SB 1650 — Vexatious Litigants
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 1559 (Ch. 2025-128)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Vexatious Litigants; Expanding actions subject to the Florida Vexatious Litigant Law; revising eligibility for designation as a vexatious litigant; prohibiting clerks of the court from accepting certain filings from a vexatious litigant, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
186 added · 173 removed186 line(s) added, 173 removed.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CS for SB 1650 By the Appropriations Committee on CriminalJudiciary; and Civil Justice;
theand CommitteeSenator onGrall Judiciary;590-02604-25 20251650c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to vexatious litigants;
and Senators Grall and Yarborough 604-03481-25 20251650c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to vexatious litigants;
PresentSection subsection (7) of section 68.093, Florida Statutes, is redesignatedamended as subsection (8) and amended, a new subsection (7) is added to that section, and subsections (2) through (5) of that section are amended, to read:
68.093 Florida Vexatious Litigant Law.— (1) This section may be cited as the “Florida Vexatious Litigant Law.” (2) As used in this section, the term:
Governed by the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure, the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, rule 5.025 of and proceedings governed by the Florida Probate Rules, or the Florida Small Claims Rules,Rules; but does not include actions concerning family law matters governed by the Florida Family Law Rules of Procedure;
In another state court or federal court governed by rules of procedure that are comparable to the rules of procedure specified in subparagraph 1.1 but does not include actions concerning family law matters governed by the Florida Family Law Page 1 of 7 CODING:
or any action in which the Florida Page 1 of 6 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CS for SB 1650 604-03481-25590-02604-25 20251650c220251650c1 Rules of Procedure or any action in which the Florida Small Claims Rules apply.
(c)(b)(c) “Security” means an undertaking by a vexatious litigant to ensure payment to a party defendant in an amount reasonably sufficient to cover the party’s defendant’s anticipated, reasonable expenses of litigation, including attorney attorney’s fees and taxable costs.
1.01(3) who, In the immediately preceding 7-year 5-year period, has commenced, prosecuted, or maintained, pro se, three five or more civil actions in any court whichthat in this state, except an action governed by the Florida Small Claims Rules, which actions have been finally and adversely determined against such person, except that an action may not be included for purposes of this subparagraph if the court finds that the action was commenced, prosecuted, or maintained in good faithfaith; or entity;
or entity;
After an action has been finally and adversely determined against the person, repeatedly relitigates or attempts to relitigate either:either the validity of the determination against the same party as to whom the action was finally determined or the cause of action, claim, controversy, or any of the issues of fact or law determined by the final and adverse determination against the same party as to whom the action was Page 2 of 7 CODING:
a.
The validity of the determination against the same party in an action that was finally determined;
or b.
The cause of action, claim, controversy, or any of the issues of fact or law determined by the final and adverse determination against the same party in an action that was Page 2 of 6 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CS for SB 1650 604-03481-25590-02604-25 20251650c220251650c1 finally determined;
5.conducts unnecessary discovery;
Repeatedlyor conductsengages in other tactics that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary discovery;delay in any action;
6.or 5.2.
Repeatedly engages in other tactics that are frivolous or solely intended to cause unnecessary delay in any action;
or 7.2.
The motion must shall be based on the grounds, and supported by a showing, that the opposing party subject to the motion plaintiff is a vexatious litigant and is not reasonably likely to prevail on the merits of the action against the moving party defendant.
(b) At the hearing upon any defendant’s motion for an order to post security, the court shall consider any evidence, written Page 3 of 67 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CS for SB 1650 604-03481-25590-02604-25 20251650c220251650c1 to post security, the court shall consider any evidence, written or oral, by witness or affidavit, which may be relevant to the consideration of the motion.
A No determination made by the court in such a hearing is not shall be admissible on the merits of the action nor or deemed to be a determination of any issue in the action.
If, after hearing the evidence, the court determines that the opposing party subject to the motion plaintiff is a vexatious litigant and is not reasonably likely to prevail on the merits of the action against the moving party defendant, the court must shall order the vexatious litigant plaintiff to furnish security to the moving party defendant in an amount and within such time as the court deems appropriate.
(c) If the vexatious litigant plaintiff fails to post security required by an order of the court under this section and the vexatious litigant is:is:, 1.
1.A plaintiff or petitioner, the court shall immediately issue an order dismissing the action with prejudice as to the moving party defendant for whose benefit the security was ordered;
A plaintiff or petitioner, the court must shall immediately issue an order dismissing the action with prejudice as to the moving party defendant for whose benefit the security was ordered;
(d) If the a motion for an order to post security is filed before prior to the trial in an action, the action is shall be automatically stayed and the moving party defendant need not Page 4 of 67 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CS for SB 1650 604-03481-25590-02604-25 20251650c220251650c1 automatically stayed and the moving party defendant need not plead or otherwise respond to the vexatious litigant’s complaint, pleading, request for relief, or other document until 10 days after the motion for an order to post security is denied.
If the motion for an order to post security is granted, the moving party must defendant shall respond or plead no later than 10 days after the required security has been furnished.
(4) In addition to any other relief provided in this section, the court in any judicial circuit may, on its own motion or on the motion of any party, enter a prefiling order prohibiting a vexatious litigant from commencing, pro se, any new action in the courts of that circuit or from filing, pro se, any pleading, request for relief, or other document in an action in the courts of that circuit without first obtaining leave of the court administrative judge of that circuit.
Leave of court shall be granted by the court administrative judge only upon a showing that the proposed actionaction, pleading, request for relief, or other document is meritorious and is not being filed for the purpose of delay or harassment.
The court administrative judge may condition the filing of the proposed actionaction, pleading, request for relief, or other document upon the furnishing of security as provided in this section.
(5) The clerk of the court may shall not file any new action byor any pleading, request for relief, or other document in an action on behalf of a pro se by a vexatious litigant against whom a prefiling order has been entered pro se unless the vexatious litigant has obtained an order from the court allowing administrative judge permitting such filing.
If the clerk of the court mistakenly allows a pro se permits a vexatious litigant to file any new an action pro se in contravention of a prefiling order, any party to that action may file with the clerk and serve on the Page 5 of 67 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CSSB 1650 590-02604-25 20251650c1 court mistakenly allows a pro se permits a vexatious litigant to file any new an action or any pleading, request for SBrelief, 1650or 604-03481-25other 20251650c2document in an action pro se in contravention of a prefiling order, any party to that action may file with the clerk and serve on the vexatious litigant plaintiff and all other parties defendants a notice stating that the plaintiff is a pro se vexatious litigant is subject to a prefiling order.
Show all 51 changed lines (11 more)
The filing of such a notice shall automatically stays stay the litigation against all parties defendants to the action.
The court administrative judge shall automatically dismiss the action or deny the pleading, request for relief, or other document filed by the vexatious litigant in an action with prejudice within 10 days after the filing of such notice unless the vexatious litigant plaintiff files a motion for leave to file the new action.action or the pleading, request for relief, or other document.
If the court administrative judge issues an order granting leave, the pleadingspleadings, or other responses permitting the action to be filed, the defendants need not plead or otherwise respond to the complaint or the pleading, request for relief, or other document need not be filed until 10 days after the date of service by the vexatious litigant plaintiff, by United States mail, of a copy of the order granting leave to file the action.
(6) The clerk of a court shall provide copies of all prefiling orders to the Clerk of the Florida Supreme Court, who shall maintain a registry of all vexatious litigants.
(b) Rules, as applicable, on the motion for an order to postPage security6 underof paragraph7 (3)(d)CODING: or the motion for leave under subsection (5);
orWords (c)stricken Dismissesare thedeletions; action under subsection (5).
(8)(7)words Theunderlined reliefare providedadditions. under this section is shall be cumulative to any other relief or remedy available to a defendant under the laws of this state or the rules of court and the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, including, but not limited to, the relief provided under s.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 1650 590-02604-25 20251650c1 post security under paragraph (3)(d) or the motion for leave under subsection (5);
or (c) Dismisses the action or denies the pleading, request for relief, or other document under subsection (5).
(8)(7) The relief provided under this section shall be cumulative to any other relief or remedy available to a defendant under the laws of this state or the rules of court and the Florida Rules of Civil Procedure, including, but not limited to, the relief provided under s.
Page 67 of 67 CODING:
Show all 51 changed rows (11 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- S 1650 c1 View text pdf
- S 1650 c2 View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 1650 Filed pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill amends the Florida Vexatious Litigant Law to redefine key terms, expand the actions subject to the law, and update procedures regarding vexatious litigants.
-
68.093
present subsection (7)→ subsection (8)Renumbers the existing subsection (7) to (8).
-
68.093
5-year→ 7-yearExtends the look-back period from 5 years to 7 years for determining if a person is a vexatious litigant.
-
68.093
By the Florida Small Claims Rules→ the Florida Small Claims RulesClarifies that civil actions governed by the Florida Small Claims Rules are included in the definition of 'action' for vexatious litigants.
-
68.093
the party’s defendant’s→ the party’sSimplifies wording regarding the meaning of 'security' related to vexatious litigants.
-
68.093
vexatious litigant pursuant to this section or by another state court or a federal court.→ vexatious litigant.Clarifies the definition of 'vexatious litigant' by removing redundancy.
-
68.093
must shall→ mustRemoves redundancy in a procedural requirement for filing motions.
-
68.093
may shall→ mayRemoves redundancy in language concerning judicial discretion.
-
68.093
to file any new action by a pro se vexatious litigant against whom a prefiling order has been entered pro se unless→ to file any new action by a pro se vexatious litigant against whom a prefiling order has been entered unlessClarifies conditions under which a pro se litigant may file actions.
-
68.093
pro se permits→ pro seClarifies the context for allowing or disallowing filing by vexatious litigants.
-
68.093
disobedience of such an order may be punished as contempt of court by the administrative judge of that circuit.→ may be punished as contempt of court.Streamlines the consequence of failing to obey a prefiling order.
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 1559 (Ch. 2025-128)
-
Substituted CS/CS/HB 1559
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/23/25
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 22 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 04/16/25, 8:30 am, 412 Knott Building
-
CS/CS by Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice read 1st time
-
Now in Rules
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice, 04/10/25, 11:00 am, 37 Senate Building
-
CS by Judiciary read 1st time
-
Now in Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Judiciary; YEAS 11 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 03/19/25, 9:00 am, 110 Senate Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Judiciary; Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Clay Yarborough · Cosponsor
- Erin Grall · Primary
- Judiciary · Primary
- Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 160 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Grall, Erin Republican
- Judiciary
- Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice
Co-sponsors (1)
- Yarborough, Clay Republican
Not signed on (160)
160 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 160 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 88% | 0% | 0% | 12% |
How each member voted (25)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Not Voting |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Not Voting |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Not Voting |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1650 do?
- Vexatious Litigants; Expanding actions subject to the Florida Vexatious Litigant Law; revising eligibility for designation as a vexatious litigant; prohibiting clerks of the court from accepting certain filings from a vexatious litigant, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 1650?
- SB 1650 is sponsored by Yarborough, Clay (Republican), Grall, Erin (Republican), Judiciary, and Appropriations Committee on Criminal and Civil Justice.
- What is the current status of SB 1650?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1650?
- Track SB 1650 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1650
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1650
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →