Florida 2025 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 R cosponsors

SB 496 — Timeshare Management Firms

Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 897 (Ch. 2025-142)

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Timeshare Management Firms; Revising applicability for provisions governing conflicts of interest between community association managers or community association management firms and certain persons with a financial interest in such associations; deleting a provision requiring managing entities that perform community association management to comply with certain provisions related to community association management firms; requiring the board of administration of a timeshare condominium to meet once per year, etc.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

151 added · 147 removed

151 line(s) added, 147 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 496 By Senator McClain 9-00598-25 2025496__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to timeshare management firms;
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 496 By the Committee on Regulated Industries;
and Senator McClain 580-03182-25 2025496c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to timeshare management firms;
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 496 9-00598-25 2025496__ Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 496 580-03182-25 2025496c1 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 496 9-00598-25 2025496__ possession to the community association creates a rebuttable presumption that the community association manager or community association management firm willfully failed to comply with this subsection.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 496 580-03182-25 2025496c1 possession to the community association creates a rebuttable presumption that the community association manager or community association management firm willfully failed to comply with this subsection.
468.4335 Conflicts of interest.— (7) This section does not apply to a community association manager or a community association management firm that manages a timeshare plan governed by chapter 721.
468.4335 Conflicts of interest.— (7) This section does not apply to a community association manager or a community association management firm that manages a timeshare plan governed by chapter 721 and that must provide disclosure under s.
721.13(13)(c)1.
721.13.
721.13 and not by s.
468.4335.
Paragraph (e) of subsection (1) and subsections (4), (10), and (13) of section 721.13, Florida Statutes, are Page 3 of 8 CODING:
Paragraph (e) of subsection (1) and subsections Page 3 of 8 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 496 9-00598-25 2025496__ amended to read:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 496 580-03182-25 2025496c1 (4), (10), and (13) of section 721.13, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
The purchaser who requests the mailing must reimburse the owners’ association in advance for the owners’ association’s actual costs in performing Page 4 of 8 CODING:
The purchaser who requests the mailing must reimburse the owners’ association in Page 4 of 8 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 496 9-00598-25 2025496__ the mailing.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 496 580-03182-25 2025496c1 advance for the owners’ association’s actual costs in performing the mailing.
In the event of such an order, the court may order the managing entity to pay the purchaser’s costs, including attorney’s fees reasonably incurred to enforce the purchaser’s rights, unless the managing entity can prove it refused the mailing in good faith because of a reasonable basis for doubt about the legitimacy of the mailing.
In the event of such an order, the court may order the managing entity to pay the purchaser’s costs, including attorney attorney’s fees reasonably incurred to enforce the purchaser’s rights, unless the managing entity can prove it refused the mailing in good faith because of a reasonable basis for doubt about the legitimacy of the mailing.
(13)(a) Notwithstanding any provisions of chapter 607, chapter 617, or chapter 718, an officer, director, or agent of Page 5 of 8 CODING:
(13)(a) Notwithstanding any provisions of chapter 607, Page 5 of 8 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 496 9-00598-25 2025496__ an owners’ association, including a timeshare management firm and any individual licensed under part VIII of chapter 468 employed by the timeshare management firm, shall discharge its his or her duties in good faith, with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances, and in a manner it he or she reasonably believes to be in the interests of the owners’ association.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 496 580-03182-25 2025496c1 chapter 617, or chapter 718, an officer, a director, or an agent of an owners’ association, including a timeshare management firm and any individual licensed under part VIII of chapter 468 employed by the timeshare management firm, shall discharge its his or her duties in good faith, with the care an ordinarily prudent person in a like position would exercise under similar circumstances, and in a manner it he or she reasonably believes to be in the interests of the owners’ association.
An officer, director, or agent of an owners’ association, including a timeshare management firm and any individual licensed under part VIII of chapter 468 employed by the timeshare management firm, are shall be exempt from liability for monetary damages in the same manner as provided in s.
An officer, a director, or an agent of an owners’ association, including a timeshare management firm and any individual licensed under part VIII of chapter 468 employed by the timeshare management firm, are shall be exempt from liability for monetary damages in the same manner as provided in s.
If a timeshare management firm that is an agent of an owners’ association or an owners’ association provides goods or services through arrangements with a parent, affiliate, or subsidiary of the timeshare management firm, the existence of Page 6 of 8 CODING:
If a timeshare management firm or an owners’ association provides goods or services through a parent, an affiliate, or a subsidiary of a timeshare management firm, the Page 6 of 8 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 496 9-00598-25 2025496__ such arrangements must be disclosed annually to the members of that owners’ association as part of the common expense budgeting process, as an explanatory note to the annual budget, or otherwise.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 496 580-03182-25 2025496c1 fact that a related party provides goods or services must be disclosed annually to the members of that owners’ association as an explanatory note to the annual budget pursuant to subparagraph (3)(c)1.
or in the management contract, or by mail sent to each owner’s notice address, in the notice of an annual or special meeting of the owners, by posting on the website of the applicable timeshare plan, or by any owner communication used by the managing entity.
If a receiver is appointed, the owners’ association shall be responsible as a common expense of the timeshare plan, for payment of the salary and expenses of the receiver, relating to the discharge of her or his duties and obligations as receiver, together with the receiver’s court Page 7 of 8 CODING:
If a receiver is appointed, the Page 7 of 8 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 496 9-00598-25 2025496__ costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 496 580-03182-25 2025496c1 owners’ association shall be responsible as a common expense of the timeshare plan, for payment of the salary and expenses of the receiver, relating to the discharge of her or his duties and obligations as receiver, together with the receiver’s court costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees.
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 897 (Ch. 2025-142)

  2. Substituted CS/HB 897

  3. Read 2nd time

  4. Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/28/25

  5. Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading

  6. Favorable by- Fiscal Policy; YEAS 18 NAYS 0

  7. On Committee agenda-- Fiscal Policy, 04/22/25, 11:00 am, 412 Knott Building

  8. Now in Fiscal Policy

  9. Favorable by Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government; YEAS 12 NAYS 0

  10. On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government, 04/15/25, 12:30 pm, 412 Knott Building

  11. CS by Regulated Industries read 1st time

  12. Now in Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government

  13. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  14. CS by Regulated Industries; YEAS 7 NAYS 0

  15. On Committee agenda-- Regulated Industries, 04/01/25, 4:00 pm, 412 Knott Building

  16. Introduced

  17. Referred to Regulated Industries; Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government; Fiscal Policy

  18. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 162 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (162)

162 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 162 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Favorable

Passed 18 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 5000
Republican 12001
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 18001
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Ingoglia — Yea
Arrington, Kristen Aston Democrat Yea
Bernard, Mack Democrat Yea
Davis, Tracie Democrat Yea
Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" Democrat Yea
Osgood, Rosalind Democrat Yea
Boyd, Jim Republican Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
Calatayud, Alexis Republican Yea
Gaetz, Don Republican Yea
Gruters, Joe Republican Yea
Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" Republican Yea
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea
Simon, Corey Republican Yea
Truenow, Keith L. Republican Yea
Vacant Republican Yea
Yarborough, Clay Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Favorable

Passed 12 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 3000
Republican 7000
Unaffiliated 1000
No Party Affiliation 1000
Total 12000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (12)
Member Party Vote
Collins — Yea
Arrington, Kristen Aston Democrat Yea
Berman, Lori Democrat Yea
Sharief, Barbara Democrat Yea
Pizzo, Jason W. B. No Party Affiliation Yea
Brodeur, Jason Republican Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
DiCeglie, Nick Republican Yea
Grall, Erin Republican Yea
McClain, Stan Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea
Truenow, Keith L. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 1000
Republican 4001
Unaffiliated 1000
No Party Affiliation 1000
Total 7001
% of votes cast 88%0%0%13%
How each member voted (8)
Member Party Vote
Ingoglia — Yea
Bernard, Mack Democrat Yea
Pizzo, Jason W. B. No Party Affiliation Yea
Boyd, Jim Republican Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Burgess, Danny Republican Yea
Calatayud, Alexis Republican Yea
Gruters, Joe Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 496 do?
Timeshare Management Firms; Revising applicability for provisions governing conflicts of interest between community association managers or community association management firms and certain persons with a financial interest in such associations; deleting a provision requiring managing entities that perform community association management to comply with certain provisions related to community association management firms; requiring the board of administration of a timeshare condominium to meet once per year, etc.
Who sponsors SB 496?
SB 496 is sponsored by McClain, Stan (Republican) and Regulated Industries.
What is the current status of SB 496?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 496?
Track SB 496 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 496

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 496

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →