Local Government Impact Fees and Development Permits and Orders
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 665 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 665.
You're tracking HB 665
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 665 — Local Government Impact Fees and Development Permits and Orders
Last action — Died in Commerce Committee, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/SB 1080 (Ch. 2025-177)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Local Government Impact Fees and Development Permits and Orders ; Prohibits county from requiring applicant to take certain actions as condition of processing development permit or development order; requires completion of demonstrated-need study using plan-based methodology before adoption of impact fee increase which expressly demonstrates certain extraordinary circumstances; prohibits increases in certain impact fees unless specified extraordinary circumstances are demonstrated; prohibits local government from increasing impact fee rate; prohibits municipality from requiring applicant to take certain actions as condition of processing development permit or development order.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
319 added · 87 removedPlain-language change summary
The amended bill, HB 665, now requires local governments to conduct a specific study demonstrating a need for any increase in impact fees, only if certain "extraordinary circumstances" are proven. Additionally, it prohibits municipalities from demanding that developers take specific actions, like funding public art, as a condition for processing development permits. These changes aim to protect developers from potentially unfair requirements and ensure that fee increases are justified and based on clear evidence.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 665 2025 A bill to be entitled An act relating to local government impact fees and development permits and orders;
prohibiting a county from requiring an applicant to take certain actions as a condition of processing or issuing a development permit or development order;
providing that any ordinance or regulation in conflict is void and unenforceable;
163.3164, F.S.;
defining the term "plan-based methodology";
amending s.
requiring thatthe completion of a demonstrated-need study includeusing a plan-based methodology before the adoption of an impact fee increase which expressly demonstrates certain information;extraordinary circumstances;
prohibiting increases in certain impact fees unless specified extraordinary circumstances are demonstrated;
prohibiting a local government from increasing an impact fee rate under certain circumstances;
prohibiting a municipality from requiring an applicant to take certain actions as a condition of processing or issuing a development permit or development order;
providing anthat effectiveany date.ordinance or regulation in conflict is void and unenforceable;
amending s.
212.055, F.S.;
conforming a cross-reference;
providing an effective Page 1 of 12 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb665-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 665 2025 date.
125.022 Development permits and orders.— (8) A county may not as a condition of processing or issuing aany development permit or development order require an applicant to install a work of art, pay a fee for a work of art, or reimburse the county for any costs that the county may incur related to a work of art.
Any ordinance or regulation in conflict with this subsection is void and unenforceable.
PresentSubsections paragraphs(39) (a)through (54) of section 163.3164, Florida Statutes, are renumbered as subsections (40) through (55), respectively, and (b)a ofnew subsection Page(39) 1is ofadded 4to CODING:that section to read:
163.3164 Community Planning Act;
definitions.—As used in this act:
(39) "Plan-based methodology" means the use of the most recent and localized data to project growth within a jurisdiction over a 6-year period and the anticipated capacity impacts created by that projected growth, and the creation of a list of capital improvements or infrastructure as defined in s.
163.31801(3) to be constructed in a defined time period to Page 2 of 12 CODING:
hb665-00hb665-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 665 2025 (3)mitigate ofthose sectionimpacts 163.31801, Florida Statutes, are redesignated as paragraphspart (b)of and (c), respectively, a new paragraphor (a)updated isimpact addedfee tostudy. that subsection, and paragraph (g) of subsection (6) of that section is amended, to read:
Section 3.
Paragraphs (a) and (b) of subsection (3) of section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, are redesignated as paragraphs (b) and (c), respectively, a new paragraph (a) is added to that subsection, and paragraph (g) of subsection (6) of that section is amended, to read:
(a) "Extraordinary circumstances" means:means the measurable effects of development which will require mitigation by the affected local government and which exceed the total of the current adopted impact fee amount combined with any increase as provided in paragraphs (6)(c), (d), and (e) in less than 4 years.
1.
For a county, that the permanent population estimate determined for the county by the University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research is at least 1.25 times the 5-year high-series population projection for the county as published by the University of Florida Bureau of Economic and Business Research immediately before the year of the population estimate;
or 2.
For a municipality, that the municipality is located within a county with such a permanent population estimate and the municipality demonstrates that it has maintained a proportionate share of the county's population growth during the preceding 5-year period.
(g) A local government, school district, or special district may increase an impact fee rate beyond the phase-in Pagelimitations 2established under paragraph (b), paragraph (c), paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) by establishing the need for such increase in full compliance with the requirements of 4subsection CODING:(4), provided the following criteria are met:
Page 3 of 12 CODING:
hb665-00hb665-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 665 2025 limitations1. established under paragraph (b), paragraph (c), paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) by establishing the need for such increase in full compliance with the requirements of subsection (4), provided the following criteria are met:
1.A demonstrated-need study using a plan-based methodology justifying any increase in excess of those authorized in paragraph (b), paragraph (c), paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) has been completed within the 12 months before the adoption of the impact fee increase and expressly demonstrates the extraordinary circumstances necessitating the need to exceed the phase-in limitations.
Aa. demonstrated-need study justifying any increase in excess of those authorized in paragraph (b), paragraph (c), paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) has been completed within the 12 months before the adoption of the impact fee increase and expressly demonstrates the extraordinary circumstances necessitating the need to exceed the phase-in limitations.
TheAn demonstrated-needincrease studyin musta identifynontransportation theimpact specificfee projectsmay thatnot willbe benefit,adopted andunless howthe suchextraordinary projectscircumstances willdemonstrated benefit,in fromthe exceedingdemonstrated-need thestudy phase-ininclude limitations.at least two of the following:
(I) The population of the local government jurisdiction over the past 5 years exceeds, by at least 10 percent, the population estimates and projections used to justify the most recent impact fee increase.
Show all 148 changed lines (108 more)
(II) The average number of building permits issued by the local government over the past 5 years exceeds, by at least 10 percent, the building permit estimates and projections used to justify the most recent impact fee increase.
(III) The employment base within the local jurisdiction over the past 5 years exceeds the employment estimates and projections used to justify the most recent impact fee.
(IV) The existing level of service grade will be lowered without an increase in the impact fee rate.
b.
An increase in a transportation impact fee may not be Page 4 of 12 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb665-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 665 2025 adopted unless the extraordinary circumstances demonstrated in the demonstrated-need study include at least three of the following:
(I) Any condition provided in sub-subparagraph a.
(II) Cost growth over the past 5 years which exceeds, by an average of at least 10 percent, the Federal Highway Administration's National Highway Construction Cost Index average used to justify the previous impact fee increase.
(III) The vehicle miles traveled in the past 5 years exceed, by at least 10 percent, the Department of Transportation's vehicle miles traveled index average used to justify the most recent impact fee.
(IV) The per-lane mile cost estimates for construction for the past 5 years exceed, by at least 10 percent, the Department of Transportation's average used to justify the most recent impact fee.
c.
An increase in an impact fee for an independent special district may not be adopted unless the extraordinary circumstances demonstrated in the demonstrated-need study include all of the following:
(I) The amount of growth experienced in the past 5 years and anticipated within the district requires a significant immediate infrastructure investment to serve such growth which will need to be financed by the special district with impact fees.
Page 5 of 12 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb665-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 665 2025 (II) The cost of infrastructure investment required to be financed by the district in the next 5 years is increasing the need for public facilities and has a direct impact on the fee amount needed to finance the additional infrastructure for the benefit of the growth.
(III) The existing level of service will be impacted without an increase in the impact fee rate.
The local government jurisdiction has held not fewer less than two publicly noticed workshops dedicated to the extraordinary circumstances necessitating the need to exceed the phase-in limitations set forth in paragraph (b), paragraph (c), paragraph (d), or paragraph (e).
SectionA 3.local government may not increase an impact fee rate beyond the phase-in limitations under this paragraph if the local government has not increased the impact fee within the past 5 years.
Any year in which the local government is prohibited from increasing an impact fee because the jurisdiction is in a hurricane disaster area is not included in the 5-year period.
Section 4.
166.033 Development permits and orders.— (8) A municipality may not as a condition of processing or issuing a development permit or development order require an Page 36 of 412 CODING:
hb665-00hb665-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 665 2025 issuing any development permit or development order require an applicant to install a work of art, pay a fee for a work of art, or reimburse the municipality for any costs that the municipality may incur related to a work of art.
SectionAny 4.ordinance or regulation in conflict with this subsection is void and unenforceable.
Section 5.
Paragraph (d) of subsection (2) of section 212.055, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
212.055 Discretionary sales surtaxes;
legislative intent;
authorization and use of proceeds.—It is the legislative intent that any authorization for imposition of a discretionary sales surtax shall be published in the Florida Statutes as a subsection of this section, irrespective of the duration of the levy.
Each enactment shall specify the types of counties authorized to levy;
the rate or rates which may be imposed;
the maximum length of time the surtax may be imposed, if any;
the procedure which must be followed to secure voter approval, if required;
the purpose for which the proceeds may be expended;
and such other requirements as the Legislature may provide.
Taxable transactions and administrative procedures shall be as provided in s.
212.054.
(2) LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE SURTAX.— (d) The proceeds of the surtax authorized by this subsection and any accrued interest shall be expended by the school district, within the county and municipalities within the Page 7 of 12 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb665-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 665 2025 county, or, in the case of a negotiated joint county agreement, within another county, to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure;
to acquire any interest in land for public recreation, conservation, or protection of natural resources or to prevent or satisfy private property rights claims resulting from limitations imposed by the designation of an area of critical state concern;
to provide loans, grants, or rebates to residential or commercial property owners who make energy efficiency improvements to their residential or commercial property, if a local government ordinance authorizing such use is approved by referendum;
or to finance the closure of county- owned or municipally owned solid waste landfills that have been closed or are required to be closed by order of the Department of Environmental Protection.
Any use of the proceeds or interest for purposes of landfill closure before July 1, 1993, is ratified.
The proceeds and any interest may not be used for the operational expenses of infrastructure, except that a county that has a population of fewer than 75,000 and that is required to close a landfill may use the proceeds or interest for long- term maintenance costs associated with landfill closure.
Counties, as defined in s.
125.011, and charter counties may, in addition, use the proceeds or interest to retire or service indebtedness incurred for bonds issued before July 1, 1987, for infrastructure purposes, and for bonds subsequently issued to refund such bonds.
Any use of the proceeds or interest for Page 8 of 12 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb665-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 665 2025 purposes of retiring or servicing indebtedness incurred for refunding bonds before July 1, 1999, is ratified.
1.
For the purposes of this paragraph, the term "infrastructure" means:
a.
Any fixed capital expenditure or fixed capital outlay associated with the construction, reconstruction, or improvement of public facilities that have a life expectancy of 5 or more years, any related land acquisition, land improvement, design, and engineering costs, and all other professional and related costs required to bring the public facilities into service.
For purposes of this sub-subparagraph, the term "public facilities" means facilities as defined in s.
163.3164 s.
163.3164(41), s.
163.3221(13), or s.
189.012(5), and includes facilities that are necessary to carry out governmental purposes, including, but not limited to, fire stations, general governmental office buildings, and animal shelters, regardless of whether the facilities are owned by the local taxing authority or another governmental entity.
b.
A fire department vehicle, an emergency medical service vehicle, a sheriff's office vehicle, a police department vehicle, or any other vehicle, and the equipment necessary to outfit the vehicle for its official use or equipment that has a life expectancy of at least 5 years.
c.
Any expenditure for the construction, lease, or maintenance of, or provision of utilities or security for, Page 9 of 12 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb665-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 665 2025 facilities, as defined in s.
29.008.
d.
Any fixed capital expenditure or fixed capital outlay associated with the improvement of private facilities that have a life expectancy of 5 or more years and that the owner agrees to make available for use on a temporary basis as needed by a local government as a public emergency shelter or a staging area for emergency response equipment during an emergency officially declared by the state or by the local government under s.
252.38.
Such improvements are limited to those necessary to comply with current standards for public emergency evacuation shelters.
The owner must enter into a written contract with the local government providing the improvement funding to make the private facility available to the public for purposes of emergency shelter at no cost to the local government for a minimum of 10 years after completion of the improvement, with the provision that the obligation will transfer to any subsequent owner until the end of the minimum period.
e.
Any land acquisition expenditure for a residential housing project in which at least 30 percent of the units are affordable to individuals or families whose total annual household income does not exceed 120 percent of the area median income adjusted for household size, if the land is owned by a local government or by a special district that enters into a written agreement with the local government to provide such housing.
The local government or special district may enter into Page 10 of 12 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb665-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 665 2025 a ground lease with a public or private person or entity for nominal or other consideration for the construction of the residential housing project on land acquired pursuant to this sub-subparagraph.
f.
Instructional technology used solely in a school district's classrooms.
As used in this sub-subparagraph, the term "instructional technology" means an interactive device that assists a teacher in instructing a class or a group of students and includes the necessary hardware and software to operate the interactive device.
The term also includes support systems in which an interactive device may mount and is not required to be affixed to the facilities.
2.
For the purposes of this paragraph, the term "energy efficiency improvement" means any energy conservation and efficiency improvement that reduces consumption through conservation or a more efficient use of electricity, natural gas, propane, or other forms of energy on the property, including, but not limited to, air sealing;
installation of insulation;
installation of energy-efficient heating, cooling, or ventilation systems;
installation of solar panels;
building modifications to increase the use of daylight or shade;
replacement of windows;
installation of energy controls or energy recovery systems;
installation of electric vehicle charging equipment;
installation of systems for natural gas fuel as defined in s.
206.9951;
and installation of efficient Page 11 of 12 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb665-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 665 2025 lighting equipment.
3.
Notwithstanding any other provision of this subsection, a local government infrastructure surtax imposed or extended after July 1, 1998, may allocate up to 15 percent of the surtax proceeds for deposit into a trust fund within the county's accounts created for the purpose of funding economic development projects having a general public purpose of improving local economies, including the funding of operational costs and incentives related to economic development.
The ballot statement must indicate the intention to make an allocation under the authority of this subparagraph.
Section 6.
Page 412 of 412 CODING:
hb665-00hb665-01-c1
Show all 148 changed rows (108 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- H 665 c1 View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 665 Filed pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill prohibits counties and municipalities from requiring applicants to install or pay for artwork as a condition of development permits and imposes conditions for increasing impact fees.
-
125.022
A county may not as a condition of processing or issuing any development permit or development order require an applicant to install a work of art, pay a fee for a work of art, or reimburse the county for any costs that the county may incur related to a work of art. Any ordinance or regulation in conflict with this subsection is void and unenforceable.
Counties cannot demand artwork-related conditions for development permits.
-
166.033
A municipality may not as a condition of processing or issuing any development permit or development order require an applicant to install a work of art, pay a fee for a work of art, or reimburse the municipality for any costs that the municipality may incur related to a work of art. Any ordinance or regulation in conflict with this subsection is void and unenforceable.
Municipalities cannot impose artwork-related conditions for development permits.
-
163.3164
"Plan-based methodology" means the use of the most recent and localized data to project growth within a jurisdiction over a 6-year period and the anticipated capacity impacts created by that projected growth, and the creation of a list of capital improvements or infrastructure as defined in s. 163.31801(3) to be constructed in a defined time period to mitigate those impacts as part of a new or updated impact fee study.
Defines 'plan-based methodology' for use in impact fee studies.
-
163.31801
"Extraordinary circumstances" means the measurable effects of development which will require mitigation by the affected local government and which exceed the total of the current adopted impact fee amount combined with any increase as provided in paragraphs (6)(c), (d), and (e) in less than 4 years.
Establishes a definition for 'extraordinary circumstances' related to impact fees.
-
163.31801
A local government, school district, or special district may increase an impact fee only as provided in this subsection.→ A local government, school district, or special district may increase an impact fee rate beyond the phase-in limitations established under paragraph (b), paragraph (c), paragraph (d), or paragraph (e) by establishing the need for such increase in full compliance with the requirements of subsection (4), provided the following criteria are met:Clarifies conditions under which impact fees may be increased.
-
163.31801
The local government jurisdiction has held not fewer than two publicly noticed workshops dedicated to the extraordinary circumstances necessitating the need to exceed the phase-in limitations set forth in paragraph (b), paragraph (c), paragraph (d), or paragraph (e).
Requires public workshops to justify impact fee increases.
Action History
-
Died in Commerce Committee, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/SB 1080 (Ch. 2025-177)
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
Now in Commerce Committee
-
Referred to Commerce Committee
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
-
CS Filed
-
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
-
Reported out of Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
-
Favorable with CS by Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
-
Added to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee agenda
-
Now in Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
-
Reported out of Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee
-
Favorable by Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee
-
Added to Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee agenda
-
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
-
Now in Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee
-
Referred to Commerce Committee
-
Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
-
Referred to Housing, Agriculture & Tourism Subcommittee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Alex Rizo · Cosponsor
- Michael Owen · Cosponsor
- Dean Black · Cosponsor
- Yvette Benarroch · Cosponsor
- Kevin M. Steele · Primary
- Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 4 co-sponsors · 158 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Steele, Kevin M. Republican
- Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
Co-sponsors (4)
- Rizo, Alex Republican
- Owen, Michael Republican
- Black, Dean Republican
- Benarroch, Yvette Republican
Not signed on (158)
158 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 158 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Caruso | — | Yea |
| Temple | — | Yea |
| Campbell, Daryl | Democrat | Yea |
| Daley, Dan | Democrat | Yea |
| Dunkley, Lisa | Democrat | Yea |
| Gantt, Ashley Viola | Democrat | Yea |
| Harris, Jennifer "Rita" | Democrat | Yea |
| Black, Dean | Republican | Yea |
| Chamberlin, Ryan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Cobb, Nan | Republican | Yea |
| Gerwig, Anne | Republican | Yea |
| Gossett-Seidman, Peggy | Republican | Not Voting |
| Griffitts Jr., Philip Wayne "Griff" | Republican | Yea |
| Holcomb, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Johnson, Chad | Republican | Yea |
| Kendall, Kim | Republican | Yea |
| Michael, Kiyan | Republican | Yea |
| Rizo, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 6% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Casello | — | Yea |
| Lopez, V. | — | Not Voting |
| Cross, Lindsay | Democrat | Nay |
| Franklin II, Gallop | Democrat | Yea |
| Hunschofsky, Christine | Democrat | Yea |
| Robinson, Felicia Simone | Democrat | Yea |
| Abbott, Shane G. | Republican | Yea |
| Albert, Jon | Republican | Yea |
| Booth, Erika | Republican | Yea |
| Cassel, Hillary | Republican | Yea |
| Gossett-Seidman, Peggy | Republican | Yea |
| Mooney Jr., James Vernon "Jim" | Republican | Yea |
| Partington, Bill | Republican | Yea |
| Persons-Mulicka, Jenna | Republican | Yea |
| Redondo, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Salzman, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Tramont, Chase | Republican | Yea |
| Tuck, Kaylee | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 665 do?
- Local Government Impact Fees and Development Permits and Orders ; Prohibits county from requiring applicant to take certain actions as condition of processing development permit or development order; requires completion of demonstrated-need study using plan-based methodology before adoption of impact fee increase which expressly demonstrates certain extraordinary circumstances; prohibits increases in certain impact fees unless specified extraordinary circumstances are demonstrated; prohibits local government from increasing impact fee rate; prohibits municipality from requiring applicant to take certain actions as condition of processing development permit or development order.
- Who sponsors HB 665?
- HB 665 is sponsored by Rizo, Alex (Republican), Owen, Michael (Republican), Black, Dean (Republican), Benarroch, Yvette (Republican), Steele, Kevin M. (Republican), and Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee.
- What is the current status of HB 665?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 665?
- Track HB 665 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 665
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 665
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →