Alternative Mobility Funding Systems and Impact Fees
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 479 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 479.
You're tracking HB 479
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 479 — Alternative Mobility Funding Systems and Impact Fees
Last action — Chapter No. 2024-266
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed House
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 15, 2023. Enacted.
Signed by Governor Ron DeSantis (Republican) on June 25, 2024.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
5 sponsors
2 primary, 3 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Bipartisan support
Sponsored across 2 parties (3 R · 1 D) — cross-party backing.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 2 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Alternative Mobility Funding Systems and Impact Fees; Authorizes local governments to adopt alternative mobility plan & fee system; provides requirements for application of adopted alternative system; prohibits alternative system from imposing responsibility for funding existing transportation deficiency upon new development; prohibits local governments that do not issue building permits from charging for transportation impacts associated with development; requires local governments that issue building permits to collect for extrajurisdictional impacts; prohibits local governments from assessing multiple charges for same transportation impact; revises requirements for calculation of impact fees by local governments & special districts.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
414 added · 462 removed414 line(s) added, 462 removed.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47,CS/HB479 Engrossed 1 2024 A bill to be entitled An act relating to alternative mobility funding systemssystems; and impact fees;
authorizing certain local governments to adopt an alternative transportationmobility systemplan thatand isfee mobility-plansystem andor fee-an basedalternative system in certain circumstances;
prohibitingproviding anrequirements alternativefor transportationthe systemapplication fromof imposing responsibility for funding an existingadopted transportationalternative deficiencysystem; upon new development;
requiringprohibiting countiesan andalternative municipalitiessystem tofrom createimposing andresponsibility executefor interlocalfunding agreementsan ifexisting a developer is charged a fee for transportation impactsdeficiency forupon a new developmentdevelopment; or redevelopment;
providingprohibiting requirementslocal governments that do not issue building permits from charging for transportation impacts associated with new development or redevelopment that occurs within such agreements;governments' jurisdiction;
providingrequiring requirementslocal forgovernments whenthat suchissue interlocalbuilding agreementspermits areto notcollect executedfor byextrajurisdictional aimpacts; specified date;
authorizingprohibiting a local governmentgovernments thatfrom issuesassessing themultiple buildingcharges permitfor tothe collectsame a fee for transportation impactsimpact; under certain circumstances unless otherwise agreed;
requiring local governments transitioning to alternative funding systems to provide holders of Page 1of 1715 CODING:
hb0479-02-e1hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47,CS/HB479 Engrossed 1 2024 alternative transportation systems to provide holders of impact fee credits with full benefit of intensity and density of prepaid credit balances as of a specified date in certain circumstances;
(33) "Mobility plan" means an alternativeintegrated transportationland systemuse mobilityand studyalternative developedmobility bytransportation usingplan a plan-based methodology and adopted into a local government comprehensive plan that promotes a compact, mixedmixed- use, and interconnected development served by a multimodal transportation system in an area that is urban in character,character or designated to be urban in character, as defined in s.
PageSection 2of2. 17 CODING:
Paragraphs (h) and (i) of subsection (5) of section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, are amended, and paragraph Page 2of 15 CODING:
hb0479-02-e1hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47,CS/HB479 Engrossed2024 1(j) 2024is Sectionadded 2.to that subsection, to read:
Paragraphs (h) and (i) of subsection (5) of section 163.3180, Florida Statutes, are amended, and paragraph (j) is added to that subsection, to read:
Allow an applicant for a development-of-regional-impact development order, development agreement, rezoning, or other land use development permit to satisfy the transportation Page 3of 1715 CODING:
hb0479-02-e1hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47,CS/HB479 Engrossed 1 2024 development order, development agreement, rezoning, or other land use development permit to satisfy the transportation concurrency requirements of the local comprehensive plan, the local government's concurrency management system, and s.
The agreement must provide that after an applicant makes its contribution or constructs its proportionate share pursuant to this sub-sub-subparagraph, the project shall be considered to have mitigated its transportation impacts and be allowed to proceedproceed. if the applicant has satisfied all other local government development requirements for the project.
A local government may not prevent a single applicant from proceeding after the applicant has satisfied its proportionate- share requirementcontribution. if the applicant has satisfied all other local government development requirements for the project.
Provide the basis upon which the landowners will be Pageassessed 4ofa 17proportionate CODING:share of the cost addressing the transportation impacts resulting from a proposed development.
Words strickenare deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0479-02-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47, Engrossed 1 2024 assessed a proportionate share of the cost addressing the transportation impacts resulting from a proposed development.
When an applicantPage contributes4of or15 constructsCODING: its proportionate share pursuant to this paragraph, a local government may not require payment or construction of transportation facilities whose costs would be greater than a development's proportionate share of the improvements necessary to mitigate the development's impacts.
Words strickenare deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB479 2024 applicant contributes or constructs its proportionate share pursuant to this paragraph, a local government may not require payment or construction of transportation facilities whose costs would be greater than a development's proportionate share of the improvements necessary to mitigate the development's impacts.
The proportionate-share formula provided in this subparagraph shall be applied only to those facilities that are determined to be significantly impacted by Pagethe 5ofproject 17traffic CODING:under review.
If any road is determined to be transportation deficient without the project traffic under review, the costs of correcting that deficiency shall be removed from the project's proportionate-share calculation and the Page 5of 15 CODING:
hb0479-02-e1hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47,CS/HB479 Engrossed2024 1necessary 2024transportation theimprovements projectto trafficcorrect underthat review.deficiency shall be considered to be in place for purposes of the proportionate-share calculation.
If any road is determined to be transportation deficient without the project traffic under review, the costs of correcting that deficiency shall be removed from the project's proportionate-share calculation and the necessary transportation improvements to correct that deficiency shall be considered to be in place for purposes of the proportionate-share calculation.
Pagee. 6of 17 CODING:
The applicant shall receive a credit on a dollar-for- dollar basis for impact fees, mobility fees, and other transportation concurrency mitigation requirements paid or payable in the future for the project.
The credit shall be Page 6of 15 CODING:
hb0479-02-e1hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47,CS/HB479 Engrossed2024 1reduced 2024up e.to 20 percent by the percentage share that the project's traffic represents of the added capacity of the selected improvement, or by the amount specified by local ordinance, whichever yields the greater credit.
The applicant shall receive a credit on a dollar-for- dollar basis for impact fees, mobility fees, and other transportation concurrency mitigation requirements paid or payable in the future for the project.
The credit shall be reduced up to 20 percent by the percentage share that the project's traffic represents of the added capacity of the selected improvement, or by the amount specified by local ordinance, whichever yields the greater credit.
(i) If a local government elects to repeal transportation Pageconcurrency, 7ofthe 17local CODING:government may it is encouraged to adopt an alternative mobility plan and fee funding system or an alternative system that is not mobility plan and fee based.
The local government that uses one or more of the tools and Page 7of 15 CODING:
hb0479-02-e1hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47,CS/HB479 Engrossed 1 2024 concurrency,techniques theidentified localin governmentparagraph may(f). it is encouraged to adopt an alternative transportation system that is mobility-plan and fee-based or an alternative transportation system that is not mobility-plan and fee-based.
TheAny localalternative government mobility funding system thatadopted usesmay onenot use an alternative system be used to deny, time, or morephase an application for site plan approval, plat approval, final subdivision approval, building permits, or the functional equivalent of such approvals provided that the toolsdeveloper andagrees techniquesto pay for the development's identified intransportation paragraphimpacts (f).via the funding mechanism implemented by the local government.
Show all 133 changed lines (93 more)
AnyThe alternativerevenue mobilityfrom the funding systemmechanism adoptedused mayin notthe use an alternative transportation system must be used to deny,implement time, or phase an application for site plan approval, plat approval, final subdivision approval, building permits, or the functionalneeds equivalent of such approvals provided that the developerlocal agreesgovernment's toplan paywhich forserves theas development's identified transportation impacts via the fundingbasis mechanismfor implemented by the localfee government.imposed.
TheAn revenuealternative fromA themobility fee-based funding mechanism used in the alternative transportation system must becomply usedwith tos. implement the needs of the local government's plan which serves as the basis for the fee imposed.
An alternative transportation A mobility fee-based funding system must comply with s.
An alternative transportation system may not impose that is not mobility fee-based shall not be applied in a manner that imposes upon new development any responsibility for funding an existing transportation deficiency as defined in paragraph (h).
(j)1.(j) Only the local government issuing the building permit may charge for transportation capacity impacts associated with new development or redevelopment that occurs within its jurisdiction.
IfSuch alocal countygovernment andmust municipalitycollect chargeand theaccount developer of a new development or redevelopment a fee for transportationany capacityextrajurisdictional impacts,impacts thepursuant countyto ands. municipality must create and Page 8of 17 CODING:
163.3177(6)(h), regardless of whether it implements a transportation concurrency system or an alternative system.
A local government may not charge new development or redevelopment for the same transportation impacts.
Page 8of 15 CODING:
hb0479-02-e1hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47,CS/HB479 Engrossed 1 2024 executeSection an3. interlocal agreement to coordinate the mitigation of their respective transportation capacity impacts.
2.
The interlocal agreement must, at a minimum:
a.
Ensure that any new development or redevelopment is not charged twice for the same transportation capacity impacts.
b.
Establish a plan-based methodology for determining the legally permissible fee to be charged to a new development or redevelopment.
c.
Require the county or municipality issuing the building permit to collect the fee, unless agreed to otherwise.
d.
Provide a method for the proportionate distribution of the revenue collected by the county or municipality to address the transportation capacity impacts of a new development or redevelopment, or provide a method of assigning responsibility for the mitigation of the transportation capacity impacts belonging to the county and the municipality.
3.
By October 1, 2025, if an interlocal agreement is not executed pursuant to this paragraph:
a.
The fee charged to a new development or redevelopment shall be based on the transportation capacity impacts apportioned to the county and municipality as identified in the developer's traffic impact study or the mobility plan adopted by the county or municipality.
b.
The developer shall receive a 10 percent reduction in the total fee calculated pursuant to sub-subparagraph a.
Page 9of 17 CODING:
Words strickenare deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0479-02-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47, Engrossed 1 2024 c.
The county or municipality issuing the building permit must collect the fee charged pursuant to sub-subparagraphs a.
and b.
and distribute the proceeds of such fee to the county and municipality within 60 days after the developer's payment.
4.
This paragraph does not apply to:
a.
A county as defined in s.
125.011(1).
b.
A county or municipality that has entered into, or otherwise updated, an existing interlocal agreement, as of October 1, 2024, to coordinate the mitigation of transportation impacts.
However, if such existing interlocal agreement is terminated, the affected county and municipality that have entered into the agreement shall be subject to the requirements of this paragraph unless the county and municipality mutually agree to extend the existing interlocal agreement before the expiration of the agreement.
Section 3.
(a) Ensure that the calculation of the impact fee is based Pageon 10the of17most CODING:recent and localized data available within the previous 12 months before adoption if the ordinance or resolution increases the impact fee.
(5)(a) Notwithstanding any charter provision, comprehensive plan policy, ordinance, development order, development permit, or resolution, the local government or special district that requires any improvement or contribution must credit against the collection of the impact fee any contribution, whether identified in a development order, proportionate share agreement, or any other form of exaction, related to public facilities or infrastructure, including monetary contributions, land dedication, site planning and design, or construction.
Any contribution must be applied on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value to reduce any impact fee collected for the general category or class of public Page 9of 15 CODING:
hb0479-02-e1hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47,CS/HB479 Engrossed 1 2024 onfacilities aor studyinfrastructure usingfor thewhich most recent and localized data available within 4 years of the currentcontribution impactwas feemade. update.
The new study must be adopted by the local government within 12 months of the initiation of the new impact fee study if the local government increases the impact fee.
(5)(a) Notwithstanding any charter provision, comprehensive plan policy, ordinance, development order, development permit, or resolution, the local government or special district that requires any improvement or contribution must credit against the collection of the impact fee any contribution, whether identified in a development order, proportionate share agreement, or any other form of exaction, related to public facilities or infrastructure, including monetary contributions, land dedication, site planning and design, or construction.
Any contribution must be applied on a dollar-for-dollar basis at fair market value to reduce any impact fee collected for the general category or class of public facilities or infrastructure for which the contribution was made.
If a local government adopts an Pagealternative 11funding of17system CODING:pursuant to s.
Words strickenare deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0479-02-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47, Engrossed 1 2024 alternative transportation system pursuant to s.
380.06 or otherwise that were in existence before the adoption of the alternative transportationfunding system is entitled to the full benefit of the intensity and density prepaid by the credit balance as of the date the alternative transportationfunding system was first established.
the procedurePage which10 mustof15 beCODING: followed to secure voter approval, if required;
Words strickenare deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB479 2024 procedure which must be followed to secure voter approval, if required;
(2) LOCAL GOVERNMENT INFRASTRUCTURE SURTAX.— (d) The proceeds of the surtax authorized by this subsection and any accrued interest shall be expended by the Pageschool 12district, of17within CODING:the county and municipalities within the county, or, in the case of a negotiated joint county agreement, within another county, to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure;
Words strickenare deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0479-02-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47, Engrossed 1 2024 school district, within the county and municipalities within the county, or, in the case of a negotiated joint county agreement, within another county, to finance, plan, and construct infrastructure;
The proceeds and any interest may not be used for the operationalPage expenses11 ofof15 infrastructure,CODING: except that a county that has a population of fewer than 75,000 and that is required to close a landfill may use the proceeds or interest for long- term maintenance costs associated with landfill closure.
Counties, as defined in s.
125.011, and charter counties may, in addition, use the proceeds or interest to retire or service indebtedness incurred for bonds issued before July 1, 1987, for infrastructure purposes, and for bonds subsequently issued to Page 13 of17 CODING:
hb0479-02-e1hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47,CS/HB479 Engrossed2024 1operational 2024expenses refundof suchinfrastructure, bonds.except that a county that has a population of fewer than 75,000 and that is required to close a landfill may use the proceeds or interest for long- term maintenance costs associated with landfill closure.
Counties, as defined in s.
125.011, and charter counties may, in addition, use the proceeds or interest to retire or service indebtedness incurred for bonds issued before July 1, 1987, for infrastructure purposes, and for bonds subsequently issued to refund such bonds.
189.012(5), and includes facilities that are necessary to carry out governmental purposes, including, but not limited to, fire stations, general governmental office buildings, and animal shelters, regardless of whether the facilitiesPage are12 ownedof15 byCODING: the local taxing authority or another governmental entity.
Words strickenare deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB479 2024 facilities are owned by the local taxing authority or another governmental entity.
Any expenditure for the construction, lease, or Pagemaintenance 14of, of17or CODING:provision of utilities or security for, facilities, as defined in s.
Words strickenare deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0479-02-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47, Engrossed 1 2024 maintenance of, or provision of utilities or security for, facilities, as defined in s.
The owner must enter into a written contract with the local government providing the improvement funding to make the private facility available to the public for purposes of emergency shelter at no cost to the local government for a minimum of 10 years after completion of the improvement, with the provision that the obligation will transfer to any subsequentPage owner13 untilof15 theCODING: end of the minimum period.
e.
Any land acquisition expenditure for a residential housing project in which at least 30 percent of the units are affordable to individuals or families whose total annual household income does not exceed 120 percent of the area median income adjusted for household size, if the land is owned by a local government or by a special district that enters into a written agreement with the local government to provide such Page 15 of17 CODING:
hb0479-02-e1hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47,CS/HB479 Engrossed2024 1subsequent 2024owner housing.until the end of the minimum period.
e.
Any land acquisition expenditure for a residential housing project in which at least 30 percent of the units are affordable to individuals or families whose total annual household income does not exceed 120 percent of the area median income adjusted for household size, if the land is owned by a local government or by a special district that enters into a written agreement with the local government to provide such housing.
For the purposes of this paragraph, the term "energy efficiency improvement" means any energy conservation and efficiency improvement that reduces consumption through conservation or a more efficient use of electricity, natural gas,Page propane,14 orof15 otherCODING: forms of energy on the property, including, but not limited to, air sealing;
Words strickenare deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0479-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB479 2024 gas, propane, or other forms of energy on the property, including, but not limited to, air sealing;
installation of systems for natural gas fuel Pageas 16defined of17in CODING:s.
Words strickenare deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb0479-02-e1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB47, Engrossed 1 2024 as defined in s.
This act shall take effect OctoberJuly 1, 2024.
Page 1715 of17of15 CODING:
hb0479-02-e1hb0479-01-c1
Show all 133 changed rows (93 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- H 479 c1 View text pdf
- H 479 e1 View text pdf
- H 479 er View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 479 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Chapter No. 2024-266
-
Approved by Governor
-
Signed by Officers and presented to Governor
-
Ordered enrolled
-
In Messages
-
CS passed; YEAS 39 NAYS 1
-
Read 3rd time
-
Read 2nd time
-
Substituted for CS/SB 688
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Withdrawn from Rules
-
Received
-
Referred to Rules
-
In Messages
-
CS passed as amended; YEAS 115, NAYS 0
-
Read 3rd time
-
Added to Third Reading Calendar
-
Placed on 3rd reading
-
Amendment 387223 adopted
-
Read 2nd time
-
Bill added to Special Order Calendar (2/27/2024)
-
Added to Second Reading Calendar
-
Bill referred to House Calendar
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
-
CS Filed
-
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
-
Reported out of Commerce Committee
-
Favorable with CS by Commerce Committee
-
Added to Commerce Committee agenda
-
Now in Commerce Committee
-
Reported out of Ways & Means Committee
-
Favorable by Ways & Means Committee
-
Added to Ways & Means Committee agenda
-
Now in Ways & Means Committee
-
Reported out of Local Administration, Federal Affairs & Special Districts Subcommittee
-
Favorable by Local Administration, Federal Affairs & Special Districts Subcommittee
-
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
-
Added to Local Administration, Federal Affairs & Special Districts Subcommittee agenda
-
Now in Local Administration, Federal Affairs & Special Districts Subcommittee
-
Referred to Commerce Committee
-
Referred to Ways & Means Committee
-
Referred to Local Administration, Federal Affairs & Special Districts Subcommittee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Commerce Committee · Primary
- William Cloud "Will" Robinson Jr. · Primary
- Johanna López · Cosponsor
- Kevin M. Steele · Cosponsor
- Susan L. Valdés · Cosponsor
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 159 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Commerce Committee
- Robinson Jr., William Cloud "Will" Republican
Co-sponsors (3)
- López, Johanna Democrat
- Steele, Kevin M. Republican
- Valdés, Susan L. Republican
Not signed on (159)
159 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 159 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 21 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 3% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Collins | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Calatayud, Alexis | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Nay |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 63 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 28 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 115 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (120)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Altman | — | Yea |
| Payne | — | Yea |
| Amesty | — | Yea |
| Fine | — | Yea |
| Renner | — | Yea |
| Roach | — | Yea |
| Bell | — | Yea |
| Grant | — | Yea |
| Beltran | — | Yea |
| Rommel | — | Yea |
| Benjamin | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Rudman | — | Yea |
| Silvers | — | Yea |
| Keen | — | Yea |
| Killebrew | — | Yea |
| Stevenson | — | Yea |
| Caruso | — | Yea |
| Temple | — | Yea |
| Tomkow | — | Yea |
| Clemons | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Casello | — | Not Voting |
| Lopez, V. | — | Yea |
| Antone, Bruce Hadley | Democrat | Yea |
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Yea |
| Bartleman, Robin | Democrat | Yea |
| Bracy Davis, LaVon | Democrat | Yea |
| Campbell, Daryl | Democrat | Yea |
| Chambliss, Kevin D. | Democrat | Yea |
| Cross, Lindsay | Democrat | Yea |
| Daley, Dan | Democrat | Yea |
| Daniels, Kimberly | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Driskell, Fentrice | Democrat | Yea |
| Dunkley, Lisa | Democrat | Yea |
| Edmonds, Jervonte "Tae" | Democrat | Yea |
| Eskamani, Dr. Anna V. | Democrat | Yea |
| Franklin II, Gallop | Democrat | Yea |
| Gantt, Ashley Viola | Democrat | Yea |
| Gottlieb, Michael "Mike" | Democrat | Yea |
| Gregory, Emily | Democrat | Yea |
| Harris, Jennifer "Rita" | Democrat | Yea |
| Hart-Lowman, Dianne "Ms Dee" | Democrat | Yea |
| Hinson, Yvonne Hayes | Democrat | Yea |
| Hunschofsky, Christine | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph, Dotie | Democrat | Yea |
| López, Johanna | Democrat | Yea |
| Nixon, Angela "Angie" | Democrat | Yea |
| Rayner, Michele K. | Democrat | Yea |
| Robinson, Felicia Simone | Democrat | Yea |
| Skidmore, Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Tant, Allison | Democrat | Yea |
| Woodson, Marie Paule | Democrat | Yea |
| Abbott, Shane G. | Republican | Yea |
| Alvarez, Daniel Antonio "Danny" | Republican | Yea |
| Anderson, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Andrade, Robert Alexander "Alex" | Republican | Yea |
| Baker, Jessica | Republican | Yea |
| Bankson, Douglas Michael "Doug" | Republican | Yea |
| Barnaby, Webster | Republican | Yea |
| Basabe, Fabián | Republican | Yea |
| Berfield, Kimberly | Republican | Yea |
| Black, Dean | Republican | Not Voting |
| Borrero, David | Republican | Not Voting |
| Botana, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Brackett, Robert A. "Robbie" | Republican | Yea |
| Brannan III, Robert Charles "Chuck" | Republican | Yea |
| Buchanan, James | Republican | Yea |
| Busatta, Demi | Republican | Yea |
| Canady, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Cassel, Hillary | Republican | Yea |
| Chamberlin, Ryan | Republican | Yea |
| Chaney, Linda | Republican | Yea |
| Duggan, Wyman | Republican | Yea |
| Esposito, Tiffany | Republican | Yea |
| Fabricio, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Garrison, Sam | Republican | Yea |
| Giallombardo, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Gonzalez Pittman, Karen | Republican | Yea |
| Gossett-Seidman, Peggy | Republican | Yea |
| Griffitts Jr., Philip Wayne "Griff" | Republican | Yea |
| Holcomb, Jeff | Republican | Yea |
| Jacques, Berny | Republican | Yea |
| Koster, Traci | Republican | Yea |
| LaMarca, Chip | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Maggard, Randall Scott "Randy" | Republican | Yea |
| Maney, Patt | Republican | Yea |
| Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| McClure, Lawrence | Republican | Yea |
| McFarland, Fiona | Republican | Yea |
| Melo, Lauren | Republican | Yea |
| Michael, Kiyan | Republican | Yea |
| Mooney Jr., James Vernon "Jim" | Republican | Yea |
| Overdorf, Tobin Rogers "Toby" | Republican | Yea |
| Perez, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Persons-Mulicka, Jenna | Republican | Yea |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Yea |
| Plasencia, Susan | Republican | Yea |
| Porras, Juan Carlos | Republican | Yea |
| Redondo, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Rizo, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Robinson Jr., William Cloud "Will" | Republican | Yea |
| Salzman, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Shoaf, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Sirois, Tyler I. | Republican | Yea |
| Smith, David | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, John | Republican | Yea |
| Stark, Paula A. | Republican | Yea |
| Steele, Kevin M. | Republican | Yea |
| Trabulsy, Dana | Republican | Yea |
| Tramont, Chase | Republican | Not Voting |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Tuck, Kaylee | Republican | Yea |
| Valdés, Susan L. | Republican | Yea |
| Yarkosky, Taylor Michael | Republican | Yea |
| Yeager, Bradford Troy "Brad" | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 479 do?
- Alternative Mobility Funding Systems and Impact Fees; Authorizes local governments to adopt alternative mobility plan & fee system; provides requirements for application of adopted alternative system; prohibits alternative system from imposing responsibility for funding existing transportation deficiency upon new development; prohibits local governments that do not issue building permits from charging for transportation impacts associated with development; requires local governments that issue building permits to collect for extrajurisdictional impacts; prohibits local governments from assessing multiple charges for same transportation impact; revises requirements for calculation of impact fees by local governments & special districts.
- Who sponsors HB 479?
- HB 479 is sponsored by Commerce Committee, Robinson Jr., William Cloud "Will" (Republican), López, Johanna (Democrat), Steele, Kevin M. (Republican), and Valdés, Susan L. (Republican).
- What is the current status of HB 479?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced November 15, 2023. Enacted.
- Where can I track HB 479?
- Track HB 479 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 479
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 479
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →