Connecticut 2024 Regular Session Status: Passed House Bipartisan · 2 D · 1 R cosponsors

HB 5266 — AN ACT AMENDING THE TIME TO PROTEST BENEFIT CHARGES ON AN EMPLOYER'S UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE QUARTERLY STATEMENT.

Last action — SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 456

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

71 added · 17 removed

71 line(s) added, 17 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
5266 February Session, 2024 LCO No.
59 February Session, 2024 House Bill No.
1115 Referred to Committee on LABOR AND PUBLIC EMPLOYEES Introduced by:
5266 House of Representatives, March 20, 2024 The Committee on Labor and Public Employees reported through REP.
(LAB) AN ACT AMENDING THE TIME TO PROTEST BENEFIT CHARGES ON AN EMPLOYER'S UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE QUARTERLY STATEMENT.
SANCHEZ, E.
of the 24th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT AMENDING THE TIME TO PROTEST BENEFIT CHARGES ON AN EMPLOYER'S UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE QUARTERLY STATEMENT.
(2) The administrator shall, not less frequently than once each calendar quarter, provide a statement of charges to each employer to LCO 1115 \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2024HB-05266-R011 of 3 HB.docx Bill No.
HB5266 / File No.
5266 whose experience record any charges have been made since the last previous such statement.
59 1 HB5266 File No.
59 (2) The administrator shall, not less frequently than once each calendar quarter, provide a statement of charges to each employer to whose experience record any charges have been made since the last previous such statement.
Section 1 October 1, 2024 31-225a(h) LCO 1115 {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2024HB-052662 of 3 R01-HB.docx } Bill No.
Section 1 October 1, 2024 31-225a(h) HB5266 / File No.
5266 LAB Joint Favorable LCO 1115 {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2024HB-05266- 3 of 3 R01-HB.docx }
59 2 HB5266 File No.
59 LAB Joint Favorable HB5266 / File No.
59 3 HB5266 File No.
59 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ Labor Dept.
Unemployment Minimal Minimal Insurance Trust Fund - See Below Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill, which shortens the time an employer can protest any unemployment benefits they contend have been improperly charged to their unemployment insurance quarterly statements from 60 to 40 days, results in a minimal net impact to the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.
To the extent the bill results in charges that otherwise would be contested, this would result in an increase in the employer experience rate and therefore result in a minimal revenue gain due to higher taxes paid by employers.
Alternatively, the bill could also result in a higher volume of fraudulent claims not being caught via employer's due diligence, which would have a minimal cost to the Unemployment Insurance Trust Fund.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to employer's compliance levels to the 40-day deadline to protest unemployment benefits improperly charged to their unemployment insurance quarterly statements.
HB5266 / File No.
59 4 HB5266 File No.
59 OLR Bill Analysis HB 5266 AN ACT AMENDING THE TIME TO PROTEST BENEFIT CHARGES ON AN EMPLOYER'S UNEMPLOYMENT INSURANCE QUARTERLY STATEMENT.
SUMMARY By law, the Department of Labor (DOL) gives employers quarterly statements that generally show their charges for unemployment benefits paid to their former employees.
This bill decreases, from 60 to days after the statement was provided, the amount of time an employer has to file a written protest with DOL explaining that the charges were improperly charged due to fraud or error.
Existing law, unchanged by the bill, prevents an eligibility issue from being reopened based on these quarterly statements if the employer previously received a notification about the former employee’s eligibilityforbenefitsandfailedtotimelyappealit ortheeligibilityissue was resolved against the employer.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2024 COMMITTEE ACTION Labor and Public Employees Committee Joint Favorable Yea 8 Nay 4 (03/07/2024) HB5266 / File No.
59 5
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 456

  2. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  3. IMMEDIATE TRANSMITTAL TO THE SENATE

  4. HOUSE PASSED, HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  5. HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  6. FILE NO. 59

  7. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 71

  8. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  9. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  10. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/19/24

  11. FILED WITH LCO

  12. Joint Favorable

  13. PUBLIC HEARING 0227

  14. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Labor and Public Employees

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 184 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (184)

184 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 184 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

House Roll Call Vote

Passed 149 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 80001
Republican 44000
Unaffiliated 25001
Total 149002
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (151)
Member Party Vote
Arnone — Yea
Khanna — Yea
Michel — Yea
Conley — Yea
Chaleski — Yea
Currey — Yea
Cheeseman — Yea
D'agostino — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dancho — Yea
Palm — Yea
Denning — Yea
Porter — Yea
Ferraro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Ryan — Yea
Harrison — Yea
Figueroa — Yea
Hayes — Not Voting
Labriola — Yea
Tercyak — Yea
Mccarthy Vahey — Yea
Mccarty, K. — Yea
Morrin Bello — Yea
Sanchez, J. — Yea
Sanchez, R. — Yea
Aimee Berger-Girvalo Democratic Yea
Alphonse Paolillo Democratic Yea
Andre F. Baker Democratic Yea
Anne M. Hughes Democratic Yea
Anthony L. Nolan Democratic Yea
Antonio Felipe Democratic Yea
Aundre Bumgardner Democratic Yea
Bob Godfrey Democratic Yea
Bobby G. Gibson Democratic Yea
Brandon Chafee Democratic Yea
Christopher Poulos Democratic Yea
Christopher Rosario Democratic Yea
Corey P. Paris Democratic Yea
Derell Wilson Democratic Yea
Dominique Johnson Democratic Yea
Eleni Kavros DeGraw Democratic Yea
Emmanuel Sanchez Democratic Yea
Farley Santos Democratic Yea
Frank Smith Democratic Yea
Fred Gee Democratic Yea
Gary A. Turco Democratic Yea
Geoff Luxenberg Democratic Yea
Geraldo C. Reyes Democratic Yea
Gregory Haddad Democratic Yea
Hector Arzeno Democratic Yea
Henry J. Genga Democratic Yea
Hilda E. Santiago Democratic Yea
Hubert D. Delany Democratic Yea
Jaime S. Foster Democratic Yea
Jane M. Garibay Democratic Yea
Jason Doucette Democratic Yea
Jason Rojas Democratic Yea
Jennifer Leeper Democratic Yea
Jill Barry Democratic Yea
Jillian Gilchrest Democratic Yea
John-Michael Parker Democratic Yea
Jonathan Fazzino Democratic Yea
Jonathan Steinberg Democratic Not Voting
Joseph P. Gresko Democratic Yea
Josh Elliott Democratic Yea
Joshua M. Hall Democratic Yea
Juan R. Candelaria Democratic Yea
Julio A. Concepcion Democratic Yea
Kadeem Roberts Democratic Yea
Kai J. Belton Democratic Yea
Kara Rochelle Democratic Yea
Kate Farrar Democratic Yea
Kerry S. Wood Democratic Yea
Kevin Brown Democratic Yea
Larry B. Butler Democratic Yea
Liz Linehan Democratic Yea
Lucy Dathan Democratic Yea
Marcus Brown Democratic Yea
Maria P. Horn Democratic Yea
Mary Fortier Democratic Yea
Mary M. Mushinsky Democratic Yea
Mary Welander Democratic Yea
Maryam Khan Democratic Yea
Matt Blumenthal Democratic Yea
Matthew Ritter Democratic Yea
Melissa Osborne Democratic Yea
Michael D. Quinn Democratic Yea
Michael DiGiovancarlo Democratic Yea
Mike Demicco Democratic Yea
Minnie Gonzalez Democratic Yea
Moira Rader Democratic Yea
Patricia A. Dillon Democratic Yea
Patrick S. Boyd Democratic Yea
Raghib Allie-Brennan Democratic Yea
Robin E. Comey Democratic Yea
Roland J. Lemar Democratic Yea
Ronald A. Napoli Democratic Yea
Sarah Keitt Democratic Yea
Stephen R. Meskers Democratic Yea
Steven J. Stafstrom Democratic Yea
Susan M. Johnson Democratic Yea
Tammy R. Exum Democratic Yea
Toni E. Walker Democratic Yea
Travis Simms Democratic Yea
Trenee McGee Democratic Yea
William Heffernan Democratic Yea
Anne Dauphinais Republican Yea
Ben McGorty Republican Yea
Bill Buckbee Republican Yea
Brian Lanoue Republican Yea
Cara Christine Pavalock-D'Amato Republican Yea
Carol Hall Republican Yea
Chris Aniskovich Republican Yea
Christie M. Carpino Republican Yea
Craig C. Fishbein Republican Yea
Dave W. Yaccarino Republican Yea
David Rutigliano Republican Yea
Devin R. Carney Republican Yea
Donna Veach Republican Yea
Doug Dubitsky Republican Yea
Gale L. Mastrofrancesco Republican Yea
Greg S. Howard Republican Yea
Irene M. Haines Republican Yea
Jason Perillo Republican Yea
Jay M. Case Republican Yea
Joe Hoxha Republican Yea
Joe Polletta Republican Yea
John E. Piscopo Republican Yea
Joseph H. Zullo Republican Yea
Karen Reddington-Hughes Republican Yea
Kathy Kennedy Republican Yea
Kurt Vail Republican Yea
Lezlye Zupkus Republican Yea
Mark DeCaprio Republican Yea
Mark W. Anderson Republican Yea
Martin Foncello Republican Yea
Mitch Bolinsky Republican Yea
Nicole Klarides-Ditria Republican Yea
Patrick E. Callahan Republican Yea
Seth Bronko Republican Yea
Steve Weir Republican Yea
Tami Zawistowski Republican Yea
Tammy Nuccio Republican Yea
Tim Ackert Republican Yea
Tom Delnicki Republican Yea
Tom O'Dea Republican Yea
Tony J. Scott Republican Yea
Tracy Marra Republican Yea
Vincent J. Candelora Republican Yea
William Pizzuto Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 5266?
HB 5266 is sponsored by Travis Simms (Democratic), Heather S. Somers (Republican), and Henry J. Genga (Democratic).
What is the current status of HB 5266?
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 5266?
Track HB 5266 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5266

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 5266

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →