Courts
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 748 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 748.
You're tracking SB 748
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 748 — Courts
Last action — Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 1197 (Ch. 2021-230)
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed Senate
-
4Passed House
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Courts; Deleting the requirement that the Clerk of the Supreme Court physically keep books, records, and other materials in the clerk’s office; requiring the clerks of the circuit court to collaborate with specified entities to prepare a plan to procure or develop a statewide electronic solution to accurately identify all assessments mandated by statute; providing for the periodic inflationary adjustment of the monetary jurisdictional limit applicable to all actions at law in county courts filed on or after a specified date, beginning in a specified year; requiring the clerk of a district court of appeal to have an office at the headquarters of the court, etc.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
347 added · 362 removed347 line(s) added, 362 removed.
Florida Senate - 2021 CS for CS for SB 748 By the CommitteesCommittee on Appropriations;Judiciary;
and Judiciary;Senator Brandes 590-02342-21 2021748c1 A bill to be entitled An act relating to courts;
and Senator Brandes 576-04225-21 2021748c2 A bill to be entitled An act relating to courts;
requiring the clerks of the circuit courtcourts, to collaborate with specified entitiesentities, to prepare a plan to procure or develop a statewide electronic solution to accurately identify all assessments mandated by statute;
providing for the periodic inflationary adjustment of the monetary jurisdictional limit applicable to all actions at law in county courts filed on or after a specified date, beginning in a2030; specified year;
requiring the Office of Economic and Demographic Research to periodically calculate and certify such jurisdictional limit to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court by a specified date;
requiring specified entities to publish the adjusted jurisdictional limit on their websites;
7367 Be It Enacted by the Legislature of the State of Florida:
7569 Section 1. Section 25.221, Florida Statutes, is amended to read:
136130 EffectiveThe July 1, 2030, and every 10 years thereafter, the $50,000 jurisdictional limit in subparagraph 3.
mustshall be adjustedadjusted, effective January 1, 2030, and increasedevery 10 years thereafter, by the percentage change in the average of the Consumer Price Index issued by the United States Department of Labor for Allthe Urbanmost Consumers,recent U.S.12-month period ending on September 30, compared to the base year average, which is the average for the 12-month period ending September 30, 2022.
CityThe Average,adjusted Alljurisdictional Itemslimit 1982-84=100,must orbe successorrounded reports,to for the precedingnearest 10$1,000. calendar years as initially reported by the United States Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics.
The adjusted jurisdictional limit must be rounded to the nearest $5,000.
However, the jurisdictional limit may not be lower than $50,000.
The Office of Economic and Demographic Research must calculate the adjusted jurisdictional limit and certify the adjusted jurisdictional limit to the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court beginning January 31, 2030, and every 10 years thereafter.
The Office of Economic and Demographic Research and the Office of the State Courts Administrator must publish the adjusted jurisdictional limit on their websites.
156142 By February 1, 2021, the Office of the State Courts Administrator shall submit a report to the Governor, the President of the Senate, and the Speaker of the House of Representatives.
235221 “I hereby certify that the above and foregoing fingerprints on this judgment are the fingerprints of the defendant, ...., and that they were placed thereon by said defendant in my presence, in open court, this the ....
day of ...., ...(year)....” 241227 Such certificate shall be signed by the judge, whose signature thereto shall be followed by the word “Judge.” b. For an electronic judgment of guilty, the fingerprints of the defendant must be electronically captured and a certificate must be issued as provided in s.
278264 “I hereby certify that the above and foregoing fingerprints on this judgment are the fingerprints of the defendant, ...., and that they were placed thereon by said defendant in my presence, in open court, this the ....
day of ...., ...(year)....” 284270 The court officer, the employee of the court, or the employee of a criminal justice agency who manually took the fingerprints shall place his or her written signature on the certification.
295281 “I hereby certify that the digital fingerprint record associated with Transaction Control Number ....
day of ...., ...(year)....” 301287 The court officer, the employee of the court, or the employee of a criminal justice agency who electronically captured the fingerprints judge shall place his or her written or electronic signature, which shall be followed by the word “Judge,” on the certification certificate.
(a) For a written judgment of guilty, the fingerprints of a the defendant who is found guilty of any offense governed by chapter 796 to against whom such judgment is rendered shall be manually taken or electronically capturedcaptured. and affixed beneath the judge’s signature on the judgment.
and affixed beneath the judge’s signature on the judgment.
353339 “I hereby certify that the above and foregoing fingerprints are of the defendant, ...(name)..., and that they were placed thereon by said defendant in my presence, in open court, this the ....
day of ...., ...(year)....” 358344 Such certificate shall be signed by the judge, whose signature thereto shall be followed by the word “Judge.” (b) For an electronic judgment of guilty, the fingerprints of the defendant must be electronically captured, and a certificate must be issued as provided in s.
View plain text versions (3)
- S 748 c1 View text html
- S 748 c2 View text Current html
- Introduced S 748 Filed html
Action History
-
Laid on Table, companion bill(s) passed, see CS/HB 1197 (Ch. 2021-230)
-
Substituted CS/HB 1197
-
Read 2nd time
-
Retained on Special Order Calendar
-
CS/CS by Appropriations read 1st time
-
Placed on Special Order Calendar, 04/22/21
-
Placed on Calendar, on 2nd reading
-
Pending reference review -under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS/CS by- Appropriations; YEAS 20 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 04/19/21, 10:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations, 04/15/21, 9:00 am, 412 Knott Building
-
Now in Appropriations
-
Subcommittee Recommendation: CS/CS by Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice; YEAS 8 NAYS 0
-
On Committee agenda-- Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice, 03/24/21, 4:30 pm, 37 Senate Building
-
CS by Judiciary read 1st time
-
Now in Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice
-
Pending reference review under Rule 4.7(2) - (Committee Substitute)
-
CS by Judiciary; YEAS 11 NAYS 0
-
Introduced
-
On Committee agenda-- Judiciary, 03/02/21, 1:30 pm, 412 Knott Building
-
Referred to Judiciary; Appropriations Subcommittee on Criminal and Civil Justice; Appropriations
-
Filed
Sponsors
- Brandes · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 163 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Brandes
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (163)
163 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 163 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Republican | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Book | — | Yea |
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Diaz | — | Yea |
| Farmer | — | Yea |
| Gainer | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Hutson | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Powell | — | Yea |
| Stewart | — | Yea |
| Bean | — | Yea |
| Stargel | — | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Albritton, Ben | Republican | Yea |
| Hooper, Ed | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
| Passidomo, Kathleen | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| No Party Affiliation | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (8)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Bracy | — | Yea |
| Gainer | — | Yea |
| Torres | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Perry | — | Yea |
| Pizzo, Jason W. B. | No Party Affiliation | Yea |
| Rodriguez, Ana Maria | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democrat | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Baxley | — | Yea |
| Broxson | — | Yea |
| Rodrigues | — | Yea |
| Thurston | — | Yea |
| Gibson | — | Yea |
| Brandes | — | Yea |
| Polsky, Tina Scott | Democrat | Yea |
| Rouson, Darryl Ervin | Democrat | Yea |
| Boyd, Jim | Republican | Yea |
| Bradley, Jennifer | Republican | Yea |
| Mayfield, Debbie | Republican | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 748 do?
- Courts; Deleting the requirement that the Clerk of the Supreme Court physically keep books, records, and other materials in the clerk’s office; requiring the clerks of the circuit court to collaborate with specified entities to prepare a plan to procure or develop a statewide electronic solution to accurately identify all assessments mandated by statute; providing for the periodic inflationary adjustment of the monetary jurisdictional limit applicable to all actions at law in county courts filed on or after a specified date, beginning in a specified year; requiring the clerk of a district court of appeal to have an office at the headquarters of the court, etc.
- Who sponsors SB 748?
- SB 748 is sponsored by Brandes.
- What is the current status of SB 748?
- This bill died with 2021 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 748?
- Track SB 748 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 748
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 748
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →