Guardianship
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1272 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1272.
You're tracking SB 1272
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1272 — Guardianship
Last action — Died in Children, Families, and Elder Affairs
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Guardianship; Prohibiting a guardian from restricting the ability of an adult ward to maintain contact with a person except in certain circumstances; requiring that an initial guardianship plan identify the persons entitled to certain information; requiring that an initial guardianship plan for an incapacitated person identify persons entitled to certain notice and to visit the incapacitated person, etc.
Bill Text
- Introduced S 1272 Filed Current pdf
AI-generated reading aid from the bill's amendatory text — verify against the official bill.
The bill enhances the rights of adult wards in guardianship by limiting a guardian's ability to restrict contact and requiring more comprehensive notification in guardianship plans.
-
744.361
If the ward is an adult, the guardian may not restrict the ability of the ward to maintain contact with a specified person unless the guardian has good cause to believe that interaction with the person poses a risk of significant physical, psychological, or financial harm to the ward, and the restriction is:→ If the ward is an adult, the guardian may not restrict the ability of the ward to maintain contact with a specified person unless the guardian has good cause to believe that interaction with the person poses a risk of significant physical, psychological, or financial harm to the ward, and the restriction is: 1. For no more than 7 business days, if the person has a family or preexisting social relationship with the ward; 2. For no more than 60 days, if the person does not have a family or preexisting social relationship with the ward; or 3. Authorized by specific order of the court unless the guardian believes that such contact may cause harm to the ward.This clarifies the conditions under which a guardian can restrict contact for adult wards.
-
744.361
The guardian must provide the ward with notice of a change in residential setting at least 14 days before the change occurs if the new residential setting will be more restrictive than the current residential setting.→ The guardian must provide the ward with notice of a change in residential setting at least 14 days before the change occurs if the new residential setting will be more restrictive than the current residential setting. Such notice is not required if the change in residential setting is authorized by the guardianship plan or a court order.This specifies exceptions to the notice requirement regarding changes in residential settings.
-
744.361
Provide appropriate notice to any person identified in an initial guardianship plan pursuant to s. 744.363(1)(h).
This establishes a new requirement for guardians to notify individuals identified in the initial guardianship plan.
-
744.363
Identification of all of the following persons: 1. The persons entitled to receive notice of the following information, when such information is known or can be reasonably ascertained by the guardian: a. The incapacitated person’s death. b. The intended disposition of the remains of the decedent. c. The funeral arrangements for the decedent. d. The final resting place of the decedent. 2. If the ward is incapacitated: a. The persons entitled to notice of the incapacitated person’s transfer to a medical facility. b. The persons entitled to visit the incapacitated person.
This requires the initial guardianship plan to include a comprehensive list of individuals entitled to receive notifications regarding the ward's status and arrangements.
Action History
-
Died in Children, Families, and Elder Affairs
-
Indefinitely postponed and withdrawn from consideration
-
Now in Children, Families, and Elder Affairs
-
Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 9 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 04/01/25, 4:00 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Judiciary; Children, Families, and Elder Affairs; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Shevrin D. "Shev" Jones · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" Democrat
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gaetz, Don | Republican | Not Voting |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Not Voting |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1272 do?
- Guardianship; Prohibiting a guardian from restricting the ability of an adult ward to maintain contact with a person except in certain circumstances; requiring that an initial guardianship plan identify the persons entitled to certain information; requiring that an initial guardianship plan for an incapacitated person identify persons entitled to certain notice and to visit the incapacitated person, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 1272?
- SB 1272 is sponsored by Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" (Democrat).
- What is the current status of SB 1272?
- This bill died with 2025 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1272?
- Track SB 1272 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1272
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1272
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →