Florida 2025 Regular Session Status: In Committee 1 D cosponsors

SB 976 — Court-appointed Psychologists

Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 901 (Ch. 2025-80)

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Court-appointed Psychologists; Requiring a party to seek disqualification of a court-appointed psychologist before filing an administrative complaint against the psychologist; providing for disqualification motions; revising provisions for award of costs and attorney fees in supplemental actions against court-appointed psychologists, etc.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

58 added · 134 removed

58 line(s) added, 134 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 976 By Senator Bernard 24-01299-25 2025976__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to court-appointed social investigators;
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 976 By the Committee on Children, Families, and Elder Affairs;
and Senator Bernard 586-03170-25 2025976c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to court-appointed psychologists;
61.20, F.S.;
requiring a court-appointed social investigator to submit a written report to the judge;
providing requirements for reports;
amending s.
requiring that a specified investigation be undertaken before a specified claim may be made against a court-appointed psychologist preparing a parenting plan;
requiring a party to seek disqualification of a court-appointed psychologist before filing an administrative complaint against the psychologist;
requiring that a certificate be filed with the claim;
providing for disqualification motions;
providing for sanctions if such certificate was not made in good faith;
revising provisions for award of costs and attorney fees in supplemental actions against court-appointed psychologists;
providing for an automatic stay of limitations period for such investigation;
providing for access to records for the investigation;
providing for immunity from liability for compliance with certain disclosure in conjunction with the investigation;
creating s.
61.123, F.S.;
requiring the Department of Children and Families to develop and publish criteria for use by court-appointed social investigators;
Subsection (4) is added to section 61.20, Florida Statutes, to read:
Subsections (2), (3), and (4) of section 61.122, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
61.20 Social investigation and recommendations regarding a parenting plan.— (4) A court-appointed social investigator must submit a written report to the judge, which must be accessible to all Page 1 of 5 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 976 24-01299-25 2025976__ parties to a legal action and must outline the social investigator’s recommendations, the reasoning for the recommendations, the factors considered in the recommendations, and an analysis of each factor considered in making the recommendations in a custody dispute, a dissolution of marriage, a case of domestic violence, or a paternity matter involving the relationship of a child and a parent, including time-sharing of children.
Section 2.
Present subsection (4) of section 61.122, Florida Statutes, is redesignated as subsection (5) and amended, a new subsection (4) is added to that section, and subsection (3) of that section is amended, to read:
award of fees, costs, reimbursement.— (3) A parent who desires to file a legal action against a court-appointed psychologist who has acted in good faith in developing a parenting plan recommendation must petition the judge who presided over the dissolution of marriage, case of domestic violence, or paternity matter involving the relationship of a child and a parent, including time-sharing of children, to appoint another psychologist.
award of fees, costs, reimbursement.— (2) An administrative complaint against a court-appointed psychologist which relates to a parenting plan recommendation conducted by the psychologist may not be filed anonymously.
Upon the parent’s showing of good cause, the court shall appoint another psychologist.
The individual who files an administrative complaint must include in the complaint his or her name, address, and telephone number.
The court shall determine who is responsible for all court costs and attorney attorney’s fees associated with making such an appointment.
Such an administrative complaint may not be filed until the complainant has moved to disqualify the selection of the psychologist pursuant to subsection (3).
(4)(a) An action may not be filed, whether it is a civil action, a criminal action, or an administrative proceeding, against a court-appointed psychologist in a dissolution of Page 2 of 5 CODING:
(3) A parent who desires to disqualify the selection of the file a legal action against a court-appointed psychologist or file an administrative complaint against the court-appointed psychologist who has acted in good faith in developing a Page 1 of 2 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 976 24-01299-25 2025976__ marriage, case of domestic violence, or paternity matter involving the relationship of a child and a parent, unless the attorney or other person filing the action has made a reasonable investigation as permitted by the circumstances to determine that there are grounds for a good faith belief that there has been negligence or a lack of good faith by the court-appointed psychologist.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 976 586-03170-25 2025976c1 parenting plan recommendation must petition the judge who is presiding presided over the dissolution of marriage, case of domestic violence, or paternity matter involving the relationship of a child and a parent, including time-sharing of children, to appoint an alternative another psychologist.
The complaint or initial pleading must contain a certificate stating that such reasonable investigation gave rise to a good faith belief that grounds exist for an action against the court-appointed psychologist.
Upon the parent’s showing of good cause, the court shall appoint another psychologist.
For purposes of this section, good faith may be shown to exist if the claimant or his or her counsel has received a written opinion of an expert, as described in s.
The court shall determine who is responsible for all court costs and attorney attorney’s fees associated with making such an appointment.
766.102, that there appears to be evidence of negligence or a lack of good faith.
(4) In any supplemental If a legal action, whether it be a civil action, a criminal action, or an administrative proceeding, is filed against a court-appointed psychologist based upon his or her participation in a dissolution of marriage, case of domestic violence, or paternity matter involving the relationship of a child and a parent, including time-sharing of children, the claimant is responsible for all reasonable costs and reasonable attorney attorney’s fees associated with the supplemental action for both parties if the psychologist is held not liable.
Such an opinion is not subject to discovery by an opposing party.
If the psychologist is held liable in civil court, the psychologist must pay all reasonable costs and reasonable attorney’s fees for the claimant.
If the court determines that such certificate was not made in good faith and that no justiciable issue was presented against a court- appointed psychologist who fully cooperated in providing informal discovery, the court must award attorney fees and taxable costs against the claimant’s counsel and must submit the matter to The Florida Bar for disciplinary review of the attorney, if any.
Section 2.
(b) An automatic 90-day extension of the statute of limitations shall be granted to allow the reasonable investigation required by paragraph (a).
This extension shall be in addition to other tolling periods.
A court order is not required for the extension to be effective.
This paragraph does not revive a cause of action on which the statute of limitations has run.
Page 3 of 5 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 976 24-01299-25 2025976__ (c) For purposes of conducting the investigation required by this subsection, and notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, copies of all medical reports and records, including bills, films, and other records, relating to the development of the parenting plan must be made available, upon request, to the plaintiff.
Show all 51 changed rows (11 more)
Previous
Latest
A court-appointed psychologist complying in good faith with this paragraph may not be held liable for civil damages attributable to the disclosure of such records or be subject to any disciplinary action based on such disclosure.
(5)(4) If a legal action, whether it be a civil action, a criminal action, or an administrative proceeding, is filed against a court-appointed psychologist in a dissolution of marriage, case of domestic violence, or paternity matter involving the relationship of a child and a parent, including time-sharing of children, the claimant is responsible for all reasonable costs and reasonable attorney attorney’s fees associated with the action for both parties if the psychologist is held not liable.
If the psychologist is held liable in civil court, the psychologist must pay all reasonable costs and reasonable attorney attorney’s fees for the claimant.
Section 3.
Section 61.123, Florida Statutes, is created to read:
61.123 Criteria to be used by social investigators.—The Department of Children and Families shall develop and publish a set of specific enumerated criteria that court-appointed social investigators may consider and weigh in evaluating the appropriateness of the environment for a child in a custody dispute, dissolution of marriage, case of domestic violence, or Page 4 of 5 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2025 SB 976 24-01299-25 2025976__ paternity matter involving the relationship of a child and a parent, including time-sharing of children.
Section 4.
Page 5 of 5 CODING:
Page 2 of 2 CODING:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 901 (Ch. 2025-80)

  2. Substituted CS/HB 901

  3. Read 2nd time

  4. Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/29/25

  5. Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading

  6. Favorable by- Fiscal Policy; YEAS 18 NAYS 0

  7. On Committee agenda-- Fiscal Policy, 04/22/25, 11:00 am, 412 Knott Building

  8. Now in Fiscal Policy

  9. Favorable by Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services; YEAS 8 NAYS 0

  10. On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, 04/10/25, 8:30 am, 412 Knott Building

  11. Now in Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services

  12. CS by Children, Families, and Elder Affairs read 1st time

  13. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  14. CS by Children, Families, and Elder Affairs; YEAS 6 NAYS 0

  15. On Committee agenda-- Children, Families, and Elder Affairs, 04/01/25, 4:00 pm, 301 Senate Building

  16. Introduced

  17. Referred to Children, Families, and Elder Affairs; Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services; Fiscal Policy

  18. Filed

Sponsors

  • Mack Bernard · Primary
  • Children, Families, and Elder Affairs · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 162 not signed on

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (162)

162 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 162 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Favorable

Passed 18 Yea · 0 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 5000
Republican 12001
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 18001
% of votes cast 95%0%0%5%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Ingoglia — Yea
Arrington, Kristen Aston Democrat Yea
Bernard, Mack Democrat Yea
Davis, Tracie Democrat Yea
Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" Democrat Yea
Osgood, Rosalind Democrat Yea
Boyd, Jim Republican Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
Calatayud, Alexis Republican Yea
Gaetz, Don Republican Yea
Gruters, Joe Republican Yea
Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" Republican Yea
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea
Simon, Corey Republican Yea
Truenow, Keith L. Republican Yea
Vacant Republican Yea
Yarborough, Clay Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Favorable

Passed 8 Yea · 0 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 2001
Republican 6001
Total 8002
% of votes cast 80%0%0%20%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Berman, Lori Democrat Yea
Davis, Tracie Democrat Not Voting
Rouson, Darryl Ervin Democrat Yea
Brodeur, Jason Republican Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
Garcia, Ileana Republican Not Voting
Gruters, Joe Republican Yea
Harrell, Gayle Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea
Trumbull, Jay Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 976 do?
Court-appointed Psychologists; Requiring a party to seek disqualification of a court-appointed psychologist before filing an administrative complaint against the psychologist; providing for disqualification motions; revising provisions for award of costs and attorney fees in supplemental actions against court-appointed psychologists, etc.
Who sponsors SB 976?
SB 976 is sponsored by Bernard, Mack (Democrat) and Children, Families, and Elder Affairs.
What is the current status of SB 976?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 976?
Track SB 976 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 976

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 976

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →