Interchange Fees on Taxes
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 564 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 564.
You're tracking SB 564
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 564 — Interchange Fees on Taxes
Last action — Died on Calendar
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Interchange Fees on Taxes; Prohibiting issuers, payment card networks, acquirer banks, and processors from receiving or charging merchants interchange fees on the tax amounts of electronic payment transactions if the merchant provides certain information in a specified manner; requiring an issuer to credit a merchant the amount of interchange fees on taxes within a certain timeframe if the merchant meets certain conditions; prohibiting specified actions relating to electronic payment transaction data by certain entities, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
95 added · 96 removed95 line(s) added, 96 removed.
Florida Senate - 2023 CS for CS for SB 564 By the CommitteesCommittee on CommerceBanking and Tourism;Insurance;
and BankingSenator andHutson Insurance;597-02621-23 2023564c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to interchange fees on taxes;
and Senator Hutson 577-03479-23 2023564c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to interchange fees on taxes;
(b) “Authorization”“Clearance” means the process throughof whichtransmitting final transaction data from a merchant requeststo approvalan issuer for anposting electronicto paymentthe transactioncardholder’s fromaccount and the issuer.calculation of fees and charges, including interchange fees, which apply to the issuer and Page 1 of 5 CODING:
(c) “Clearance” means the process of transmitting final Page 1 of 5 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2023 CS for CS for SB 564 577-03479-23597-02621-23 2023564c22023564c1 transaction data from a merchant to an issuer for posting to the cardholder’s account and the calculation of fees and charges, including interchange fees, which apply to the issuer and merchant.
(d)(c) “Credit card” means a card, plate, coupon book, or other credit device existing for the purpose of obtaining money, property, labor, or services on credit.
(e)(d) “Debit card”:
(f)(e) “Electronic payment transaction” means a transaction in which a person uses a debit card, credit card, or other payment code or device issued or approved through a payment card network to debit a deposit account or use a line of credit, whether authorization is based on a signature, a personal identification number, or other means.
(g)(f) “Interchange fee” means a fee established, charged, or received by a payment card network for the purpose of compensating the issuer for its involvement in an electronic payment transaction.
(h)(g) “Issuer” means a person issuing a debit card or credit card or the issuer’s agent.
(i)(h) “Merchant” has the same meaning as the term “dealer” in Pages. 2 of 5 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2023 CS for CS for SB 564 577-03479-23 2023564c2 s.
(j)(i) “Payment card network” means an entity:
That directly or through licensed members, processors, orPage agents2 providesof the5 proprietaryCODING: services, infrastructure, and software that route information and data to conduct electronic payment transaction authorization, clearance, and settlement;
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2023 CS for SB 564 597-02621-23 2023564c1 or agents provides the proprietary services, infrastructure, and software that routes information and data to conduct electronic payment transaction authorization, clearance, and settlement;
(k)(j) “Processor” means an entity that facilitates, services, processes, or manages the debit or credit authorization, billing, transfer, payment procedures, or settlement with respect to any electronic payment transaction.
(l)(k) “Settlement” means the process of transmitting sales information to the issuing bank for collection and reimbursement of funds to the merchant and calculating and reporting the net transaction amount to the issuer and merchant for an electronic payment transaction that is cleared.
(m)(l) “Tax” means all taxes and fees levied under chapter 212 and s.
(n)(m) “Tax documentation” means documentation sufficient for the payment card network to determine the total amount of the electronic payment transaction and the tax amount of such transaction.
Examples of tax documentation include, but are not limited to, invoices, receipts, journals, ledgers, and tax returns filed with the PageDepartment 3 of 5Revenue CODING:or local taxing authorities.
(2) This section does not apply to an electronic payment transaction in which the tax amount is not separately stated on Page 3 of 5 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2023 CS for CS for SB 564 577-03479-23597-02621-23 2023564c22023564c1 Departmentthe ofconsumer’s Revenuepayment invoice, sales slip, or localother taxingevidence authorities.of sale as required under s.
(2) This section does not apply to an electronic payment transaction in which the tax amount is not separately stated on the consumer’s payment invoice, sales slip, or other evidence of sale as required under s.
(3) Except as provided in subsection (2), an issuer, a payment card network, an acquirer bank, or a processor may not receive or charge the merchant any interchange fees on the tax amount of an electronic payment transaction if the merchant informs the acquirer bankbank, its designee, or itsany designeeother entity as provided in the payment card network’s terms and conditions of service of such tax amount as part of the authorizationclearance process for the electronic payment transaction.
A merchant must transmit the tax amount data as part of the authorizationclearance process to avoid being charged interchange fees on the tax amount of an electronic payment transaction.
(4) A merchant that does not transmit the tax amount data in accordance with subsection (3) may submit tax documentation for the electronic payment transaction to the acquirer bankbank, its designee, or itsany designeeother entity as provided in the payment card network’s terms and conditions of service no later than 180 days after the date of the electronic payment transaction, and within 30 days, the issuer must credit to the merchant the amount of interchange fees charged on the tax amount of the electronic payment transaction.
Florida Senate - 2023 CS for CS for SB 564 577-03479-23597-02621-23 2023564c22023564c1 Section 2.
View plain text versions (4)
- S 564 c1 View text pdf
- S 564 c2 View text pdf
- S 564 c3 View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 564 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Died on Calendar
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
CS/CS/CS by Rules read 1st time
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS/CS by- Rules; YEAS 15 NAYS 4
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 04/24/23, 1:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
CS/CS by Commerce and Tourism read 1st time
-
Now in Rules
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Commerce and Tourism; YEAS 7 NAYS 2
-
On Committee agenda-- Commerce and Tourism, 04/04/23, 8:30 am, 110 Senate Building
-
CS by Banking and Insurance read 1st time
-
Now in Commerce and Tourism
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Banking and Insurance; YEAS 9 NAYS 2
-
On Committee agenda-- Banking and Insurance, 03/15/23, 1:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Introduced
-
Referred to Banking and Insurance; Commerce and Tourism; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Hutson · Primary
- Banking and Insurance · Primary
- Commerce and Tourism · Primary
- Rules · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 160 not signed on · 2 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- Hutson
- Banking and Insurance
- Commerce and Tourism
- Rules
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (160)
160 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 160 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 20% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Nay |
| Broxson | — | Not Voting |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Nay |
| Osgood, Rosalind | Democrat | Nay |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Simon, Corey | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 20% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Not Voting |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Nay |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 9 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 17% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (12)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Ingoglia | — | Nay |
| Torres | — | Nay |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Not Voting |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 564 do?
- Interchange Fees on Taxes; Prohibiting issuers, payment card networks, acquirer banks, and processors from receiving or charging merchants interchange fees on the tax amounts of electronic payment transactions if the merchant provides certain information in a specified manner; requiring an issuer to credit a merchant the amount of interchange fees on taxes within a certain timeframe if the merchant meets certain conditions; prohibiting specified actions relating to electronic payment transaction data by certain entities, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 564?
- SB 564 is sponsored by Hutson, Banking and Insurance, Commerce and Tourism, and Rules.
- What is the current status of SB 564?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 564?
- Track SB 564 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 564
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 564
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →