Water Management Districts
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 952 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 952.
You're tracking SB 952
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 952 — Water Management Districts
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see HB 169 (Ch. 2021-62)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Water Management Districts; Authorizing water management districts to purchase commodities and contractual services from the contracts of other specified entities under certain circumstances, etc.
Bill Text
- Introduced S 952 Filed Current html
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see HB 169 (Ch. 2021-62)
-
Substituted HB 169
-
Read 2nd time
-
Retained on Special Order Calendar
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/21/21
-
Retained on Calendar
-
Retained on Special Order Calendar
-
Retained on Special Order Calendar
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/01/21
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Favorable by- Rules; YEAS 17 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Rules, 03/25/21, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Rules
-
Favorable by Governmental Oversight and Accountability; YEAS 5 NAYS 0
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Governmental Oversight and Accountability, 03/03/21, 12:00 pm, 37 Senate Building
-
Now in Governmental Oversight and Accountability
-
Favorable by Environment and Natural Resources; YEAS 5 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Environment and Natural Resources, 02/15/21, 3:30 pm, 37 Senate Building
-
Referred to Environment and Natural Resources; Governmental Oversight and Accountability; Rules
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Danny Burgess · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Burgess, Danny Republican
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Book | — | Yea |
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Garcia, Ileana | Republican | Yea |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Not Voting |
| Gruters, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 83% | 0% | 0% | 17% |
How each member voted (6)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Ausley | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Not Voting |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Brodeur, Jason | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 952 do?
- Water Management Districts; Authorizing water management districts to purchase commodities and contractual services from the contracts of other specified entities under certain circumstances, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 952?
- SB 952 is sponsored by Burgess, Danny (Republican).
- What is the current status of SB 952?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 952?
- Track SB 952 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 952
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 952
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →