New Hampshire 2026 Session Status: Passed House 14 R cosponsors

HB 1734 — establishing a committee to study the feasibility of establishing experimental treatment centers in New Hampshire and the oversight thereof.

Last action — Sen. Rochefort Refused to Accede to House Request for Committee of Conference, MA, VV; 05/21/2026; SJ 13

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 17, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.

Next likely step: consideration and a floor vote in the Senate.

Odds of enactment

Moderate chance

Based on the sponsor, cosponsors, and committee posture, this bill has a moderate chance of becoming law.

Upgrade to see the exact probability and what's driving it.

A statistical estimate from our own model of past outcomes — an insight, not a guarantee. Policymaking is volatile.

Prognosis

Advancing 38% · moderate confidence
  • Passed House

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 14 sponsors

    1 primary, 13 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (14 R).

Based on stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes, and cross-state momentum — a description of the observable signals, not a prediction.

In plain language

This bill creates a committee to study experimental treatment centers in New Hampshire.

The bill establishes a committee to explore the feasibility and oversight of experimental treatment centers in New Hampshire. This involves gathering information from various stakeholders and researching similar centers in other states.

Summary

(New Title) establishing a committee to study the feasibility of establishing experimental treatment centers in New Hampshire and the oversight thereof.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

265 added · 59 removed

Plain-language change summary

The amendment to HB 1734 shifts the focus from simply studying the feasibility of establishing experimental treatment centers in New Hampshire to actually authorizing their creation. This means that patients could gain access to innovative treatments earlier, as the centers would provide investigational drugs and devices that have shown promise in early clinical trials. This change is significant because it aims to enhance patient access to cutting-edge healthcare solutions while potentially attracting more clinical trials and research initiatives to the state.

→
Previous
Latest
HB 1734-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE 11Mar2026...
HB 1734-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE 11Mar2026...
0666h 05/14/2026 1864s SESSION 26-2801 05/06 HOUSE BILL 1734-FN AN ACT establishing a committee to study the feasibility of establishing experimental treatment centers in New Hampshire and the oversight thereof.
0666h SESSION 26-2801 05/06 HOUSE BILL 1734-FN AN ACT authorizing the establishment of experimental treatment centers.
Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── AMENDED ANALYSIS This bill establishes a committee to study the feasibility of establishing experimental treatment centers in New Hampshire and the oversight thereof.
Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs ───────────────────────────────────────────────────────────────── ANALYSIS This bill permits the establishment of experimental treatment centers.
The centers would be authorized by the department of health and human services to provide treatment involving an investigational drug, biologic, or device that has successfully completed phase one of a clinical trial, but is not yet FDA-approved for general use and either remains under investigation in a clinical trial or has a demonstrated safety record from a qualified medical institution.
HB 1734-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE 11Mar2026...
HB 1734-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE 11Mar2026...
0666h 05/14/2026 1864s 26-2801 05/06 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT establishing a committee to study the feasibility of establishing experimental treatment centers in New Hampshire and the oversight thereof.
0666h 26-2801 05/06 STATE OF NEW HAMPSHIRE In the Year of Our Lord Two Thousand Twenty-Six AN ACT authorizing the establishment of experimental treatment centers.
1 Committee Established.
1 Short Title.
There is established a committee to study the feasibility of establishing experimental treatment centers in New Hampshire and the oversight thereof.
This act shall be known as the "John Lewicke and Michael Yakubovich Experimental Treatment Centers Act".
2 Membership and Compensation.
2 New Chapter;
Experimental Treatment Centers.
Amend RSA by inserting after chapter 126-Z the following new chapter:
CHAPTER 126-ZZ EXPERIMENTAL TREATMENT CENTERS 126-ZZ:1 Statement of Intent.
The general court enacts this chapter to promote maximum access to innovative health care by removing legal barriers to cutting-edge treatments and to make New Hampshire a jurisdiction that attracts and fosters clinical trials and the development of drugs, biologics, and devices intended to combat illness and promote human flourishing.  This chapter shall be construed consistently with the general court's stated purpose.
126-ZZ:2 Definitions.
In this chapter:
The members of the committee shall be as follows:
“Eligible patient” means a person to whom all of the following apply:
(a) Two members of the senate, appointed by the president of the senate, one of whom shall be a member of the minority party.
(a) The person has received a recommendation from the patient's treating physician for an experimental treatment;
(b) Three members of the house of representatives, appointed by the speaker of the house of representatives, one of whom shall be a member of the minority party.
(b) The physician certifies in writing that they have provided the recommendation and that the patient has considered alternative treatments approved by the FDA;
and (c) The person has given written informed consent for use of the experimental treatment, including at least the following information:
(1) Clear identification of the specific experimental treatment sought by the patient;
(2) Certification that the patient and physician have discussed whether there are any applicable FDA-approved treatments and, if so, the nature of such treatments;
(3) Certification that the patient and physician have discussed best and worst outcomes from the treatment and the most likely outcome based on available data;
(4) An acknowledgment that insurance is not obligated to pay for treatment or consequent care;
(5) A statement, if applicable, that patient is liable for treatment expenses;
and (6) A prominent statement that the patient is seeking treatment from an experimental treatment center under RSA 126-ZZ.
HB 1734-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE - Page 2 - II.
“Experimental treatment” means the provision of a medical intervention by a health care provider involving an investigational drug, biologic, or device that has successfully completed phase one of a clinical trial, but is not yet FDA-approved for general use and either:
(a) Remains under investigation in a clinical trial;
or (b) Has a demonstrated safety record through documented clinical evidence from a qualified medical institution as defined in paragraph VI.
For the purposes of this provision, “qualified medical institution” may be further defined by the department of health and human services through a rulemaking under RSA 541-A.
III.
“Experimental treatment center” means a health care provider, whether a business or nonprofit, that administers experimental therapies pursuant to RSA 126-ZZ:3.
An entity’s status as an experimental treatment center under this chapter is legally distinct from its licensing status under RSA 151:2, its administration of any treatments under 126-Z, and its participation in other protected access.
IV.
“Other protected access” includes expanded access or compassionate use, in which the treating physician has requested access under 21 C.F.R.
Part 312, Subpart I and other applicable FDA regulations or off-label use consistent with the physician’s professional obligations under RSA 329.
V.
“Physician” means the licensed allopathic or osteopathic physician providing medical care or treatment to the patient.
VI.
“Qualified medical institution” means an institution that has generated documented clinical evidence supporting the safety of a medical intervention equivalent to that required for successful completion of a phase I clinical trial, and operates under one of the following frameworks:
Show all 148 changed rows (108 more)
Previous
Latest
(a) Oversight by a regulatory authority recognized by international standards;
or (b) Oversight by a regulatory authority that demonstrates substantially equivalent standards for data quality, monitoring, and patient protection as determined by the experimental treatment center’s scientific review board.
126-ZZ:3 Availability of Investigational Drugs, Biologics, or Devices.
I.
A manufacturer of a drug, biologic, or device used in experimental treatments or an experimental treatment center may make available the drug, biologic, or device to eligible patients pursuant to this chapter.
The manufacturer or treatment center may:
(a) Provide the drug, biologic, or device to an eligible patient without compensation;
or (b) Require the eligible patient to pay for the treatment and establish payment arrangements with the patient;
and (c) Ask eligible patients to participate in data collection relating to the use of the drug, biologic, or device.
Members of the committee shall receive mileage at the legislative rate when attending to the duties of the committee.
Nothing in this chapter requires a health care insurer or any state agency to provide coverage for any experimental treatment.
3 Duties.
HB 1734-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE - Page 3 - III.
The committee shall:
Nothing in this chapter requires the manufacturer of an experimental treatment to include a patient in any particular clinical trial or study.
IV.
Nothing in this chapter requires a health care provider or manufacturer to make an experimental treatment available to any eligible patient.
V.
Nothing in this chapter shall prohibit an experimental treatment center from conducting clinical research protocols.
Clinical research protocols may be approved by an institutional review board (IRB) meeting pursuant to 45 C.F.R.
Part 46 or by a scientific review board established under this chapter.
Research protocols may employ any study design, participant stratification, outcome measurement, or monitoring approach consistent with the protocol's scientific and ethical justification.Clinical research conducted under this section shall maintain all study records, including protocols, consent forms, case reports, and safety data, for not less than 3 years and shall make such records available to state or federal regulatory authorities upon reasonable request or where disclosure is required by law or regulation.
Sites conducting research under this chapter consent to inspection by state or federal regulatory authorities, at reasonable times and upon reasonable request, as necessary to verify compliance with applicable requirements.
126-ZZ:4 Limitation on State or Political Subdivision Action.
Determine what would be needed for sufficient oversight of experimental treatment centers by the department of health and human services, the bureau of consumer protection at the department of justice, and the office of professional licensure and certification.
Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the board of medicine shall not revoke, fail to renew, or take any other action against a physician's license issued pursuant to RSA 329, or any other law, based primarily on a physician's recommendation to an eligible patient regarding or prescription for treatment under this chapter.
Solicit information and testimony from the department of health and human services, the bureau of consumer protection, and the office of profession licensure and certification on what they would require in terms of legislation, rules, appropriation, and any potential federal waivers to properly oversee these centers.
Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary, the department of health and human services shall not take action against a provider licensed under RSA 151, or any other law, based primarily on the institution's participation in treatment authorized under this chapter.
126-ZZ:5 Experimental Treatment Center Licensing.
I.
A provider seeking to provide experimental treatments under this chapter, including but not limited to a health care facility licensed under RSA 151, shall obtain experimental treatment center authorization from the department of health and human services.
II.
The authorization fee shall be $2,500 initially and $1,250 annually for facilities already licensed under RSA 151, and $10,000 initially and $5,000 annually for entities not otherwise licensed.
Solicit information and testimony from the current operator of an experimental treatment center or a trade group representing experimental treatment centers.
To obtain authorization from the department, applicants shall have a medical director who is a physician licensed to practice medicine in New Hampshire.
If the department promulgates a rule governing adverse event reporting procedures, experimental treatment centers have an ongoing obligation to demonstrate compliance with that rule.
Solicit information and testimony from a governmental oversight body from another state that currently allows experimental treatment centers.
Authorized providers may administer experimental treatments to eligible patients pursuant to RSA 126-ZZ:2, II if reviewed and approved by a scientific review board established under this chapter.
The scientific review board shall determine the appropriate quality standards, HB 1734-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE - Page 4 - documentation requirements, and clinical oversight for each treatment protocol, which may include quality frameworks and documentation standards recognized by international regulatory authorities.
The scientific review board shall include not fewer than 3 members with appropriate expertise and shall include at least one licensed physician and at least one member with experience in clinical outcomes research.
Providers may share scientific review boards or board members with other authorized facilities or with academic institutions.
Solicit information and testimony from an individual or entity with expertise in the FDA drug and device approval process.
Notwithstanding any law or regulation to the contrary, health care facilities currently licensed under RSA 151 may add experimental treatment center services by obtaining authorization under this section without otherwise obtaining additional licensing.
Solicit information and testimony from an individual or entity with expertise in current Good Manufacturing Practice (cGMP) for drug manufacturing.
Notwithstanding any law or regulation to the contrary, authorized experimental treatment centers may establish payment arrangements with patients, including direct pay, subscription models, membership fees, or other payment structures, including digital currencies, with or without regard to insurance coverage requirements.
Research experimental treatment centers in other states, including all benefits and consequences of those centers in those states, including patient outcomes and costs to the state's health care system.
Notwithstanding any law or regulation to the contrary, services provided by authorized experimental treatment centers under this chapter are exempt from any state insurance coverage mandates, network adequacy requirements, and prior authorization procedures.
HB 1734-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE - Page 2 - VIII.
VIII.
Research the feasibility of proper oversight of these facilities, including oversight challenges in other states that have implemented these experimental treatment centers.
The commissioner may adopt rules under RSA 541-A establishing minimum standards for scientific review boards, adverse event reporting, and authorization procedures.
4 Chairperson;
IX.
Quorum.
A company operating an experimental treatment center in New Hampshire shall be eligible to apply for the research and development tax credit under RSA 77-A:5, XIII.
The members of the study committee shall elect a chairperson from among the members.
X.
The first meeting of the committee shall be called by the first-named senate member.
The commissioner may also enter into reciprocal agreements with other states or their similar agencies for cross-border treatment coordination and shared scientific review board recognition.
The first meeting of the committee shall be held within 45 days of the effective date of this section.
The department shall issue experimental treatment center licenses to applicants already licensed under another state’s substantially similar law, provided the applicant satisfies paragraph IV in New Hampshire.
Four members of the committee shall constitute a quorum.
A state’s law is presumptively “substantially similar” to New Hampshire’s if it provides for the licensure of experimental treatment centers requiring approval of treatment protocols and assessment of experimental treatment for patient safety by scientific review boards.
5 Report.
126-ZZ:6 Manufacturing I.
The committee shall report its findings and any recommendations for proposed legislation to the president of the senate, the speaker of the house of representatives, the senate clerk, the house clerk, the governor, and the state library on or before November 1, 2026.
Authorized experimental treatment centers may manufacture drugs, biologics, or devices on-site or through contracted facilities, provided the center's scientific review board approves the manufacturing protocol and determines it meets quality standards equivalent to recognized pharmaceutical manufacturing frameworks for patient safety.
6 Effective Date.
The scientific review board shall determine the appropriate quality framework for manufacturing and compounding under this chapter for purposes of clinical use in experimental treatment centers.
This act shall take effect upon its passage.
HB 1734-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE - Page 5 - II.
LBA 26-2801 05/21/2026 HB 1734-FN- FISCAL NOTE AS AMENDED BY THE SENATE (AMENDMENT #2026-1864s) AN ACT establishing a committee to study the feasibility of establishing experimental treatment centers in New Hampshire and the oversight thereof.
The scientific review board shall document its rationale for approving manufacturing facilities and protocols, including comparison to recognized industry standards such as good manufacturing practice or international organization for standardization frameworks.
III.
Batch and distribution records shall be maintained for each lot and provided to the department within fifteen days upon request.
The experimental treatment center shall maintain such records for a minimum of two years.
IV.
The commissioner may adopt rules under RSA 541-A establishing manufacturing standards and quality requirements, including rules to enforce the requirements of this section.
V.
Nothing in this section shall be construed to alter the jurisdiction or authority of the board of pharmacy under RSA 318.
126-ZZ:7 Free Care and Public Benefits.
I.
Each licensed experimental treatment center shall allocate 2 percent of its net annual profits to support access to experimental treatments and health care for qualifying New Hampshire residents.
The center shall document and report this allocation on a form provided by the department, if the department provides such a form.
Documentation and reporting shall be submitted no later than February 1 of each year.
II.
The requirement in paragraph I may be fulfilled by one or a combination of the following:
(a) Providing experimental treatment, as defined in this chapter, for free to qualifying New Hampshire residents who are eligible patients in an amount equal to at least 2 percent of the center’s net annual profits;
or (b) Contributing an amount equal to at least 2 percent of the center’s net annual profits the uncompensated care fund established under RSA 167:64, the opioid abatement trust fund established under RSA 126-A:84, the alcohol abuse prevention and treatment fund established under RSA 176-A:1, the lead paint poisoning control fund established under RSA 130-A:15, or any fund to benefit the developmentally disabled established under RSA 171-A:8-b, provided that the department may adjudicate in a rulemaking under RSA 541-A that one or more of these funds is functionally inactive and therefore ineligible to satisfy the requirements of this provision.
III.
The commissioner of the department of health and human services shall adopt rules, pursuant to RSA 541-A, establishing criteria for identifying “qualifying New Hampshire residents” eligible to receive free experimental treatment under subparagraph II(a).
Such rules may consider factors including income level, insurance status, and medical need.
IV.
The department may adopt rules and develop procedures to review and approve documentation under this section and ensure that required allocations are made annually.
3 New Subparagraph;
Health Care Facility Licensing;
Exemptions;
Experimental Treatment Center.
Amend RSA 151:2, II as follows by inserting after subparagraph (i) the following new subparagraph:
HB 1734-FN - AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE - Page 6 - (j) To the extent that a provider operates as an experimental treatment center defined in RSA 126-ZZ, operating under that chapter and in compliance with all review and patient protection standards described therein, it shall not be required to obtain a license except as provided in that chapter.
4 Effective Date.
This act shall take effect January 1, 2027.
LBA 26-2801 Revised 05/01/2026 HB 1734-FN- FISCAL NOTE AS AMENDED BY THE HOUSE (AMENDMENT #2026-0666h) AN ACT authorizing the establishment of experimental treatment centers.
The Office of Legislative Budget Assistant states this bill has no fiscal impact on state, county and local expenditures or revenue.
This bill does not provide funding, nor does it authorize new positions.
Estimated State Impact FY 2026 FY 2027 FY 2028 FY 2029 Revenue $0 Indeterminable Indeterminable Indeterminable Revenue Fund(s) General fund Expenditures* $0 $2.5 million+ $1 million+ $1 million+ Funding Source(s) General fund Appropriations* $0 $0 $0 $0 Funding Source(s) None *Expenditure = Cost of bill *Appropriation = Authorized funding to cover cost of bill METHODOLOGY:
This bill establishes a process for the licensure and regulation of experimental treatment centers.
The bill permits health care providers to offer medical interventions involving investigational drugs, biologics, or devices that have successfully completed phase I of a clinical trial but are not yet FDA-approved for general use, and makes the Department of Health and Human Services responsible for oversight of these entities.
The Office of the Legislative Budget Assistant notes that previous versions of this fiscal note, including the initial version for the bill as amended by the House, identified a fiscal impact of less than $10,000 per year.
Subsequent to the issuance of those fiscal notes, the Department of Health and Human Services re-assessed the bill's impact on its operations, resulting in a significantly greater cost estimate.
The analysis that follows is based on the Department's re- assessment.
The Department assumes that, in order to handle the new responsibilities created by the bill, it will need to establish a new bureau or unit responsible for licensing and regulating experimental treatment centers.
This will further necessitate the development and implementation of a new set of administrative rules specific to these centers.
Because the bill creates a new chapter of law, the Department is unclear how the new responsibilities will connect to the statutory requirements of RSA 151, the state’s health facilities licensing statute.
At a minimum, this is expected to involve the creation of a new licensing category and minimum standards for scientific review boards, not currently known to or understood by the Department.
The Department anticipates a need for new personnel, as well as a contracted consultant with expertise in investigational drugs, biologics, or devices that have successfully completed phase I of a clinical trial but are not yet FDA-approved.
For FY27, salaries for three staff members—two administrative and investigative positions plus a supervisor—are estimated at $465,000, while an expert consultant specializing in investigational treatments would cost an additional $250,000, for a total of $715,000.
In FY28, staff salaries would rise to $489,000, with the consultant’s fee dropping to $75,000, totaling $564,000.
By FY29, staff salaries are projected at $513,000 and the consultant’s fee remains at $75,000, making the year’s total $588,000.
The Department assumes it will need the following resources for initial and ongoing IT costs:
· System Development (Application + Database):
$1.0 million.
· Labor Costs up to $950,000 for Year 1 (Plus additional labor for following years, depending on programmatic need).
This figure assumes the following positions/consultants will be necessary:
Technical Lead (1), Developers (2-3), Database/Application Administrator (1/2-1), Business Analyst (1), QA/Tester (1), Project Manager (shared/part-time).
· Data Storage and Hosting:
$50,000 – $150,000 annually · Annual Operating Costs, including user support and help desk, vendor licensing fees (if using a platform), cloud hosting and storage, routine enhancements, system monitoring and cyber security updates:
$250,000 – $450,000 per year Finally, the Department expects to need an additional $550,000 in FY27 and some indeterminable amount in subsequent years for office space and equipment, as well as general operating costs such as office utilities, supplies, printing, legal and hearing costs, outreach and stakeholder engagement, and travel.
Combined, these estimates assume first-year costs of approximately $2.5 million, and ongoing costs of $1 million or more.
The bill does allow for the following authorization fees for experimental treatment centers $2,500 initially and $1,250 annually for facilities already licensed under RSA 151, and $10,000 initially and $5,000 annually for entities not otherwise licensed under RSA 151.
While these fees will result in an increase in state revenue, the number of entities that may seek authorization is unknown, and so the resulting revenue increase is indeterminable.
None
Department of Health and Human Services
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Sen. Rochefort Refused to Accede to House Request for Committee of Conference, MA, VV; 05/21/2026; SJ 13

  2. Speaker Appoints: Reps. W. MacDonald, Drew, Markell, Milz 05/14/2026 HJ 13

  3. House Non-Concurs with Senate Amendment 2026-1864s and Requests CofC (Rep. W. MacDonald): MA VV 05/14/2026 HJ 13

  4. Committee Amendment # 2026-1864s, AA, VV; 05/14/2026; SJ 12

  5. Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-1864s, MA, VV; OT3rdg; 05/14/2026; SJ 12

  6. Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-1864s, 05/14/2026; Vote 5-0; CC; SC 18

  7. Hearing: 04/01/2026, Room 100, SH, 09:15 am; SC 12

  8. Introduced 03/12/2026 and Referred to Health and Human Services; SJ 7

  9. Ought to Pass with Amendment 2026-0666h: MA DV 182-152 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 203

  10. Amendment # 2026-0666h: AA DV 181-151 03/11/2026 HJ 7 P. 202

  11. Minority Committee Report: Inexpedient to Legislate

  12. Majority Committee Report: Ought to Pass with Amendment # 2026-0666h 02/11/2026 (Vote 10-8; RC) HC 10 P. 52

  13. Executive Session: 02/11/2026 02:30 pm GP 158

  14. Public Hearing: 01/28/2026 09:00 am GP 158

  15. Introduced 01/07/2026 and referred to Health, Human Services and Elderly Affairs HJ 1 P. 33

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 13 co-sponsors · 401 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (13)

Not signed on (401)

401 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 401 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 1734 do?
(New Title) establishing a committee to study the feasibility of establishing experimental treatment centers in New Hampshire and the oversight thereof.
Who sponsors HB 1734?
HB 1734 is sponsored by Victoria Sullivan (Republican), Tim McGough (Republican), Julie Miles (Republican), Keith Murphy (Republican), Yury Polozov (Republican), Lisa Mazur (Republican), JD Bernardy (Republican), Daniel Innis (Republican), Brian Cole (Republican), Jason Osborne (Republican), Dan McGuire (Republican), Jim Kofalt (Republican), Steven Kesselring (Republican), and Jay Markell (Republican).
What is the current status of HB 1734?
This bill has passed the House. Introduced December 17, 2025. It now moves to the second chamber.
Where can I track HB 1734?
Track HB 1734 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 1734

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 1734

Last checked for changes about 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →