SB 227 — AN ACT CONCERNING MUNICIPAL INTERNET WEB SITES.
Last action — FILE NO. 196
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
61 added · 12 removed61 line(s) added, 12 removed.
Senate General Assembly RaisedFile Bill No.
227196 February Session, 2024 LCOSenate Bill No.
599227 ReferredSenate, toApril 2, 2024 The Committee on PLANNINGPlanning ANDand DEVELOPMENTDevelopment Introducedreported by:through SEN.
(PD)RAHMAN ANof ACTthe CONCERNING4th MUNICIPALDist., INTERNETChairperson WEBof SITES.the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING MUNICIPAL INTERNET WEB SITES.
Section 1 from passage New section LCOPD 599Joint \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2024SB-00227-R01Favorable ofSB227 2/ SB.docxFile Bill No.
227196 PD1 JointSB227 FavorableFile LCONo. 599 {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2024SB-00227- 2 of 2 R01-SB.docx }
196 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ Various Municipalities Potential See Below See Below Cost Explanation The bill requires municipalities to register a ".gov" internet top-level domain and redirect any existing Internet web site addresses maintained by such municipality to the new ".gov" domain.
This results in a potential cost to various municipalities in FY 25 to the extent they do not have the necessary staff to transition to a .gov domain.
Currently, 116 of Connecticut's 169 municipalities do not have a ".gov" top-level domain and would need to register a new domain with such designation.
There is no registration cost for entities eligible for the ".gov" designation.
There is no fiscal impact to municipalities that already use a .gov domain or have the staff necessary to complete the transition to the new domain.
For towns without the resources to complete the transition, there is a federal grant program administered by the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency within the United States Department of Homeland Security that assists with the transition process .
1 1https://www.cisa.gov/state-and-local-cybersecurity-grant-program SB227 / File No.
196 2 SB227 File No.
196 The Out Years:
State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None SB227 / File No.
196 3 SB227 File No.
196 OLR Bill Analysis SB 227 AN ACT CONCERNING MUNICIPAL INTERNET WEB SITES.
SUMMARY This bill requires all municipalities, by July 1, 2026, to maintain a .gov Internet domain and register it with the Department of Homeland Security’s Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency.
Municipalities (i.e., cities and towns) must redirect any other domains they use to the .gov domain or stop using them.
The bill’s requirements apply regardless of any municipal charter, special act, or home rule ordinance that requires otherwise.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Upon passage COMMITTEE ACTION Planning and Development Committee Joint Favorable Yea 21 Nay 0 (03/15/2024) SB227 / File No.
196 4
Action History
-
FILE NO. 196
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 140
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/02/24
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0228
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Planning and Development
Sponsors
- MD Rahman · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- MD Rahman Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (186)
186 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 186 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 227?
- SB 227 is sponsored by MD Rahman (Democratic).
- What is the current status of SB 227?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 227?
- Track SB 227 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 227
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 227
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →