Cybersecurity Incident Liability
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 658 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 658.
You're tracking SB 658
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 658 — Cybersecurity Incident Liability
Last action — Laid on Table
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Vetoed by Governor Ron DeSantis (Republican) on March 05, 2024.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Cybersecurity Incident Liability; Providing that a county, municipality, other political subdivision of the state, commercial entity, or third-party agent that complies with certain requirements is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident; requiring certain entities to adopt certain revised frameworks or standards within a specified time period; specifying that the defendant in certain actions has a certain burden of proof, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
102 added · 94 removed102 line(s) added, 94 removed.
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for SB 658 By Senatorthe DiCeglieCommittee 18-00891-24on 2024658__Governmental AOversight billand toAccountability; be entitled An act relating to cybersecurity incident liability;
and Senator DiCeglie 585-03019-24 2024658c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to cybersecurity incident liability;
providing that a county, municipality, other political subdivision of the state, commercial entity, or third-party agent that complies with certain requirements is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident;
282.3185282.3185, isand notany liableother inpolitical connectionsubdivision withof athe cybersecuritystate incident.that substantially complies with s.
(2)282.3185 Aon solea proprietorship,voluntary partnership,basis, corporation, trust, estate, cooperative, association, or other commercial entity or third-party agent that acquires, maintains, stores, or uses personal information is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incidentincident. if the entity substantially complies with s.
501.171,(2) ifA applicable,sole andproprietorship, has:partnership, corporation, trust, estate, cooperative, association, or other commercial entity or third-party agent that acquires, maintains, stores, or uses Page 1 of 4 CODING:
Page 1 of 3 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for SB 658 18-00891-24585-03019-24 2024658__2024658c1 (a)personal Adoptedinformation ais cybersecuritynot programliable thatin substantiallyconnection aligns with thea currentcybersecurity versionincident ofif anythe standards,entity guidelines,substantially orcomplies regulationswith thats. implement any of the following:
501.171, if applicable, and has:
(a) Adopted a cybersecurity program that substantially aligns with the current version of any standards, guidelines, or regulations that implement any of the following:
part 160 and part 164,164 subparts A and C.
The Federal Information Security Modernization Act of 2014,Page Pub.2 of 4 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for SB 658 585-03019-24 2024658c1 2014, Pub.
Page(3) 2The scale and scope of 3substantial CODING:alignment with a standard, law, or regulation under paragraph (2)(a) or paragraph (2)(b) by a covered entity or third-party agent, as applicable, is appropriate if it is based on all of the following factors:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2024 SB 658 18-00891-24 2024658__ (3) The scale and scope of substantial alignment with a standard, law, or regulation under paragraph (2)(a) or paragraph (2)(b) by a covered entity or third-party agent, as applicable, is appropriate if it is based on all of the following factors:
(4) Any commercial entity or third-party agent covered by subsection (2) whichthat substantially complies with a combination of industry-recognized cybersecurity frameworks or standards to gain the presumption against liability pursuant to subsection (2) must, upon the revision of two or more of the frameworks or standards with which the entity complies, adopt the revised frameworks or standards within 1 year after the latest publication date stated in the revisions and, if applicable, comply with the Payment Card Industry Data Security Standard (PCI DSS).
Failure of a county, municipality, other political subdivision of the state, or commercial entity to substantially implement a cybersecurity program that is in compliance with this section is not evidence of negligence and does not constitute negligence per se.
(6) In an action in connection with a cybersecurity incident,Page if3 the defendant is an entity covered by subsection (1) or subsection (2), the defendant has the burden of proof4 toCODING: establish substantial compliance.
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2024 CS for SB 658 585-03019-24 2024658c1 incident, if the defendant is an entity covered by subsection (1) or subsection (2), the defendant has the burden of proof to establish substantial compliance.
Page 34 of 34 CODING:
View plain text versions (2)
- S 658 c1 View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 658 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Laid on Table
-
Substituted CS/CS/HB 473 (Vetoed by Governor)
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/05/24
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 11 NAYS 5
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 02/14/24, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Rules
-
CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability read 1st time
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 5 NAYS 1
-
On Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 02/06/24, 3:00 pm, 37 Senate Building
-
Now in Governmental Oversight and Accountability
-
Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 7 NAYS 2
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 01/29/24, 4:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Judiciary; Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Governmental Oversight and Accountability · Primary
- Nick DiCeglie · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 162 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Governmental Oversight and Accountability
- DiCeglie, Nick Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (162)
162 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 162 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 25% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Nay |
| Broxson | — | Not Voting |
| Hutson | — | Not Voting |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Nay |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Nay |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Nay |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Not Voting |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 17% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Nay |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 20% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Nay |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Nay |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Not Voting |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 658 do?
- Cybersecurity Incident Liability; Providing that a county, municipality, other political subdivision of the state, commercial entity, or third-party agent that complies with certain requirements is not liable in connection with a cybersecurity incident; requiring certain entities to adopt certain revised frameworks or standards within a specified time period; specifying that the defendant in certain actions has a certain burden of proof, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 658?
- SB 658 is sponsored by Governmental Oversight and Accountability and DiCeglie, Nick (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 658?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 658?
- Track SB 658 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 658
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 658
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →