Florida 2024 Regular Session Status: To Executive 1 R cosponsors

SB 658 — Cybersecurity Incident Liability

Last action — Laid on Table

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

Vetoed by Governor Ron DeSantis (Republican) on March 05, 2024.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Cybersecurity Incident Liability; Providing that a county, municipality, other political subdivision of the state, commercial entity, or third-party agent that complies with certain requirements is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident; requiring certain entities to adopt certain revised frameworks or standards within a specified time period; specifying that the defendant in certain actions has a certain burden of proof, etc.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

102 added · 94 removed

102 line(s) added, 94 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Florida Senate - 2024 SB 658 By Senator DiCeglie 18-00891-24 2024658__ A bill to be entitled An act relating to cybersecurity incident liability;
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for SB 658 By the Committee on Governmental Oversight and Accountability;
and Senator DiCeglie 585-03019-24 2024658c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to cybersecurity incident liability;
providing that a county, municipality, commercial entity, or third-party agent that complies with certain requirements is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident;
providing that a county, municipality, other political subdivision of the state, commercial entity, or third-party agent that complies with certain requirements is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident;
282.3185 is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident.
282.3185, and any other political subdivision of the state that substantially complies with s.
(2) A sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, trust, estate, cooperative, association, or other commercial entity or third-party agent that acquires, maintains, stores, or uses personal information is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident if the entity substantially complies with s.
282.3185 on a voluntary basis, is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident.
501.171, if applicable, and has:
(2) A sole proprietorship, partnership, corporation, trust, estate, cooperative, association, or other commercial entity or third-party agent that acquires, maintains, stores, or uses Page 1 of 4 CODING:
Page 1 of 3 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2024 SB 658 18-00891-24 2024658__ (a) Adopted a cybersecurity program that substantially aligns with the current version of any standards, guidelines, or regulations that implement any of the following:
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for SB 658 585-03019-24 2024658c1 personal information is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident if the entity substantially complies with s.
501.171, if applicable, and has:
(a) Adopted a cybersecurity program that substantially aligns with the current version of any standards, guidelines, or regulations that implement any of the following:
part 160 and part 164, subparts A and C.
part 160 and part 164 subparts A and C.
The Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014, Pub.
The Federal Information Security Modernization Act of Page 2 of 4 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for SB 658 585-03019-24 2024658c1 2014, Pub.
Page 2 of 3 CODING:
(3) The scale and scope of substantial alignment with a standard, law, or regulation under paragraph (2)(a) or paragraph (2)(b) by a covered entity or third-party agent, as applicable, is appropriate if it is based on all of the following factors:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2024 SB 658 18-00891-24 2024658__ (3) The scale and scope of substantial alignment with a standard, law, or regulation under paragraph (2)(a) or paragraph (2)(b) by a covered entity or third-party agent, as applicable, is appropriate if it is based on all of the following factors:
(4) Any commercial entity or third-party agent covered by subsection (2) which substantially complies with a combination of industry-recognized cybersecurity frameworks or standards to gain the presumption against liability pursuant to subsection (2) must, upon the revision of two or more of the frameworks or standards with which the entity complies, adopt the revised frameworks or standards within 1 year after the latest publication date stated in the revisions and, if applicable, comply with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS).
(4) Any commercial entity or third-party agent covered by subsection (2) that substantially complies with a combination of industry-recognized cybersecurity frameworks or standards to gain the presumption against liability pursuant to subsection (2) must, upon the revision of two or more of the frameworks or standards with which the entity complies, adopt the revised frameworks or standards within 1 year after the latest publication date stated in the revisions and, if applicable, comply with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS).
Failure of a county, municipality, or commercial entity to substantially implement a cybersecurity program that is in compliance with this section is not evidence of negligence and does not constitute negligence per se.
Failure of a county, municipality, other political subdivision of the state, or commercial entity to substantially implement a cybersecurity program that is in compliance with this section is not evidence of negligence and does not constitute negligence per se.
(6) In an action in connection with a cybersecurity incident, if the defendant is an entity covered by subsection (1) or subsection (2), the defendant has the burden of proof to establish substantial compliance.
(6) In an action in connection with a cybersecurity Page 3 of 4 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for SB 658 585-03019-24 2024658c1 incident, if the defendant is an entity covered by subsection (1) or subsection (2), the defendant has the burden of proof to establish substantial compliance.
Page 3 of 3 CODING:
Page 4 of 4 CODING:
View plain text versions (2)

Action History

  1. Laid on Table

  2. Substituted CS/CS/HB 473 (Vetoed by Governor)

  3. Read 2nd time

  4. Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/05/24

  5. Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading

  6. Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 11 NAYS 5

  7. On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/14/24, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building

  8. Now in Rules

  9. CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability read 1st time

  10. Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)

  11. CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 5 NAYS 1

  12. On Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 02/06/24, 3:00 pm, 37 Senate Building

  13. Now in Governmental Oversight and Accountability

  14. Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 7 NAYS 2

  15. On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 01/29/24, 4:00 pm, 412 Knott Building

  16. Introduced

  17. Referred to Judiciary; Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Rules

  18. Filed

Sponsors

  • Governmental Oversight and Accountability · Primary
  • Nick DiCeglie · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 162 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (2)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (162)

162 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 162 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Favorable

Passed 11 Yea · 5 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 2202
Republican 9002
Democrat 0300
Total 11504
% of votes cast 55%25%0%20%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Baxley — Yea
Perry — Yea
Book — Nay
Torres — Nay
Broxson — Not Voting
Hutson — Not Voting
Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" Democrat Nay
Osgood, Rosalind Democrat Nay
Rouson, Darryl Ervin Democrat Nay
Boyd, Jim Republican Yea
Brodeur, Jason Republican Not Voting
Burgess, Danny Republican Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
DiCeglie, Nick Republican Yea
Garcia, Ileana Republican Yea
Hooper, Ed Republican Yea
Mayfield, Debbie Republican Yea
Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican Yea
Simon, Corey Republican Yea
Yarborough, Clay Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 658 do?
Cybersecurity Incident Liability; Providing that a county, municipality, other political subdivision of the state, commercial entity, or third-party agent that complies with certain requirements is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident; requiring certain entities to adopt certain revised frameworks or standards within a specified time period; specifying that the defendant in certain actions has a certain burden of proof, etc.
Who sponsors SB 658?
SB 658 is sponsored by Governmental Oversight and Accountability and DiCeglie, Nick (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 658?
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 658?
Track SB 658 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 658

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 658

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →