SB 976 — Court-appointed Psychologists
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 901 (Ch. 2025-80)
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Court-appointed Psychologists; Requiring a party to seek disqualification of a court-appointed psychologist before filing an administrative complaint against the psychologist; providing for disqualification motions; revising provisions for award of costs and attorney fees in supplemental actions against court-appointed psychologists, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
58 added · 134 removed58 line(s) added, 134 removed.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 976 By Senatorthe BernardCommittee 24-01299-25on 2025976__Children, AFamilies, billand toElder beAffairs; entitled An act relating to court-appointed social investigators;
and Senator Bernard 586-03170-25 2025976c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to court-appointed psychologists;
61.20, F.S.;
requiring a court-appointed social investigator to submit a written report to the judge;
providing requirements for reports;
amending s.
requiring that a specifiedparty investigationto beseek undertakendisqualification beforeof a specifiedcourt-appointed claimpsychologist maybefore befiling madean againstadministrative acomplaint court-appointedagainst psychologistthe preparingpsychologist; a parenting plan;
requiringproviding thatfor adisqualification certificatemotions; be filed with the claim;
providingrevising provisions for sanctionsaward ifof suchcosts certificateand wasattorney notfees made in goodsupplemental faith;actions against court-appointed psychologists;
providing for an automatic stay of limitations period for such investigation;
providing for access to records for the investigation;
providing for immunity from liability for compliance with certain disclosure in conjunction with the investigation;
creating s.
61.123, F.S.;
requiring the Department of Children and Families to develop and publish criteria for use by court-appointed social investigators;
SubsectionSubsections (4)(2), is(3), addedand to(4) of section 61.20,61.122, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
61.20 Social investigation and recommendations regarding a parenting plan.— (4) A court-appointed social investigator must submit a written report to the judge, which must be accessible to all Page 1 of 5 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 976 24-01299-25 2025976__ parties to a legal action and must outline the social investigator’s recommendations, the reasoning for the recommendations, the factors considered in the recommendations, and an analysis of each factor considered in making the recommendations in a custody dispute, a dissolution of marriage, a case of domestic violence, or a paternity matter involving the relationship of a child and a parent, including time-sharing of children.
Section 2.
Present subsection (4) of section 61.122, Florida Statutes, is redesignated as subsection (5) and amended, a new subsection (4) is added to that section, and subsection (3) of that section is amended, to read:
award of fees, costs, reimbursement.— (3)(2) AAn parentadministrative whocomplaint desires to file a legal action against a court-appointed psychologist whowhich hasrelates actedto in good faith in developing a parenting plan recommendation mustconducted petitionby the judgepsychologist whomay presidednot overbe thefiled dissolutionanonymously. of marriage, case of domestic violence, or paternity matter involving the relationship of a child and a parent, including time-sharing of children, to appoint another psychologist.
UponThe theindividual parent’swho showingfiles ofan goodadministrative cause,complaint must include in the courtcomplaint shallhis appointor anotherher psychologist.name, address, and telephone number.
TheSuch courtan shalladministrative determinecomplaint whomay isnot responsiblebe forfiled alluntil courtthe costscomplainant andhas attorneymoved attorney’sto feesdisqualify associatedthe withselection makingof suchthe anpsychologist appointment.pursuant to subsection (3).
(4)(a)(3) AnA actionparent maywho notdesires beto filed,disqualify whetherthe itselection isof the file a civillegal action,action against a criminalcourt-appointed action,psychologist or file an administrative proceeding,complaint against athe court-appointed psychologist who has acted in agood dissolutionfaith ofin developing a Page 21 of 52 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 976 24-01299-25586-03170-25 2025976__2025976c1 marriage,parenting caseplan ofrecommendation domesticmust violence,petition orthe paternityjudge matterwho involvingis thepresiding relationshippresided ofover athe childdissolution andof amarriage, parent,case unlessof thedomestic attorneyviolence, or otherpaternity personmatter filinginvolving the actionrelationship hasof made a reasonablechild investigationand as permitted by the circumstances to determine that there are grounds for a goodparent, faithincluding belieftime-sharing that there has been negligence or a lack of goodchildren, faithto byappoint thean court-appointedalternative another psychologist.
TheUpon complaintthe orparent’s initialshowing pleadingof must contain a certificate stating that such reasonable investigation gave rise to a good faithcause, beliefthe thatcourt groundsshall existappoint foranother an action against the court-appointed psychologist.
ForThe purposescourt ofshall thisdetermine section,who goodis faithresponsible mayfor beall showncourt tocosts existand ifattorney theattorney’s claimantfees orassociated hiswith ormaking hersuch counsel has received a written opinion of an expert,appointment. as described in s.
766.102,(4) thatIn thereany appearssupplemental toIf a legal action, whether it be evidencea civil action, a criminal action, or an administrative proceeding, is filed against a court-appointed psychologist based upon his or her participation in a dissolution of negligencemarriage, case of domestic violence, or paternity matter involving the relationship of a lackchild and a parent, including time-sharing of goodchildren, faith.the claimant is responsible for all reasonable costs and reasonable attorney attorney’s fees associated with the supplemental action for both parties if the psychologist is held not liable.
SuchIf anthe opinionpsychologist is notheld subjectliable toin discoverycivil bycourt, anthe opposingpsychologist party.must pay all reasonable costs and reasonable attorney’s fees for the claimant.
IfSection the2. court determines that such certificate was not made in good faith and that no justiciable issue was presented against a court- appointed psychologist who fully cooperated in providing informal discovery, the court must award attorney fees and taxable costs against the claimant’s counsel and must submit the matter to The Florida Bar for disciplinary review of the attorney, if any.
(b) An automatic 90-day extension of the statute of limitations shall be granted to allow the reasonable investigation required by paragraph (a).
This extension shall be in addition to other tolling periods.
A court order is not required for the extension to be effective.
This paragraph does not revive a cause of action on which the statute of limitations has run.
Page 3 of 5 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 976 24-01299-25 2025976__ (c) For purposes of conducting the investigation required by this subsection, and notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, copies of all medical reports and records, including bills, films, and other records, relating to the development of the parenting plan must be made available, upon request, to the plaintiff.
Show all 51 changed lines (11 more)
A court-appointed psychologist complying in good faith with this paragraph may not be held liable for civil damages attributable to the disclosure of such records or be subject to any disciplinary action based on such disclosure.
(5)(4) If a legal action, whether it be a civil action, a criminal action, or an administrative proceeding, is filed against a court-appointed psychologist in a dissolution of marriage, case of domestic violence, or paternity matter involving the relationship of a child and a parent, including time-sharing of children, the claimant is responsible for all reasonable costs and reasonable attorney attorney’s fees associated with the action for both parties if the psychologist is held not liable.
If the psychologist is held liable in civil court, the psychologist must pay all reasonable costs and reasonable attorney attorney’s fees for the claimant.
Section 3.
Section 61.123, Florida Statutes, is created to read:
61.123 Criteria to be used by social investigators.—The Department of Children and Families shall develop and publish a set of specific enumerated criteria that court-appointed social investigators may consider and weigh in evaluating the appropriateness of the environment for a child in a custody dispute, dissolution of marriage, case of domestic violence, or Page 4 of 5 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 976 24-01299-25 2025976__ paternity matter involving the relationship of a child and a parent, including time-sharing of children.
Section 4.
Page 52 of 52 CODING:
Show all 51 changed rows (11 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- S 976 c1 View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 976 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 901 (Ch. 2025-80)
-
Substituted CS/HB 901
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/29/25
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Favorable by- Fiscal Policy; YEAS 18 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Fiscal Policy, 04/22/25, 11:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Fiscal Policy
-
Favorable by Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, 04/10/25, 8:30 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services
-
CS by Children, Families, and Elder Affairs read 1st time
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Children, Families, and Elder Affairs; YEAS 6 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Children, Families, and Elder Affairs, 04/01/25, 4:00 pm, 301 Senate Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Children, Families, and Elder Affairs; Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services; Fiscal Policy
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Mack Bernard · Primary
- Children, Families, and Elder Affairs · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 162 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Bernard, Mack Democrat
- Children, Families, and Elder Affairs
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (162)
162 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 162 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Yea |
| Bernard, Mack | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Calatayud, Alexis | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Sharief, Barbara | Democrat | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Not Voting |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 976 do?
- Court-appointed Psychologists; Requiring a party to seek disqualification of a court-appointed psychologist before filing an administrative complaint against the psychologist; providing for disqualification motions; revising provisions for award of costs and attorney fees in supplemental actions against court-appointed psychologists, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 976?
- SB 976 is sponsored by Bernard, Mack (Democrat) and Children, Families, and Elder Affairs.
- What is the current status of SB 976?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 976?
- Track SB 976 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 976
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 976
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →