SB 964 — Coverage for Biomarker Testing
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 885 (Ch. 2024-249)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Coverage for Biomarker Testing; Requiring the Department of Management Services to provide coverage of biomarker testing for specified purposes for state employees’ state group health insurance plan policies issued on or after a specified date; requiring state group health insurance plans to provide enrollees and participating providers with a clear and convenient process for authorization requests for biomarker testing; authorizing the Agency for Health Care Administration to pay for biomarker testing under the Medicaid program for specified purposes, subject to specific appropriations; requiring that Medicaid recipients and participating providers be provided a clear and convenient process for authorization requests for biomarker testing, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
176 added · 185 removed176 line(s) added, 185 removed.
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for CS for SB 964 By the Appropriations Committee on HealthBanking and HumanInsurance; Services;
theand CommitteeSenator onCalatayud Banking597-03029-24 and2024964c1 Insurance;A bill to be entitled An act relating to coverage for biomarker testing;
and Senator Calatayud 603-03307-24 2024964c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to coverage for biomarker testing;
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for CS for SB 964 603-03307-24597-03029-24 2024964c22024964c1 requiring managed care plans to provide Medicaid recipients and health care providers with a clear and convenient process for authorization requests for biomarker testing;
requiring the agency to include the rate impact of the act in certain rates that become effective on a specified date;
The term includes, but is not limited to, single analyte tests, multiplex panel tests, protein expression, and whole exome, whole genome, and whole transcriptome sequencing performed at a participating in-network laboratory facility that is certified pursuant to the federal Clinical Laboratory Page 2 of 7 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for CS for SB 964 603-03307-24597-03029-24 2024964c22024964c1 whole exome, whole genome, and whole transcriptome sequencing performed at a participating in-network laboratory facility that is certified pursuant to the federal Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendment (CLIA) or that has obtained a CLIA Certificate of Waiver by the United States Food and Drug Administration for the tests.
As used in this subparagraph, the term “nationally recognized clinical practice guideline” means an evidence-based clinical practice guideline developed by independent organizations or Pagemedical 3professional ofsocieties 7using CODING:a transparent methodology and reporting structure and with a conflict-of-interest policy.
Guidelines developed by such organizations or societies Page 3 of 7 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for CS for SB 964 603-03307-24597-03029-24 2024964c22024964c1 medicalestablish professionalstandards societiesof usingcare informed by a transparentsystematic methodologyreview of evidence and reportingan structureassessment of the benefits and withcosts aof conflict-of-interestalternative policy.care options and include recommendations intended to optimize patient care.
Guidelines developed by such organizations or societies establish standards of care informed by a systematic review of evidence and an assessment of the benefits and costs of alternative care options and include recommendations intended to optimize patient care.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to prevent or limit the agency from adjusting fees, reimbursement rates, lengths of stay, number of visits, or number of services, or making any other adjustments necessary to Pagecomply 4with the availability of 7moneys CODING:and any limitations or directions provided for in the General Appropriations Act or chapter 216.
If necessary to safeguard the state’s systems of Page 4 of 7 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for CS for SB 964 603-03307-24597-03029-24 2024964c22024964c1 complyproviding withservices theto availabilityelderly of moneys and anydisabled limitationspersons orand directionssubject providedto for in the Generalnotice Appropriationsand Actreview orprovisions chapterof 216.s.
If necessary to safeguard the state’s systems of providing services to elderly and disabled persons and subject to the notice and review provisions of s.
Page3. 5 of 7 CODING:
“Clinical utility” means the test result provides information that is used in the formulation of a treatment or monitoring strategy that informs a patient’s outcome and impacts Page 5 of 7 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for CS for SB 964 603-03307-24597-03029-24 2024964c22024964c1 3.the clinical decision.
“Clinical utility” means the test result provides information that is used in the formulation of a treatment or monitoring strategy that informs a patient’s outcome and impacts the clinical decision.
(c) Recipients and participating providers must be provided access to a clear and convenient process to request authorization for biomarker testing as provided under this Page 6 of 7 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for CS for SB 964 603-03307-24597-03029-24 2024964c22024964c1 (c) Recipients and participating providers must be provided access to a clear and convenient process to request authorization for biomarker testing as provided under this subsection.
TheThis Agency for Health Care Administration is directed to include the rate impact of this act inshall thetake applicableeffect MedicaidJuly managed medical assistance program and long- term care managed care program rates that become effective on October 1, 2024.
Section 5.
This act shall take effect October 1, 2024.
View plain text versions (3)
- S 964 c1 View text pdf
- S 964 c2 View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 964 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/HB 885 (Ch. 2024-249)
-
Substituted CS/CS/HB 885
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/05/24
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Favorable by- Fiscal Policy; YEAS 16 NAYS 0
-
CS/CS by Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services read 1st time
-
On Committee agenda-- Fiscal Policy, 02/22/24, 12:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Fiscal Policy
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services; YEAS 10 NAYS 0
-
CS by Banking and Insurance read 1st time
-
Now in Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, 02/13/24, 1:30 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Banking and Insurance; YEAS 9 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Banking and Insurance, 02/06/24, 3:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Banking and Insurance; Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services; Fiscal Policy
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services · Primary
- Banking and Insurance · Primary
- Alexis Calatayud · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 161 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services
- Banking and Insurance
- Calatayud, Alexis Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (161)
161 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 161 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Collins | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Hutson | — | Not Voting |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Calatayud, Alexis | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Not Voting |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 10 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Not Voting |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Not Voting |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Not Voting |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 964 do?
- Coverage for Biomarker Testing; Requiring the Department of Management Services to provide coverage of biomarker testing for specified purposes for state employees’ state group health insurance plan policies issued on or after a specified date; requiring state group health insurance plans to provide enrollees and participating providers with a clear and convenient process for authorization requests for biomarker testing; authorizing the Agency for Health Care Administration to pay for biomarker testing under the Medicaid program for specified purposes, subject to specific appropriations; requiring that Medicaid recipients and participating providers be provided a clear and convenient process for authorization requests for biomarker testing, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 964?
- SB 964 is sponsored by Appropriations Committee on Health and Human Services, Banking and Insurance, and Calatayud, Alexis (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 964?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 964?
- Track SB 964 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 964
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 964
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →