SB 1024 — Renewable Energy Generation
Last action — Laid on Table
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Renewable Energy Generation; Authorizing certain entities to prohibit the installation of solar collectors under certain circumstances; revising and providing legislative findings relating to the redesign of net metering to avoid cross-subsidization of electric service costs between classes of ratepayers; providing the terms for public utility net metering programs after a specified date; providing conditions under which rulemaking must be initiated if the penetration rate of customer-owned or -leased renewable generation meets a specified threshold, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
47 added · 53 removed47 line(s) added, 53 removed.
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for CS for SB 1024 By the CommitteesCommittee on CommunityRegulated Affairs;Industries;
and RegulatedSenator Industries;Bradley 580-01960-22 20221024c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to renewable energy generation;
and Senator Bradley 578-02849-22 20221024c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to renewable energy generation;
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for CS for SB 1024 578-02849-22580-01960-22 20221024c220221024c1 property owner may not be denied permission to install solar collectors or other energy devices by any entity granted the power or right in any deed restriction, covenant, declaration, or similar binding agreement to approve, forbid, control, or direct alteration of property with respect to residential dwellings and within the boundaries of a condominium unit.
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for CS for SB 1024 578-02849-22580-01960-22 20221024c220221024c1 innovative technologies.
The net metering must ensure that all energy delivered by the public utility is purchased at the public utility’s applicable retail rate and that all energy delivered by the customer-owned or -leased renewable generation to the public utility is credited to the customer asat follows:the public utility’s full Page 3 of 5 CODING:
Page 3 of 5 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for CS for SB 1024 578-02849-22580-01960-22 20221024c220221024c1 a.avoided costs.
During calendar years 2024 and 2025, the credit is 75 percent of the public utility’s retail rate.
b.
During calendar years 2026 and 2027, the credit is 50 percent of the public utility’s retail rate.
c.
During calendar year 2028, the credit is the public utility’s full avoided costs.
(b) Any public utility customer who owns or leases renewable generation that is in service before January 1, 2023, pursuant to a standard interconnection agreement offered by a public utilityutility, shall be granted 2010 years to continue to use the net metering rate design and rates that applied before the revised net metering rule was adopted under paragraph (a).
This paragraph applies to customers who purchase or lease real property upon which customer-owned or -leased renewable generation is installed for all or part of that 20-year10-year period.
(8)(7) Under the provisions of subsections (5) and (7) (6), when a utility purchases power generated from biogas produced by the anaerobic digestion of agricultural waste, including food waste or other agricultural byproducts, net metering shall be available at a single metering point or as a part of conjunctive billing of multiple points for a customer at a single location, so long as the provision of such service and its associated charges, terms, and other conditions are not reasonably projected to result in higher cost electric service to the Page 4 of 5 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for CS for SB 1024 578-02849-22580-01960-22 20221024c220221024c1 available at a single metering point or as a part of conjunctive billing of multiple points for a customer at a single location, so long as the provision of such service and its associated charges, terms, and other conditions are not reasonably projected to result in higher cost electric service to the utility’s general body of ratepayers or adversely affect the adequacy or reliability of electric service to all customers, as determined by the commission for public utilities, or as determined by the governing authority of the municipal electric utility or rural electric cooperative that serves at retail.
View plain text versions (4)
- S 1024 c1 View text pdf
- S 1024 c2 View text pdf
- S 1024 c3 View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 1024 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Laid on Table
-
Substituted CS/CS/HB 741 (Vetoed by Governor)
-
Read 2nd time
-
CS/CS/CS by Rules read 1st time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 03/04/22
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS/CS by- Rules; YEAS 12 NAYS 4
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 03/01/22, 1:30 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Rules
-
CS/CS by Community Affairs read 1st time
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by Community Affairs; YEAS 6 NAYS 3
-
On Committee agenda-- Community Affairs, 02/08/22, 3:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
CS by Regulated Industries read 1st time
-
Now in Community Affairs
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Regulated Industries; YEAS 6 NAYS 2
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Regulated Industries, 01/11/22, 4:00 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Referred to Regulated Industries; Community Affairs; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Rules · Primary
- Community Affairs · Primary
- Regulated Industries · Primary
- Jennifer Bradley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →4 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 160 not signed on · 1 voted No
Sponsors (4)
- Rules
- Community Affairs
- Regulated Industries
- Bradley, Jennifer Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (160)
160 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 160 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 12 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Nay |
| Bracy | — | Nay |
| Brandes | — | Nay |
| Farmer | — | Nay |
| Bean | — | Not Voting |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Cruz | — | Nay |
| Farmer | — | Nay |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Nay |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 6 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 22% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Nay |
| Book | — | Nay |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Not Voting |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1024 do?
- Renewable Energy Generation; Authorizing certain entities to prohibit the installation of solar collectors under certain circumstances; revising and providing legislative findings relating to the redesign of net metering to avoid cross-subsidization of electric service costs between classes of ratepayers; providing the terms for public utility net metering programs after a specified date; providing conditions under which rulemaking must be initiated if the penetration rate of customer-owned or -leased renewable generation meets a specified threshold, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 1024?
- SB 1024 is sponsored by Rules, Community Affairs, Regulated Industries, and Bradley, Jennifer (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 1024?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 1024?
- Track SB 1024 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1024
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1024
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →