Connecticut 2024 Regular Session Status: Enacted Bipartisan · 2 R · 1 D cosponsors

HB 5273 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY AND PLANNING DIVISION WITHIN THE OFFICE OF POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, AUDITS AND MUNICIPAL FINANCE.

Last action — SIGNED BY GOVERNOR

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed House
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2024. Enacted.

Signed by Governor Ned Lamont (Democratic) on June 05, 2024.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 96% · high confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 5 sponsors

    5 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Bipartisan support

    Sponsored across 2 parties (2 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 2 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

763 added · 713 removed

763 line(s) added, 713 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
Substitute House Bill No.
227 February Session, 2024 Substitute House Bill No.
5273 Public Act No.
5273 House of Representatives, April 3, 2024 The Committee on Planning and Development reported through REP.
24-132 AN ACT CONCERNING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY AND PLANNING DIVISION WITHIN THE OFFICE OF POLICY AND MANAGEMENT, AUDITS AND MUNICIPAL FINANCE.
KAVROS DEGRAW of the 17th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY AND PLANNING DIVISION WITHIN THE OFFICE OF POLICY AND MANAGEMENT.
Any municipality which neglects to transmit to said secretary such claim and supporting documentation as required by this section shall forfeit two sHB5273 / File No.
Any municipality which neglects to transmit to said secretary such claim and supporting documentation as required by this section shall forfeit two hundred fifty dollars to the state, provided said secretary may waive such forfeiture in accordance with procedures and standards adopted by regulation in accordance with chapter 54.
227 1 sHB5273 File No.
227 hundred fifty dollars to the state, provided said secretary may waive such forfeiture in accordance with procedures and standards adopted by regulation in accordance with chapter 54.
Any claimant aggrieved by the results of the secretary's review shall have the rights of appeal as set forth in section 12-120b.
Any claimant aggrieved Substitute House Bill No.
5273 by the results of the secretary's review shall have the rights of appeal as set forth in section 12-120b.
[The] Not later than July 1, 2024, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management shall [annually] cause to be prepared by the tax collector complete statements relating to the mill rate and tax levy [during the preceding] for the ensuing fiscal year, such statements to be made upon printed blanks to be prepared and furnished by the secretary to all such officers at least thirty days before sHB5273 / File No.
[The] Not later than July 1, 2024, and annually thereafter, the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management shall [annually] cause to be prepared by the tax collector complete statements relating to the mill rate and tax levy [during the preceding] for the ensuing fiscal year, such statements to be made upon printed blanks to be prepared and furnished by the secretary to all such officers at least thirty days before the date prescribed by the secretary for the filing of such statements.
227 2 sHB5273 File No.
Public Act No.
227 the date prescribed by the secretary for the filing of such statements.
24-132 2 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
Any person who neglects to file a true and correct report in the office of the secretary at the time and in the form required by [him] the secretary or which, in making and filing such report, includes therein any wilful misstatement, shallforfeit onehundreddollarstothestate,providedthe secretary may waive such forfeiture in accordance with procedures and standards adopted by regulation in accordance with chapter 54.
5273 Any person who neglects to file a true and correct report in the office of the secretary at the time and in the form required by [him] the secretary or which, in making and filing such report, includes therein any wilful misstatement, shallforfeit onehundreddollarstothestate,providedthe secretary may waive such forfeiture in accordance with procedures and standards adopted by regulation in accordance with chapter 54.
(a) (1) A town implementing a revaluation of all real property may phase in a real property assessment increase, or a portion of such increase resulting from such revaluation, by requiring the assessor to sHB5273 / File No.
(a) (1) A town implementing a revaluation of all real property may Public Act No.
227 3 sHB5273 File No.
24-132 3 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
227 gradually increase the assessment or the rate of assessment applicable to such property in the assessment year preceding that in which the revaluation is implemented, in accordance with one of the methods set forth in subsection (b) of this section.
5273 phase in a real property assessment increase, or a portion of such increase resulting from such revaluation, by requiring the assessor to gradually increase the assessment or the rate of assessment applicable to such property in the assessment year preceding that in which the revaluation is implemented, in accordance with one of the methods set forth in subsection (b) of this section.
Ifatownchoosesto phase inaportion oftheincrease intheassessment ofeach parcel ofrealproperty resulting from said revaluation, said legislative body shall establish a factor, which shall be not less than twenty-five per cent in any assessment year commencing prior to October 1, 2024, or twenty per cent in any assessment year commencing on or after October 1, 2024, and shall apply such factor to such increases for all parcels of real property, regardless of property classification.
Ifatown choosesto phase inaportion oftheincrease intheassessment ofeach parcel ofrealproperty resulting from said revaluation, said legislative body shall establish a factor, which shall be not less than twenty-five per cent in any assessment year commencing prior to October 1, 2024, or twenty per cent in any assessment year commencing on or after October 1, 2024, and shall apply such factor to such increases for all parcels of real property, regardless of property classification.
(a) (1) At least once every ten years, the commission shall prepare or amend and shall adopt a plan of conservation and development for the municipality.
Public Act No.
24-132 4 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
5273 (a) (1) At least once every ten years, the commission shall prepare or amend and shall adopt a plan of conservation and development for the municipality.
The commission may adopt such sHB5273 / File No.
The commission may adopt such geographical, functional or other amendments to the plan or parts ofthe plan, in accordance with the provisions of this section, as it deems necessary.
227 4 sHB5273 File No.
227 geographical, functional or other amendments to the plan or parts ofthe plan, in accordance with the provisions of this section, as it deems necessary.
(4) "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management or the designee of the secretary;
Public Act No.
24-132 5 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
5273 (4) "Secretary" means the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management or the designee of the secretary;
and (6) "Employee organization" means any lawful association, labor sHB5273 / File No.
and (6) "Employee organization" means any lawful association, labor organization, federation or council having as a primary purpose the improvement of wages, hours and other conditions of employment.
227 5 sHB5273 File No.
227 organization, federation or council having as a primary purpose the improvement of wages, hours and other conditions of employment.
(D) the organization that would be responsible for regional service or initiative delivery;
(D) the organization that would be responsible for regional service or initiative Public Act No.
24-132 6 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
5273 delivery;
(H) a cost benefit analysis for the provision of the service or initiative by each participating municipality and by the sHB5273 / File No.
(H) a cost benefit analysis for the provision of the service or initiative by each participating municipality and by the entity or board of education submitting the proposal;
227 6 sHB5273 File No.
227 entity or board of education submitting the proposal;
(A) The proposed service or initiative will (i) reduce municipal and state costs, (ii) enhance capacity in the delivery of services, or (iii) result in an improvement in the level of service provided when compared to the local delivery of such service, (B) the proposed service or initiative will be available to or benefit all participating members of the regional councilofgovernmentsorregionaleducationalservicecenterregardless of such members' participation in the grant application process;
(A) The proposed service or initiative will (i) reduce municipal and state Public Act No.
[(B) when compared to the existing delivery of services by participating members of the council or center, the proposal demonstrates (i) a positive cost benefit to such members, (ii) increased efficiency and capacity in the delivery of services, (iii) a diminished need for state funding, and (iv) increased cost savings;] (C) the proposed service or initiative promotes cooperation among participating members that may sHB5273 / File No.
24-132 7 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
227 7 sHB5273 File No.
5273 costs, (ii) enhance capacity in the delivery of services, or (iii) result in an improvement in the level of service provided when compared to the local delivery of such service, (B) the proposed service or initiative will be available to or benefit all participating members of the regional councilofgovernmentsorregionaleducationalservicecenterregardless of such members' participation in the grant application process;
227 lead to a reduction in economic or social inequality;
[(B) when compared to the existing delivery of services by participating members of the council or center, the proposal demonstrates (i) a positive cost benefit to such members, (ii) increased efficiency and capacity in the delivery of services, (iii) a diminished need for state funding, and (iv) increased cost savings;] (C) the proposed service or initiative promotes cooperation among participating members that may lead to a reduction in economic or social inequality;
Show all 190 changed rows (150 more)
Previous
Latest
(e) Any board of education awarded a grant for a proposal submitted pursuant to subsection (c) of this section may deposit any cost savings realized as a result of the implementation of the proposed service or initiative into a nonlapsing account pursuant to section 10-248a.
(e) Any board of education awarded a grant for a proposal submitted pursuant to subsection (c) of this section may deposit any cost savings realized as a result of the implementation of the proposed service or Public Act No.
24-132 8 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
5273 initiative into a nonlapsing account pursuant to section 10-248a.
Subsection (a) of section 12-170d of the general statutes is sHB5273 / File No.
Subsection (a) of section 12-170d of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2024):
227 8 sHB5273 File No.
227 repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2024):
[, provided such application shall be made within one year from the close of the calendar year for which the grant is requested.] If the rental quarters are occupied by more than one person, it shall be assumed for the purposes of this section and sections 12-170e and 12-170f, as amended by this act, that each of such persons pays his or her proportionate share of the rental and utility expenses levied thereon and grants shall be calculated on that portion of utility and rent bills paid that are applicable to the person making application for grant under said sections.
[, provided such application shall be made within one year from the close of the calendar year for which the grant is requested.] If the rental quarters are occupied by more than one person, it shall be assumed for the purposes of this section and sections 12-170e and 12-170f, as amended by this act, that each of such persons pays his Public Act No.
24-132 9 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
5273 or her proportionate share of the rental and utility expenses levied thereon and grants shall be calculated on that portion of utility and rent bills paid that are applicable to the person making application for grant under said sections.
(1) (A)Atthecloseofthecalendaryearforwhichagrantisclaimedbesixty- five years of age or over, or his or her spouse who is residing with such renter shall be sixty-five years of age or over, at the close of such year, or be fifty years of age or over and the surviving spouse of a renter who at the time of his or her death had qualified and was entitled to tax relief under this chapter, provided such spouse was domiciled with such renter at the time of his or her death, or (B) at the close of the calendar year for which a grant is claimed be under age sixty-five and eligible in accordance with applicable federal regulations, to receive permanent total disability benefits under Social Security, or if such renter has not sHB5273 / File No.
(1) (A)Atthecloseofthecalendaryearforwhichagrantisclaimedbesixty- five years of age or over, or his or her spouse who is residing with such renter shall be sixty-five years of age or over, at the close of such year, or be fifty years of age or over and the surviving spouse of a renter who at the time of his or her death had qualified and was entitled to tax relief under this chapter, provided such spouse was domiciled with such renter at the time of his or her death, or (B) at the close of the calendar year for which a grant is claimed be under age sixty-five and eligible in accordance with applicable federal regulations, to receive permanent total disability benefits under Social Security, or if such renter has not been engaged in employment covered by Social Security and accordingly hasnot qualifiedfor SocialSecurity benefitsbut has become qualified for permanent total disability benefits under any federal, state orlocalgovernmentretirementordisabilityplan,includingtheRailroad Retirement Act and any government-related teacher's retirement plan, determined by the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management to containrequirementsinrespecttoqualificationforsuchpermanenttotal disability benefits which are comparable to such requirements under Social Security;
227 9 sHB5273 File No.
227 been engaged in employment covered by Social Security and accordingly hasnot qualifiedfor SocialSecurity benefitsbut has become qualified for permanent total disability benefits under any federal, state orlocalgovernmentretirementordisabilityplan,includingtheRailroad Retirement Act and any government-related teacher's retirement plan, determined by the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management to containrequirementsinrespecttoqualificationforsuchpermanenttotal disability benefits which are comparable to such requirements under Social Security;
(3) shall have taxable and nontaxable income, the total of which shall hereinafter be called "qualifying income", during the calendar year preceding the filing of such renter's claim in an amount of not more than twenty thousand dollars, jointly with spouse, if married, and not more than sixteen thousand two hundred dollars if unmarried, provided such maximum amounts of qualifying income shall be subject to adjustment in accordance with subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-170e, and provided the amount of any Medicaid payments made on behalf of the renter or the spouse of the renter shall not constitute income;
(3) shall have taxable and nontaxable income, the total of which shall hereinafter be called "qualifying income", during the Public Act No.
24-132 10 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
5273 calendar year preceding the filing of such renter's claim in an amount of not more than twenty thousand dollars, jointly with spouse, if married, and not more than sixteen thousand two hundred dollars if unmarried, provided such maximum amounts of qualifying income shall be subject to adjustment in accordance with subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 12-170e, and provided the amount of any Medicaid payments made on behalf of the renter or the spouse of the renter shall not constitute income;
Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (4) of this subsection, a renter who receives cash assistance from the Department of Social Services in the calendar year prior to that in which such renter sHB5273 / File No.
Notwithstanding the provisions of subdivision (4) of this subsection, a renter who receives cash assistance from the Department of Social Services in the calendar year prior to that in which such renter files an application for a grant may be entitled to receive such grant provided the amount of the cash assistance received shall be deducted from the amount of such grant and the difference between the amount of the cash assistance and the amount of the grant is equal to or greater than ten dollars.
227 10 sHB5273 File No.
227 files an application for a grant may be entitled to receive such grant provided the amount of the cash assistance received shall be deducted from the amount of such grant and the difference between the amount of the cash assistance and the amount of the grant is equal to or greater than ten dollars.
Sec.
Public Act No.
24-132 11 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
5273 Sec.
The secretary may grant such extension in the case of extenuating circumstance due to illness or incapacitation as evidenced sHB5273 / File No.
The secretary may grant such extension in the case of extenuating circumstance due to illness or incapacitation as evidenced byacertificatesignedby aphysician,physicianassistantoranadvanced practice registered nurse to that extent, or if the secretary determines there is good cause for doing so.] A renter making such application shall present to such assessor or agent, in substantiation of the renter's application, a copy of the renter's federal income tax return, and if not required to file a federal income tax return, such other evidence of qualifying income, receipts for money received, or cancelled checks, or copies thereof, and any other evidence the assessor or such agent may require.
227 11 sHB5273 File No.
When the assessor or agent is satisfied that the applying renter is entitled to a grant, such assessor or agent shall issue a certificate of Public Act No.
227 byacertificatesignedbyaphysician,physicianassistantoranadvanced practice registered nurse to that extent, or if the secretary determines there is good cause for doing so.] A renter making such application shall present to such assessor or agent, in substantiation of the renter's application, a copy of the renter's federal income tax return, and if not required to file a federal income tax return, such other evidence of qualifying income, receipts for money received, or cancelled checks, or copies thereof, and any other evidence the assessor or such agent may require.
24-132 12 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
When the assessor or agent is satisfied that the applying renter is entitled to a grant, such assessor or agent shall issue a certificate of grant in such form as the secretary may prescribe and supply showing the amount of the grant due.
5273 grant in such form as the secretary may prescribe and supply showing the amount of the grant due.
Such list and any supplements thereto shall be approved for payment by the secretary and shall be forwarded by the secretary to the Comptroller, along with a notice of any per cent reduction in claim amounts,andtheComptrollershall,notlaterthanfifteendaysfollowing receipt of such list, draw an order on the Treasurer in favor of each person on such list and on supplements to such list in the amount of such person's claim, minus any per cent reduction noticed by the sHB5273 / File No.
Such list and any supplements thereto shall be approved for payment by the secretary and shall be forwarded by the secretary to the Comptroller, along with a notice of any per cent reduction in claim amounts,andtheComptrollershall,notlaterthanfifteendaysfollowing receipt of such list, draw an order on the Treasurer in favor of each person on such list and on supplements to such list in the amount of such person's claim, minus any per cent reduction noticed by the secretary pursuant to this subsection, and the Treasurer shall pay such amount to such person, not later than fifteen days following receipt of such order.
227 12 sHB5273 File No.
(d) If the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management determines a renter was overpaid for such grant, the amount of any subsequent grant paid to the renter under section 12-170d, as amended by this act, after such determination shall be reduced by the amount of Public Act No.
227 secretary pursuant to this subsection, and the Treasurer shall pay such amount to such person, not later than fifteen days following receipt of such order.
24-132 13 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
(d) If the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management determines a renter was overpaid for such grant, the amount of any subsequent grant paid to the renter under section 12-170d, as amended by this act, after such determination shall be reduced by the amount of overpayment until the overpayment has been recouped.
5273 overpayment until the overpayment has been recouped.
sHB5273 / File No.
Sec.
227 13 sHB5273 File No.
11.
227 Sec.11.Sections8-159aand12-19fofthegeneralstatutesarerepealed.
Section 4-231 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2024):
(Effective July 1, 2024) This act shall take effect as follows and shall amend the following sections:
(a) (1) Each nonstate entity [which] that expends a total amount of state financial assistance equal to or in excess of [three] five hundred Public Act No.
Section 1 from passage 12-94a Sec.
24-132 14 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
2 from passage 12-9 Sec.
5273 thousand dollars in any fiscal year of such nonstate entity beginning on or after July 1, [2009] 2024, shall have either a single audit or a program- specific audit made for such fiscal year, in accordance with the provisions of subdivision (2) or (3) of this subsection, as applicable, and the requirements of regulations adopted pursuant to section 4-236.
3 from passage 7-325(d) Sec.
(2) If the total amount of state financial assistance expended in any such fiscal year is for a single program, such nonstate entity may elect to have a program-specific audit made in lieu of a single audit, provided [a] no grant agreement or [a] statutory or regulatory provision governing the program of state financial assistance [does not require] requires a financial statement audit of such nonstate entity.
4 from passage New section Sec.
(3) If the total amount of state financial assistance expended in any such fiscal year is for more than one program, such entity shall have a single audit made for such fiscal year.
5 July 1, 2024, and 12-62c(a)(1) applicable to assessment years commencing on or after October 1, 2024 Sec.
(b) Notwithstanding any provision of the general statutes or any regulation adopted under any provision of the general statutes, each nonstate entity that expends total state financial assistance of less than [three] five hundred thousand dollars in any fiscal year of such nonstate entity beginning on or after July 1, [2009] 2024, shall be exempt with respect to such fiscal year from complying with any statutory or regulatory requirements concerning financial or financial and compliance audits that would otherwise [be applicable] apply to such nonstate entity.
6 July 1, 2024 8-23(a) Sec.
(c) No provision of this section shall be deemed to exempt a nonstate entity from complying with any statutory or regulatory provision requiring [the] such nonstate entity to (1) maintain records concerning state financial assistance, or (2) provide access to such records to a state agency.
7 July 1, 2024 4-124s Sec.
Sec.
8 July 1, 2024 12-170d(a) Sec.
12.
9 July 1, 2024 12-170f Sec.
Section 4-232 of the general statutes is repealed and the Public Act No.
10 July 1, 2024 19a-200(c) Sec.
24-132 15 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
11 July 1, 2024 Repealer section Statement of Legislative Commissioners:
5273 following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2024):
In section 7(f)(2), "local" was changed to "municipal" for consistency.
(a) Each nonstate entity [which] that is required to be audited pursuant to sections 4-230 to 4-236, inclusive, shall designate an independent auditor to conduct such audit.
PD Joint Favorable Subst.
Not later than thirty days before the end of the fiscal period for which the audit is required, the nonstate entity shall file the name of such auditor with the cognizant agency designated pursuant to section 4-235.
sHB5273 / File No.
If a nonstate entity fails to make such filing, the cognizant agency may designate an independent auditor to conduct the audit.
227 14 sHB5273 File No.
A nonstate entity shall be responsible for paying the costs of any audit conducted by an independent auditor designated by a cognizant agency.
227 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
(b) (1) Upon the completion of [the] an audit [,] pursuant to sections 4-230 to 4-236, inclusive, [the] each nonstate entity shall file a copy ofthe audit report with the cognizant agency designated pursuant to section 4-235 and, if applicable, state grantor agencies and pass-through entities.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Once filed, such report shall be made available by the nonstate entity for public inspection.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
Copies of the report shall be filed not later than thirty days after completion of such report, if possible, but not later than six months after the end of the audit period.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
The cognizant agency may grant an extension of not more than thirty days, if the auditor conducting the audit and the chief executive officer of the nonstate entity jointly submit a request in writing to the cognizant agency that includes the reasons for such extension and an estimate of the time needed for completion of such audit, [at least] not less than thirty days prior to the end of such six-month period.
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ Policy & Mgmt., Off.
If the reason for the extension relates to deficiencies in the accounting system of the nonstate entity, the request shall be accompanied by a corrective action plan.
GF - Potential Up to 1,400 Up to 1,400 Revenue Gain Policy & Mgmt., Off.
The auditor or chief executive officer shall promptly provide any additional information the cognizant agency may require.
GF - Potential Minimal Minimal Savings Note:
Before determining whether to grant an extension request, the cognizant agency may require the auditor and officials of the nonstate entity to meet with Public Act No.
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
24-132 16 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
Municipalities Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ Various Municipalities Potential Minimal Minimal Revenue Gain Special Districts Potential Minimal Minimal Cost Local and Regional School Potential See Below See Below Districts Revenue Gain Explanation The bill makes various changes to municipalities and programs administered by the Office of Policy and Management (OPM) described below.
5273 representatives of the cognizant agency.
The bill requires special service districts to submit annual mill rate and tax levy information to OPM and subjects them to a $100 fine for failing to meet this requirement.
No extension granted pursuant to this subdivision shall extend beyond twelve months after the last day of the fiscal year to which such audit applies.
This results in a potential minimal cost to the special service districts and corresponding revenue gain to OPM.
(2)Anynonstateentity,or theauditorofsuch nonstateentity, [which] that failsto have [the]anaudit report filedonitsbehalf [within]not later thansixmonthsaftertheendofthefiscalyearorwithinthetimegranted by the cognizant agency, may be assessed [,] by the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management [,] a civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars [but not more than] and not to exceed ten thousand dollars.
sHB5273 / File No.
In addition to, or in lieu of such penalty, the cognizant agency may assign an auditor to perform [the] an audit of such nonstate entity.
227 15 sHB5273 File No.
In such case, [the] such nonstate entity shall be responsible for paying the costs related to [the] such audit.
227 As of 2021, there were 14 special service districts.
The secretary may, upon receipt of a written request from an official of the nonstate entity or its auditor, waive all such penalties if the secretary determines that there [appears to be] is reasonable cause for the entity not having completed or provided [the] a required audit report.
If each of these failed to report the information to OPM, it would result in a revenue gain of $1,400 to OPM beginning in FY 25.
Sec.
The bill eliminates a requirement for municipalities to submit a letter with certain funding applications if the municipality fails to update its plan of conservation and development.
13.
Beginning in FY 25 only applications that are for discretionary funding of greater than $25,000 must include this letter.
Section 7-576a of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2024):
Failure to submit this letter results in disqualification from discretionary funding.
[(a) Any] The Municipal Finance Advisory Commission may designate any municipality referred to said commission pursuant to subsection (d) of section 7-395 [to the Municipal Finance Advisory Commission shall be designated] as a tier I municipality.
This results in a potential revenue gain to municipalities beginning in FY 25 to the extent less municipalities are disqualified from discretionary funding.
The chief elected official of any municipality that does not meet the conditions identified under subsection (d) of section 7-395 may apply to the Municipal Finance Advisory Commission for designation as a tier I municipality, provided such official (1) expects that such municipality will meet one or more such conditions in the following twenty-four month period, and (2) submits a report to the Municipal Finance Advisory Commission, in a form and manner prescribed by the commission, that confirms that such condition or conditions will be met Public Act No.
There is also a potential grand list shift in out years.
24-132 17 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
This is associated with a reduction from 25% to 20% in the minimum revaluation phase- in for revaluation increases.
5273 in such period.
This aligns with current law that allows municipalities to phase-in the revaluation over five years.
Each decision to designate a municipality as a tier I municipality pursuant to this section shall be based on an evaluation of such municipality's financial condition and financial practices.
The bill also expands eligible purposes for which OPM can award regional performance incentive program (RPIP) grants.
In addition to the requirements of section 7-394b, each municipality designated as a tier I municipality shall prepare and present a five-year financial plan to the Municipal Finance Advisory Commission for its review and approval.
This results in a potential revenue gain to Regional Education Service Centers (RECS) and Councils of Government beginning in FY 25 to the extent additional grants are awarded.
[(b) The secretary shall refer any municipality designated as a tier I municipality to the Municipal Finance Advisory Commission, pursuant to the provisions of section 7-395.
The bill shortens the application period for the Renters Rebate program by one day and eliminates the extension period for renters possessing a physician's or advanced practice registered nurse's certificate.
In addition to the requirements of section 7-394b, such municipality shall prepare and present a five-year financial plan to the Municipal Finance Advisory Commission for its review and approval.] Sec.
This may result in potential savings for the Office of Policy and Management beginning in FY 25 as they could see less applicants due to the deadline adjustments.
14.
The bill makes various other changes including eliminating obsolete grant programs that do not result in a fiscal impact.
Section 7-576f of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2024):
1These special service districts are located in the following municipalities:
(a) (1) A municipality designated as a tier I municipality in accordance with section 7-576a, as amended by this act, shall retain such designation, notwithstanding any positive changes in the factors leading to its current designation, until the Municipal Finance Advisory Commission, by unanimous vote, terminates such designation based on an evaluation of such municipality's financial condition and financial practices.
Bridgeport, Danbury, Hartford, Manchester, Middletown, New Britain, New Haven, New London, Stamford, and West Hartford.
[(a)] (2) A municipality designated as a [tier I municipality in accordance with section 7-576a,] tier II municipality in accordance with section 7-576b, tier III municipality in accordance with section 7-576c, or tier IV municipality in accordance with section 7-576e, as amended by this act, shall retain such designation, notwithstanding any positive changes in the factors leading to its current designation, until, in the fiscal years following such designation, [(1)] the Municipal Accountability Review Board determines that (A) there have been no Public Act No.
sHB5273 / File No.
24-132 18 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
227 16 sHB5273 File No.
5273 audited operating deficits in the general fund of the municipality for two consecutive fiscal years, [(2)] (B) the [municipality's] municipality has a long-term bond rating from one or more bond rating agencies that is investment grade or higher and such bond rating has either improved or remained unchanged since its most current designation, [(3)] (C) the municipality has presented and the [commission or] board has approved a financial plan that projects a positive fund balance for the three succeeding consecutive fiscalyearscoveredby suchfinancialplan, [where] provided (i) each fiscal year of such plan is based upon recurring revenue and expenses, (ii) a positive fund balance of at least five per cent is projected in the third such fiscal year, [and (4)] and (iii) such plan does not include funding received pursuant to section 7-576i, as amended by this act, or 7-576j, (D) the municipality's audits for such consecutive fiscal years have been completed and [contain no general fund deficit] the General Fund reports an audited fund balance of at least five per cent, and (E) there is no evidence that the municipality has engaged in unsound or irregular financial practices in relation to commonly accepted standards in municipal finance.
227 The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation, fines, and grants awarded.
The board may undertake the determination described in this subdivision at its discretion or upon the request of a municipality.
sHB5273 / File No.
(b) [Notwithstanding subsection (a) of this section, the Municipal Finance Advisory Commission may, by unanimous vote, end the designation of a municipality designated as a tier I municipality, based on an evaluation of such municipality's financial condition.] (1) If the Municipal Accountability Review Board determines that a municipality has satisfied the criteria listed in subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of this section, the secretary shall, at the secretary's discretion and in consideration of the fiscal condition of the municipality and best interests of the state, terminate such municipality's tier designation or redesignate such municipality to a lower tier, provided no such municipalityshallberedesignatedasatierImunicipality.Notlaterthan sixty days after the board makes such determination, the secretary shall Public Act No.
227 17 sHB5273 File No.
24-132 19 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
227 OLR Bill Analysis sHB 5273 AN ACT CONCERNING THE RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE INTERGOVERNMENTAL POLICY AND PLANNING DIVISION WITHIN THE OFFICE OF POLICY AND MANAGEMENT.
5273 notify the municipality of the secretary's decision to terminate such municipality's tier designation or redesignate such municipality to a lower tier.
SUMMARY This bill:
A municipality shall retain its existing tier designation until such notice is received.
1.
If the secretary fails to provide such notice prior to the expiration of said sixty-day period, the municipality's tier designation shall be deemed terminated on the sixty-first day following such determination.
makes various changes to the regional performance incentive program (RPIP), including its application requirements and selection criteria (§ 7);
(2) A municipality redesignated to a lower tier pursuant to subdivision (1) of this subsection shall (A) meet the requirements of this chapter pertaining to such lower tier, and (B) not request a determination from the Municipal Accountability Review Board pursuant to subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of this section during the one-year period following such redesignation.
2.
Sec.
changes the rental rebate program’s deadlines for filing and processing applications and eliminates the ability to apply to the Office of Policy and Management (OPM) for an extension (§§ 8 & 9);
15.
3.
Section 7-576i of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2024):
reduces, from 25% to 20%, the minimum revaluation phase-in factor for municipalities opting to phase in a portion of a revaluation increase, which allows them to phase-in up to 80%, rather than 75%, over a maximum of five assessment years;
(a) Any designated tier II, III, or IV municipality shall be eligible to receive funding from the Municipal Restructuring Fund, which fund shall be nonlapsing.
and 4.
A designated tier II, III or IV municipality seeking such funds shall submit, for approval by the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management, a plan detailing its overall restructuring plan, including local actions to be taken and its proposed use of such funds.
limits the discretionary state funding applications to which municipalities must attach a letter if they have not updated their local plans of conservation and development (C&D) (§ 6).
Notwithstanding section 10-262j, a municipality may, as part of such plan and in consultation with its local board of education, submit a proposed reduction in the minimum budget requirement related to its education budget.
The bill also makes the following changes to conform to current OPM practice:
The secretary shall consult with the Commissioner of Education in approving or rejecting such proposed reduction.
1.
The secretary shall consult with the [municipal accountability review board] Municipal Accountability Review Board in making distribution decisions and attaching appropriate conditions thereto, including the timing of any such distributions and whether such funds shall be distributed in the form of a municipal restructuring fund loan subject to Public Act No.
shifts, from municipal tax collectors to assessors, the requirement to certify to OPM the revenue loss associated with the property tax exemption for totally disabled homeowners (§ 1) and sHB5273 / File No.
24-132 20 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
227 18 sHB5273 File No.
5273 repayment by the municipality.
227 2.
The distribution of such assistance funds shall be based on the relative fiscal needs of the requesting municipalities.
requires the annual statements municipal and special taxing district tax collectors provide to OPM on their mill rate and tax levy to be based on data for the ensuing, rather than preceding, fiscal year, beginning with the FY 25 statements (§§ 2 & 3).
The secretary may approve all, none or a portion of the funds requested by a municipality.
It also extends this annual mill rate and tax levy reporting requirement to municipal special services districts and subjects them to the same $100 fine for failing to file a true and correct statement that applies to special taxing districts under existing law (§ 4).
In attaching conditions to such funding, the secretary shall consider the impact of such conditions on the ability of a municipality to meet legal and other obligations.
Lastly, the bill eliminates an obsolete (1) state grant program designed to provide formula grants to municipalities to address urban problems and (2) provision on allocating payment in lieu of taxes grants for the Torrington courthouse (§§ 10 & 11).
The board shall monitor and report to the secretary on the use of such funds and adherence to the conditions attached thereto.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
The secretary shall develop and issue guidance on the (1) administration of the [municipal restructuring fund] Municipal Restructuring Fund, (2) criteria for participation by municipalities and requirements for plan submission, and (3) prioritization for the awarding of assistance funds pursuant to thissection.Any municipalitythatreceivesfundingfromthe [municipal restructuring fund] Municipal Restructuring Fund, in addition to the other responsibilities and authority given to the board with respect to designated tiers II, III and IV municipalities, shall be required to receive board approval of its annual budgets.
July 1, 2024, except that the provisions on annual mill rate and tax levy reporting to OPM are effective upon passage and the revaluation phase-in provisions are applicable to assessment years beginning on or after October 1, 2024.
(b) The secretary may distribute funds from the Municipal Restructuring Fund to a third party on behalf of a designated tier II, tier III or tier IV municipality.
§ 7 — RPIP Eligible Purposes The bill expands the eligible purposes for which OPM may award RPIP grants to include services that two or more participating municipalities or boards of education can provide on a regional and ongoing basis, rather than services that one or more of these entities currently provide but not on a regional basis.
Funds received by a municipality pursuant to this section may be used, in part, to pay an arbitrator selected pursuant to clause (v) of subdivision (3) of subsection (a) of section 7-576e, as amended by this act.
By law, eligibility for RPIP grants is limited to councils of governments (COG) and regional educational services centers (RESC).
[(b)] (c) Notwithstanding the provisions of subsection (a) of this section, in making distributions from the Municipal Restructuring Fund, the board shall give immediate consideration to any municipality that shall default on debt obligations by January 1, 2018, without an immediate distribution of such funds.
As under existing law, OPM may also award the grants for (1) redistributing specified state grants to municipalities according to regional priorities, (2) regional revenue sharing among municipalities that have entered certain agreements to do so, and (3) qualifying regional special education initiatives.
Sec.
Application Requirements By law, applicants must include certain information about the sHB5273 / File No.
16.
227 19 sHB5273 File No.
Subdivision (2) of subsection (a) of section 7-576e of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2024):
227 proposal and its projected benefits and implementation plan as part of their RPIP applications.
Public Act No.
The bill makes the following changes to this required information:
24-132 21 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
1.
5273 (2) The Municipal Accountability Review Board may designate a tier III municipality as a tier IV municipality basedonafinding by theboard that the fiscal condition of such municipality warrants such a designation based upon an evaluation of the following criteria:
requires applicants to include an estimate of the proposal’s anticipated savings or costs that will be avoided during the grant award period and in future fiscal years, rather than the amount by which participating municipalities will reduce their mill rates as a result of these savings;
(A) The balance in the municipal reserve fund;
2.
(B) the short and long-term liabilities of the municipality, including, but not limited to, the municipality's ability to meet minimum funding levels required by law, contract or court order;
requires that the implementation plan for the proposed regional service or initiative address any potential growth or reduction in participation rates during the grant award period;
(C) the initial budgeted revenue for the municipality for the past five fiscal years as compared to the actual revenue received by the municipality for such fiscal years;
and 3.
(D) budget projections for the following five fiscal years;
specifiesthatitincludeacopyofanacknowledgment,ratherthan an acknowledgment itself, from any employer organization (e.g., labor union) potentially impacted by the proposal that it was informed and consulted about it.
(E) the economic outlook for the municipality;
By law, the proposal must also include a resolution endorsing the proposalfromtheCOG’sorRESC’sgoverningbody.Undercurrentlaw, this resolution must state that the entity will fund at least 25% of the proposal’s first year costs and all of its costs by the fourth year.
[and] (F) the municipality's access to capital markets;
The bill instead requires that the resolution affirm that the entity will fund an increasing proportion of the proposal’s costs during the grant award period, including 50% of the proposal’s costs by the end of the period and all of its costs afterwards.
and (G) evidence of unsound or irregular financial practices in relation to commonly accepted standards in municipal finance that the board believes may materially affect the municipality's financial condition.
Selection Criteria Current law requires the OPM secretary to award grants to proposals that he determines best meet specified criteria, including that the project demonstrate, compared to existing service delivery, increased capacity and efficiency, a cost benefit to members, increased cost savings, and a diminished need for state funding.
For the purpose of determining whether to make a finding pursuant to this subdivision, the membership of the board shall additionally include the chief elected official of such municipality, the treasurer of such municipality and a member of the legislative body of such municipality, as selected by such body.
The bill instead requires that the secretaryawardgrantstoproposalsthatbestreducemunicipalandstate costs, enhance service delivery capacity, or improve the level of service provided compared to having it delivered at the local level.
In conducting a vote on any such determination, the treasurer of such municipality shall be a non-voting member of the board.
sHB5273 / File No.
The board shall submit such finding and recommended designation to the secretary, who shall provide for a thirty-day notice and public comment period related to such finding and recommendation.
227 20 sHB5273 File No.
Following the public notice and comment period, the secretary shall forward the board's finding and recommended designationandareportregardingthecommentsreceivedinthisregard to the Governor.
227 It also makes a conforming change by eliminating the criteria that the proposal include a statement that the applicant will fund at least 25% of the proposal’s first year costs and all its costs by the fourth year.
Following the receipt of such documentation from the secretary, the Governor may approve or disapprove the board's recommended designation.
Required Report to the Legislature The bill requires the OPM secretary, in his annual report to the legislatureonRPIP,todescribethelocalorstatecostsavings,ratherthan property tax reductions, achieved by the program.
Sec.
§§ 8 & 9 — RENTAL REBATE PROGRAM The bill advances the application deadline for the rental rebate program by one day, from October 1 to September 30, and eliminates the ability to apply to OPM for an extension by November 15 of the claim year.
17.
Under current law, the OPM secretary can grant an extension (1) for good cause or (2) if the applicant provides a certificate (signed by a qualifying medical professional) that he or she was ill or incapacitated because of extenuating circumstances.
Section 7-393 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2024):
By law, unchanged by the bill, local officials must forward rental rebate applications to the OPM secretary by the end of the month following the month in which the renter applied.
Public Act No.
By advancing the application deadline to September 30, the bill also pushes up the deadline for towns to forward applications to OPM from November 30 to October 31.
24-132 22 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
The bill correspondingly pushes back, from October 15 to November 15, the date by which OPM must make a list of approved applications and forward them to the comptroller for payment.
5273 Upon the completion of an audit, the independent auditor shall file certified copies of the audit report with (1) the appointing authority, (2) in the case of a town, city or borough, with the clerk of such town, city or borough, (3) in the case of a regional school district, with the clerks of the towns, cities or boroughs in which such regional school district is located and with the board of education, (4) in the case of an audited agency, with the clerks of the towns, cities or boroughs in which such audited agency is located, and (5) in each case, with the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management.
By law, unchanged by the bill, the comptroller must draw an order on the state treasurer within 15 days after receiving the list of approved payments from OPM.
Such copies shall be filed within six months from the end of the fiscal year of the municipality, regional school district or audited agency, but the secretary may grant an extension of not more than thirty days, provided the auditor making the audit and the chief executive officer of the municipality, regional school district or audited agency shall jointly submit a request in writing to the secretary stating the reasons for such extension at least thirty days prior to the end of such six-month period.
Lastly, the bill makes a conforming change by eliminating a requirement that renters apply for the rebate within a year after theyear for which they are requesting the grant.
If the reason for the extension relates to deficiencies in the accounting system of the municipality, regional school district or audited agency the request must be accompanied by a corrective action plan.
§ 5 — REVALUATION PHASE-INS Connecticut law allows municipalities to phase-in post-revaluation sHB5273 / File No.
The secretary may, after a hearing with the auditor and officials of the municipality, regional school district or audited agency, grant an additional extension if conditions warrant, provided such extension shall not exceed six months from the date the auditor was required to file such copies.
227 21 sHB5273 File No.
Said auditor shall preserve all of his or her working papers employed in the preparation of any such audit until the expiration of [three] five years from the date of filing a certified copy of the audit with the secretary and such working papers shall be available, upon written request and upon reasonable notice from the secretary, during such time for inspection by the secretary or his authorized representative, at the office or place of business of the auditor, during usual business hours.
227 assessmentincreasesinpropertyvaluesoveraperiodof uptofiveyears.
Any municipality, regional school district, audited agency or auditor who fails to have the audit report filed on its behalf within six months from theendofthefiscalyearorwithinthetimegrantedbythesecretaryshall Public Act No.
When a revaluation is phased-in, the real property assessment represents less than 70% of the property’s revalued fair market value for each year of a phase-in term.
24-132 23 of 24 Substitute House Bill No.
Phase-ins give taxpayers time to adjust to assessment increases after a revaluation.
5273 be referred by the secretary to the Municipal Finance Advisory Commission established pursuant to section 7-394b, assessed a civil penalty of not less than one thousand dollars but not more than [ten] fifty thousand dollars or both, except that the secretary may waive such penalties if, in the secretary's opinion, there appears to be reasonable cause for not having completed or provided the required audit report, provided an official of the municipality, regional school district or audited agency or theauditor submitsa writtenrequest for such waiver.
Existing law gives municipalities four options for phasing-in revaluations, including one option that phases-in just a portion of the increase in values or the overall rate at which they increased.
The secretary may impose any civil penalty assessed pursuant to this sectionagainst a municipality,regionalschooldistrict or auditedagency in the form of a reduction in the amount of one or more grants awarded by the secretary, including, but not limited to, any grant payable pursuant to section 12-18b.
Under current law, if a municipality chooses this option, it may phase-in no more than 75% of either increase.
Sec.18.Sections8-159a and12-19fofthegeneralstatutesarerepealed.
The amount or portion the town phases-in is called the “phase-in factor,” and the town must uniformly apply it to all types of property.
(Effective July 1, 2024) Approved June 5, 2024 Public Act No.
The bill reduces the minimum phase-in factor from 25% to 20%, which in turn allows municipalities to phase-in up to 80%, rather than 75%, of either increase over a maximum of five assessment years.
24-132 24 of 24
In practice, OPM applies this factor to all revaluation phase-ins, regardless of whether they phase in all or part of the revaluation increase.
Based on this current practice, municipalities may only phase- in revaluation increases for up to four years with a minimum phase-in factor of 25% per year.
So, reducing the phase-in factor from 25% to 20% allows towns to phase-in a revaluation for up to five years.
The law, however, already allows towns to phase-in revaluation increases for up to five years.
§ 6 — DISCRETIONARY STATE FUNDING APPLICATIONS Under current law, any municipality that fails to update its plan of C&D every 10 years must (1) submit a letter to specified state officials explaining why it was not amended and (2) include a copy of this letter in each application for discretionary funding it submits to any state agency.
The bill limits the funding applications for which municipalities must attach this letter to those that exceed $25,000.
By law, unchanged by the bill, municipalities that fail to update their plans of C&D or submit the letter described above are disqualified from sHB5273 / File No.
227 22 sHB5273 File No.
227 receivingdiscretionarystatefundsunlesstheOPMsecretarywaivesthis provision.
COMMITTEE ACTION Planning and Development Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 19 Nay 2 (03/15/2024) sHB5273 / File No.
227 23
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. SIGNED BY GOVERNOR

  2. TRANSMITTED BY SECRETARY OF THE STATE TO GOVERNOR

  3. TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATE

  4. PUBLIC ACT 24-132

  5. ON CONSENT CALENDAR /IN CONCURRENCE

  6. SEN. PASSED, HO. AMEND. SCH. A

  7. SEN. ADOPTED HO. AMEND. SCH. A

  8. RULES SUSPENDED

  9. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 476

  10. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  11. TRANSMITTED PURSUANT TO JOINT RULE 17

  12. HOUSE PASSED, HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  13. HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  14. FILE NO. 227

  15. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 168

  16. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  17. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  18. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/02/24

  19. FILED WITH LCO

  20. Joint Favorable Substitute

  21. PUBLIC HEARING 0228

  22. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Planning and Development

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on

Sponsors (5)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Senate Roll Call Vote

Passed 36 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 23000
Unaffiliated 3000
Republican 10000
Total 36000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (36)
Member Party Vote
Kevin C. Kelly — Yea
Lisa Seminara — Yea
Marilyn Moore — Yea
Bob Duff Democratic Yea
Catherine A. Osten Democratic Yea
Ceci Maher Democratic Yea
Christine Cohen Democratic Yea
Derek Slap Democratic Yea
Douglas McCrory Democratic Yea
Gary A. Winfield Democratic Yea
Herron Gaston Democratic Yea
James J. Maroney Democratic Yea
Jan Hochadel Democratic Yea
Joan V. Hartley Democratic Yea
John W. Fonfara Democratic Yea
Jorge Cabrera Democratic Yea
Julie Kushner Democratic Yea
MD Rahman Democratic Yea
Mae Flexer Democratic Yea
Martha Marx Democratic Yea
Martin M. Looney Democratic Yea
Matthew L. Lesser Democratic Yea
Norman Needleman Democratic Yea
Patricia Billie Miller Democratic Yea
Rick Lopes Democratic Yea
Saud Anwar Democratic Yea
Eric C. Berthel Republican Yea
Heather S. Somers Republican Yea
Henri Martin Republican Yea
Jeff Gordon Republican Yea
John A. Kissel Republican Yea
Paul Cicarella Republican Yea
Rob Sampson Republican Yea
Ryan Fazio Republican Yea
Stephen G. Harding Republican Yea
Tony Hwang Republican Yea

Official roll call →

House Roll Call Vote

Passed 150 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 81000
Republican 44000
Unaffiliated 25001
Total 150001
% of votes cast 99%0%0%1%
How each member voted (151)
Member Party Vote
Arnone — Not Voting
Khanna — Yea
Michel — Yea
Conley — Yea
Chaleski — Yea
Currey — Yea
Cheeseman — Yea
D'agostino — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Dancho — Yea
Palm — Yea
Denning — Yea
Porter — Yea
Ferraro — Yea
Cook — Yea
Ryan — Yea
Harrison — Yea
Figueroa — Yea
Hayes — Yea
Labriola — Yea
Tercyak — Yea
Mccarthy Vahey — Yea
Mccarty, K. — Yea
Morrin Bello — Yea
Sanchez, J. — Yea
Sanchez, R. — Yea
Aimee Berger-Girvalo Democratic Yea
Alphonse Paolillo Democratic Yea
Andre F. Baker Democratic Yea
Anne M. Hughes Democratic Yea
Anthony L. Nolan Democratic Yea
Antonio Felipe Democratic Yea
Aundre Bumgardner Democratic Yea
Bob Godfrey Democratic Yea
Bobby G. Gibson Democratic Yea
Brandon Chafee Democratic Yea
Christopher Poulos Democratic Yea
Christopher Rosario Democratic Yea
Corey P. Paris Democratic Yea
Derell Wilson Democratic Yea
Dominique Johnson Democratic Yea
Eleni Kavros DeGraw Democratic Yea
Emmanuel Sanchez Democratic Yea
Farley Santos Democratic Yea
Frank Smith Democratic Yea
Fred Gee Democratic Yea
Gary A. Turco Democratic Yea
Geoff Luxenberg Democratic Yea
Geraldo C. Reyes Democratic Yea
Gregory Haddad Democratic Yea
Hector Arzeno Democratic Yea
Henry J. Genga Democratic Yea
Hilda E. Santiago Democratic Yea
Hubert D. Delany Democratic Yea
Jaime S. Foster Democratic Yea
Jane M. Garibay Democratic Yea
Jason Doucette Democratic Yea
Jason Rojas Democratic Yea
Jennifer Leeper Democratic Yea
Jill Barry Democratic Yea
Jillian Gilchrest Democratic Yea
John-Michael Parker Democratic Yea
Jonathan Fazzino Democratic Yea
Jonathan Steinberg Democratic Yea
Joseph P. Gresko Democratic Yea
Josh Elliott Democratic Yea
Joshua M. Hall Democratic Yea
Juan R. Candelaria Democratic Yea
Julio A. Concepcion Democratic Yea
Kadeem Roberts Democratic Yea
Kai J. Belton Democratic Yea
Kara Rochelle Democratic Yea
Kate Farrar Democratic Yea
Kerry S. Wood Democratic Yea
Kevin Brown Democratic Yea
Larry B. Butler Democratic Yea
Liz Linehan Democratic Yea
Lucy Dathan Democratic Yea
Marcus Brown Democratic Yea
Maria P. Horn Democratic Yea
Mary Fortier Democratic Yea
Mary M. Mushinsky Democratic Yea
Mary Welander Democratic Yea
Maryam Khan Democratic Yea
Matt Blumenthal Democratic Yea
Matthew Ritter Democratic Yea
Melissa Osborne Democratic Yea
Michael D. Quinn Democratic Yea
Michael DiGiovancarlo Democratic Yea
Mike Demicco Democratic Yea
Minnie Gonzalez Democratic Yea
Moira Rader Democratic Yea
Patricia A. Dillon Democratic Yea
Patrick S. Boyd Democratic Yea
Raghib Allie-Brennan Democratic Yea
Robin E. Comey Democratic Yea
Roland J. Lemar Democratic Yea
Ronald A. Napoli Democratic Yea
Sarah Keitt Democratic Yea
Stephen R. Meskers Democratic Yea
Steven J. Stafstrom Democratic Yea
Susan M. Johnson Democratic Yea
Tammy R. Exum Democratic Yea
Toni E. Walker Democratic Yea
Travis Simms Democratic Yea
Trenee McGee Democratic Yea
William Heffernan Democratic Yea
Anne Dauphinais Republican Yea
Ben McGorty Republican Yea
Bill Buckbee Republican Yea
Brian Lanoue Republican Yea
Cara Christine Pavalock-D'Amato Republican Yea
Carol Hall Republican Yea
Chris Aniskovich Republican Yea
Christie M. Carpino Republican Yea
Craig C. Fishbein Republican Yea
Dave W. Yaccarino Republican Yea
David Rutigliano Republican Yea
Devin R. Carney Republican Yea
Donna Veach Republican Yea
Doug Dubitsky Republican Yea
Gale L. Mastrofrancesco Republican Yea
Greg S. Howard Republican Yea
Irene M. Haines Republican Yea
Jason Perillo Republican Yea
Jay M. Case Republican Yea
Joe Hoxha Republican Yea
Joe Polletta Republican Yea
John E. Piscopo Republican Yea
Joseph H. Zullo Republican Yea
Karen Reddington-Hughes Republican Yea
Kathy Kennedy Republican Yea
Kurt Vail Republican Yea
Lezlye Zupkus Republican Yea
Mark DeCaprio Republican Yea
Mark W. Anderson Republican Yea
Martin Foncello Republican Yea
Mitch Bolinsky Republican Yea
Nicole Klarides-Ditria Republican Yea
Patrick E. Callahan Republican Yea
Seth Bronko Republican Yea
Steve Weir Republican Yea
Tami Zawistowski Republican Yea
Tammy Nuccio Republican Yea
Tim Ackert Republican Yea
Tom Delnicki Republican Yea
Tom O'Dea Republican Yea
Tony J. Scott Republican Yea
Tracy Marra Republican Yea
Vincent J. Candelora Republican Yea
William Pizzuto Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 5273?
HB 5273 is sponsored by Lisa Seminara, Travis Simms (Democratic), David Michel, Tom Delnicki (Republican), and Martin Foncello (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 5273?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 22, 2024. Enacted.
Where can I track HB 5273?
Track HB 5273 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5273

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 5273

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →