HB 429 — Motor Vehicle Manufacturers and Franchised Motor Vehicle Dealers
Last action — Chapter No. 2025-38
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2025. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Ron DeSantis (Republican) on May 19, 2025.
Odds of enactment
High chanceBased on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a high chance of becoming law.
Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.
A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.
Prognosis
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
6 sponsors
3 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (3 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.
Summary
Motor Vehicle Manufacturers and Franchised Motor Vehicle Dealers; Revises provisions related to relations between applicants and licensees, or common entities thereof, and franchised motor vehicle dealers including prohibitions on certain performance metrics, prohibition on retaliation, and circumstances under which franchise agreements are deemed unfair.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
124 added · 116 removed124 line(s) added, 116 removed.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 429 2025 A bill to be entitled An act relating to motor vehicle manufacturers and franchised motor vehicle dealers;
prohibiting an applicant or a licensee, or a common entity thereof, from establishing,implementing implementing, or enforcing certain criteria for measuring the sales or service performance ofmeasurement itscriteria franchisedwithout providing motor vehicle dealers unlesswith certainthe conditionsbasis arefor met;any sales or service performance measurement;
prohibiting an applicant or a licensee, or a common entity thereof, from engaging in ancertain actionretaliatory thator isdiscriminatory takenconduct; as retaliation against a motor vehicle dealer under certain circumstances;
revising theconditions circumstancesunder in which a discontinuation, cancellation, nonrenewal, modification, or replacementnonrenewal of a franchise agreement is deemedconsidered unfair;
320.61 may be denied, suspended, or revoked within the entire state or at any specific location or locations within the state at which the applicant or licensee engages or proposes to engage in business, upon proof Page 1 of 5 CODING:
hb429-02-c2hb429-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 429 2025 location or locations within the state at which the applicant or licensee engages or proposes to engage in business, upon proof that the section was violated with sufficient frequency to establish a pattern of wrongdoing, and a licensee or applicant shall be liable for claims and remedies provided in ss.
(42)(a) The applicant or licensee, or a common entity thereof, has established, implemented, or enforced criteria for measuring the sales or service performance of any of its franchised motor vehicle dealers in this state which have a material or adverse effect on any motor vehicle dealer and which:
(b) The An applicant or, licensee, or a common entityentity, or an affiliate thereof, has implemented or enforced criteria for measuring the sales or service performance of any of its franchised motor vehicle dealers in this state without, before implementation or enforcement, providing a written description Page 2 of 5 CODING:
hb429-02-c2hb429-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 429 2025 vehicle dealers in this state without first making available and readily accessible, before such implementation or enforcement, a written description to each such franchised,franchised or an affiliate thereof, which enforces against any motor vehicle dealer any such performance measurement criteria shall, upon the request of the motor vehicle dealer, describe in writing to the motor vehicle dealer in this state whichproviding, describes, in detail, how the performance measurement criteria were designed, calculated, established, and uniformly applied.
(43) The applicant or licensee, or a common entity thereof, has engaged in an action, or implemented a policy, standard, rule, practice, or program, taken as retaliation against a franchised motor vehicle dealer because the dealer invoked aany statutory right createdpursuant byto ss.
320.60-320.70,320.60-320.70; asserted that the applicant, licensee, or common entity has acted in a manner that violates a provision of ss.
320.60-320.70,asserted orthat hasthe testified,applicant assisted,or licensee, or participatedcommon inentity anythereof, manneracted in an investigation, a proceeding,manner or a hearing that mayviolates directlyany affectprovision theof applicant,ss. licensee, or common entity.
A320.60-320.70; motor vehicle dealer who can demonstrate that a violation of, or failure to comply with, any of the preceding provisions by an applicant or licensee will or may adversely and pecuniarily affect the complaining dealer, shall be entitled to pursue all of the remedies, procedures, and rights of recovery available Page 3 of 5 CODING:
Wordsor strickentestified, areassisted, deletions;or participated in any manner in an investigation, a proceeding, or a hearing that may directly affect the applicant or licensee, or common entity thereof.
wordsA underlinedmotor arevehicle additions.dealer who can demonstrate that a violation of, or failure to comply with, any of the preceding provisions by an applicant or licensee will or may adversely and pecuniarily affect the complaining dealer, shall be entitled to pursue all of the remedies, procedures, and rights of recovery available under ss.
hb429-02-c2 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 429 2025 under ss.
320.641Page Discontinuations,3 cancellations, nonrenewals, modifications, and replacement of franchise5 agreements.—CODING: (3) Any motor vehicle dealer who receives a notice of intent to discontinue, cancel, not renew, modify, or replace may, within the 90-day notice period, file a petition or complaint for a determination of whether such action is an unfair or prohibited discontinuation, cancellation, nonrenewal, modification, or replacement.
Agreements and certificates of appointment must shall continue in effect until final determination of the issues raised in such petition or complaint by the motor vehicle dealer.
A discontinuation, cancellation, or nonrenewal of a franchise agreement is unfair if it is not clearly permitted by the franchise agreement;
is not undertaken in good faith;
is not undertaken for good cause;
or is not based on a material and substantial an alleged breach of the franchise agreement by the motor vehicle dealer which is not in fact a material and substantial breach;
or, if the grounds relied upon for termination, cancellation, or nonrenewal have not been applied in a uniform and consistent manner by the licensee.
If the notice of discontinuation, cancellation, or nonrenewal relates to an alleged failure of the new motor vehicle dealer's sales or service performance obligations under the franchise Page 4 of 5 CODING:
hb429-02-c2hb429-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 429 2025 agreement,320.641 theDiscontinuations, newcancellations, nonrenewals, modifications, and replacement of franchise agreements.— (3) Any motor vehicle dealer mustwho firstreceives bea providednotice withof atintent leastto 180discontinue, dayscancel, tonot correctrenew, modify, or replace may, within the alleged90-day failurenotice beforeperiod, file a licenseepetition mayor sendcomplaint thefor noticea determination of whether such action is an unfair or prohibited discontinuation, cancellation, nonrenewal, modification, or nonrenewal.replacement.
AAgreements modificationand orcertificates replacementof isappointment unfairshall ifcontinue itin iseffect notuntil clearlyfinal permitteddetermination of the issues raised in such petition or complaint by the franchisemotor agreement;vehicle dealer.
(a) A discontinuation, cancellation, or nonrenewal of a franchise agreement is notunfair undertakenunless inall goodof faith;the following apply:
or1. is not undertaken for good cause.
Theif applicantIt oris licenseenot hasclearly shallpermitted haveby the burdenfranchise ofagreement; proof that such discontinuation, cancellation, nonrenewal, modification, or replacement action is fair and not prohibited.
2.
It is not undertaken in good faith;
3.
It is not undertaken for good cause;
4.
It or is based on the motor vehicle dealer's an alleged breach of the franchise agreement which is not in fact a material and substantial breach, but not if the discontinuation, cancellation, or nonrenewal applies to all same line-make franchised motor vehicle dealers and is otherwise permitted by ss.
320.60-320.70;
and 5.
or, if The grounds relied upon for discontinuation termination, cancellation, or nonrenewal have not been applied Page 4 of 5 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Show all 51 changed lines (11 more)
hb429-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 429 2025 in a uniform and consistent manner by the licensee.
(b) If the notice of discontinuation, cancellation, or nonrenewal relates to an alleged failure of the new motor vehicle dealer's sales or service performance obligations under the franchise agreement, the new motor vehicle dealer must first be provided with at least 180 days to correct the alleged failure before a licensee may send the notice of discontinuation, cancellation, or nonrenewal.
(c) A modification or replacement is unfair unless all of the following apply:
1.
if It is not clearly permitted by the franchise agreement;
2.
It is not undertaken in good faith;
and 3.
It or is not undertaken for good cause.
(d) The applicant or licensee shall have the burden of proof that any such discontinuation, cancellation, nonrenewal, modification, or replacement action is fair and not prohibited.
hb429-02-c2hb429-01-c1
Show all 51 changed rows (11 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- H 429 c1 View text pdf
- H 429 c2 View text pdf
- H 429 er View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 429 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Chapter No. 2025-38
-
Approved by Governor
-
Signed by Officers and presented to Governor
-
Ordered enrolled
-
In Messages
-
CS passed; YEAS 37 NAYS 0
-
Read 3rd time
-
Read 2nd time
-
Substituted for CS/SB 1820
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Withdrawn from Rules
-
Received
-
Referred to Rules
-
In Messages
-
CS passed; YEAS 115, NAYS 0
-
Read 3rd time
-
Added to Third Reading Calendar
-
Placed on 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
Bill added to Special Order Calendar (4/23/2025)
-
Added to Second Reading Calendar
-
Bill referred to House Calendar
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 2)
-
CS Filed
-
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
-
Reported out of Commerce Committee
-
Favorable with CS by Commerce Committee
-
Added to Commerce Committee agenda
-
Now in Commerce Committee
-
Reported out of Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
-
Favorable by Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
-
Added to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee agenda
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
-
Now in Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
-
Referred to Commerce Committee
-
Referred to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
-
CS Filed
-
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
-
Reported out of Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee
-
Favorable with CS by Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee
-
Added to Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee agenda
-
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
-
Now in Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee
-
Referred to Commerce Committee
-
Referred to Civil Justice & Claims Subcommittee
-
Referred to Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Michael Owen · Cosponsor
- Tom Fabricio · Cosponsor
- Daryl Campbell · Cosponsor
- Bradford Troy "Brad" Yeager · Primary
- Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee · Primary
- Commerce Committee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 158 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Yeager, Bradford Troy "Brad" Republican
- Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee
- Commerce Committee
Co-sponsors (3)
- Owen, Michael Republican
- Fabricio, Tom Republican
- Campbell, Daryl Democrat
Not signed on (158)
158 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 158 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Collins | — | Not Voting |
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Bernard, Mack | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharief, Barbara | Democrat | Yea |
| Smith, Carlos Guillermo | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Calatayud, Alexis | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 78 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 33 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 115 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (119)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 429 do?
- Motor Vehicle Manufacturers and Franchised Motor Vehicle Dealers; Revises provisions related to relations between applicants and licensees, or common entities thereof, and franchised motor vehicle dealers including prohibitions on certain performance metrics, prohibition on retaliation, and circumstances under which franchise agreements are deemed unfair.
- Who sponsors HB 429?
- HB 429 is sponsored by Owen, Michael (Republican), Fabricio, Tom (Republican), Campbell, Daryl (Democrat), Yeager, Bradford Troy "Brad" (Republican), Industries & Professional Activities Subcommittee, and Commerce Committee.
- What is the current status of HB 429?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 05, 2025. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 429?
- Track HB 429 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 429
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 429
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →