SB 937 — AN ACT PROVIDING WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN CANCERS IN FIREFIGHTERS.
Last action — FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
12 added · 132 removed12 line(s) added, 132 removed.
Senate General Assembly FileSubstitute Bill No.
100937 January Session, 2023 SubstituteAN SenateACT BillPROVIDING No.WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN CANCERS IN FIREFIGHTERS.
937 Senate, March 16, 2023 The Committee on Labor and Public Employees reported through SEN.
KUSHNER of the 24th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT PROVIDING WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN CANCERS IN FIREFIGHTERS.
sSB937(b) /For Filepurposes No.of this section, there shall be a rebuttable presumption that the diagnosis of cancer of a uniformed member of a paid municipal or volunteer fire department arose out of and in the course of employment as a result of exposures particular to the duties performed as a firefighter.
100Such 1presumption sSB937applies Fileto any condition of cancer affecting the brain, skin, skeletal system, digestive system, endocrine system, respiratory system, lymphatic system, reproductive LCO \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00937-R01 of 3 SB.docx Substitute Bill No.
100937 (b)system,urinary Forsystem purposesor ofhematologicalsystemthat thisresultsinthedeath section,or theretemporary shallor bepermanent atotal rebuttable presumption that the diagnosis of cancer of a uniformed member of a paid municipal or volunteerpartial firedisability department arose out of andsuch in the course of employment as a result of exposures particular to the duties performed as a firefighter.
Such presumption applies to any condition of cancer affecting the brain, skin, skeletal system, digestive system, endocrine system, respiratory system, lymphatic system, reproductive system,urinary system or hematologicalsystemthat resultsinthedeath or temporary or permanent total or partial disability of such firefighter.
(6) Such firefighter failed to use respiratory protection, as described in 29 CFR 1910.134 of the Occupational Safety and Health Standards, or other personal protective equipment, as described in 29 CFR 1910.134 of sSB937the /Occupational FileSafety No.and Health Standards in the course of such employment;
100or 2(7) sSB937Such Fileclaimed cancer is not known to result from the exposure to heat, radiation or a known carcinogen as determined by the InternationalAgency for ResearchonCanceror theNationalToxicology LCO {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00932 of 3 R02-SB.docx } Substitute Bill No.
100937 theProgram Occupationalof Safetythe andUnited HealthStates StandardsDepartment inof theHealth courseand ofHuman suchServices. employment;
or (7) Such claimed cancer is not known to result from the exposure to heat, radiation or a known carcinogen as determined by the InternationalAgency for ResearchonCanceror theNationalToxicology Program of the United States Department of Health and Human Services.
Section 1 October 1, 2023 Section 1 31-294j StatementLAB ofJoint LegislativeFavorable Commissioners:Subst.
In-LCO Subsec.APP Joint Favorable LCO {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00937- 3 of 3 R02-SB.docx }
(b)(6), "used" was changed to "use", for proper grammar.
LAB Joint Favorable Subst.
-LCO sSB937 / File No.
100 3 sSB937 File No.
100 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
Municipalities Effect FY 24 $ FY 25 $ Various Municipalities STATE Potential Potential MANDATE - Cost Explanation The bill results in a potential cost to municipalities beginning in FY 24, by creating a rebuttable presumption in workers’ compensation law that firefighting performed by firefighters causes numerous types of cancer.
To the extent more firefighters qualify for workers’ compensation benefits due to particular cancer diagnoses, there will be a potential cost to municipalities.
There are approximately 26,800 firefighters 2 in the State of Connecticut.
1State mandate is defined in Sec.
2-32b(2) of the Connecticut General Statutes, "state mandate" means any state initiated constitutional, statutory or executive action that requires a local government to establish, expand or modify its activities in such a way as to necessitate additional expenditures from local revenues.
2Data from the Connecticut State Firefighters Association for 2016/17.
sSB937 / File No.
100 4 sSB937 File No.
100 The Out Years The annualized ongoing fiscal impact identified above would continue into the future subject to inflation and the number of relevant workers’ compensation claims.
Sources:Connecticut State Firefighters Association sSB937 / File No.
100 5 sSB937 File No.
100 OLR Bill Analysis SB 937 AN ACT PROVIDING WORKERS' COMPENSATION BENEFITS FOR CERTAIN CANCERS IN FIREFIGHTERS.
SUMMARY This bill creates a rebuttable presumption in workers’ compensation law that firefighting performed by uniformed paid municipal and volunteer firefighters causes numerous types of cancer.
It makes those with the disease eligible for workers’ compensation benefits unless the presumption is rebutted with clear and convincing evidence that the firefighter does not meet the bill’s criteria.
As with any workers’ compensation claim, to qualify for benefits, the disease must result in death or the temporary or permanent total or partial disability of the employee.
The bill also permits retired firefighters to apply for the benefits within five years of their retirement.
Show all 69 changed lines (29 more)
Workers’ compensation law is separate from the existing Firefighter Cancer Relief Program, which is unchanged by the bill (see BACKGROUND).
EFFECTIVE DATE:
October 1, 2023 PRESUMPTION AND ELIGIBLE TYPES OF CANCER The bill creates a presumption that the cancer diagnosis of paid municipal or volunteer firefighters “arose out of and in the course of employment as a result of exposure particular to the duties performed as a firefighter.” This presumption applies to any condition of cancer affecting the brain, skin, or any of the following systems:
skeletal, digestive, endocrine, respiratory, lymphatic, reproductive, urinary, or sSB937 / File No.
100 6 sSB937 File No.
100 hematological.
GROUNDS TO REBUT THE PRESUMPTION Under the bill, the presumption may be rebutted by clear and convincing evidence that:
1.
upon entry into service, a physical examination of the firefighter revealed evidence of the claimed cancer;
2.
the firefighter failed to submit to annual physical examinations after entry into service;
3.
subsequent physical examinations revealed evidence of, or a propensity for, the claimed cancer;
4.
the firefighter used cigarettes or other tobacco products, as defined in state law, during the 15-year period before the cancer diagnosis;
5.
when the cancer was diagnosed, or should have been diagnosed, the firefighter was employed for less than five years as (a) an interior structural firefighter at a municipal, state, or volunteer fire department or (b) a local fire marshal, deputy fire marshal, fire investigator, fire inspector, or other class of inspector or investigator meeting the minimum state qualification standards;
6.
the firefighter failed to use respiratory protection or other personal protective equipment as described in federal OSHA regulations (29 C.F.R.
1910.134);
or 7.
the claimed cancer is not known to result from exposure to heat, radiation, or a known carcinogen as determined by the International Agency for Research on Cancer or the federal Department of Health and Human Services’ National Toxicology Program.
sSB937 / File No.
100 7 sSB937 File No.
100 RETIRED FIREFIGHTERS The bill specifies that anyone no longer actively employed or serving as a firefighter who would otherwise qualify for benefits under the bill can apply for benefits within five years after the person was employed or last served as a firefighter.
BACKGROUND Firefighter Cancer Relief Program Under the Firefighter Cancer Relief Program, firefighters diagnosed with cancer may qualify for wage replacement benefits if they meet programcriteria.Thereliefprogramlawspecifiesthat(1)anawardfrom thefunddoesnot create apresumptionthat thecancer isdue to working as a firefighter and (2) a firefighter cannot simultaneously receive wage replacement benefits from the fund and from workers’ compensation.
It further states that receiving benefits from the relief fund does not prohibit a firefighter from being awarded workers’ compensations benefits.
COMMITTEE ACTION Labor and Public Employees Committee Joint Favorable Yea 8 Nay 3 (02/28/2023) sSB937 / File No.
100 8
Show all 69 changed rows (29 more)
Action History
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
NO NEW FILE BY COMM. ON Appropriations
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
REF. BY SEN. TO COMM. ON Appropriations
-
FILE NO. 100
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 90
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 03/15/23
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0207
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Labor and Public Employees
Sponsors
- J. Sanchez · Primary
- Rick L. Hayes · Primary
- Cristin Mccarthy Vahey · Primary
- Carol Hall · Primary
- Jane M. Garibay · Primary
- Travis Simms · Primary
- Patrick E. Callahan · Primary
- Sarah Keitt · Primary
- Seth Bronko · Primary
- Devin R. Carney · Primary
- Saud Anwar · Primary
- Anthony L. Nolan · Primary
- Kara Rochelle · Primary
- Derek Slap · Primary
- Mary Fortier · Primary
- Matt Blumenthal · Primary
- Greg S. Howard · Primary
- Kathy Kennedy · Primary
- Dominique Johnson · Primary
- Tony J Scott · Primary
- Laura Dancho · Primary
- Hector Arzeno · Primary
- Ronald A. Napoli · Primary
- Martin Foncello · Primary
- Michael D. Quinn · Primary
- Amy Morrin Bello · Primary
- Julie Kushner · Primary
- Bob Duff · Primary
- Patrick S. Boyd · Primary
- Keith Denning · Primary
- Jennifer Leeper · Primary
- Joseph H. Zullo · Primary
- Corey P. Paris · Primary
- Christie M. Carpino · Primary
- Chris Aniskovich · Primary
- Irene M. Haines · Primary
- Bill Buckbee · Primary
- Ben McGorty · Primary
- Joseph P. Gresko · Primary
- Jason Perillo · Primary
- Anne M. Hughes · Primary
- Gary A. Turco · Primary
- Dave W. Yaccarino · Primary
- David Michel · Primary
- Tami Zawistowski · Primary
- Hubert D. Delany · Primary
- Kevin Brown · Primary
- Mark Decaprio · Primary
- Rachel Khanna · Primary
- Rachel Chaleski · Primary
- Charles J. Ferraro · Primary
- Mary M. Mushinsky · Primary
- Brian Lanoue · Primary
- Tom Delnicki · Primary
- Robyn A. Porter · Primary
- Kurt Vail · Primary
- Joe Polletta · Primary
- Brandon Chafee · Primary
- Matthew L. Lesser · Primary
- Ceci Maher · Primary
- Jan Hochadel · Primary
- Jeff Gordon · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →62 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 125 not signed on
Sponsors (62)
- Sanchez, J.
- Hayes, Rick L.
- Mccarthy Vahey, Cristin
- Carol Hall Republican
- Jane M. Garibay Democratic
- Travis Simms Democratic
- Patrick E. Callahan Republican
- Keitt, Sarah
- Bronko, Seth
- Devin R. Carney Republican
- Saud Anwar Democratic
- Anthony L. Nolan Democratic
- Kara Rochelle Democratic
- Derek Slap Democratic
- Fortier, Mary
- Matt Blumenthal Democratic
- Greg S. Howard Republican
- Kathy Kennedy Republican
- Johnson, Dominique
- Scott, Tony J
- Dancho, Laura
- Arzeno, Hector
- Ronald A. Napoli Democratic
- Foncello, Martin
- Michael D. Quinn Democratic
- Morrin Bello, Amy
- Julie Kushner Democratic
- Bob Duff Democratic
- Patrick S. Boyd Democratic
- Denning, Keith
- Jennifer Leeper Democratic
- Joseph H. Zullo Republican
- Paris, Corey P.
- Christie M. Carpino Republican
- Aniskovich, Chris
- Irene M. Haines Republican
- Bill Buckbee Republican
- Ben McGorty Republican
- Joseph P. Gresko Democratic
- Jason Perillo Republican
- Anne M. Hughes Democratic
- Gary A. Turco Democratic
- Dave W. Yaccarino Republican
- Michel, David
- Tami Zawistowski Republican
- Delany, Hubert D.
- Brown, Kevin
- Decaprio, Mark
- Khanna, Rachel
- Chaleski, Rachel
- Ferraro, Charles J.
- Mary M. Mushinsky Democratic
- Brian Lanoue Republican
- Tom Delnicki Republican
- Porter, Robyn A.
- Kurt Vail Republican
- Joe Polletta Republican
- Brandon Chafee Democratic
- Matthew L. Lesser Democratic
- Ceci Maher Democratic
- Jan Hochadel Democratic
- Jeff Gordon Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (125)
125 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 125 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors SB 937?
- SB 937 is sponsored by Sanchez, J., Hayes, Rick L., Mccarthy Vahey, Cristin, Carol Hall (Republican), Jane M. Garibay (Democratic), Travis Simms (Democratic), Patrick E. Callahan (Republican), Keitt, Sarah, Bronko, Seth, Devin R. Carney (Republican), Saud Anwar (Democratic), Anthony L. Nolan (Democratic), Kara Rochelle (Democratic), Derek Slap (Democratic), Fortier, Mary, Matt Blumenthal (Democratic), Greg S. Howard (Republican), Kathy Kennedy (Republican), Johnson, Dominique, Scott, Tony J, Dancho, Laura, Arzeno, Hector, Ronald A. Napoli (Democratic), Foncello, Martin, Michael D. Quinn (Democratic), Morrin Bello, Amy, Julie Kushner (Democratic), Bob Duff (Democratic), Patrick S. Boyd (Democratic), Denning, Keith, Jennifer Leeper (Democratic), Joseph H. Zullo (Republican), Paris, Corey P., Christie M. Carpino (Republican), Aniskovich, Chris, Irene M. Haines (Republican), Bill Buckbee (Republican), Ben McGorty (Republican), Joseph P. Gresko (Democratic), Jason Perillo (Republican), Anne M. Hughes (Democratic), Gary A. Turco (Democratic), Dave W. Yaccarino (Republican), Michel, David, Tami Zawistowski (Republican), Delany, Hubert D., Brown, Kevin, Decaprio, Mark, Khanna, Rachel, Chaleski, Rachel, Ferraro, Charles J., Mary M. Mushinsky (Democratic), Brian Lanoue (Republican), Tom Delnicki (Republican), Porter, Robyn A., Kurt Vail (Republican), Joe Polletta (Republican), Brandon Chafee (Democratic), Matthew L. Lesser (Democratic), Ceci Maher (Democratic), Jan Hochadel (Democratic), and Jeff Gordon (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 937?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 937?
- Track SB 937 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 937
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 937
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →