Florida 2025 Regular Session Status: Passed House 1 R cosponsors

HB 569 — Construction and Facilities

Last action — Died in Rules, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 443 (Ch. 2025-106)

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Construction and Facilities; Provides that charter school is public facility for purpose of concurrency; authorizes developers to provide specified improvements & contributions to public schools; requires developers to receive credits for impact fees from such improvements & contributions; provides requirements for location of such schools; requires such credits to be approved by local governments & special districts; prohibits local governing authorities from imposing or enforcing certain vehicular stacking ordinances or regulations against specified schools during certain hours; revises building requirements for charter schools; prohibits local governing authorities from requiring charter school to obtain certain exemptions or approvals under land development code for specified purposes relating to allowable uses.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

156 added · 129 removed

156 line(s) added, 129 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB 569 2025 A bill to be entitled An act relating to construction and facilities;
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 569 2025 A bill to be entitled An act relating to construction and facilities;
exempting specified public facilities from concurrency;
providing that a charter school is public facility for the purpose of concurrency;
providing requirements for the location of such schools;
prohibiting local governing authorities from imposing or enforcing vehicular stacking ordinances or regulations against specified schools during certain hours;
prohibiting local governing authorities from imposing or enforcing certain vehicular stacking ordinances or regulations against specified schools during certain hours;
prohibiting local governing authorities from requiring a charter school to obtain certain exemptions or approvals under the land development code for specified purposes relating to allowable uses;
Section 1.
Page 1 of 6 CODING:
Paragraph (c) is added to subsection (1) of section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, to read:
163.3180 Concurrency.— (1) Sanitary sewer, solid waste, drainage, and potable water are the only public facilities and services subject to the concurrency requirement on a statewide basis.
Additional public Page 1 of 5 CODING:
hb569-00 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB 569 2025 facilities and services may not be made subject to concurrency on a statewide basis without approval by the Legislature;
hb569-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 569 2025 Section 1.
however, any local government may extend the concurrency requirement so that it applies to additional public facilities within its jurisdiction.
Subsection (4) of section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
(c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, construction projects of public facilities, as defined in s.
163.3180 Concurrency.— (4) The concurrency requirement as implemented in local comprehensive plans applies to state and other public facilities and development to the same extent that it applies to all other facilities and development, as provided by law.
163.3164, that are necessary to ensure the protection of the health, safety, and general welfare, including public schools, shall be exempt from concurrency.
For purposes of this subsection, a charter school is considered a public facility.
Because charter schools are a part of concurrency and serve a public good, local governments are authorized to grant special variances for the opening of a charter school in a manner consistent with traditional public schools.
Paragraph (c) is added to subsection (5) of section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, to read:
Subsection (5) of section 163.31801, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
challenges.— (5) (c) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, if a local government or special district charges and collects an education impact fee, a developer may contract with a school district or charter school to provide an improvement or contribution, including monetary contributions, land dedications, site planning and design, or construction, and Page 2 of 5 CODING:
challenges.— (5)(a) Notwithstanding any charter provision, comprehensive plan policy, ordinance, development order, development permit, or resolution, the local government or special district that requires any improvement or contribution must credit against the collection of the impact fee any contribution, whether identified in a development order, proportionate share agreement, or any form of exaction related to public facilities or infrastructure, including monetary contributions, land dedication, site planning and design, or construction.
Any contribution must be applied on a dollar-for- dollar basis at fair market value to reduce any impact fee collected for the general category or class of public facilities Page 2 of 6 CODING:
hb569-00 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB 569 2025 shall be credited against the collection of the education impact fee on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value.
hb569-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 569 2025 or infrastructure for which the contribution was made.
(b) Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, if a local government or special district charges and collects an education impact fee, a developer may contract with a school district or charter school to provide an improvement or contribution, including monetary contributions, land dedications, site planning and design, or construction, and shall be credited against the collection of the education impact fee on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value.
(c)(b) If a local government or special district does not charge and collect an impact fee for the general category or class of public facilities or infrastructure contributed, a credit may not be applied under paragraph (a).
316.18941 Vehicular stacking during school hours.— Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, local governing authorities may not impose or enforce any vehicular stacking ordinance or regulation against any public school or private school during adopted school hours, including during student drop-off and pick-up hours, if such ordinance or regulation would limit enrollment.
316.18941 Vehicular stacking during school hours.— Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, local authorities may not impose or enforce any vehicular stacking ordinance or regulation against any public school or private school during adopted school hours, including during student drop-off and pick-up hours, if such ordinance or regulation would limit enrollment.
Section 4.
Page 3 of 6 CODING:
Paragraph (a) of subsection (18) of section 1002.33, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
1002.33 Charter schools.— (18) FACILITIES.— (a) A startup charter school shall utilize facilities which comply with the Florida Building Code pursuant to chapter 553 except for the State Requirements for Educational Facilities.
Conversion charter schools shall utilize facilities that comply with the State Requirements for Educational Facilities provided that the school district and the charter school have entered into a mutual management plan for the Page 3 of 5 CODING:
hb569-00 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB 569 2025 reasonable maintenance of such facilities.
hb569-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 569 2025 Section 4.
Paragraphs (a) and (c) of subsection (18) of section 1002.33, Florida Statutes, are amended to read:
1002.33 Charter schools.— (18) FACILITIES.— (a) A startup charter school shall utilize facilities which comply with the Florida Building Code pursuant to chapter 553 except for the State Requirements for Educational Facilities.
Conversion charter schools shall utilize facilities that comply with the State Requirements for Educational Facilities provided that the school district and the charter school have entered into a mutual management plan for the reasonable maintenance of such facilities.
The local governing authority shall not adopt, or impose, or enforce any local building requirements or site-development restrictions that impact, such as parking and site-size criteria, student enrollment and capacity, and occupant load, and that are addressed by and more stringent than those found in the State Requirements for Educational Facilities of the Florida Building Code and the Florida Fire Prevention Code.
The local governing authority shall not adopt, or impose, or enforce any local building requirements or site-development restrictions that impact, such as parking and site-size criteria, student enrollment and capacity, and occupant load, and that are addressed by and more stringent than those found in the State Requirements for Educational Facilities of the Florida Building Page 4 of 6 CODING:
A local governing authority may not require a proposed charter school to obtain a special exemption or conditional use approval in order for the charter school to be an allowable use under the local governing authority's land development code.
A local governing authority must treat charter schools equitably in comparison to similar requirements, restrictions, and site planning processes imposed upon public schools that are not charter schools, including such provisions that are established by interlocal agreement.
An interlocal agreement entered into by a school district for the development of only its own schools, including provisions Page 4 of 5 CODING:
hb569-00 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB 569 2025 relating to the extension of infrastructure, may be used by charter schools.
hb569-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 569 2025 Code.
A local governing authority must treat charter schools equitably in comparison to similar requirements, restrictions, and site planning processes imposed upon public schools that are not charter schools, including such provisions that are established by interlocal agreement.
An interlocal agreement entered into by a school district for the development of only its own schools, including provisions relating to the extension of infrastructure, may be used by charter schools.
(c) Any facility, or portion thereof, used to house a charter school whose charter has been approved by the sponsor and the governing board, pursuant to subsection (7), is exempt Page 5 of 6 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb569-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 569 2025 from ad valorem taxes pursuant to s.
Show all 49 changed rows (9 more)
Previous
Latest
196.1983.
Notwithstanding any other law, local ordinance, or regulation to the contrary, a local governing authority may not require a charter school to obtain a special exemption or conditional use approval in order for the charter school to be an allowable use under the local governing authority's land development code.
Any library, community service, museum, performing arts, theater, cinema, or church facility;
any facility or land owned by a Florida College System institution or university;
any similar public institutional facilities;
and any facility recently used to house a school or child care facility licensed under s.
402.305 may provide space to charter schools within their facilities under their preexisting zoning and land use designations without obtaining a special exception, rezoning, or a land use change.
Page 5 of 5 CODING:
Page 6 of 6 CODING:
hb569-00
hb569-01-c1
View plain text versions (2)

How this bill changes current law

5 changes Share ↗

AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.

The bill classifies charter schools as public facilities, provides guidelines for developer contributions to public schools, and limits local government regulations on charter school facilities.

  • 163.3180

    A → a charter school is considered a public facility.

    Charter schools are established as public facilities under concurrency requirements.

  • 163.31801

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, if a local government or special district charges and collects an education impact fee, a developer may contract with a school district or charter school to provide an improvement or contribution...and shall be credited against the collection of the education impact fee on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value.

    Developers can get credits against education impact fees for contributions made to schools.

  • 316.18941

    Notwithstanding any other provision of law to the contrary, local authorities may not impose or enforce any vehicular stacking ordinance or regulation against any public school or private school during adopted school hours...

    Local governments cannot regulate vehicular stacking at schools during school hours.

  • 1002.33

    the local governing authority shall not adopt, or impose, or enforce any local building requirements or site-development restrictions that impact, such as parking and site-size criteria... → The local governing authority shall not adopt, or impose, or enforce any local building requirements or site-development restrictions that impact, such as parking and site-size criteria, student enrollment and capacity, and occupant load, and that are addressed by and more stringent than those found in the State Requirements for Educational Facilities of the Florida Building Code.

    Local authorities cannot impose stricter building requirements on charter schools than what is required for public schools.

  • 1002.33

    a local governing authority may not require a charter school to obtain a special exemption or conditional use approval in order for the charter school to be an allowable use under the local governing authority's land development code. → Notwithstanding any other law, local ordinance, or regulation to the contrary, a local governing authority may not require a charter school to obtain a special exemption or conditional use approval in order for the charter school to be an allowable use under the local governing authority's land development code.

    Charter schools are exempt from obtaining special approvals under land development codes.

Action History

  1. Died in Rules, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 443 (Ch. 2025-106)

  2. Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

  3. Received

  4. Referred to Rules

  5. In Messages

  6. CS passed; YEAS 86, NAYS 26

  7. Read 3rd time

  8. Added to Third Reading Calendar

  9. Placed on 3rd reading

  10. Read 2nd time

  11. Bill added to Special Order Calendar (4/16/2025)

  12. Added to Second Reading Calendar

  13. Bill released to House Calendar

  14. Reported out of State Affairs Committee

  15. Favorable by State Affairs Committee

  16. Added to State Affairs Committee agenda

  17. Now in State Affairs Committee

  18. Reported out of Education Administration Subcommittee

  19. Favorable by Education Administration Subcommittee

  20. Added to Education Administration Subcommittee agenda

  21. Now in Education Administration Subcommittee

  22. Referred to State Affairs Committee

  23. Referred to Education Administration Subcommittee

  24. 1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)

  25. CS Filed

  26. Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)

  27. Reported out of Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee

  28. Favorable with CS by Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee

  29. PCS added to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee agenda

  30. 1st Reading (Original Filed Version)

  31. Now in Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee

  32. Referred to State Affairs Committee

  33. Referred to Education Administration Subcommittee

  34. Referred to Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee

  35. Filed

Sponsors

  • Kim Kendall · Primary
  • Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 162 not signed on · 25 voted No

Sponsors (2)

  • Kendall, Kim Republican
  • Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (162)

162 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 162 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passage, Third Reading

Passed 86 Yea · 26 Nay · 7 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 76005
Democrat 62502
Unaffiliated 4100
Total 862607
% of votes cast 72%22%0%6%
How each member voted (119)
Member Party Vote
Caruso — Yea
Casello — Nay
Temple — Yea
Tomkow — Yea
Lopez, V. — Yea
Alvarez, Jose Democrat Yea
Antone, Bruce Hadley Democrat Not Voting
Aristide, Wallace Democrat Nay
Bartleman, Robin Democrat Nay
Bracy Davis, LaVon Democrat Nay
Campbell, Daryl Democrat Nay
Chambliss, Kevin D. Democrat Nay
Cross, Lindsay Democrat Nay
Daley, Dan Democrat Not Voting
Daniels, Kimberly Democrat Yea
Driskell, Fentrice Democrat Nay
Dunkley, Lisa Democrat Yea
Edmonds, Jervonte "Tae" Democrat Nay
Eskamani, Dr. Anna V. Democrat Nay
Franklin II, Gallop Democrat Yea
Gantt, Ashley Viola Democrat Nay
Gottlieb, Michael "Mike" Democrat Nay
Harris, Jennifer "Rita" Democrat Nay
Hart-Lowman, Dianne "Ms Dee" Democrat Nay
Hinson, Yvonne Hayes Democrat Nay
Hunschofsky, Christine Democrat Nay
Joseph, Dotie Democrat Nay
López, Johanna Democrat Yea
Nixon, Angela "Angie" Democrat Nay
Rayner, Michele K. Democrat Nay
Robinson, Felicia Simone Democrat Nay
Rosenwald, Mitch Democrat Nay
Skidmore, Kelly Democrat Nay
Smith, Carlos Guillermo Democrat Yea
Spencer, Leonard Democrat Nay
Tant, Allison Democrat Nay
Tendrich, Debra Democrat Nay
Woodson, Marie Paule Democrat Nay
Abbott, Shane G. Republican Yea
Albert, Jon Republican Yea
Alvarez, Daniel Antonio "Danny" Republican Yea
Anderson, Adam Republican Yea
Andrade, Robert Alexander "Alex" Republican Yea
Baker, Jessica Republican Yea
Bankson, Douglas Michael "Doug" Republican Yea
Barnaby, Webster Republican Yea
Basabe, Fabián Republican Yea
Benarroch, Yvette Republican Yea
Berfield, Kimberly Republican Yea
Black, Dean Republican Yea
Blanco, Omar Republican Yea
Booth, Erika Republican Yea
Borrero, David Republican Yea
Botana, Adam Republican Yea
Brackett, Robert A. "Robbie" Republican Yea
Brannan III, Robert Charles "Chuck" Republican Yea
Buchanan, James Republican Yea
Busatta, Demi Republican Yea
Canady, Jennifer Republican Yea
Cassel, Hillary Republican Yea
Chamberlin, Ryan Republican Yea
Chaney, Linda Republican Yea
Cobb, Nan Republican Yea
Conerly, William "Bill" Republican Yea
Duggan, Wyman Republican Yea
Esposito, Tiffany Republican Yea
Fabricio, Tom Republican Yea
Garrison, Sam Republican Yea
Gentry, Richard Republican Yea
Gerwig, Anne Republican Yea
Giallombardo, Mike Republican Yea
Gonzalez Pittman, Karen Republican Yea
Gossett-Seidman, Peggy Republican Yea
Greco, Sam Republican Yea
Griffitts Jr., Philip Wayne "Griff" Republican Not Voting
Grow, J.J. Republican Yea
Holcomb, Jeff Republican Not Voting
Jacques, Berny Republican Yea
Johnson, Chad Republican Yea
Kendall, Kim Republican Yea
Kincart Jonsson, Jennifer Republican Yea
Koster, Traci Republican Yea
LaMarca, Chip Republican Yea
Maggard, Randall Scott "Randy" Republican Yea
Maney, Patt Republican Yea
Mayfield, Debbie Republican Yea
McClure, Lawrence Republican Yea
McFarland, Fiona Republican Yea
Melo, Lauren Republican Yea
Michael, Kiyan Republican Yea
Miller, Monique Republican Yea
Mooney Jr., James Vernon "Jim" Republican Yea
Nix Jr., Danny Republican Yea
Oliver, Vanessa Republican Yea
Overdorf, Tobin Rogers "Toby" Republican Yea
Owen, Michael Republican Yea
Partington, Bill Republican Yea
Perez, Daniel Republican Yea
Persons-Mulicka, Jenna Republican Yea
Plakon, Rachel Saunders Republican Yea
Plasencia, Susan Republican Not Voting
Porras, Juan Carlos Republican Yea
Redondo, Mike Republican Yea
Rizo, Alex Republican Yea
Robinson Jr., William Cloud "Will" Republican Yea
Salzman, Michelle Republican Yea
Sapp, Judson Republican Yea
Shoaf, Jason Republican Yea
Sirois, Tyler I. Republican Not Voting
Snyder, John Republican Yea
Stark, Paula A. Republican Yea
Steele, Kevin M. Republican Yea
Trabulsy, Dana Republican Yea
Tramont, Chase Republican Yea
Tuck, Kaylee Republican Yea
Valdés, Susan L. Republican Yea
Weinberger, Meg Republican Yea
Yarkosky, Taylor Michael Republican Not Voting
Yeager, Bradford Troy "Brad" Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 569 do?
Construction and Facilities; Provides that charter school is public facility for purpose of concurrency; authorizes developers to provide specified improvements & contributions to public schools; requires developers to receive credits for impact fees from such improvements & contributions; provides requirements for location of such schools; requires such credits to be approved by local governments & special districts; prohibits local governing authorities from imposing or enforcing certain vehicular stacking ordinances or regulations against specified schools during certain hours; revises building requirements for charter schools; prohibits local governing authorities from requiring charter school to obtain certain exemptions or approvals under land development code for specified purposes relating to allowable uses.
Who sponsors HB 569?
HB 569 is sponsored by Kendall, Kim (Republican) and Intergovernmental Affairs Subcommittee.
What is the current status of HB 569?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 569?
Track HB 569 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 569

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 569

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →