic | Yea |
| Derek Slap | Democratic | Yea |
| Douglas McCrory | Democratic | Yea |
| Gary A. Winfield | Democratic | Yea |
| Herron Gaston | Democratic | Yea |
| James J. Maroney | Democratic | Yea |
| Jan Hochadel | Democratic | Yea |
| Joan V. Hartley | Democratic | Yea |
| John W. Fonfara | Democratic | Yea |
| Jorge Cabrera | Democratic | Yea |
| Julie Kushner | Democratic | Yea |
| MD Rahman | Democratic | Yea |
| Mae Flexer | Democratic | Yea |
| Martha Marx | Democratic | Yea |
| Martin M. Looney | Democratic | Yea |
| Matthew L. Lesser | Democratic | Yea |
| Norman Needleman | Democratic | Yea |
| Patricia Billie Miller | Democratic | Yea |
| Rick Lopes | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Saud Anwar | Democratic | Yea |
| Eric C. Berthel | Republican | Yea |
| Heather S. Somers | Republican | Yea |
| Henri Martin | Republican | Yea |
| Jeff Gordon | Republican | Yea |
| John A. Kissel | Republican | Yea |
| Paul Cicarella | Republican | Yea |
| Rob Sampson | Republican | Yea |
| Ryan Fazio | Republican | Yea |
| Stephen G. Harding | Republican | Yea |
| Tony Hwang | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What is the current status of SB 324?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 29, 2024. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 324?
- Track SB 324 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 324
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 324
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →