Connecticut 2023 Regular Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 21 D · 18 R cosponsors

SB 937 — AN ACT PROVIDING WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN CANCERS IN FIREFIGHTERS.

Last action — FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

12 added · 132 removed

12 line(s) added, 132 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Senate General Assembly File No.
General Assembly Substitute Bill No.
100 January Session, 2023 Substitute Senate Bill No.
937 January Session, 2023 AN ACT PROVIDING WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN CANCERS IN FIREFIGHTERS.
937 Senate, March 16, 2023 The Committee on Labor and Public Employees reported through SEN.
KUSHNER of the 24th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT PROVIDING WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN CANCERS IN FIREFIGHTERS.
sSB937 / File No.
(b) For purposes of this section, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the diagnosis of cancer of a uniformed member of a paid municipal or volunteer fire department arose out of and in the course of employment as a result of exposures particular to the duties performed as a firefighter.
100 1 sSB937 File No.
Such presumption applies to any condition of cancer affecting the brain, skin, skeletal system, digestive system, endocrine system, respiratory system, lymphatic system, reproductive LCO \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00937-R01 of 3 SB.docx Substitute Bill No.
100 (b) For purposes of this section, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the diagnosis of cancer of a uniformed member of a paid municipal or volunteer fire department arose out of and in the course of employment as a result of exposures particular to the duties performed as a firefighter.
937 system,urinary system or hematologicalsystemthat resultsinthedeath or temporary or permanent total or partial disability of such firefighter.
Such presumption applies to any condition of cancer affecting the brain, skin, skeletal system, digestive system, endocrine system, respiratory system, lymphatic system, reproductive system,urinary system or hematologicalsystemthat resultsinthedeath or temporary or permanent total or partial disability of such firefighter.
(6) Such firefighter failed to use respiratory protection, as described in 29 CFR 1910.134 of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards, or other personal protective equipment, as described in 29 CFR 1910.134 of sSB937 / File No.
(6) Such firefighter failed to use respiratory protection, as described in 29 CFR 1910.134 of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards, or other personal protective equipment, as described in 29 CFR 1910.134 of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards in the course of such employment;
100 2 sSB937 File No.
or (7) Such claimed cancer is not known to result from the exposure to heat, radiation or a known carcinogen as determined by the InternationalAgency for ResearchonCanceror theNationalToxicology LCO {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00932 of 3 R02-SB.docx } Substitute Bill No.
100 the Occupational Safety and Health Standards in the course of such employment;
937 Program of the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
or (7) Such claimed cancer is not known to result from the exposure to heat, radiation or a known carcinogen as determined by the InternationalAgency for ResearchonCanceror theNationalToxicology Program of the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
October 1, 2023 Section 1 31-294j Statement of Legislative Commissioners:
Section 1 October 1, 2023 31-294j LAB Joint Favorable Subst.
In Subsec.
-LCO APP Joint Favorable LCO {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00937- 3 of 3 R02-SB.docx }
(b)(6), "used" was changed to "use", for proper grammar.
LAB Joint Favorable Subst.
-LCO sSB937 / File No.
100 3 sSB937 File No.
100 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 24 $ FY 25 $ Various Municipalities STATE Potential Potential MANDATE - Cost Explanation The bill results in a potential cost to municipalities beginning in FY 24, by creating a rebuttable presumption in workers’ compensation law that firefighting performed by firefighters causes numerous types of cancer.
To the extent more firefighters qualify for workers’ compensation benefits due to particular cancer diagnoses, there will be a potential cost to municipalities.
There are approximately 26,800 firefighters 2 in the State of Connecticut.
1State mandate is defined in Sec.
2-32b(2) of the Connecticut General Statutes, "state mandate" means any state initiated constitutional, statutory or executive action that requires a local government to establish, expand or modify its activities in such a way as to necessitate additional expenditures from local revenues.
2Data from the Connecticut State Firefighters Association for 2016/17.
sSB937 / File No.
100 4 sSB937 File No.
100 The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation and the number of relevant workers’ compensation claims.
Sources:Connecticut State Firefighters Association sSB937 / File No.
100 5 sSB937 File No.
100 OLR Bill Analysis SB 937 AN ACT PROVIDING WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN CANCERS IN FIREFIGHTERS.
SUMMARY This bill creates a rebuttable presumption in workers’ compensation law that firefighting performed by uniformed paid municipal and volunteer firefighters causes numerous types of cancer.
It makes those with the disease eligible for workers’ compensation benefits unless the presumption is rebutted with clear and convincing evidence that the firefighter does not meet the bill’s criteria.
As with any workers’ compensation claim, to qualify for benefits, the disease must result in death or the temporary or permanent total or partial disability of the employee.
The bill also permits retired firefighters to apply for the benefits within five years of their retirement.
Show all 69 changed rows (29 more)
Previous
Latest
Workers’ compensation law is separate from the existing Firefighter Cancer Relief Program, which is unchanged by the bill (see BACKGROUND).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2023 PRESUMPTION AND ELIGIBLE TYPES OF CANCER The bill creates a presumption that the cancer diagnosis of paid municipal or volunteer firefighters “arose out of and in the course of employment as a result of exposure particular to the duties performed as a firefighter.” This presumption applies to any condition of cancer affecting the brain, skin, or any of the following systems:
skeletal, digestive, endocrine, respiratory, lymphatic, reproductive, urinary, or sSB937 / File No.
100 6 sSB937 File No.
100 hematological.
GROUNDS TO REBUT THE PRESUMPTION Under the bill, the presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that:
1.
upon entry into service, a physical examination of the firefighter revealed evidence of the claimed cancer;
2.
the firefighter failed to submit to annual physical examinations after entry into service;
3.
subsequent physical examinations revealed evidence of, or a propensity for, the claimed cancer;
4.
the firefighter used cigarettes or other tobacco products, as defined in state law, during the 15-year period before the cancer diagnosis;
5.
when the cancer was diagnosed, or should have been diagnosed, the firefighter was employed for less than five years as (a) an interior structural firefighter at a municipal, state, or volunteer fire department or (b) a local fire marshal, deputy fire marshal, fire investigator, fire inspector, or other class of inspector or investigator meeting the minimum state qualification standards;
6.
the firefighter failed to use respiratory protection or other personal protective equipment as described in federal OSHA regulations (29 C.F.R.
1910.134);
or 7.
the claimed cancer is not known to result from exposure to heat, radiation, or a known carcinogen as determined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer or the federal Department of Health and Human Services’ National Toxicology Program.
sSB937 / File No.
100 7 sSB937 File No.
100 RETIRED FIREFIGHTERS The bill specifies that anyone no longer actively employed or serving as a firefighter who would otherwise qualify for benefits under the bill can apply for benefits within five years after the person was employed or last served as a firefighter.
BACKGROUND Firefighter Cancer Relief Program Under the Firefighter Cancer Relief Program, firefighters diagnosed with cancer may qualify for wage replacement benefits if they meet programcriteria.Thereliefprogramlawspecifiesthat(1)anawardfrom thefunddoesnot create apresumptionthat thecancer isdue to working as a firefighter and (2) a firefighter cannot simultaneously receive wage replacement benefits from the fund and from workers’ compensation.
It further states that receiving benefits from the relief fund does not prohibit a firefighter from being awarded workers’ compensations benefits.
COMMITTEE ACTION Labor and Public Employees Committee Joint Favorable Yea 8 Nay 3 (02/28/2023) sSB937 / File No.
100 8
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  2. NO NEW FILE BY COMM. ON Appropriations

  3. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  4. FILED WITH LCO

  5. Joint Favorable

  6. REF. BY SEN. TO COMM. ON Appropriations

  7. FILE NO. 100

  8. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 90

  9. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  10. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  11. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/15/23

  12. FILED WITH LCO

  13. Joint Favorable

  14. PUBLIC HEARING 0207

  15. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Labor and Public Employees

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

62 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 125 not signed on

Sponsors (62)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (125)

125 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 125 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 937?
SB 937 is sponsored by Sanchez, J., Hayes, Rick L., Mccarthy Vahey, Cristin, Carol Hall (Republican), Jane M. Garibay (Democratic), Travis Simms (Democratic), Patrick E. Callahan (Republican), Keitt, Sarah, Bronko, Seth, Devin R. Carney (Republican), Saud Anwar (Democratic), Anthony L. Nolan (Democratic), Kara Rochelle (Democratic), Derek Slap (Democratic), Fortier, Mary, Matt Blumenthal (Democratic), Greg S. Howard (Republican), Kathy Kennedy (Republican), Johnson, Dominique, Scott, Tony J, Dancho, Laura, Arzeno, Hector, Ronald A. Napoli (Democratic), Foncello, Martin, Michael D. Quinn (Democratic), Morrin Bello, Amy, Julie Kushner (Democratic), Bob Duff (Democratic), Patrick S. Boyd (Democratic), Denning, Keith, Jennifer Leeper (Democratic), Joseph H. Zullo (Republican), Paris, Corey P., Christie M. Carpino (Republican), Aniskovich, Chris, Irene M. Haines (Republican), Bill Buckbee (Republican), Ben McGorty (Republican), Joseph P. Gresko (Democratic), Jason Perillo (Republican), Anne M. Hughes (Democratic), Gary A. Turco (Democratic), Dave W. Yaccarino (Republican), Michel, David, Tami Zawistowski (Republican), Delany, Hubert D., Brown, Kevin, Decaprio, Mark, Khanna, Rachel, Chaleski, Rachel, Ferraro, Charles J., Mary M. Mushinsky (Democratic), Brian Lanoue (Republican), Tom Delnicki (Republican), Porter, Robyn A., Kurt Vail (Republican), Joe Polletta (Republican), Brandon Chafee (Democratic), Matthew L. Lesser (Democratic), Ceci Maher (Democratic), Jan Hochadel (Democratic), and Jeff Gordon (Republican).
What is the current status of SB 937?
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 937?
Track SB 937 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 937

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 937

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →