Emergency Manangement Powers of Political Subdivisions
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when HB 945 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on HB 945.
You're tracking HB 945
We'll email you the moment it moves.
HB 945 — Emergency Manangement Powers of Political Subdivisions
Last action — Died in State Affairs Committee; companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/SB 2006 (Ch. 2021-8)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Emergency Manangement Powers of Political Subdivisions; Specifies requirements for purpose & scope of emergency orders; provides for automatic expiration of emergency orders; authorizes extension of emergency orders for specified duration; requires majority vote of governing body for such extension; authorizes governing body to convene & vote remotely; authorizes Governor & Legislature to invalidate emergency orders upon certain determinations; prohibits issuance of certain emergency orders.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
60 added · 60 removed60 line(s) added, 60 removed.
F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 945 2021 A bill to be entitled An act relating to emergency management powers of political subdivisions;
providing applicability for significant emergency orders;
providing exceptions;
specifying requirements for the purpose and scope of significant emergency orders;
providing for the automatic expiration of significant emergency orders;
authorizing the extension of significant emergency orders for a specified duration;
requiringprohibiting suchthe extensionissuance to be approved by a majority vote of thecertain governingsignificant body;emergency orders;
authorizing the governing body to convene and vote remotely;
authorizing the Governor or Legislature to invalidate emergency orders upon certain determinations;
prohibiting the issuance of certain emergency orders;
(4) EXPIRATION AND EXTENSION OF SIGNIFICANT EMERGENCY ORDERS.— (a) As used in this subsection, the term "significant Page 1 of 3 CODING:
hb0945-02-c2hb0945-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 945 2021 (a)emergency As used in this subsection, the term "emergency order" means an order or ordinance issued or enacted by a political subdivision in response to an emergency pursuant to this chapter or chapter 381 that limitsapplies theto rightsall orresidents libertieswithin ofthe individualspolitical orsubdivision businessesand withinlimits the politicalright subdivision.of a resident to:
(b)1. It is the intent of the Legislature to minimize the negative effects of an emergency order issued by a political subdivision.
NotwithstandingExercise anyreligious otherfreedom, law,including anthe emergencyright order issued by a political subdivision must be narrowly tailored to serveattend a compellingreligious publicservice; health or safety purpose.
Any such emergency order must be limited in duration, applicability, and scope in order to reduce any infringement on individual liberty to the greatest extent possible.
(c)1.
An emergency order automatically expires 7 days after issuance but may be extended, as necessary, in 7-day increments for a total duration of not more than 42 days.
AnSpeak emergencyfreely orderor mayassemble; be extended only upon a majority vote of the governing body of the political subdivision approving the extension.
The3. governing body may convene and vote remotely through electronic means for the sole purpose of extending an emergency order under this paragraph.
TheWork, orderbe extendingrewarded thefor emergencyindustry, order shall recite the circumstances requiring remote convening and voting, the method or methodsenter ofinto electronica meanscontract; used to convene and vote, and the governing body's finding of necessity to convene and vote by electronic Page 2 of 3 CODING:
4.
Travel;
5.
Acquire, possess, or protect real or personal property;
6.
Not be subject to unreasonable search and seizure;
or 7.
Purchase, keep, or bear a lawful firearm or ammunition.
(b) A significant emergency order may provide an exception for first responders as defined in s.
112.1815(1), health care practitioners as defined in s.
456.001, and employees of a public utility as defined in s.
366.02(1).
(c) It is the intent of the Legislature to minimize the negative effects of an extended significant emergency order issued by a political subdivision.
Notwithstanding any other law, a significant emergency order issued by a political subdivision must be narrowly tailored to serve a compelling public health or safety purpose.
Any such emergency order must be limited in duration, applicability, and scope in order to Page 2 of 3 CODING:
hb0945-02-c2hb0945-01-c1 F L O R I D A H O U S E O F R E P R E S E N T A T I V E S CS/CS/HBCS/HB 945 2021 means.reduce any infringement on individual liberty to the greatest extent possible.
(d) TheA Governor,significant oremergency theorder Legislatureautomatically byexpires concurrent7 resolution,days mayafter atissuance anybut timemay invalidatebe anextended, emergencyas ordernecessary, issuedin by7-day aincrements politicalfor subdivisiona iftotal theduration Governorof ornot Legislaturemore determinesthan that42 suchdays. order unnecessarily restricts individual liberty.
(e) Upon the expiration of ana significant emergency order, a political subdivision may not issue a substantially similar order.
hb0945-02-c2hb0945-01-c1
View plain text versions (3)
- H 945 c1 View text pdf
- H 945 c2 View text Current pdf
- Introduced H 945 Filed pdf
Action History
-
Died in State Affairs Committee; companion bill(s) passed, see CS/CS/SB 2006 (Ch. 2021-8)
-
Now in State Affairs Committee
-
Referred to State Affairs Committee
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 2)
-
CS Filed
-
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
-
Reported out of Local Administration & Veterans Affairs Subcommittee
-
Favorable with CS by Local Administration & Veterans Affairs Subcommittee
-
Added to Local Administration & Veterans Affairs Subcommittee agenda
-
Now in Local Administration & Veterans Affairs Subcommittee
-
Referred to State Affairs Committee
-
Referred to Local Administration & Veterans Affairs Subcommittee
-
1st Reading (Committee Substitute 1)
-
CS Filed
-
Laid on Table under Rule 7.18(a)
-
Reported out of Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee
-
Favorable with CS by Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee
-
Added to Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee agenda
-
1st Reading (Original Filed Version)
-
Now in Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee
-
Referred to State Affairs Committee
-
Referred to Local Administration & Veterans Affairs Subcommittee
-
Referred to Pandemics & Public Emergencies Committee
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Rommel · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on · 6 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Rommel
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democrat | 0 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 5 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 28% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Benjamin | — | Nay |
| Goff-Marcil | — | Nay |
| Harding | — | Yea |
| Sabatini | — | Yea |
| Toledo | — | Yea |
| Bartleman, Robin | Democrat | Nay |
| Daley, Dan | Democrat | Nay |
| Joseph, Dotie | Democrat | Not Voting |
| Woodson, Marie Paule | Democrat | Nay |
| Barnaby, Webster | Republican | Yea |
| DiCeglie, Nick | Republican | Yea |
| Giallombardo, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Melo, Lauren | Republican | Yea |
| Overdorf, Tobin Rogers "Toby" | Republican | Yea |
| Persons-Mulicka, Jenna | Republican | Yea |
| Salzman, Michelle | Republican | Yea |
| Smith, David | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, John | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 12 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 67% | 33% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (18)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bell | — | Yea |
| Byrd | — | Yea |
| Casello | — | Nay |
| Clemons | — | Yea |
| Goff-Marcil | — | Nay |
| Jenne | — | Nay |
| Mariano | — | Yea |
| Payne | — | Yea |
| Williamson | — | Yea |
| Zika | — | Yea |
| Thompson, Geraldine F. "Geri" | — | Nay |
| Driskell, Fentrice | Democrat | Nay |
| Smith, Carlos Guillermo | Democrat | Nay |
| Giallombardo, Mike | Republican | Yea |
| Leek, Thomas J. "Tom" | Republican | Yea |
| McFarland, Fiona | Republican | Yea |
| Snyder, John | Republican | Yea |
| Trabulsy, Dana | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does HB 945 do?
- Emergency Manangement Powers of Political Subdivisions; Specifies requirements for purpose & scope of emergency orders; provides for automatic expiration of emergency orders; authorizes extension of emergency orders for specified duration; requires majority vote of governing body for such extension; authorizes governing body to convene & vote remotely; authorizes Governor & Legislature to invalidate emergency orders upon certain determinations; prohibits issuance of certain emergency orders.
- Who sponsors HB 945?
- HB 945 is sponsored by Rommel.
- What is the current status of HB 945?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HB 945?
- Track HB 945 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HB 945
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HB 945
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →