HB 7005 — Civil Liability for Covid-19-related Claims Against Certain Health Care Providers
Last action — Died on Second Reading Calendar; companion bill(s) passed, see CS/SB 72 (Ch. 2021-1)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Civil Liability for Covid-19-related Claims Against Certain Health Care Providers; Provides requirements for civil action based on COVID-19-related medical claim; provides requirements for civil action based on COVID-19-related negligence claim; specifies timeframe within which civil action may be commenced; provides retroactive application; provides for applicability; provides exception of application of this act to certain civil actions.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
162 added · 198 removed162 line(s) added, 198 removed.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 7005 2021 A bill to be entitled An act relating to civil liability for COVID-19- related claims against certain health care providers;
specifying the timeframe within which a civil action may be commenced;
providing for applicability;
providing for future repeal unless reenacted;
768.381 Liability protections for COVID-19-related claims against certain health care providers.— (1) LEGISLATIVEThe FINDINGS AND INTENT.—The Legislature finds that the COVID-19 outbreak in this state threatens the continued viability of certain health care institutions and other entities Pagethat 1serve the overall well- being of 8the CODING:state.
The threat of unknown and potentially unbounded liability to such institutions and entities, in the Page 1 of 7 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 7005 2021 wake of a pandemic that contributehas already left many of these institutions vulnerable, has created an overpowering public necessity to theprovide overallan well-beingimmediate ofand theremedial state.legislative solution.
TheTherefore, threatthe ofLegislature unknownintends andfor potentiallythese unbounded liability to such institutions and entities,entities into theenjoy wakeheightened ofprotections aagainst pandemiccertain thattypes has already left many of thesecivil institutionsliability vulnerable,as hasa createdresult anof overpoweringthe publicCOVID-19 necessitypandemic. to provide an immediate and remedial legislative solution.
Therefore, the Legislature intends for these institutions and entities to enjoy heightened legal protections against liability as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Legislature finds that the public interest as a whole is best served by providing relief to these institutions and entities so that they may remain viable and continue to contributeserve tothe this state.
(2) DEFINITIONS.—AsAs used in this section, the term:
(b) "COVID-19-related medical claim" means a civiltort liability claim broughtarising againstunder achapter health400, carechapter provider429, or chapter 766, which is based on a defendant's breach of the applicable standard of care or duty of care owedand tothat: a patient or a resident related to:
DiagnosisCaused or treatment of, or failure to diagnose or treat, a person forto contract COVID-19;
Page2. 2 of 8 CODING:
Arose from the defendant's delay or omission in performing a surgical procedure, which delay or omission was directly caused by the COVID-19 pandemic;
Page 2 of 7 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 7005 2021 2.3.
ProvisionArose offrom athe noveldefendant's act or experimentalomission COVID-19with treatment;respect to an emergency medical condition as defined in s.
3.395.002, and which act or omission was the result of a lack of resources directly caused by the COVID-19 pandemic;
Transmission of COVID-19;
DelayArose orfrom cancellationthe ofdefendant's aprovision surgery or a delay or cancellation of a medicalnovel procedure, a test, or anexperimental appointmentCOVID-19 basedtreatment onto a healthpatient carediagnosed provider'swith interpretationCOVID-19; or application of government-issued health standards or guidance specifically relating to the COVID-19 emergency;
AnArose actfrom orthe omissiondefendant's provision of treatment to a patient diagnosed with respectCOVID-19 whose injuries were directly related to an emergencyexacerbation medicalof conditionthe aspatient's definedpreexisting inconditions s.by COVID-19.
395.002,(c) which"COVID-19-related actnegligence claim" means a tort claim brought against a health care provider not arising under chapter 400, chapter 429, or omissionchapter was766, thewhich resultis ofbased on a lackdefendant's breach of resourcesthe directlyapplicable duty of care and that caused bya theperson COVID-to 19contract pandemic.COVID-19.
(c) "COVID-19-related negligence claim" means a civil liability claim brought against a health care provider which is based on a defendant's breach of the applicable duty of care which caused a person who is not a patient or a resident to contract COVID-19.
A federally qualified health center as defined in 42 PageU.S.C. 3 of 8 CODING:
s.
1396d(l)(2)(B), as that definition exists on the Page 3 of 7 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 7005 2021 U.S.C.effective date of this act.
s.
1396d(l)(2)(B), as that definition exists on the effective date of this act.
(e)(3) "Resident"With meansrespect ato person residing in and receiving care from a nursingCOVID-19-related facilitymedical licensedclaim: under chapter 400 or an assisted living facility licensed under chapter 429.
(3)(a) COVID-19-RELATEDIt MEDICALis CLAIMS.—Thean provisionsaffirmative ofdefense thisthat subsectionthe applydefendant tocomplied awith COVID-19-relatedgovernment-issued medicalhealth claim.standards or guidance in effect at the time the cause of action accrued.
(a)(b) The complaintfact finder must beconsider pledall withrelevant particularitysurrounding bycircumstances, allegingincluding factsany inrelevant sufficienteffects detailof tothe supportCOVID-19 eachpandemic, elementin ofdetermining the claim.appropriate standard of care.
(b)(c) IfA thedefendant complaint is not pledliable withfor particularity,any theact courtor mustomission dismissunless thesuch action.act or omission constitutes gross negligence as defined in s.
Page768.72(2)(b) 4or ofintentional 8misconduct CODING:as defined in s.
768.72(2)(a).
Page 4 of 7 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 7005 2021 (c)(4) AWith plaintiffrespect mustto provea byCOVID-19-related thenegligence greaterclaim: weight of the evidence that the health care provider was grossly negligent or engaged in intentional misconduct.
(d) The affirmative defenses that apply to a COVID-19- related claim against a health care provider include, in addition to any other affirmative defenses recognized by law, the health care provider's:
1.
Show all 72 changed lines (32 more)
Substantial compliance with government-issued health standards specifically relating to COVID-19 or other relevant standards, including standards relating to the preservation or prioritization of supplies, materials, or equipment;
2.
Substantial compliance with government-issued health standards specific to infectious diseases in the absence of standards specifically applicable to COVID-19;
3.
Substantial compliance with government-issued health standards relating to COVID-19 or other relevant standards was not possible due to the widespread shortages of necessary supplies, materials, equipment, or personnel;
4.
Substantial compliance with any applicable government- issued health standards relating to COVID-19 or other relevant standards if the applicable standards were in conflict;
or 5.
Substantial compliance with government-issued health standards relating to COVID-19 or other relevant standards was not possible because there was insufficient time to implement the standards.
Page 5 of 8 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb7005-02-c2 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 7005 2021 (4) COVID-19-RELATED NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS.—The provisions of this subsection apply to a COVID-19-related negligence claim.
If the court determines that the defendant did not make such a good faith effort, the plaintiff may proceed with the Pageaction. 6 of 8 CODING:
However, absent at least gross negligence proven by Page 5 of 7 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 7005 2021 action.clear and convincing evidence, the defendant is not liable for any act or omission relating to a COVID-19-related negligence claim.
However, absent at least gross negligence proven by clear and convincing evidence, the defendant is not liable for any act or omission relating to a COVID-19-related negligence claim.
(5)(e) COMMENCEMENTThe OFfact ACTION.—Afinder plaintiff must commenceconsider aall civilrelevant actionsurrounding forcircumstances, aincluding COVID-19-relatedany medicalrelevant claimeffects or a COVID-19- related negligence claim within 1 year after the cause of action accrued or within 1 year after the effectiveCOVID-19 datepandemic, ofin thisdetermining act if the causeappropriate ofstandard action accrued before the effective date of thiscare. act.
(6)(5) INTERACTIONA WITHplaintiff OTHERmust LAWS.—commence (a)a Thiscivil sectionaction doesfor nota createCOVID- 19-related medical claim or a newCOVID-19-related negligence claim within 1 year after the cause of action butaccrued insteador applieswithin in1 additionyear toafter anythe othereffective applicabledate provisions of law,this including,act butif notthe limitedcause to,of chaptersaction 400,accrued 429,before 766,the andeffective 768.date of this act.
This(6) sectionThe controlsprovisions overof anythis conflictingact provisionapply ofretroactively law, but onlydo tonot apply in a civil action against a particularly named defendant that is commenced before the extenteffective date of thethis conflict.act.
(b) This sectionact doesis notrepealed apply1 toyear claimsand governed1 day after the date this act becomes a law, unless reenacted by chapterthe 440.Legislature.
(7) APPLICABILITY AND REPEAL.—The provisions of this act apply retroactively but do not apply in a civil action against a particularly named defendant that is commenced before the effective date of this act.
This act is repealed 1 year and 1 Page 7 of 8 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb7005-02-c2 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 7005 2021 day after the date this act becomes a law unless reenacted by the Legislature.
SectionPage 3.6 of 7 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 7005 2021 Section 3.
Page 87 of 87 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2hb7005-01-c1
Show all 72 changed rows (32 more)
View plain text versions (3)
- H 7005 c1 View text pdf
- H 7005 c2 View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 7005 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Died on Second Reading Calendar; companion bill(s) passed, see CS/SB 72 (Ch. 2021-1)
-
Added to Second Reading Calendar
-
Bill referred to House Calendar
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 2)
-
CS Filed
-
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
-
Reported out of Judiciary Committee
-
Favorable with CS by Judiciary Committee
-
Added to Judiciary Committee agenda
-
Now in Judiciary Committee
-
Referred to Judiciary Committee
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
-
CS Filed
-
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
-
Reported out of Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee
-
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
-
Favorable with CS by Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee
-
Added to Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee agenda
-
Now in Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee
-
Referred to Judiciary Committee
-
Referred to Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Health and Human Services Committee · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Health and Human Services Committee
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 24% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alexander | — | Nay |
| Byrd | — | Yea |
| Diamond | — | Nay |
| Fernandez-Barquin | — | Yea |
| Fetterhoff | — | Yea |
| Grieco | — | Yea |
| Learned | — | Yea |
| Roach | — | Yea |
| Driskell, Fentrice | Democrat | Nay |
| Gottlieb, Michael "Mike" | Democrat | Nay |
| Gregory, Emily | Democrat | Yea |
| Hart-Lowman, Dianne "Ms Dee" | Democrat | Nay |
| Brannan III, Robert Charles "Chuck" | Republican | Yea |
| Busatta, Demi | Republican | Not Voting |
| Duggan, Wyman | Republican | Yea |
| Grall, Erin | Republican | Yea |
| Perez, Daniel | Republican | Yea |
| Plakon, Rachel Saunders | Republican | Yea |
| Salzman, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, John | Republican | Yea |
| Truenow, Keith L. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bell | — | Yea |
| Byrd | — | Yea |
| Casello | — | Nay |
| Clemons | — | Yea |
| Goff-Marcil | — | Nay |
| Jenne | — | Nay |
| Mariano | — | Yea |
| Payne | — | Yea |
| Williamson | — | Yea |
| Zika | — | Yea |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Nay |
| Driskell, Fentrice | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Carlos Guillermo | Democrat | Nay |
| Giallombardo, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| McFarland, Fiona | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, John | Republican | Yea |
| Trabulsy, Dana | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 10 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 2 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 81% | 14% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Altman | — | Yea |
| Benjamin | — | Yea |
| Caruso | — | Yea |
| Duran | — | Yea |
| Grant | — | Yea |
| Davis, Tracie | Democrat | Nay |
| Rayner, Michele K. | Democrat | Nay |
| Robinson, Felicia Simone | Democrat | Yea |
| Skidmore, Kelly | Democrat | Yea |
| Tant, Allison | Democrat | Nay |
| Botana, Adam | Republican | Yea |
| Burton, Colleen | Republican | Yea |
| Garrison, Sam | Republican | Yea |
| Koster, Traci | Republican | Yea |
| Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. | Republican | Yea |
| Melo, Lauren | Republican | Yea |
| Persons-Mulicka, Jenna | Republican | Yea |
| Rizo, Alex | Republican | Yea |
| Robinson Jr., William Cloud "Will" | Republican | Yea |
| Sirois, Tyler I. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Yarborough, Clay | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 7005 do?
- Civil Liability for Covid-19-related Claims Against Certain Health Care Providers; Provides requirements for civil action based on COVID-19-related medical claim; provides requirements for civil action based on COVID-19-related negligence claim; specifies timeframe within which civil action may be commenced; provides retroactive application; provides for applicability; provides exception of application of this act to certain civil actions.
- Who sponsors HB 7005?
- HB 7005 is sponsored by Health and Human Services Committee.
- What is the current status of HB 7005?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 7005?
- Track HB 7005 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 7005
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 7005
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →