Jai Alai Permitholders
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 622 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 622.
You're tracking SB 622
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 622 — Jai Alai Permitholders
Last action — Died in Messages
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Jai Alai Permitholders; Authorizing holders of valid pari-mutuel permits to lease certain facilities to any other holder of the same pari-mutuel permit or to any jai alai permitholder when located within a specified radius of each other; authorizing such lessees to apply for a certain license; prohibiting such lessees from operating a cardroom or slot machine at the leased facility, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
82 added · 42 removed82 line(s) added, 42 removed.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CS for SB 622 By the CommitteesCommittee on FiscalRegulated Policy;Industries;
and RegulatedSenators Industries;Rodriguez and Calatayud 580-02870-25 2025622c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to jai alai permitholders;
and Senators Rodriguez and Calatayud 594-03852-25 2025622c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to jai alai permitholders;
authorizingproviding that holders of a valid pari- mutuel permitspermit tomay lease certaintheir pari-mutuel permitted facilities to any other holder of the same pari-mutuel permit or to any jai alai permitholder when located within a specified radius of each other;
authorizing such lesseeslessee to apply for a certainlicense, license;rather than be entitled to a permit and license, to conduct specified gaming activities at the leased premises;
prohibitingreenacting suchss. lessees from operating a cardroom or slot machine at the leased facility;
requiring550.054(14)(b) certainand jai550.615(8), alaiF.S., permitholdersrelating to application for permit to conduct apari-mutuel minimumwagering numberand ofintertrack livewagering, performancesrespectively, usingto theirincorporate existingthe permit;amendment made to s.
prohibiting550.475, operationF.S., underin areferences lessor’sthereto; permit;
550.475 Lease of pari-mutuel facilities by pari-mutuel permitholders.—Holders of valid pari-mutuel permits for the conduct of any pari-mutuel wagering in this state may are entitled to lease any and all of their facilitiespari-mutuel at their permitted locationfacilities as of January 1, 2021, to any other holder of a same class valid pari-mutuel permit or to any jai alai permitholder, when located within a 35-mile radius of each other;
and such lessee may apply for a is entitled to a permit and license to conduct intertrack wagering and operate its race meet or jai alai games at the leased facility but may not Page 1 of 23 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CS for SB 622 594-03852-25580-02870-25 2025622c22025622c1 operatepremises. a cardroom or slot machine license at the leased facility.
A jai alai permitholder that leases a facility from another permitholder in accordance with this section must conduct a minimum of 20 live performances using such permitholder’s existing permit and may not operate under the lessor’s permit premises.
For the purpose of incorporating the amendment made by this act to section 550.475, Florida Statutes, in a reference thereto, paragraph (b) of subsection (14) of section 550.054, Florida Statutes, is reenacted to read:
550.054 Application for permit to conduct pari-mutuel wagering.— (14) (b) The commission, upon application from the holder of a jai alai permit meeting all conditions of this section, shall convert the permit and shall issue to the permitholder a permit to conduct greyhound racing.
A permitholder of a permit converted under this section shall be required to apply for and conduct a full schedule of live racing each fiscal year to be eligible for any tax credit provided by this chapter.
The holder of a permit converted pursuant to this subsection or any holder of a permit to conduct greyhound racing located in a county in which it is the only permit issued pursuant to this section who operates at a leased facility pursuant to s.
550.475 may move the location for which the permit has been issued to another location within a 30-mile radius of the location fixed in the permit issued in that county, provided the move does not cross the county boundary and such location is approved under the zoning regulations of the county or municipality in which the permit is located, and upon such relocation may use the permit for the conduct of pari-mutuel wagering and the operation of a cardroom.
The provisions of s.
550.6305(9)(d) and (f) shall apply to any permit converted under this subsection and shall continue to apply to any permit which was previously included Page 2 of 3 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 622 580-02870-25 2025622c1 under and subject to such provisions before a conversion pursuant to this section occurred.
Section 3.
For the purpose of incorporating the amendment made by this act to section 550.475, Florida Statutes, in a reference thereto, subsection (8) of section 550.615, Florida Statutes, is reenacted to read:
550.615 Intertrack wagering.— (8) In any three contiguous counties of the state where there are only three permitholders, all of which are greyhound permitholders, if any permitholder leases the facility of another permitholder for all or any portion of the conduct of its live race meet pursuant to s.
550.475, such lessee may conduct intertrack wagering at its pre-lease permitted facility throughout the entire year.
Section 4.
Page 23 of 23 CODING:
View plain text versions (3)
- S 622 c1 View text pdf
- S 622 c2 View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 622 Filed pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends the existing law to allow jai alai permitholders to lease facilities under specific conditions and establishes requirements for minimum live performances.
-
Section 550.475
may are entitled to lease any and all of their facilities at their permitted location as of January 1, 2021, to any other holder of a same class valid pari-mutuel permit or to any jai alai permitholder, when located within a 35-mile radius of each other;→ are entitled to lease any and all of their facilities at their permitted location as of January 1, 2021, to any other holder of a same class valid pari-mutuel permit or to any jai alai permitholder, when located within a 35-mile radius of each other;It clarifies that holders of valid permits may lease their facilities to specific entities.
-
Section 550.475
and such lessee may apply for a is entitled to a permit and license to conduct intertrack wagering and operate its race meet or jai alai games at the leased facility but may not→ and such lessee may apply for a permit and license to conduct intertrack wagering and operate its race meet or jai alai games at the leased facility but may notIt ensures that lessees can apply for necessary permits while prohibiting certain operations.
-
Section 550.475
A jai alai permitholder that leases a facility from another permitholder in accordance with this section must conduct a minimum of 20 live performances using such→ A jai alai permitholder that leases a facility from another permitholder in accordance with this section must conduct a minimum of 20 live performances using suchIt establishes a requirement for minimum live performances by jai alai permitholders leasing facilities.
-
Section 550.475
may not operate under the lessor’s permit premises.→ may not operate under the lessor’s permit premises.It maintains the prohibition on operating under the lessor's permit.
Action History
-
Died in Messages
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
In Messages
-
CS passed; YEAS 37 NAYS 1
-
Read 3rd time
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/29/25
-
CS/CS by Fiscal Policy read 1st time
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by- Fiscal Policy; YEAS 18 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Fiscal Policy, 04/22/25, 11:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Fiscal Policy
-
Favorable by Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government; YEAS 12 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government, 04/15/25, 12:30 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
CS by Regulated Industries read 1st time
-
Now in Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Regulated Industries; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Regulated Industries, 03/25/25, 4:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Regulated Industries; Appropriations Committee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government; Fiscal Policy
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Alexis Calatayud · Cosponsor
- Ana Maria Rodriguez · Primary
- Regulated Industries · Primary
- Fiscal Policy · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 160 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (3)
- Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican
- Regulated Industries
- Fiscal Policy
Co-sponsors (1)
- Calatayud, Alexis Republican
Not signed on (160)
160 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 160 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 24 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 97% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (38)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Collins | — | Yea |
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Bernard, Mack | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharief, Barbara | Democrat | Yea |
| Smith, Carlos Guillermo | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Calatayud, Alexis | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Yea |
| Bernard, Mack | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Calatayud, Alexis | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Collins | — | Yea |
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharief, Barbara | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Fine | — | Not Voting |
| Bernard, Mack | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Calatayud, Alexis | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 622 do?
- Jai Alai Permitholders; Authorizing holders of valid pari-mutuel permits to lease certain facilities to any other holder of the same pari-mutuel permit or to any jai alai permitholder when located within a specified radius of each other; authorizing such lessees to apply for a certain license; prohibiting such lessees from operating a cardroom or slot machine at the leased facility, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 622?
- SB 622 is sponsored by Calatayud, Alexis (Republican), Rodriguez, Ana Maria (Republican), Regulated Industries, and Fiscal Policy.
- What is the current status of SB 622?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 622?
- Track SB 622 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 622
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 622
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →