California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Passed Assembly

AB 2310 — State employees: memorandum of understanding.

Last action — Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Assembly
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law provides that a provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees that requires the expenditure of funds does not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions of a memorandum of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Unit 18 that require the expenditure of funds, and would provide that these provisions will become effective even if these provisions are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. This bill would provide that provisions of the memorandum of understanding approved by the bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for those provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would require the state employer and the affected employee organization to meet and confer to renegotiate the affected provisions if funds for those provisions are not specifically appropriated by the Legislature.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Referred to Com. on P.E. & R.

  2. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  3. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 54. Noes 23. Page 5121.)

  4. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  5. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 14. Noes 3.) (May 27).

  6. In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.

  7. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  8. Re-referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.

  9. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S. Read second time and amended.

  10. Referred to Com. on P.E., R., & S.S.

  11. From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.

  12. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Santiago · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Santiago

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

AB 2310 SANTIAGO Assembly Third Reading

Passed 54 Yea · 23 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 491902
Democratic 5000
Republican 0401
Total 542303
% of votes cast 68%29%0%4%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Baker — Nay
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Mullin — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Campos — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Gray — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Lopez — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Harper — Nay
Kim — Nay
Burke — Yea
Levine — Yea
Chang — Not Voting
Linder — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Chau — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Mayes — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Ting — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Wood — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hadley — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 14 Yea · 3 Nay · 3 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 12202
Democratic 2000
Republican 0101
Total 14303
% of votes cast 70%15%0%15%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chang — Nay
Bonilla — Yea
Daly — Yea
Holden — Yea
Bigelow — Not Voting
Obernolte — Not Voting
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Weber — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Subjects

finance labor
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2310 do?
Existing law provides that a provision of a memorandum of understanding reached between the state employer and a recognized employee organization representing state civil service employees that requires the expenditure of funds does not become effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act. This bill would approve provisions of a memorandum of understanding entered into between the state employer and State Bargaining Unit 18 that require the expenditure of funds, and would provide that these provisions will become effective even if these provisions are approved by the Legislature in legislation other than the annual Budget Act. This bill would provide that provisions of the memorandum of understanding approved by the bill that require the expenditure of funds will not take effect unless funds for those provisions are specifically appropriated by the Legislature, and would require the state employer and the affected employee organization to meet and confer to renegotiate the affected provisions if funds for those provisions are not specifically appropriated by the Legislature.
Who sponsors AB 2310?
AB 2310 is sponsored by Santiago.
What is the current status of AB 2310?
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track AB 2310?
Track AB 2310 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2310

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of AB 2310

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →