SB 976 — Protection of Ecological Systems
Last action — Chapter No. 2021-181
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed House
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 01, 2021. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 R).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 5 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Protection of Ecological Systems; Creating the "Florida Wildlife Corridor Act"; requiring the Department of Environmental Protection to take certain actions to support the Florida wildlife corridor; requiring the St. Johns River Water Management District, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, Seminole County, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the Department of Transportation, to issue a report that includes information and updates regarding the implementation of recommendations from the Little Wekiva Watershed Management Plan Final Report dated November 2005 by a specified date; requiring the Department of Environmental Protection and the water management district to review certain permits along the Little Wekiva River, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
50 added · 191 removed50 line(s) added, 191 removed.
Florida Senate - 2021 CS for CS for SB 976 By the CommitteesCommittee on Appropriations;Environment and Natural Resources;
and EnvironmentSenator andBrodeur Natural592-02336-21 Resources;2021976c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to a study of the Little Wekiva River;
andrequiring Senatorthe BrodeurDepartment 576-04421-21of 2021976c2Environmental AProtection, billin toconsultation bewith entitled An act relating to the protectionSt. of ecological systems;
creatingJohns s.River Water Management District, Seminole County, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the Department of Transportation, to conduct a study and issue a report on sediment accumulation and water quality in the Little Wekiva River by a specified date;
259.1055,providing F.S.;requirements for the report;
providingauthorizing alocal shortand title;state entities or their contractors to conduct restoration efforts during the study period;
providingrequiring legislativethe findingsdepartment and athe purposewater formanagement thedistrict Floridato Wildlifereview Corridorcertain Act;permits along the Little Wekiva River;
defining terms;
requiring the Department of Environmental Protection to take certain actions to support the Florida wildlife corridor;
providing construction;
requiring the St.
Johns River Water Management District, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, Seminole County, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the Department of Transportation, to issue a report that includes information and updates regarding the implementation of recommendations from the Little Wekiva Watershed Management Plan Final Report dated November 2005 by a specified date;
requiring the Department of Environmental Protection and the water management district to review certain permits along the Little Wekiva River;
2419 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
2621 Section 1. Section1. The 259.1055,Department Floridaof Statutes,Environmental isProtection, createdin toconsultation read:with the St.
259.1055 FloridaJohns wildlifeRiver corridor.—Water (1) SHORTManagement TITLE.—ThisDistrict, sectionSeminole mayCounty, bethe citedFish asand Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the “FloridaDepartment Wildlifeof CorridorTransportation, Act.”shall (2) LEGISLATIVEconduct FINDINGS.—Thea Legislaturestudy findsand thatissue thisa state’sreport populationby isDecember growing31, rapidly2021, andto thatidentify landsthe andsource watersof thatsediment provideaccumulation thisin state’sthe greenLittle infrastructureWekiva River and vitaldetail habitatimprovements forto wide-rangingthe wildlife,water suchquality asand ecology of the Floridaarea panther,which needmight be achieved by efforts to beremove preservedaccumulated sediments by appropriate means, restore the natural river channel, remove invasive plants, and protected.implement protective measures.
The Legislaturereport furthermust findsinclude that the Florida wildlife corridor is an existingestimated physical,cost geographicallyfor definedeach areaimprovement consistingand ofpotential morefunding thansources. 18 million acres of land, 10 million of which are conservation lands.
(3) PURPOSE.—TheLocal purposeor ofstate thisagencies act,or andtheir ofcontractors themay Floridaconduct wildliferestoration corridorefforts itself,during is to create incentives for conservation and sustainable development while sustaining and conserving the greenstudy infrastructureperiod. that is the foundation of this state’s economy and quality of life by doing all of the following:
(a) MaintainingThe wildlifedepartment accessand to the habitatswater neededmanagement todistrict allowshall forimmediately migrationreview ofany andpermits geneticnorth exchangeof amongstS.R. regional wildlife populations.
(b) Preventing436 fragmentationwhere the Little Wekiva River is identified as the “receiving waters” to assess whether any permittee is in violation of wildlifeany habitats.permit conditions, take appropriate action to resolve any compliance issues, and remediate any impacts related to sedimentation in the Little Wekiva River and its adjacent wetland habitat.
(c) ProtectingIf thea headwaterspermittee or their contractors are found to be in violation of majorany watersheds,permit includingcondition associated with a project that has had an accumulation of sediments or has been found to have caused ecological harm to the EvergladesLittle andWekiva River, the St.permitting agencies shall levy all fines authorized by law commensurate with restoration costs.
JohnsSection River.2. This act shall take effect July 1, 2021.
(d) Providing ecological connectivity of the lands needed for flood and sea-level rise resiliency and large-scale ecosystem functions, such as water management and prescribed burns essential for land management and restoration.
(e) Preserving and protecting land and waters that are not only vital to wildlife but are critical to this state’s groundwater recharge and that serve as watersheds that provide drinking water to most Floridians and help maintain the health of downstream coastal estuaries.
(f) Providing for wildlife crossings for the protection and safety of wildlife and the traveling public.
(g) Helping to sustain this state’s working ranches, farms, and forests that provide compatible wildlife habitats while sustaining rural prosperity and agricultural production.
(4) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section, the term:
(a) “Conserved lands” means federal, state, or local lands owned or managed for conservation purposes, including, but not limited to, federal, state, and local parks;
federal and state forests;
wildlife management areas;
wildlife refuges;
military bases and airports with conservation lands;
properties owned by land trusts and managed for conservation;
and privately owned land with a conservation easement, including, but not limited to, ranches, forestry operations, and groves.
(b) “Department” means the Department of Environmental Protection.
(c) “Florida Ecological Greenways Network” is a periodically updated model developed to delineate large connected areas of statewide ecological significance.
(d) “Florida wildlife corridor” means the conserved lands and opportunity areas defined by the department as priority one, two, and three categories of the Florida Ecological Greenways Network.
(e) “Opportunity area” means those lands and waters within the Florida wildlife corridor which are not conserved lands and the green spaces within the Florida wildlife corridor which lack conservation status, are contiguous to or between conserved lands, and provide an opportunity to develop the Florida wildlife corridor into a statewide conservation network.
(f) “Wildlife” has the same meaning as in Article II of the Wildlife Violator Compact Act, s.
379.2255.
Show all 67 changed lines (27 more)
(g) “Wildlife corridor” means a network of connected wildlife habitats required for the long-term survival of and genetic exchange amongst regional wildlife populations which serves to prevent fragmentation by providing ecological connectivity of the lands needed to furnish adequate habitats and allow safe movement and dispersal.
(h) “Wildlife crossing” means a landscape design element that connects two or more patches of wildlife habitat and that is meant to function as a safe conduit for wildlife over or beneath roads, waters, and other barriers to wildlife movement and that is designed to protect Florida panther and other critical wildlife habitat corridor connections and to reduce motor vehicle collisions with wildlife, to reduce the likelihood of injuries and mortalities to humans and wildlife from such collisions, and to reduce the potential for damage to motor vehicles from such collisions.
(5) DUTIES OF THE DEPARTMENT.—The department shall:
(a) Encourage all state, regional, and local agencies that acquire lands, including, but not limited to, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission and the Department of Transportation, to include in their land-buying efforts the acquisition of sufficient legal interest in opportunity areas to ensure the continued viability of the Florida wildlife corridor.
(b) Encourage investment in conservation easements voluntarily entered into by private landowners to conserve opportunity areas.
(c) Encourage state land-buying agencies and state land management agencies to consider the conservation of opportunity areas as a multiphased project for the purpose of listing, acquisition, and management.
(d) Consider the inclusion of private funds to supplement the state’s contribution in its efforts to acquire a fee or less-than-fee interest in lands that contain recognized opportunity areas and conserved lands in the Florida wildlife corridor.
(e) Seek opportunities to attract new sources of federal funding and to strengthen existing programs to protect and conserve the Florida wildlife corridor.
(f) Encourage private landowners, through existing and future incentives and liability protections, to continue to allow their private property to be used for the preservation and enhancement of the Florida wildlife corridor.
(g) Encourage new approaches and novel financing mechanisms for long-term protection of the Florida wildlife corridor, including, but not limited to, public-private partnerships;
payments for ecosystem services;
blended financing for growth, resilience, and green infrastructure;
and support for the sustainable growth of agriculture.
(h) Encourage state and local agencies with economic and ecotourism development responsibilities to recognize the importance of the Florida wildlife corridor in encouraging public access to wildlife areas and bringing nature-based tourism to local communities and to support acquisition and development activities for preservation and enhancement of the Florida wildlife corridor.
(i) Encourage private investment in ecotourism focused on the Florida wildlife corridor.
(j) Encourage the protection, preservation, and enhancement of the natural value of the Florida wildlife corridor for current and future residents of this state.
(6) CONSTRUCTION.—This section may not be construed to authorize or affect the use of private property.
Section 2. (1) The St.
Johns River Water Management District, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, Seminole County, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the Department of Transportation, shall issue a report by December 31, 2021, that includes information and updates regarding the implementation of recommendations from the Little Wekiva Watershed Management Plan Final Report dated November 2005.
The report must include, but not be limited to, the following information:
a description of all projects or recommendations included in the report that have been implemented and their completion dates, an analysis of how the projects or recommendations achieved the results included in the report, an analysis of costs for ongoing operation and maintenance of the constructed projects completed, a list of permit violations which may have contributed to sediment buildup north of S.R.
436, an analysis of any new projects that may benefit the watershed, and recommendations and cost estimates for future studies or projects that may be necessary to identify new or potentially significant contributors of sediment accumulation in the Little Wekiva River.
(2)(a) The Department of Environmental Protection and the water management district shall immediately review, with the goal of identifying significant contributors of sediment accumulation, any permits which the water management district has determined may have contributed to sediment buildup north of S.R.
436 to assess whether the permittee is in violation of any permit conditions.
Appropriate action to resolve compliance issues shall be undertaken pursuant to chapter 373, Florida Statutes, if the department or the water management district discovers a violation of any permit condition.
(b) As part of the review, the Department of Environmental Protection and the water management district shall review known violations of such permits since 2018 and attempt to determine, using existing information, what effects such violations may have had on sediment accumulation in the Little Wekiva River.
Section 3. This act shall take effect July 1, 2021.
Show all 67 changed rows (27 more)
View plain text versions (4)
- S 976 c1 View text html
- S 976 c2 View text html
- S 976 er View text Current html
- Introduced S 976 Filed html
Action History
-
Chapter No. 2021-181
-
Approved by Governor
-
Signed by Officers and presented to Governor
-
Message sent to senate
-
Ordered enrolled
-
CS passed; YEAS 115, NAYS 0
-
Read 3rd time
-
Added to Third Reading Calendar
-
Placed on 3rd reading
-
Read 2nd time
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 2)
-
Bill added to Special Order Calendar (4/26/2021)
-
Bill referred to House Calendar
-
In Messages
-
CS passed; YEAS 40 NAYS 0
-
Read 3rd time
-
Read 2nd time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/22/21
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
CS/CS by Appropriations read 1st time
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by- Appropriations; YEAS 19 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 04/19/21, 10:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Appropriations
-
Subcommittee Recommendation: Favorable by Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government; YEAS 11 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government, 03/24/21, 4:30 pm, 110 Senate Building
-
CS by Environment and Natural Resources read 1st time
-
Now in Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Environment and Natural Resources; YEAS 5 NAYS 0
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Environment and Natural Resources, 03/02/21, 1:30 pm, 37 Senate Building
-
Referred to Environment and Natural Resources; Appropriations Subcommittee on Agriculture, Environment, and General Government; Appropriations
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Jason Brodeur · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Brodeur, Jason Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 52 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Republican | 44 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democrat | 19 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 115 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 96% | 0% | 0% | 4% |
How each member voted (120)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alexander | — | Yea |
| Aloupis | — | Yea |
| Geller | — | Yea |
| Altman | — | Yea |
| Goff-Marcil | — | Yea |
| Renner | — | Yea |
| Grant | — | Yea |
| Roach | — | Yea |
| Bell | — | Yea |
| Grieco | — | Yea |
| Beltran | — | Yea |
| Hage | — | Yea |
| Benjamin | — | Yea |
| Harding | — | Yea |
| Hardy | — | Yea |
| Rommel | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Hawkins | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Ingoglia | — | Yea |
| Silvers | — | Yea |
| Jenne | — | Yea |
| Bush | — | Yea |
| Byrd | — | Yea |
| Killebrew | — | Yea |
| Slosberg | — | Yea |
| Caruso | — | Yea |
| Casello | — | Yea |
| Latvala | — | Yea |
| Learned | — | Yea |
| Sprowls | — | Yea |
| Clemons | — | Yea |
| Stevenson | — | Yea |
| Diamond | — | Yea |
| Mariano | — | Yea |
| Toledo | — | Yea |
| Tomkow | — | Yea |
| Drake | — | Yea |
| DuBose | — | Yea |
| McCurdy | — | Yea |
| Duran | — | Yea |
| Willhite | — | Yea |
| Morales | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Fernandez-Barquin | — | Yea |
| Williamson | — | Yea |
| Fetterhoff | — | Yea |
| Fine | — | Yea |
| Fischer | — | Yea |
| Payne | — | Yea |
| Zika | — | Yea |
| Sabatini | — | Not Voting |
| Omphroy | — | Not Voting |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Yea |
| Arrington, Kristen Aston | Democrat | Yea |
| Bartleman, Robin | Democrat | Yea |
| Chambliss, Kevin D. | Democrat | Yea |
| Daley, Dan | Democrat | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Yea |
| Driskell, Fentrice | Democrat | Yea |
| Eskamani, Dr. Anna V. | Democrat | Yea |
| Gottlieb, Michael "Mike" | Democrat | Yea |
| Gregory, Emily | Democrat | Yea |
| Hart-Lowman, Dianne "Ms Dee" | Democrat | Yea |
| Hinson, Yvonne Hayes | Democrat | Yea |
| Hunschofsky, Christine | Democrat | Yea |
| Joseph, Dotie | Democrat | Yea |
| Nixon, Angela "Angie" | Democrat | Yea |
| Rayner, Michele K. | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Robinson, Felicia Simone | Democrat | Yea |
| Skidmore, Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Smith, Carlos Guillermo | Democrat | Yea |
| Tant, Allison | Democrat | Yea |
| Woodson, Marie Paule | Democrat | Yea |
| Andrade, Robert Alexander "Alex" | Republican | Yea |
| Barnaby, Webster | Republican | Yea |
| Borrero, David | Republican | Yea |
| Botana, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Brannan III, Robert Charles "Chuck" | Republican | Yea |
| Buchanan, James | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Busatta, Demi | Republican | Yea |
| Chaney, Linda | Republican | Not Voting |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Duggan, Wyman | Republican | Yea |
| Fabricio, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Garrison, Sam | Republican | Yea |
| Giallombardo, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Not Voting |
| Koster, Traci | Republican | Yea |
| LaMarca, Chip | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| Maggard, Randall Scott "Randy" | Republican | Yea |
| Maney, Patt | Republican | Yea |
| Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| McClain, Stan | Republican | Yea |
| McClure, Lawrence | Republican | Yea |
| McFarland, Fiona | Republican | Yea |
| Melo, Lauren | Republican | Yea |
| Mooney Jr., James Vernon "Jim" | Republican | Yea |
| Overdorf, Tobin Rogers "Toby" | Republican | Yea |
| Perez, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Persons-Mulicka, Jenna | Republican | Yea |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Yea |
| Plasencia, Susan | Republican | Yea |
| Rizo, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Robinson Jr., William Cloud "Will" | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Salzman, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Shoaf, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Sirois, Tyler I. | Republican | Yea |
| Smith, David | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, John | Republican | Yea |
| Trabulsy, Dana | Republican | Yea |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Trumbull, Jay | Republican | Yea |
| Tuck, Kaylee | Republican | Yea |
| Vacant | Republican | Yea |
| Valdés, Susan L. | Republican | Yea |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 22 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Ausley | — | Yea |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Gainer | — | Yea |
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Taddeo | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Simpson | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Cruz | — | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Jones, Shevrin D. "Shev" | Democrat | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Burgess, Danny | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Harrell, Gayle | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Wright, Tom A. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 19 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Book | — | Yea |
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Gainer | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Not Voting |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ausley | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Berman, Lori | Democrat | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ausley | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Not Voting |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 976 do?
- Protection of Ecological Systems; Creating the "Florida Wildlife Corridor Act"; requiring the Department of Environmental Protection to take certain actions to support the Florida wildlife corridor; requiring the St. Johns River Water Management District, in consultation with the Department of Environmental Protection, Seminole County, the Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission, and the Department of Transportation, to issue a report that includes information and updates regarding the implementation of recommendations from the Little Wekiva Watershed Management Plan Final Report dated November 2005 by a specified date; requiring the Department of Environmental Protection and the water management district to review certain permits along the Little Wekiva River, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 976?
- SB 976 is sponsored by Brodeur, Jason (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 976?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 01, 2021. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 976?
- Track SB 976 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 976
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 976
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →