HB 593 — Misdescription of Beneficiaries and Banks
Last action — Died on Second Reading Calendar
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Misdescription of Beneficiaries and Banks; Revises requirements for rights as beneficiary of order & acceptance of order when beneficiary is nonexistent or unidentifiable person or account; removes rules relating to accepted payment orders; revises requirements relating to misdescription of banks for intermediaries & beneficiaries.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
102 added · 106 removed102 line(s) added, 106 removed.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB593CS/HB593 2024 A bill to be entitled An act relating to misdescription of beneficiaries and banks;
hb0593-00hb0593-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB593CS/HB593 2024 by an identifying or bank account number.
hb0593-00hb0593-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB593CS/HB593 2024 accepted, the originator's payment order described the beneficiary inconsistently by name and number, and the beneficiary's bank pays any person who the originator did not intend to pay, then the originator is not obliged to pay its order,order unless the originatorperson wasidentified grosslyby negligentnumber inas sendingpermitted theby originalparagraph instructions,(2)(a), and the beneficiary'sfollowing bankrules wasapply: diligent in ascertaining whether the number and name referred to the same person.
the person identified by number as permitted by paragraph (2)(a), the following rules apply:
(4) In a case governed by paragraph (2)(a), If the beneficiary's bank improperly rightfully pays any the person identified by number and that person was not entitled or intended to receive payment from the originator, the amount paid Page 3of 6 CODING:
hb0593-00hb0593-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB593CS/HB593 2024 beneficiary's bank improperly rightfully pays any the person identified by number and that person was not entitled or intended to receive payment from the originator, the amount paid may be recovered from that person to the extent allowed by the law governing mistake and restitution.
(a) If the originator is obliged to pay its payment order due to gross negligence as stated in subsection (3), the originator has the right to recover.
Otherwise, the bank who has borne the loss of the order has the right to recover.
670.208 Misdescription of intermediary bank or beneficiary's bank.— (1) This subsection applies to a Any payment order Pageidentifying 4ofan 6intermediary CODING:bank or the beneficiary's bank must use both only by an identifying number and a name.
(a) The receiving bank must may rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary's bank Page 4of 6 CODING:
hb0593-00hb0593-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB593CS/HB593 2024 identifyingand anneed intermediarynot bankdetermine orwhether the beneficiary'snumber bankidentifies musta usebank bothand onlywhether bythe anbank identifyingidentified by number andmatches athe name.name provided.
(a) The receiving bank must may rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary's bank and need not determine whether the number identifies a bank and whether the bank identified by number matches the name provided.
(b) If the sender is not a bank and the receiving bank proves that the sender, before the payment order was accepted, had notice that the receiving bank might rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary's bank even if it identifies a person different from the bank Page 5of 6 CODING:
hb0593-00hb0593-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S HB593CS/HB593 2024 proves that the sender, before the payment order was accepted, had notice that the receiving bank might rely on the number as the proper identification of the intermediary or beneficiary's bank even if it identifies a person different from the bank identified by name, the rights and obligations of the sender and the receiving bank are governed by paragraph (a), as though the sender were a bank.
hb0593-00hb0593-01-c1
View plain text versions (2)
- H 593 c1 View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 593 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Died on Second Reading Calendar
-
Added to Second Reading Calendar
-
Bill released to House Calendar
-
Reported out of Commerce Committee
-
Favorable by Commerce Committee
-
Added to Commerce Committee agenda
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
-
Now in Commerce Committee
-
Referred to Commerce Committee
-
CS Filed
-
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
-
Reported out of Insurance & Banking Subcommittee
-
Favorable with CS by Insurance & Banking Subcommittee
-
Added to Insurance & Banking Subcommittee agenda
-
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
-
Now in Insurance & Banking Subcommittee
-
Referred to Commerce Committee
-
Referred to Insurance & Banking Subcommittee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Beltran · Primary
- Lauren Melo · Cosponsor
- Insurance & Banking Subcommittee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 161 not signed on
Sponsors (2)
- Beltran
- Insurance & Banking Subcommittee
Co-sponsors (1)
- Melo, Lauren Republican
Not signed on (161)
161 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 161 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 9 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 76% | 0% | 0% | 24% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Benjamin | — | Yea |
| Rommel | — | Yea |
| Rudman | — | Yea |
| Antone, Bruce Hadley | Democrat | Yea |
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Yea |
| Daley, Dan | Democrat | Yea |
| Daniels, Kimberly | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph, Dotie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Tant, Allison | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Barnaby, Webster | Republican | Not Voting |
| Duggan, Wyman | Republican | Yea |
| Esposito, Tiffany | Republican | Yea |
| Giallombardo, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| LaMarca, Chip | Republican | Yea |
| Maney, Patt | Republican | Yea |
| Melo, Lauren | Republican | Yea |
| Overdorf, Tobin Rogers "Toby" | Republican | Yea |
| Sirois, Tyler I. | Republican | Yea |
| Steele, Kevin M. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tramont, Chase | Republican | Not Voting |
| Yeager, Bradford Troy "Brad" | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 16 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Benjamin | — | Not Voting |
| Keen | — | Yea |
| Rudman | — | Yea |
| Stevenson | — | Yea |
| Temple | — | Yea |
| Franklin II, Gallop | Democrat | Yea |
| Hunschofsky, Christine | Democrat | Yea |
| Tant, Allison | Democrat | Yea |
| Woodson, Marie Paule | Democrat | Yea |
| Abbott, Shane G. | Republican | Yea |
| Anderson, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Borrero, David | Republican | Yea |
| Botana, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Canady, Jennifer | Republican | Not Voting |
| Duggan, Wyman | Republican | Yea |
| Fabricio, Tom | Republican | Not Voting |
| Griffitts Jr., Philip Wayne "Griff" | Republican | Yea |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Yea |
| Steele, Kevin M. | Republican | Yea |
| Tramont, Chase | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 593 do?
- Misdescription of Beneficiaries and Banks; Revises requirements for rights as beneficiary of order & acceptance of order when beneficiary is nonexistent or unidentifiable person or account; removes rules relating to accepted payment orders; revises requirements relating to misdescription of banks for intermediaries & beneficiaries.
- Who sponsors HB 593?
- HB 593 is sponsored by Beltran, Melo, Lauren (Republican), and Insurance & Banking Subcommittee.
- What is the current status of HB 593?
- This bill died with 2024 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 593?
- Track HB 593 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 593
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 593
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →