Construction and Facilities
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 569 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 569.
You're tracking HB 569
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 569 — Construction and Facilities
Last action — Died in Rules, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 443 (Ch. 2025-106)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Construction and Facilities; Provides that charter school is public facility for purpose of concurrency; authorizes developers to provide specified improvements & contributions to public schools; requires developers to receive credits for impact fees from such improvements & contributions; provides requirements for location of such schools; requires such credits to be approved by local governments & special districts; prohibits local governing authorities from imposing or enforcing certain vehicular stacking ordinances or regulations against specified schools during certain hours; revises building requirements for charter schools; prohibits local governing authorities from requiring charter school to obtain certain exemptions or approvals under land development code for specified purposes relating to allowable uses.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
156 added · 129 removed156 line(s) added, 129 removed.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 569 2025 A bill to be entitled An act relating to construction and facilities;
exemptingproviding specifiedthat a charter school is public facilitiesfacility fromfor the purpose of concurrency;
providing requirements for the location of such schools;
prohibiting local governing authorities from imposing or enforcing certain vehicular stacking ordinances or regulations against specified schools during certain hours;
prohibiting local governing authorities from requiring a charter school to obtain certain exemptions or approvals under the land development code for specified purposes relating to allowable uses;
SectionPage 1.1 of 6 CODING:
Paragraph (c) is added to subsection (1) of section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, to read:
163.3180 Concurrency.— (1) Sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, and potable water are the only public facilities and services subject to the concurrency requirement on a statewide basis.
Additional public Page 1 of 5 CODING:
hb569-00hb569-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 569 2025 facilitiesSection and1. services may not be made subject to concurrency on a statewide basis without approval by the Legislature;
however,Subsection any(4) localof governmentsection may163.3180, extendFlorida theStatutes, concurrencyis requirementamended so that it applies to additionalread: public facilities within its jurisdiction.
(c)163.3180 NotwithstandingConcurrency.— any(4) The concurrency requirement as implemented in local comprehensive plans applies to state and other provisionpublic offacilities lawand development to the contrary,same constructionextent projectsthat ofit publicapplies facilities,to all other facilities and development, as definedprovided inby s.law.
163.3164,For thatpurposes are necessary to ensure the protection of thethis health,subsection, safety,a andcharter generalschool welfare,is includingconsidered a public schools,facility. shall be exempt from concurrency.
Because charter schools are a part of concurrency and serve a public good, local governments are authorized to grant special variances for the opening of a charter school in a manner consistent with traditional public schools.
ParagraphSubsection (c) is added to subsection (5) of section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
challenges.— (5)(5)(a) (c) Notwithstanding any othercharter provisionprovision, ofcomprehensive lawplan topolicy, theordinance, contrary,development iforder, adevelopment permit, or resolution, the local government or special district chargesthat andrequires collectsany animprovement educationor contribution must credit against the collection of the impact fee,fee aany developercontribution, maywhether contractidentified within a schooldevelopment districtorder, proportionate share agreement, or charterany schoolform toof provideexaction anrelated improvementto public facilities or contribution,infrastructure, including monetary contributions, land dedications,dedication, site planning and design, or construction,construction. and Page 2 of 5 CODING:
Any contribution must be applied on a dollar-for- dollar basis at fair market value to reduce any impact fee collected for the general category or class of public facilities Page 2 of 6 CODING:
hb569-00hb569-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 569 2025 shallor beinfrastructure creditedfor againstwhich the collectioncontribution ofwas themade. education impact fee on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, if a local government or special district charges and collects an education impact fee, a developer may contract with a school district or charter school to provide an improvement or contribution, including monetary contributions, land dedications, site planning and design, or construction, and shall be credited against the collection of the education impact fee on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value.
(c)(b) If a local government or special district does not charge and collect an impact fee for the general category or class of public facilities or infrastructure contributed, a credit may not be applied under paragraph (a).
316.18941 Vehicular stacking during school hours.— Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, local governing authorities may not impose or enforce any vehicular stacking ordinance or regulation against any public school or private school during adopted school hours, including during student drop-off and pick-up hours, if such ordinance or regulation would limit enrollment.
SectionPage 4.3 of 6 CODING:
Paragraph (a) of subsection (18) of section 1002.33, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
1002.33 Charter schools.— (18) FACILITIES.— (a) A startup charter school shall utilize facilities which comply with the Florida Building Code pursuant to chapter 553 except for the State Requirements for Educational Facilities.
Conversion charter schools shall utilize facilities that comply with the State Requirements for Educational Facilities provided that the school district and the charter school have entered into a mutual management plan for the Page 3 of 5 CODING:
hb569-00hb569-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 569 2025 reasonableSection maintenance4. of such facilities.
Paragraphs (a) and (c) of subsection (18) of section 1002.33, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
1002.33 Charter schools.— (18) FACILITIES.— (a) A startup charter school shall utilize facilities which comply with the Florida Building Code pursuant to chapter 553 except for the State Requirements for Educational Facilities.
Conversion charter schools shall utilize facilities that comply with the State Requirements for Educational Facilities provided that the school district and the charter school have entered into a mutual management plan for the reasonable maintenance of such facilities.
The local governing authority shall not adopt, or impose, or enforce any local building requirements or site-development restrictions that impact, such as parking and site-size criteria, student enrollment and capacity, and occupant load, and that are addressed by and more stringent than those found in the State Requirements for Educational Facilities of the Florida Building CodePage and4 theof Florida6 FireCODING: Prevention Code.
A local governing authority may not require a proposed charter school to obtain a special exemption or conditional use approval in order for the charter school to be an allowable use under the local governing authority's land development code.
A local governing authority must treat charter schools equitably in comparison to similar requirements, restrictions, and site planning processes imposed upon public schools that are not charter schools, including such provisions that are established by interlocal agreement.
An interlocal agreement entered into by a school district for the development of only its own schools, including provisions Page 4 of 5 CODING:
hb569-00hb569-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HBCS/HB 569 2025 relatingCode. to the extension of infrastructure, may be used by charter schools.
A local governing authority must treat charter schools equitably in comparison to similar requirements, restrictions, and site planning processes imposed upon public schools that are not charter schools, including such provisions that are established by interlocal agreement.
An interlocal agreement entered into by a school district for the development of only its own schools, including provisions relating to the extension of infrastructure, may be used by charter schools.
(c) Any facility, or portion thereof, used to house a charter school whose charter has been approved by the sponsor and the governing board, pursuant to subsection (7), is exempt Page 5 of 6 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb569-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 569 2025 from ad valorem taxes pursuant to s.
Show all 49 changed lines (9 more)
196.1983.
Notwithstanding any other law, local ordinance, or regulation to the contrary, a local governing authority may not require a charter school to obtain a special exemption or conditional use approval in order for the charter school to be an allowable use under the local governing authority's land development code.
Any library, community service, museum, performing arts, theater, cinema, or church facility;
any facility or land owned by a Florida College System institution or university;
any similar public institutional facilities;
and any facility recently used to house a school or child care facility licensed under s.
402.305 may provide space to charter schools within their facilities under their preexisting zoning and land use designations without obtaining a special exception, rezoning, or a land use change.
Page 56 of 56 CODING:
hb569-00hb569-01-c1
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
View plain text versions (2)
- H 569 c1 View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 569 Filed pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill classifies charter schools as public facilities, provides guidelines for developer contributions to public schools, and limits local government regulations on charter school facilities.
-
163.3180
A→ a charter school is considered a public facility.Charter schools are established as public facilities under concurrency requirements.
-
163.31801
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, if a local government or special district charges and collects an education impact fee, a developer may contract with a school district or charter school to provide an improvement or contribution...and shall be credited against the collection of the education impact fee on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value.
Developers can get credits against education impact fees for contributions made to schools.
-
316.18941
Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, local authorities may not impose or enforce any vehicular stacking ordinance or regulation against any public school or private school during adopted school hours...
Local governments cannot regulate vehicular stacking at schools during school hours.
-
1002.33
the local governing authority shall not adopt, or impose, or enforce any local building requirements or site-development restrictions that impact, such as parking and site-size criteria...→ The local governing authority shall not adopt, or impose, or enforce any local building requirements or site-development restrictions that impact, such as parking and site-size criteria, student enrollment and capacity, and occupant load, and that are addressed by and more stringent than those found in the State Requirements for Educational Facilities of the Florida Building Code.Local authorities cannot impose stricter building requirements on charter schools than what is required for public schools.
-
1002.33
a local governing authority may not require a charter school to obtain a special exemption or conditional use approval in order for the charter school to be an allowable use under the local governing authority's land development code.→ Notwithstanding any other law, local ordinance, or regulation to the contrary, a local governing authority may not require a charter school to obtain a special exemption or conditional use approval in order for the charter school to be an allowable use under the local governing authority's land development code.Charter schools are exempt from obtaining special approvals under land development codes.
Action History
-
Died in Rules, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 443 (Ch. 2025-106)
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
Received
-
Referred to Rules
-
In Messages
-
CS passed; YEAS 86, NAYS 26
-
Read 3rd time
-
Added to Third Reading Calendar
-
Placed on 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
Bill added to Special Order Calendar (4/16/2025)
-
Added to Second Reading Calendar
-
Bill released to House Calendar
-
Reported out of State Affairs Committee
-
Favorable by State Affairs Committee
-
Added to State Affairs Committee agenda
-
Now in State Affairs Committee
-
Reported out of Education Administration Subcommittee
-
Favorable by Education Administration Subcommittee
-
Added to Education Administration Subcommittee agenda
-
Now in Education Administration Subcommittee
-
Referred to State Affairs Committee
-
Referred to Education Administration Subcommittee
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
-
CS Filed
-
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
-
Reported out of Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
-
Favorable with CS by Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
-
PCS added to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee agenda
-
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
-
Now in Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
-
Referred to State Affairs Committee
-
Referred to Education Administration Subcommittee
-
Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Kim Kendall · Primary
- Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 162 not signed on · 25 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Kendall, Kim Republican
- Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (162)
162 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 162 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 76 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Democrat | 6 | 25 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 86 | 26 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 72% | 22% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (119)
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 569 do?
- Construction and Facilities; Provides that charter school is public facility for purpose of concurrency; authorizes developers to provide specified improvements & contributions to public schools; requires developers to receive credits for impact fees from such improvements & contributions; provides requirements for location of such schools; requires such credits to be approved by local governments & special districts; prohibits local governing authorities from imposing or enforcing certain vehicular stacking ordinances or regulations against specified schools during certain hours; revises building requirements for charter schools; prohibits local governing authorities from requiring charter school to obtain certain exemptions or approvals under land development code for specified purposes relating to allowable uses.
- Who sponsors HB 569?
- HB 569 is sponsored by Kendall, Kim (Republican) and Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee.
- What is the current status of HB 569?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 569?
- Track HB 569 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 569
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 569
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →