Florida 2023 Regular Session Status: In Committee 2 D cosponsors

SB 66 — Risk Protection Orders

Last action — Died in Criminal Justice

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

In plain language

This bill redefines who can file a petition for a risk protection order.

The bill expands the definition of 'petitioner' for risk protection orders to include certain family members of the respondent. It is currently not available in text form.

Summary

Risk Protection Orders; Redefining the term “petitioner” to include an individual who has a biological or legal parent-child relationship with, who is a legal guardian of, or who is a spouse or sibling of a respondent, for purposes of determining standing for the filing of a petition for a risk protection order, etc.

Bill Text

We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.

Read SB 66 on the official Florida source →

Action History

  1. Died in Criminal Justice

  2. Introduced

  3. Referred to Criminal Justice; Judiciary; Rules

  4. Filed

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 2 co-sponsors · 161 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (2)

Not signed on (161)

161 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 161 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 66 do?
Risk Protection Orders; Redefining the term “petitioner” to include an individual who has a biological or legal parent-child relationship with, who is a legal guardian of, or who is a spouse or sibling of a respondent, for purposes of determining standing for the filing of a petition for a risk protection order, etc.
Who sponsors SB 66?
SB 66 is sponsored by Polsky, Tina Scott (Democrat), Book, and Berman, Lori (Democrat).
What is the current status of SB 66?
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 66?
Track SB 66 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 66

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 66

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →