Florida 2021 Regular Session Status: In Committee

HB 7005 — Civil Liability for Covid-19-related Claims Against Certain Health Care Providers

Last action — Died on Second Reading Calendar; companion bill(s) passed, see CS/SB 72 (Ch. 2021-1)

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Civil Liability for Covid-19-related Claims Against Certain Health Care Providers; Provides requirements for civil action based on COVID-19-related medical claim; provides requirements for civil action based on COVID-19-related negligence claim; specifies timeframe within which civil action may be commenced; provides retroactive application; provides for applicability; provides exception of application of this act to certain civil actions.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

162 added · 198 removed

162 line(s) added, 198 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 7005 2021 A bill to be entitled An act relating to civil liability for COVID-19- related claims against certain health care providers;
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 7005 2021 A bill to be entitled An act relating to civil liability for COVID-19- related claims against certain health care providers;
specifying the timeframe within which a civil action may be commenced;
specifying the timeframe within which civil action may be commenced;
providing for applicability;
providing for future repeal unless reenacted;
768.381 Liability protections for COVID-19-related claims against certain health care providers.— (1) LEGISLATIVE FINDINGS AND INTENT.—The Legislature finds that the COVID-19 outbreak in this state threatens the continued viability of certain health care institutions and other entities Page 1 of 8 CODING:
768.381 Liability protections for COVID-19-related claims against certain health care providers.— (1) The Legislature finds that the COVID-19 outbreak threatens the continued viability of certain health care institutions and other entities that serve the overall well- being of the state.
The threat of unknown and potentially unbounded liability to such institutions and entities, in the Page 1 of 7 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 7005 2021 that contribute to the overall well-being of the state.
hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 7005 2021 wake of a pandemic that has already left many of these institutions vulnerable, has created an overpowering public necessity to provide an immediate and remedial legislative solution.
The threat of unknown and potentially unbounded liability to such institutions and entities, in the wake of a pandemic that has already left many of these institutions vulnerable, has created an overpowering public necessity to provide an immediate and remedial legislative solution.
Therefore, the Legislature intends for these institutions and entities to enjoy heightened protections against certain types of civil liability as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Therefore, the Legislature intends for these institutions and entities to enjoy heightened legal protections against liability as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic.
The Legislature finds the public interest as a whole is best served by providing relief to these institutions and entities so that they may remain viable and continue to contribute to this state.
The Legislature finds that the public interest as a whole is best served by providing relief to these institutions and entities so that they may remain viable and continue to serve the state.
(2) DEFINITIONS.—As used in this section, the term:
(2) As used in this section, the term:
(b) "COVID-19-related medical claim" means a civil liability claim brought against a health care provider which is based on a breach of the applicable standard of care or duty of care owed to a patient or a resident related to:
(b) "COVID-19-related medical claim" means a tort claim arising under chapter 400, chapter 429, or chapter 766, which is based on a defendant's breach of the applicable standard of care or duty of care and that:
Diagnosis or treatment of, or failure to diagnose or treat, a person for COVID-19;
Caused a person to contract COVID-19;
Page 2 of 8 CODING:
2.
Arose from the defendant's delay or omission in performing a surgical procedure, which delay or omission was directly caused by the COVID-19 pandemic;
Page 2 of 7 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 7005 2021 2.
hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 7005 2021 3.
Provision of a novel or experimental COVID-19 treatment;
Arose from the defendant's act or omission with respect to an emergency medical condition as defined in s.
3.
395.002, and which act or omission was the result of a lack of resources directly caused by the COVID-19 pandemic;
Transmission of COVID-19;
Delay or cancellation of a surgery or a delay or cancellation of a medical procedure, a test, or an appointment based on a health care provider's interpretation or application of government-issued health standards or guidance specifically relating to the COVID-19 emergency;
Arose from the defendant's provision of a novel or experimental COVID-19 treatment to a patient diagnosed with COVID-19;
An act or omission with respect to an emergency medical condition as defined in s.
Arose from the defendant's provision of treatment to a patient diagnosed with COVID-19 whose injuries were directly related to an exacerbation of the patient's preexisting conditions by COVID-19.
395.002, which act or omission was the result of a lack of resources directly caused by the COVID- 19 pandemic.
(c) "COVID-19-related negligence claim" means a tort claim brought against a health care provider not arising under chapter 400, chapter 429, or chapter 766, which is based on a defendant's breach of the applicable duty of care and that caused a person to contract COVID-19.
(c) "COVID-19-related negligence claim" means a civil liability claim brought against a health care provider which is based on a defendant's breach of the applicable duty of care which caused a person who is not a patient or a resident to contract COVID-19.
A federally qualified health center as defined in 42 Page 3 of 8 CODING:
A federally qualified health center as defined in 42 U.S.C.
s.
1396d(l)(2)(B), as that definition exists on the Page 3 of 7 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 7005 2021 U.S.C.
hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 7005 2021 effective date of this act.
s.
1396d(l)(2)(B), as that definition exists on the effective date of this act.
(e) "Resident" means a person residing in and receiving care from a nursing facility licensed under chapter 400 or an assisted living facility licensed under chapter 429.
(3) With respect to a COVID-19-related medical claim:
(3) COVID-19-RELATED MEDICAL CLAIMS.—The provisions of this subsection apply to a COVID-19-related medical claim.
(a) It is an affirmative defense that the defendant complied with government-issued health standards or guidance in effect at the time the cause of action accrued.
(a) The complaint must be pled with particularity by alleging facts in sufficient detail to support each element of the claim.
(b) The fact finder must consider all relevant surrounding circumstances, including any relevant effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, in determining the appropriate standard of care.
(b) If the complaint is not pled with particularity, the court must dismiss the action.
(c) A defendant is not liable for any act or omission unless such act or omission constitutes gross negligence as defined in s.
Page 4 of 8 CODING:
768.72(2)(b) or intentional misconduct as defined in s.
768.72(2)(a).
Page 4 of 7 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 7005 2021 (c) A plaintiff must prove by the greater weight of the evidence that the health care provider was grossly negligent or engaged in intentional misconduct.
hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 7005 2021 (4) With respect to a COVID-19-related negligence claim:
(d) The affirmative defenses that apply to a COVID-19- related claim against a health care provider include, in addition to any other affirmative defenses recognized by law, the health care provider's:
1.
Show all 72 changed rows (32 more)
Previous
Latest
Substantial compliance with government-issued health standards specifically relating to COVID-19 or other relevant standards, including standards relating to the preservation or prioritization of supplies, materials, or equipment;
2.
Substantial compliance with government-issued health standards specific to infectious diseases in the absence of standards specifically applicable to COVID-19;
3.
Substantial compliance with government-issued health standards relating to COVID-19 or other relevant standards was not possible due to the widespread shortages of necessary supplies, materials, equipment, or personnel;
4.
Substantial compliance with any applicable government- issued health standards relating to COVID-19 or other relevant standards if the applicable standards were in conflict;
or 5.
Substantial compliance with government-issued health standards relating to COVID-19 or other relevant standards was not possible because there was insufficient time to implement the standards.
Page 5 of 8 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb7005-02-c2 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 7005 2021 (4) COVID-19-RELATED NEGLIGENCE CLAIMS.—The provisions of this subsection apply to a COVID-19-related negligence claim.
If the court determines that the defendant did not make such a good faith effort, the plaintiff may proceed with the Page 6 of 8 CODING:
If the court determines that the defendant did not make such a good faith effort, the plaintiff may proceed with the action.
However, absent at least gross negligence proven by Page 5 of 7 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 7005 2021 action.
hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 7005 2021 clear and convincing evidence, the defendant is not liable for any act or omission relating to a COVID-19-related negligence claim.
However, absent at least gross negligence proven by clear and convincing evidence, the defendant is not liable for any act or omission relating to a COVID-19-related negligence claim.
(5) COMMENCEMENT OF ACTION.—A plaintiff must commence a civil action for a COVID-19-related medical claim or a COVID-19- related negligence claim within 1 year after the cause of action accrued or within 1 year after the effective date of this act if the cause of action accrued before the effective date of this act.
(e) The fact finder must consider all relevant surrounding circumstances, including any relevant effects of the COVID-19 pandemic, in determining the appropriate standard of care.
(6) INTERACTION WITH OTHER LAWS.— (a) This section does not create a new cause of action but instead applies in addition to any other applicable provisions of law, including, but not limited to, chapters 400, 429, 766, and 768.
(5) A plaintiff must commence a civil action for a COVID- 19-related medical claim or a COVID-19-related negligence claim within 1 year after the cause of action accrued or within 1 year after the effective date of this act if the cause of action accrued before the effective date of this act.
This section controls over any conflicting provision of law, but only to the extent of the conflict.
(6) The provisions of this act apply retroactively but do not apply in a civil action against a particularly named defendant that is commenced before the effective date of this act.
(b) This section does not apply to claims governed by chapter 440.
This act is repealed 1 year and 1 day after the date this act becomes a law, unless reenacted by the Legislature.
(7) APPLICABILITY AND REPEAL.—The provisions of this act apply retroactively but do not apply in a civil action against a particularly named defendant that is commenced before the effective date of this act.
This act is repealed 1 year and 1 Page 7 of 8 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb7005-02-c2 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HB 7005 2021 day after the date this act becomes a law unless reenacted by the Legislature.
Section 3.
Page 6 of 7 CODING:
Words stricken are deletions;
words underlined are additions.
hb7005-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/HB 7005 2021 Section 3.
Page 8 of 8 CODING:
Page 7 of 7 CODING:
hb7005-02-c2
hb7005-01-c1
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. Died on Second Reading Calendar; companion bill(s) passed, see CS/SB 72 (Ch. 2021-1)

  2. Added to Second Reading Calendar

  3. Bill referred to House Calendar

  4. 1st Reading (Committee Substitute 2)

  5. CS Filed

  6. Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)

  7. Reported out of Judiciary Committee

  8. Favorable with CS by Judiciary Committee

  9. Added to Judiciary Committee agenda

  10. Now in Judiciary Committee

  11. Referred to Judiciary Committee

  12. 1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)

  13. CS Filed

  14. Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)

  15. Reported out of Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee

  16. 1st Reading (Original Filed Version)

  17. Favorable with CS by Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee

  18. Added to Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee agenda

  19. Now in Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee

  20. Referred to Judiciary Committee

  21. Referred to Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee

  22. Filed

Sponsors

  • Health and Human Services Committee · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 8 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Health and Human Services Committee

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (163)

163 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 163 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 15 Yea · 5 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6200
Republican 8001
Democrat 1300
Total 15501
% of votes cast 71%24%0%5%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Alexander — Nay
Byrd — Yea
Diamond — Nay
Fernandez-Barquin — Yea
Fetterhoff — Yea
Grieco — Yea
Learned — Yea
Roach — Yea
Driskell, Fentrice Democrat Nay
Gottlieb, Michael "Mike" Democrat Nay
Gregory, Emily Democrat Yea
Hart-Lowman, Dianne "Ms Dee" Democrat Nay
Brannan III, Robert Charles "Chuck" Republican Yea
Busatta, Demi Republican Not Voting
Duggan, Wyman Republican Yea
Grall, Erin Republican Yea
Perez, Daniel Republican Yea
Plakon, Rachel Saunders Republican Yea
Salzman, Michelle Republican Yea
Snyder, John Republican Yea
Truenow, Keith L. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 12 Yea · 6 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7400
Democrat 0200
Republican 5000
Total 12600
% of votes cast 67%33%0%0%
How each member voted (18)
Member Party Vote
Bell — Yea
Byrd — Yea
Casello — Nay
Clemons — Yea
Goff-Marcil — Nay
Jenne — Nay
Mariano — Yea
Payne — Yea
Williamson — Yea
Zika — Yea
Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" — Nay
Driskell, Fentrice Democrat Nay
Smith, Carlos Guillermo Democrat Nay
Giallombardo, Mike Republican Yea
Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" Republican Yea
McFarland, Fiona Republican Yea
Snyder, John Republican Yea
Trabulsy, Dana Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 17 Yea · 3 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5000
Republican 10001
Democrat 2300
Total 17301
% of votes cast 81%14%0%5%
How each member voted (21)
Member Party Vote
Altman — Yea
Benjamin — Yea
Caruso — Yea
Duran — Yea
Grant — Yea
Davis, Tracie Democrat Nay
Rayner, Michele K. Democrat Nay
Robinson, Felicia Simone Democrat Yea
Skidmore, Kelly Democrat Yea
Tant, Allison Democrat Nay
Botana, Adam Republican Yea
Burton, Colleen Republican Yea
Garrison, Sam Republican Yea
Koster, Traci Republican Yea
Massullo, Ralph E., Jr. Republican Yea
Melo, Lauren Republican Yea
Persons-Mulicka, Jenna Republican Yea
Rizo, Alex Republican Yea
Robinson Jr., William Cloud "Will" Republican Yea
Sirois, Tyler I. Republican Not Voting
Yarborough, Clay Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does HB 7005 do?
Civil Liability for Covid-19-related Claims Against Certain Health Care Providers; Provides requirements for civil action based on COVID-19-related medical claim; provides requirements for civil action based on COVID-19-related negligence claim; specifies timeframe within which civil action may be commenced; provides retroactive application; provides for applicability; provides exception of application of this act to certain civil actions.
Who sponsors HB 7005?
HB 7005 is sponsored by Health and Human Services Committee.
What is the current status of HB 7005?
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HB 7005?
Track HB 7005 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HB 7005

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HB 7005

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →