Florida 2025 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 R cosponsors

SB 498 — Trust Fund Interest for Purposes Approved by the Supreme Court

Last action — Died in Messages

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Trust Fund Interest for Purposes Approved by the Supreme Court; Authorizing financial institutions to hold funds in specified trust accounts to be used for specified purposes; requiring such financial institutions to pay a certain minimum interest rate or dividend; requiring that the interest rate be a specified percentage; requiring a financial institution to submit a quarterly rate validation sheet and affidavit to the Chief Financial Officer attesting that it will pay a minimum certain interest rate or dividend; requiring that the affidavit attest that certain information is true and factual, etc.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

117 added · 94 removed

117 line(s) added, 94 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CS for SB 498 By the Committees on Banking and Insurance;
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 498 By the Committee on Judiciary;
and Judiciary;
and Senator Grall 590-02314-25 2025498c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to trust fund interest for purposes approved by the Supreme Court;
and Senator Grall 597-03070-25 2025498c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to trust fund interest for purposes approved by the Supreme Court;
requiring such financial institutions to pay a certain interest rate or dividend;
requiring such financial institutions to quarterly select a certain interest rate alternative for a specified purpose;
prohibiting the interest rate from being less than a specified percentage;
providing requirements for such interest rate alternatives;
requiring a financial institution to submit a rate validation sheet and affidavit to the Chief Financial Officer attesting it will pay a certain interest rate or dividend;
requiring a financial institution to submit a rate validation sheet and affidavit to the Chief Financial Officer within a specified timeframe attesting it will pay a certain interest rate;
requiring the Chief Financial Officer to determine, at specified intervals, the interest rate of a specified interest rate alternative;
providing that such rates are effective on specified dates;
requiring the Chief Financial Officer to inform a certain entity of the determined interest rate within a specified timeframe;
WHEREAS, in September 1981, the Florida Supreme Court implemented the nation’s first Interest on Trust Accounts (IOTA) program, establishing a vital funding source for civil legal aid, justice system improvements, and public service programs for law students, and WHEREAS, Funding Florida Legal Aid (FFLA), formerly known as The Florida Bar Foundation, and the Florida Bankers Association have cooperated for decades to sustain the program and encourage participation, and WHEREAS, in March 2023, the Florida Supreme Court adopted new rules requiring lawyers to secure interest rates based on the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate, compelling banks to pay Page 1 of 4 CODING:
WHEREAS, in September 1981, the Florida Supreme Court implemented the nation’s first Interest on Trust Accounts (IOTA) program, establishing a vital funding source for civil legal aid, justice system improvements, and public service programs for law students, and Page 1 of 4 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CS for SB 498 597-03070-25 2025498c2 higher rates for IOTA accounts than for other similar accounts, and WHEREAS, 44 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico have mandatory IOTA programs modeled after Florida’s pre- 2023 system, while 5 states and the U.S.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 498 590-02314-25 2025498c1 WHEREAS, Funding Florida Legal Aid (FFLA), formerly known as The Florida Bar Foundation, and the Florida Bankers Association have cooperated for decades to sustain the program and encourage participation, and WHEREAS, in March 2023, the Florida Supreme Court adopted new rules requiring lawyers to secure interest rates based on the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate, compelling banks to pay higher rates for IOTA accounts than for other similar accounts, and WHEREAS, 44 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico have mandatory IOTA programs modeled after Florida’s pre- 2023 system, while 5 states and the U.S.
Virgin Islands operate voluntary or opt-out programs, and WHEREAS, the 2023 rule change made Florida an outlier compared to other jurisdictions where IOTA rates are typically benchmarked against interest-bearing checking account rates, and WHEREAS, the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate serves as a benchmark for lending and is not used to set deposit account rates, and WHEREAS, the 2023 rule change resulted in banks paying higher rates on funds in IOTA accounts, resulting in record revenues, exceeding $279 million, paid to FFLA during the 2023- 2024 fiscal year, nearly four times the prior peak rate and far exceeding average annual interest revenues, and WHEREAS, in October 2024, the Florida Supreme Court authorized FFLA to hold nearly $143 million in reserve, and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of this state for the Legislature to establish statutory benchmarks for IOTA rates to ensure regulatory safety, fairness, and sustainability, similar to the quarterly interest rate determinations made by the Chief Financial Officer for interest paid on court judgments, NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Virgin Islands operate voluntary or opt-out programs, and WHEREAS, the 2023 rule change made Florida an outlier compared to other jurisdictions where IOTA rates are typically benchmarked against interest-bearing checking account rates, and WHEREAS, the Wall Street Journal Prime Rate serves as a benchmark for lending and is not used to set deposit account rates, and WHEREAS, the 2023 rule change resulted in banks paying higher rates on funds in IOTA accounts, resulting in record revenues, exceeding $279 million, paid to FFLA during the 2023- 2024 fiscal year, nearly four times the prior peak rate and far exceeding average annual interest revenues, and WHEREAS, in October 2024, the Florida Supreme Court authorized FFLA to hold nearly $143 million in reserve, and WHEREAS, it is in the best interests of this state for the Legislature to establish statutory benchmarks for IOTA rates to ensure regulatory safety, fairness, and sustainability, similar Page 2 of 4 CODING:
Section 1.
Section 655.97, Florida Statutes, is created to Page 2 of 4 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CS for SB 498 597-03070-25 2025498c2 read:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 498 590-02314-25 2025498c1 to the quarterly interest rate determinations made by the Chief Financial Officer for interest paid on court judgments, NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
Section 1.
Section 655.97, Florida Statutes, is created to read:
If the institution holds such an account, it must pay the highest interest rate or dividend generally available from the institution to its comparable business or consumer accounts or nonmaturing deposit accounts, provided that the trust account meets or exceeds the same minimum balance or other account requirements, but the interest rate on trust accounts may not be less than 0.25 percent.
If the institution holds such an account, it must quarterly select one of the following interest rate alternatives to determine the interest it will pay to the entity established by the Supreme Court:
(a) The financial institution must submit a rate validation sheet and affidavit to the Chief Financial Officer by the tenth day of each quarter attesting that it will pay the same interest rate or dividend on the lawyer or law firm trust accounts that it is paying on its comparable business or consumer accounts or nonmaturing deposit accounts or the minimum 0.25 percent.
(a) The first interest rate alternative must be set at the highest interest rate or dividend generally available from the institution to its comparable business or consumer accounts or nonmaturing deposit accounts, provided that the trust account meets or exceeds the same minimum balance or other account requirements.
(b) The affidavit must attest that the rate information submitted on the rate validation sheet is true and factual.
1.
(c) The Chief Financial Officer shall verify that the rate validation sheet and affidavit have been received by the Department of Financial Services.
If a financial institution chooses to pay the rate alternative provided in this paragraph, it must submit a rate validation sheet and affidavit to the Chief Financial Officer by the tenth day of each quarter attesting that it will pay at Page 3 of 4 CODING:
(2) This section does not apply to interest rates established by written contract or obligations unrelated to the Page 3 of 4 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for CS for SB 498 597-03070-25 2025498c2 trust accounts described by this section.
Florida Senate - 2025 CS for SB 498 590-02314-25 2025498c1 least the same interest on the lawyer or law firm trust accounts that it is paying on its comparable business or consumer accounts or nonmaturing deposit accounts.
2.
The affidavit must attest that the rate information submitted on the rate validation sheet is true and factual.
3.
The Chief Financial Officer shall verify that the rate validation sheet and affidavit have been received by the Department of Financial Services.
(b) The second interest rate alternative must be set at 25 percent of the federal funds target rate determined by the Federal Open Market Committee of the Federal Reserve System or 0.25 percent, whichever is higher, net of fees.
1.
Each December 1, March 1, June 1, and September 1, the Chief Financial Officer shall determine the interest rate of the second interest rate alternative.
The rate alternative determined by the Chief Financial Officer is effective on the following January 1, April 1, July 1, and October 1, respectively.
2.
Within 3 days after determining the interest rate under this paragraph, the Chief Financial Officer shall inform the entity established by the Supreme Court of the determined interest rate for the upcoming quarter.
(2) This section does not apply to interest rates established by written contract or obligations unrelated to the trust accounts described by this section.
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. Died in Messages

  2. Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration

  3. In Messages

  4. CS passed as amended; YEAS 28 NAYS 10

  5. Read 3rd time

  6. Amendment(s) adopted (233904)

  7. Read 2nd time

  8. Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/23/25

  9. Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading

  10. CS/CS/CS by Rules read 1st time

  11. Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  12. CS/CS/CS by- Rules; YEAS 17 NAYS 7

  13. On Committee agenda-- Rules, 04/08/25, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building

  14. CS/CS by Banking and Insurance read 1st time

  15. Now in Rules

  16. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  17. CS/CS by Banking and Insurance; YEAS 9 NAYS 1

  18. On Committee agenda-- Banking and Insurance, 03/31/25, 1:30 pm, 412 Knott Building

  19. Now in Banking and Insurance

  20. CS by Judiciary read 1st time

  21. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  22. CS by Judiciary; YEAS 9 NAYS 2

  23. On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 03/12/25, 8:30 am, 110 Senate Building

  24. Introduced

  25. Referred to Judiciary; Banking and Insurance; Rules

  26. Filed

Sponsors

  • Erin Grall · Primary
  • Judiciary · Primary
  • Banking and Insurance · Primary
  • Rules · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 160 not signed on · 11 voted No

Sponsors (4)

  • Grall, Erin Republican
  • Judiciary
  • Banking and Insurance
  • Rules

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (160)

160 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 160 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Third Reading

Passed 28 Yea · 10 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democrat 1900
Republican 24100
Unaffiliated 2000
No Party Affiliation 1000
Total 281000
% of votes cast 74%26%0%0%
How each member voted (38)
Member Party Vote
Ingoglia — Yea
Collins — Yea
Arrington, Kristen Aston Democrat Nay
Berman, Lori Democrat Nay
Bernard, Mack Democrat Nay
Davis, Tracie Democrat Nay
Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" Democrat Nay
Osgood, Rosalind Democrat Nay
Polsky, Tina Scott Democrat Yea
Rouson, Darryl Ervin Democrat Nay
Sharief, Barbara Democrat Nay
Smith, Carlos Guillermo Democrat Nay
Pizzo, Jason W. B. No Party Affiliation Yea
Albritton, Ben Republican Yea
Boyd, Jim Republican Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Brodeur, Jason Republican Yea
Burgess, Danny Republican Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
Calatayud, Alexis Republican Yea
DiCeglie, Nick Republican Yea
Gaetz, Don Republican Yea
Garcia, Ileana Republican Yea
Grall, Erin Republican Yea
Gruters, Joe Republican Yea
Harrell, Gayle Republican Yea
Hooper, Ed Republican Yea
Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" Republican Yea
Martin, Jonathan Republican Yea
McClain, Stan Republican Yea
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Nay
Simon, Corey Republican Yea
Truenow, Keith L. Republican Yea
Trumbull, Jay Republican Yea
Vacant Republican Yea
Wright, Tom A. Republican Yea
Yarborough, Clay Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 7 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 16101
Unaffiliated 1000
Democrat 0500
No Party Affiliation 0100
Total 17701
% of votes cast 68%28%0%4%
How each member voted (25)
Member Party Vote
Ingoglia — Yea
Berman, Lori Democrat Nay
Davis, Tracie Democrat Nay
Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" Democrat Nay
Osgood, Rosalind Democrat Nay
Rouson, Darryl Ervin Democrat Nay
Pizzo, Jason W. B. No Party Affiliation Nay
Boyd, Jim Republican Yea
Bradley, Jennifer Republican Yea
Brodeur, Jason Republican Not Voting
Burgess, Danny Republican Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
DiCeglie, Nick Republican Yea
Gaetz, Don Republican Yea
Garcia, Ileana Republican Yea
Gruters, Joe Republican Yea
Harrell, Gayle Republican Yea
Hooper, Ed Republican Yea
Martin, Jonathan Republican Yea
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Nay
Simon, Corey Republican Yea
Trumbull, Jay Republican Yea
Vacant Republican Yea
Wright, Tom A. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 1 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 6000
No Party Affiliation 1000
Democrat 1100
Unaffiliated 1000
Total 9100
% of votes cast 90%10%0%0%
How each member voted (10)
Member Party Vote
Ingoglia — Yea
Osgood, Rosalind Democrat Nay
Sharief, Barbara Democrat Yea
Pizzo, Jason W. B. No Party Affiliation Yea
Boyd, Jim Republican Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
Hooper, Ed Republican Yea
Martin, Jonathan Republican Yea
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea
Truenow, Keith L. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 9 Yea · 2 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Republican 8000
Democrat 1200
Total 9200
% of votes cast 82%18%0%0%
How each member voted (11)
Member Party Vote
Berman, Lori Democrat Nay
Osgood, Rosalind Democrat Nay
Polsky, Tina Scott Democrat Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
DiCeglie, Nick Republican Yea
Gaetz, Don Republican Yea
Hooper, Ed Republican Yea
Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" Republican Yea
Passidomo, Kathleen Republican Yea
Trumbull, Jay Republican Yea
Yarborough, Clay Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 498 do?
Trust Fund Interest for Purposes Approved by the Supreme Court; Authorizing financial institutions to hold funds in specified trust accounts to be used for specified purposes; requiring such financial institutions to pay a certain minimum interest rate or dividend; requiring that the interest rate be a specified percentage; requiring a financial institution to submit a quarterly rate validation sheet and affidavit to the Chief Financial Officer attesting that it will pay a minimum certain interest rate or dividend; requiring that the affidavit attest that certain information is true and factual, etc.
Who sponsors SB 498?
SB 498 is sponsored by Grall, Erin (Republican), Judiciary, Banking and Insurance, and Rules.
What is the current status of SB 498?
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 498?
Track SB 498 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 498

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 498

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →