Connecticut 2024 Regular Session Status: In Committee 2 R cosponsors

HB 5216 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE SAFETY CAPACITY AT GARDNER LAKE STATE PARK.

Last action — REF. BY HOUSE TO COMMITTEE ON Appropriations

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

96 added · 14 removed

96 line(s) added, 14 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly Raised Bill No.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
5216 February Session, 2024 LCO No.
82 February Session, 2024 House Bill No.
1102 Referred to Committee on ENVIRONMENT Introduced by:
5216 House of Representatives, March 21, 2024 The Committee on Environment reported through REP.
(ENV) AN ACT CONCERNING THE SAFETY CAPACITY AT GARDNER LAKE STATE PARK.
GRESKO of the 121st Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE SAFETY CAPACITY AT GARDNER LAKE STATE PARK.
(5) the pedestrian and vehicular traffic on any state highway without a sidewalk that leads to said state park that threatens, or is reasonably likely to threaten,publicsafety by pedestrians walking onthesideofthe highway or by impeding the travel of emergency vehicles because of the high volume of vehicles parked or moving on the highway;
(5) the pedestrian and vehicular traffic on any state highway without a sidewalk that leads to said state park that threatens, or is reasonably likely to threaten,public safety by pedestrians walking onthesideofthe highway or by impeding the travel of emergency vehicles because of the high volume of vehicles parked or moving on the highway;
and (6) the authority of the commissioner to utilize the number of vehicles entering LCO 1102 \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2024HB-05216-R011 of 2 HB.docx Bill No.
and (6) the HB5216 / File No.
5216 said state park as a proxy for the number of visitors at said state park.
82 1 HB5216 File No.
82 authority of the commissioner to utilize the number of vehicles entering said state park as a proxy for the number of visitors at said state park.
Section 1 from passage New section ENV Joint Favorable LCO 1102 {\\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2024HB-05216- 2 of 2 R01-HB.docx }
Section 1 from passage New section ENV Joint Favorable HB5216 / File No.
82 2 HB5216 File No.
82 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 25 $ FY 26 $ Department of Energy and GF - Potential 356,000 13,000 Environmental Protection Cost State Comptroller - Fringe GF - Potential 5,000 5,000 Benefits Cost Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill results in a potential cost to the state of approximately $361,000 in FY 25 and $18,000 annually thereafter associated with managing pedestrian entry to Gardner State Park.
The bill allows the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) to close the park to all new entrants once capacity is reached.
Currently, when the park is at capacity, DEEP prevents additionalvehiclesfromenteringbutlackssufficientresourcesandtools to prevent further pedestrian entries.
If DEEP chooses to manage pedestrian entries to the park, the department will incur a one-time cost of approximately $320,000 in FY to install fencing that allows limited pedestrian access.
To monitor and enforce a capacity limit, the department may hire a seasonal Environmental Conservation patrol officer at a total cost of $41,000 in The fringe benefit costs for most state employees are budgeted centrally in accounts administered by the Comptroller.
The estimated active employee fringe benefit cost associated with most personnel changes is 41.25% of payroll in FY 25.
HB5216 / File No.
82 3 HB5216 File No.
82 FY 25, consisting of approximately $12,000 for wages, $5,000 for fringe benefits within the Office of the State Comptroller, and $24,000 in other expenses including a vehicle.
The personnel-related expenses would total approximately $18,000 in FY 26 and annually thereafter.
The bill additionally requires DEEP to develop and post a capacity limit and to coordinate traffic control efforts.
These aspects of the bill have no fiscal impact as:
(1) they largely codify current practices;
and (2) the department has sufficient resources to post a capacity limit sign.
The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation.
HB5216 / File No.
82 4 HB5216 File No.
82 OLR Bill Analysis HB 5216 AN ACT CONCERNING THE SAFETY CAPACITY AT GARDNER LAKE STATE PARK.
SUMMARY This bill requires the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) commissioner to develop and publicly post the capacity limit of Gardner Lake State Park (inSalem) by January 31, 2025.
Under the bill, she must use the following factors when determining the capacity limit:
1.
the number of visitors and swimmers that can be supervised safely given the park and lifeguard staffing levels;
2.
Show all 51 changed rows (11 more)
Previous
Latest
the park’s parking and public restroom capacity;
3.
pedestrian and vehicular traffic on any highway without a sidewalk leading to the park that threatens, or is reasonably likely to threaten, pedestrians’ public safety or impede emergency vehicles using the highway due to the high volume of parked or moving vehicles;
and 4.
the commissioner’s authority to use the number of vehicles entering the park as a proxy for the number of park visitors.
The bill also (1) requires the DEEP commissioner to coordinate with municipaland state lawenforcement to implement trafficcontrolefforts to minimize public safety concerns on local roads and state highways outside the park and (2) allows her to close the park to new entrants when it reaches the capacity limit.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
Upon passage HB5216 / File No.
82 5 HB5216 File No.
82 COMMITTEE ACTION Environment Committee Joint Favorable Yea 34 Nay 0 (03/08/2024) HB5216 / File No.
82 6
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. REF. BY HOUSE TO COMMITTEE ON Appropriations

  2. FILE NO. 82

  3. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 85

  4. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  5. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  6. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/20/24

  7. FILED WITH LCO

  8. Joint Favorable

  9. PUBLIC HEARING 0228

  10. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Environment

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

5 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 182 not signed on

Sponsors (5)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (182)

182 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 182 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HB 5216?
HB 5216 is sponsored by Mccarty, K., Kevin Ryan, Holly H. Cheeseman, Irene M. Haines (Republican), and Mark DeCaprio (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 5216?
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 5216?
Track HB 5216 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 5216

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 5216

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →