SB 620 — Local Business Protection Act
Last action — Vetoed by Governor
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Local Business Protection Act; Citing this act as the "Local Business Protection Act"; authorizing certain businesses to claim business damages from a county or municipality if the county or municipality enacts or amends certain ordinances or charter provisions; limiting the amount of business damages that may be recovered; specifying ordinances and charter provisions that do not result in liability for business damages; requiring businesses and counties or municipalities to follow certain presuit procedures before businesses file an action for business damages, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
329 added · 209 removed329 line(s) added, 209 removed.
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for SB 620 FirstBy Engrossed 2022620e1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to the LocalCommittee Businesson ProtectionAppropriations; Act;
providingand aSenator shortHutson title;576-02163-22 2022620c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to local government;
authorizing courtsbusinesses to awardrecover reasonablecosts attorneyand fees in a specified manner and costsif tocertain prevailingrequirements parties;are met;
specifying that certain evidence relating to mediations and negotiations is inadmissible as evidence in certain proceedings;
authorizingrequiring governingcourts bodies of municipalities to provideconsider specifiedcertain relief,factors notwithstandingand certainfollow ordinancesspecified andguidance charterwhen provisions;assessing costs;
providingdefining applicabilitythe andterm construction;“benefits”;
providingspecifying anrequirements effectivefor date.the courts in determining and awarding attorney fees;
WHEREAS,requiring theattorneys Legislature recognizes that the continued economic growth and economicbusinesses prosperityto ofsubmit thiscertain statedocumentation arerelating tied to theattorney protectionfees; of private property rights and the stability of laws, ordinances, and charter provisions, and WHEREAS, the Legislature recognizes that the protection of private property rights and the stability of laws and local Page 1 of 7 CODING:
requiring businesses claiming the right to recover business damages to state the nature and extent of the damages;
requiring a jury to determine whether a business is entitled to business damages and Page 1 of 11 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for SB 620 First576-02163-22 Engrossed2022620c1 2022620e1 rules and regulations affecting business activities encourage investments by businesses in their real property, facilities, operations, and workforces, and WHEREAS, investments by businesses drive the economicamount growth of asuch community,damages andunless WHEREAS, the economicbusiness costselects ofto localhave rules and regulations that are primarily for the benefit of a county or municipality as a whole should be borne by the county or municipality as a whole, and WHEREAS, the Legislature intends to require counties and municipalities to compensate businesses for business damages whendetermined an ordinance or a charter provision causes a business significant economic harm, NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Enacted by the Legislaturecourt; of the State of Florida:
providing applicability and construction;
providing an effective date.
WHEREAS, the Legislature recognizes that the continued economic growth and economic prosperity of this state are tied to the protection of private property rights and the stability of laws, ordinances, and charter provisions, and WHEREAS, the Legislature recognizes that the protection of private property rights and the stability of laws and local rules and regulations affecting business activities encourage investments by businesses in their real property, facilities, operations, and workforces, and WHEREAS, investments by businesses drive the economic growth of a community, and WHEREAS, the economic costs of local rules and regulations that are primarily for the benefit of a county or municipality as a whole should be borne by the county or municipality as a whole, and WHEREAS, the Legislature intends to require counties and municipalities to compensate businesses for business damages when an ordinance or a charter provision causes a business significant economic harm, NOW, THEREFORE, Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
This act may be cited as the “Local Business Protection Act.” Section 2.
70.91 Compensation for business damages caused by county or municipal ordinances or charter provisions.— (1) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the term “business records” includes, but is not limited to, copies of federal income tax returns, federal income tax withholding statements, federal miscellaneous income tax statements, state sales tax returns, balance sheets, profit and loss statements, state corporate income tax returns for the 3 years preceding the enactment of or amendment to an ordinance or a charter, and Page 2 of 711 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for SB 620 First576-02163-22 Engrossed2022620c1 2022620e170.91 Compensation for business damages caused by county or municipal ordinances or charter provisions.— (1) DEFINITION.—For purposes of this section, the term “business records” includes, but is not limited to, copies of federal income tax returns, federal income tax withholding statements, federal miscellaneous income tax statements, state sales tax returns, balance sheets, profit and loss statements, state corporate income tax returns for the 3 years preceding the enactment of or amendment to an ordinance or a charter, and other records relied upon by a business to substantiate a claim for business damages.
(2) CLAIMS FOR BUSINESS DAMAGES.— (a) Except as provided in paragraph (c), a private, for- profit business may claim business damages from a county or municipality if:
The county or municipality enacts or amends an ordinance or a charter provision that has or will cause a reduction of at least 15 percent of the business’ profit as applied on a per location basis of a business operated within the jurisdiction;
The business has engaged in lawful business in thethis jurisdictionstate for the 3 years preceding the enactment of or amendment to the ordinance or charter.
(b) The amount of business damages may be established by any reasonable method, but the amount of business damages that may be recovered by a business may not exceedexceed: the present value of the business’ future lost profits for the lesser of 7 years or the number of years the business had been in operation in the jurisdiction before the ordinance or charter provision was enacted.
(c) A county or municipality is not liable for business damages caused by:
AnThe ordinancepresent orvalue charterof provision7 thatyears’ islost requiredprofits; to comply with, or is expressly authorized by, state or federal law;
or 2.
An amount equal to the business’ gross receipts for the 60 months preceding the date of enactment of or amendment to the ordinance or charter provision.
This subparagraph applies if the ordinance or charter will cause a total loss of profit.
Page 3 of 11 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for SB 620 576-02163-22 2022620c1 (c) A county or municipality is not liable for business damages caused by:
1.
An ordinance or a charter provision that is required to comply with state or federal law;
Page3. 3 of 7 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
CS for SB 620 First Engrossed 2022620e1 3.
Part II of chapter 163, relating to growth policy, county and municipal planning, and land development regulation,regulation; including zoning, development orders, and development permits;
or 7.
An ordinance or charter provision relating to the adoption of a budget or budget amendment,amendment. including revenue sources necessary to fund the budget;
8.(3) PRESUIT PROCEDURES.— (a) At least 180 days before a business files an action under this section against a county or municipality and within 180 days after the effective date of the relevant ordinance or Page 4 of 11 CODING:
Show all 122 changed lines (82 more)
An ordinance or charter provision relating to procurement;
or 9.
An ordinance or charter provision intended to promote, enable, or facilitate economic competition.
(d) An amendment to an ordinance or charter provision after the effective date of this act gives rise to a claim under this section only to the extent that the application of the amendatory language is the cause of the claimed impact on a business apart from the ordinance or charter provision being Page 4 of 7 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for SB 620 First576-02163-22 Engrossed2022620c1 2022620e1charter amended.provision, the business must present a written offer to settle the business’ claim for business damages to the head of the county or municipality enacting or amending the ordinance.
(3) PRESUIT PROCEDURES;
ATTORNEY FEES AND COSTS.— (a) At least 180 days before a business files an action under this section against a county or municipality and within 180 days after the effective date of the relevant ordinance or charter provision, the business must present a written offer to settle the business’ claim for business damages to the head of the county or municipality enacting or amending the ordinance or charter provision.
(b) Within 120 days after receipt of the good faith business damage offer and accompanying business records, the county or municipality must, by certified mail, accept or reject the business’ offer or make a counteroffer,counteroffer. which may include an offer to grant a waiver to the application of the ordinance or charter provision.
(c)Failure Ifof athe businesscounty filesor anmunicipality actionto forrespond to or reject the business damages,damage itoffer must be fileddeemed withinto 1be yeara aftercounteroffer theof effectivezero datedollars for purposes of thecalculating relevantattorney ordinance,fees ordinanceunder amendment,subsection or(6) chartersolely provision.based upon the benefits achieved for the business.
(d)(c) EvidenceIf ofthe negotiationsbusiness and the county or ofmunicipality anyreach writtena orsettlement oralbefore Pagea 5lawsuit is filed, the business that settles the claim for business damages in lieu of 7litigation CODING:is entitled to recover costs in the same manner as provided in subsection (5) and attorney fees in the same manner as provided in subsection (6), more specifically as follows:
1.
If the business recovers business damages based upon the Page 5 of 11 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for SB 620 First576-02163-22 Engrossed2022620c1 2022620e1county statementsor usedmunicipality inaccepting mediationthe business’ initial offer or negotiationsthe betweenbusiness accepting the partiescounty’s underor thismunicipality’s sectioninitial iscounteroffer, inadmissibleattorney fees must be calculated in anyaccordance proceedingwith forparagraphs business(6)(c)-(f) damages,for exceptthe inattorney’s atime proceedingrequired to determinepresent reasonablethe costsbusiness’ andgood attorneyfaith fees.offer.
(e)Otherwise, Inattorney anfees action for the award of business damages,damages must be calculated as provided in paragraphs (6)(a) and (b), based upon the courtdifference maybetween awardthe reasonablefinal attorneyjudgment feesor settlement of business damages and coststhe county’s or municipality’s counteroffer to the prevailingbusiness party.owner’s offer.
(4)2. OPPORTUNITY TO CURE.—There is no liability under this section for a county or municipality that, within the 120-day timeframe provided for in paragraph (3)(b):
Presuit costs must be presented, calculated, and awarded in the same manner as provided in subsection (5), after the business owner submits to the county or municipality all business damage reports or other work products for which recovery is sought and upon the county or municipality paying any amounts due for business damages or upon final judgment.
3.
If the parties cannot agree on the amount of costs and attorney fees to be paid by the county or municipality, the business owner may file a complaint in the circuit court in the county in which the business is located to recover attorney fees and costs.
If a business files a complaint for business damages, it must be filed within 1 year after the effective date of the relevant ordinance, ordinance amendment, or charter provision.
(d) Evidence of negotiations or of any written or oral statements used in mediation or negotiations between the parties under this section is inadmissible in any proceeding for business damages, except in a proceeding to determine reasonable costs and attorney fees.
(4) OPPORTUNITY TO CURE.—There is no liability under this Page 6 of 11 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for SB 620 576-02163-22 2022620c1 section for a county or municipality that, within the 120-day timeframe provided for in subsection (3)(b):
(b) Amends the ordinance or charter provision that gave rise to the business’ claim in a manner that returns the ordinance or charter provision to its form in existence before the business’ claim arosearose; or in a manner that avoids causing a reduction of at least 15 percent of the business’ profit as applied on a per location basis within the jurisdiction;
or (c) Publishes notice of its intent to repeal or amend the ordinance that gave rise to the business’ claim and, within 30 days after publication of the notice, amends the ordinance in a manner that returns the ordinance to its form in existence before the business’ claim arose or in a manner that avoids causing a reduction of at least 15 percent of the business’ profit as applied on a per location basis within the jurisdiction, or repeals the ordinance;ordinance.
(d)(5) GrantsCOSTS.— (a) If a waiverbusiness ofrecovers business damages, the ordinancecounty or chartermunicipality provisionmust topay athe businessbusiness’ submittingreasonable acosts, claimincluding fora businessreasonable damages;accountant’s fee.
orPrejudgment (e)interest Withmay respectnot tobe apaid charteron provision,costs the county provides notice of its intent to amend or repealattorney thefees. charter Page 6 of 7 CODING:
(b) At least 30 days before a hearing to assess costs under this subsection, the attorney for the business shall submit to the county or municipality for each expert witness the expert witness’ complete time records and a detailed statement of services rendered by date, nature of services performed, time spent performing the services, and costs incurred and a copy of any fee agreement that may exist between the expert witness and the business or the business’ attorney.
(c) In assessing costs, the court shall consider all factors relevant to the reasonableness of the costs, including, but not limited to, the fees paid to similar experts retained in Page 7 of 11 CODING:
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for SB 620 First576-02163-22 Engrossed2022620c1 2022620e1the provisioncase thatby is the basiscounty ofor themunicipality businessor damageother claimparties and the charterreasonable provisioncosts isof amendedsimilar orservices repealed by thesimilarly votersqualified atpersons. an election or special election that occurs within 90 days after publication of the notice.
The(d) governingIn bodyassessing ofcosts ato municipalitybe maypaid provideby reliefthe undercounty thisor subsectionmunicipality, notwithstandingthe anycourt ordinanceshall orbe charterguided provisionby the amount the business would ordinarily have been expected to pay for the contrary.services rendered if the county or municipality was not responsible for the costs.
(5)(e) APPLICATION;The court shall make specific findings that justify each sum awarded as an expert witness fee.
CONSTRUCTION.—This(6) sectionATTORNEY doesFEES.— not(a) applyAs toused ain businessthis thatsubsection, maythe claimterm business“benefits” damagesmeans underthe chapterdifference, 73exclusive of interest, between the final judgment or settlement and maythe notlast bewritten construedoffer tomade authorizeby doublethe recoveries.county or municipality before the business hires an attorney.
SectionIf 3.the county or municipality does not make a written settlement offer before the business hires an attorney, benefits must be measured from the first written offer after the attorney is hired.
(b)1.
In determining attorney fees, if business records kept by the owner in the ordinary course of business were provided to the county or municipality to substantiate the business damage offer made by the business, benefits for amounts awarded for business damages must be based upon the difference between the final judgment or settlement and the written counteroffer made by the county or municipality.
2.
In determining attorney fees, if existing business records kept by the owner in the ordinary course of business were not provided to the county or municipality to substantiate Page 8 of 11 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for SB 620 576-02163-22 2022620c1 the business damage offer made by the business and those records that were not provided are later deemed material to the determination of business damages, benefits for amounts awarded for business damages must be based upon the difference between the final judgment or settlement and the first written counteroffer made by the county or municipality within 90 days after the receipt of the business records previously not provided to the county or municipality.
3.
The court may also consider nonmonetary benefits obtained for the business through the efforts of the attorney, to the extent such nonmonetary benefits are specifically identified by the court and can, within a reasonable degree of certainty, be quantified.
4.
Attorney fees based upon benefits achieved shall be awarded in accordance with the following schedule:
a.
Thirty-three percent of any benefit up to $250,000;
plus b.
Twenty-five percent of any portion of the benefit between $250,000 and $1 million;
plus c.
Twenty percent of any portion of the benefit exceeding $1 million.
(c) In assessing attorney fees in a claim for business damages, when not otherwise provided for, the court shall consider:
1.
The novelty, difficulty, and importance of the questions involved.
2.
The skill employed by the attorney in conducting the case.
3.
The amount of money involved.
4.
The responsibility incurred and fulfilled by the Page 9 of 11 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for SB 620 576-02163-22 2022620c1 attorney.
5.
The attorney’s time and labor reasonably required to adequately represent the client in relation to the benefits resulting to the client.
6.
The fee, or rate of fee, customarily charged for legal services of a comparable or similar nature.
(d) In determining the amount of attorney fees to be paid by the county or municipality under paragraph (c), the court shall be guided by the fees the business would ordinarily be expected to pay for these services if the county or municipality was not responsible for the payment of those fees.
(e) At least 30 days before a hearing to assess attorney fees under paragraph (c), the attorney for the business shall submit to the county or municipality and to the court complete time records and a detailed statement of services rendered by date, nature of services performed, time spent performing the services, and costs incurred.
(f) The business shall provide to the court a copy of any fee agreement that may exist between the business and its attorney, and the court must reduce the amount of attorney fees to be paid by the business by the amount of any attorney fees awarded by the court.
(7) TRIAL.—A business claiming the right to recover business damages must state in its complaint the nature and extent of those damages.
At trial, a jury shall determine whether a business is entitled to business damages and the amount of damages, if any.
However, the business may elect to have business damages determined by the court.
(8) APPLICATION;
CONSTRUCTION.—This section does not apply Page 10 of 11 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
Florida Senate - 2022 CS for SB 620 576-02163-22 2022620c1 to a business that may claim business damages under chapter 73 and may not be construed to authorize double recoveries.
Section 2.
Section 4.3.
Page 711 of 711 CODING:
Show all 122 changed rows (82 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- S 620 c1 View text pdf
- S 620 e1 View text pdf
- S 620 er View text Current pdf
- Introduced S 620 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Vetoed by Governor
-
Signed by Officers and presented to Governor
-
Ordered enrolled
-
CS passed; YEAS 69, NAYS 45
-
Read 3rd time
-
Added to Third Reading Calendar
-
Placed on 3rd reading
-
Amendment 521123 Failed
-
Amendment 773345 Failed
-
Amendment 199089 Failed
-
Read 2nd time
-
1st Reading (Engrossed 1)
-
Bill added to Special Order Calendar (3/8/2022)
-
Bill referred to House Calendar
-
In Messages
-
Immediately certified
-
CS passed as amended; YEAS 22 NAYS 14
-
Read 3rd time
-
Amendment(s) adopted (507868, 609228)
-
Read 2nd time
-
CS by Appropriations read 1st time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 01/27/22
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by- Appropriations; YEAS 11 NAYS 7
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 01/20/22, 11:30 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Introduced
-
Now in Appropriations
-
Remaining references corrected to Appropriations
-
Original reference(s)- removed: Rules
-
Now in Rules
-
Favorable by Judiciary; YEAS 7 NAYS 4
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 11/30/21, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Referred to Judiciary; Rules; Appropriations
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Appropriations · Primary
- Hutson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →2 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 162 not signed on · 70 voted No
Sponsors (2)
- Appropriations
- Hutson
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (162)
162 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 162 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 28 | 21 | 0 | 3 |
| Republican | 40 | 4 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 1 | 20 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 69 | 45 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 58% | 38% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (119)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alexander | — | Nay |
| Aloupis | — | Yea |
| Geller | — | Nay |
| Altman | — | Nay |
| Goff-Marcil | — | Nay |
| Renner | — | Yea |
| Grant | — | Yea |
| Roach | — | Yea |
| Bell | — | Nay |
| Grieco | — | Nay |
| Beltran | — | Yea |
| Hage | — | Yea |
| Benjamin | — | Nay |
| Harding | — | Yea |
| Rommel | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Sabatini | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Nay |
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Diamond | — | Nay |
| Drake | — | Yea |
| McCurdy | — | Nay |
| Duran | — | Nay |
| Willhite | — | Nay |
| Morales | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Nay |
| Williamson | — | Yea |
| Fernandez-Barquin | — | Yea |
| Omphroy | — | Yea |
| Fetterhoff | — | Yea |
| Fine | — | Yea |
| Payne | — | Yea |
| Zika | — | Yea |
| Silvers | — | Nay |
| Jenne | — | Nay |
| Killebrew | — | Nay |
| Slosberg-King | — | Nay |
| Byrd | — | Yea |
| Caruso | — | Yea |
| Latvala | — | Yea |
| Casello | — | Nay |
| Learned | — | Nay |
| Sprowls | — | Yea |
| Clemons | — | Yea |
| Mariano | — | Yea |
| Toledo | — | Yea |
| Tomkow | — | Yea |
| Fischer | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Not Voting |
| Bush | — | Not Voting |
| Stevenson | — | Not Voting |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Nay |
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Nay |
| Bartleman, Robin | Democrat | Nay |
| Campbell, Daryl | Democrat | Nay |
| Chambliss, Kevin D. | Democrat | Nay |
| Daley, Dan | Democrat | Nay |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Nay |
| Driskell, Fentrice | Democrat | Nay |
| Eskamani, Dr. Anna V. | Democrat | Nay |
| Gottlieb, Michael "Mike" | Democrat | Nay |
| Gregory, Emily | Democrat | Yea |
| Hart-Lowman, Dianne "Ms Dee" | Democrat | Nay |
| Hinson, Yvonne Hayes | Democrat | Nay |
| Hunschofsky, Christine | Democrat | Nay |
| Joseph, Dotie | Democrat | Nay |
| Nixon, Angela "Angie" | Democrat | Nay |
| Rayner, Michele K. | Democrat | Nay |
| Robinson, Felicia Simone | Democrat | Nay |
| Skidmore, Kelly | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Carlos Guillermo | Democrat | Nay |
| Tant, Allison | Democrat | Nay |
| Woodson, Marie Paule | Democrat | Nay |
| Andrade, Robert Alexander "Alex" | Republican | Yea |
| Barnaby, Webster | Republican | Yea |
| Borrero, David | Republican | Yea |
| Botana, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Brannan III, Robert Charles "Chuck" | Republican | Yea |
| Buchanan, James | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Busatta, Demi | Republican | Yea |
| Chaney, Linda | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Duggan, Wyman | Republican | Yea |
| Fabricio, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Garrison, Sam | Republican | Yea |
| Giallombardo, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Yea |
| Koster, Traci | Republican | Yea |
| LaMarca, Chip | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Maggard, Randall Scott "Randy" | Republican | Yea |
| Maney, Patt | Republican | Nay |
| Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| McClure, Lawrence | Republican | Yea |
| McFarland, Fiona | Republican | Yea |
| Melo, Lauren | Republican | Yea |
| Mooney Jr., James Vernon "Jim" | Republican | Nay |
| Overdorf, Tobin Rogers "Toby" | Republican | Yea |
| Perez, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Persons-Mulicka, Jenna | Republican | Yea |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Yea |
| Plasencia, Susan | Republican | Not Voting |
| Rizo, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Robinson Jr., William Cloud "Will" | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Salzman, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Shoaf, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Sirois, Tyler I. | Republican | Yea |
| Smith, David | Republican | Nay |
| Snyder, John | Republican | Yea |
| Trabulsy, Dana | Republican | Yea |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tuck, Kaylee | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Valdés, Susan L. | Republican | Nay |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 24 | 26 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 20 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 42 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 46 | 69 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 39% | 58% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (119)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Roach | — | Nay |
| Bell | — | Yea |
| Grieco | — | Yea |
| Beltran | — | Nay |
| Hage | — | Nay |
| Benjamin | — | Yea |
| Harding | — | Nay |
| Rommel | — | Nay |
| Alexander | — | Yea |
| Aloupis | — | Nay |
| Geller | — | Yea |
| Altman | — | Nay |
| Goff-Marcil | — | Yea |
| Renner | — | Nay |
| Grant | — | Nay |
| Roth | — | Nay |
| Hawkins | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Caruso | — | Nay |
| Latvala | — | Nay |
| Casello | — | Yea |
| Learned | — | Yea |
| Sprowls | — | Nay |
| Stevenson | — | Nay |
| Clemons | — | Nay |
| Zika | — | Nay |
| Fischer | — | Nay |
| Sabatini | — | Not Voting |
| Williamson | — | Not Voting |
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Silvers | — | Yea |
| Jenne | — | Yea |
| Bush | — | Yea |
| Killebrew | — | Yea |
| Slosberg-King | — | Yea |
| Byrd | — | Nay |
| Mariano | — | Nay |
| Toledo | — | Nay |
| Tomkow | — | Nay |
| Diamond | — | Yea |
| Drake | — | Nay |
| McCurdy | — | Yea |
| Duran | — | Yea |
| Willhite | — | Yea |
| Morales | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fernandez-Barquin | — | Nay |
| Omphroy | — | Yea |
| Fetterhoff | — | Nay |
| Fine | — | Yea |
| Payne | — | Nay |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Yea |
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Yea |
| Bartleman, Robin | Democrat | Yea |
| Campbell, Daryl | Democrat | Yea |
| Chambliss, Kevin D. | Democrat | Yea |
| Daley, Dan | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Driskell, Fentrice | Democrat | Yea |
| Eskamani, Dr. Anna V. | Democrat | Yea |
| Gottlieb, Michael "Mike" | Democrat | Yea |
| Gregory, Emily | Democrat | Nay |
| Hart-Lowman, Dianne "Ms Dee" | Democrat | Yea |
| Hinson, Yvonne Hayes | Democrat | Yea |
| Hunschofsky, Christine | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph, Dotie | Democrat | Yea |
| Nixon, Angela "Angie" | Democrat | Yea |
| Rayner, Michele K. | Democrat | Yea |
| Robinson, Felicia Simone | Democrat | Yea |
| Skidmore, Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Smith, Carlos Guillermo | Democrat | Yea |
| Tant, Allison | Democrat | Yea |
| Woodson, Marie Paule | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrade, Robert Alexander "Alex" | Republican | Nay |
| Barnaby, Webster | Republican | Nay |
| Borrero, David | Republican | Nay |
| Botana, Adam | Republican | Nay |
| Brannan III, Robert Charles "Chuck" | Republican | Nay |
| Buchanan, James | Republican | Nay |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Nay |
| Busatta, Demi | Republican | Nay |
| Chaney, Linda | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Nay |
| Duggan, Wyman | Republican | Nay |
| Fabricio, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Garrison, Sam | Republican | Nay |
| Giallombardo, Mike | Republican | Nay |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Nay |
| Koster, Traci | Republican | Nay |
| LaMarca, Chip | Republican | Nay |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Nay |
| Maggard, Randall Scott "Randy" | Republican | Nay |
| Maney, Patt | Republican | Nay |
| Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. | Republican | Nay |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Nay |
| McClure, Lawrence | Republican | Nay |
| McFarland, Fiona | Republican | Nay |
| Melo, Lauren | Republican | Nay |
| Mooney Jr., James Vernon "Jim" | Republican | Nay |
| Overdorf, Tobin Rogers "Toby" | Republican | Nay |
| Perez, Daniel | Republican | Nay |
| Persons-Mulicka, Jenna | Republican | Nay |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Nay |
| Plasencia, Susan | Republican | Nay |
| Rizo, Alex | Republican | Nay |
| Robinson Jr., William Cloud "Will" | Republican | Nay |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Nay |
| Salzman, Michelle | Republican | Not Voting |
| Shoaf, Jason | Republican | Nay |
| Sirois, Tyler I. | Republican | Nay |
| Smith, David | Republican | Nay |
| Snyder, John | Republican | Nay |
| Trabulsy, Dana | Republican | Nay |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Nay |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Not Voting |
| Tuck, Kaylee | Republican | Nay |
| Vacant | Republican | Nay |
| Valdés, Susan L. | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 9 | 0 | 3 |
| Democrat | 0 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 22 | 14 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 36% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Ausley | — | Nay |
| Farmer | — | Nay |
| Powell | — | Nay |
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Gainer | — | Not Voting |
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Nay |
| Book | — | Nay |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Nay |
| Taddeo | — | Nay |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Nay |
| Brandes | — | Nay |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Cruz | — | Not Voting |
| Bracy | — | Not Voting |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Nay |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Nay |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Nay |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Nay |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Nay |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| No Party Affiliation | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 11 | 7 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 55% | 35% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Nay |
| Bracy | — | Nay |
| Brandes | — | Nay |
| Gibson | — | Nay |
| Powell | — | Nay |
| Stewart | — | Nay |
| Gainer | — | Not Voting |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Nay |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 36% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Nay |
| Gibson | — | Nay |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Nay |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Nay |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 620 do?
- Local Business Protection Act; Citing this act as the "Local Business Protection Act"; authorizing certain businesses to claim business damages from a county or municipality if the county or municipality enacts or amends certain ordinances or charter provisions; limiting the amount of business damages that may be recovered; specifying ordinances and charter provisions that do not result in liability for business damages; requiring businesses and counties or municipalities to follow certain presuit procedures before businesses file an action for business damages, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 620?
- SB 620 is sponsored by Appropriations and Hutson.
- What is the current status of SB 620?
- This bill died with 2022 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 620?
- Track SB 620 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 620
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 620
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →