Dredging and Beach Restoration Projects
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1072 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1072.
You're tracking SB 1072
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1072 — Dredging and Beach Restoration Projects
Last action — Died in Rules
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Dredging and Beach Restoration Projects; Directing the Department of Environmental Protection to require, as a condition of permits issued for certain dredging and beach restoration projects, that any adverse impact analysis conducted for the activity meet certain requirements; requiring a local government to provide notice of its intent to conduct an analysis to certain adjacent local governments, etc.
Bill Text
We don't have the full text on file for this bill yet.
Read SB 1072 on the official Florida source →Action History
-
Died in Rules
-
CS/CS by Community Affairs read 1st time
-
Now in Rules
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Community Affairs; YEAS 7 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Community Affairs, 04/05/23, 8:30 am, 401 Senate Building
-
CS by Environment and Natural Resources read 1st time
-
Now in Community Affairs
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Environment and Natural Resources; YEAS 9 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Environment and Natural Resources, 03/14/23, 8:30 am, 301 Senate Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Environment and Natural Resources; Community Affairs; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Ana Maria Rodriguez · Primary
- Environment and Natural Resources · Primary
- Community Affairs · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 161 not signed on
Sponsors (3)
- Rodriguez, Ana Maria Republican
- Environment and Natural Resources
- Community Affairs
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (161)
161 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 161 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| No Party Affiliation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 78% | 0% | 0% | 22% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Not Voting |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Calatayud, Alexis | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Martin, Jonathan | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1072 do?
- Dredging and Beach Restoration Projects; Directing the Department of Environmental Protection to require, as a condition of permits issued for certain dredging and beach restoration projects, that any adverse impact analysis conducted for the activity meet certain requirements; requiring a local government to provide notice of its intent to conduct an analysis to certain adjacent local governments, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 1072?
- SB 1072 is sponsored by Rodriguez, Ana Maria (Republican), Environment and Natural Resources, and Community Affairs.
- What is the current status of SB 1072?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1072?
- Track SB 1072 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1072
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1072
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →