California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 1 D cosponsors

SB 468 — Health care districts: design-build.

Last action — Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 97.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law authorizes certain health care districts to use the design-build process when contracting for the construction of a building or improvements directly related to construction of a hospital or health facility building in those districts, as specified. Existing law sets forth the procurement process for design-build projects, as specified, and requires specified information submitted by design-build entities to be certified under penalty of perjury. This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2022, the Beach Cities Health District and the Peninsula Health Care District to use the design-build process for the construction of facilities or other buildings in those districts, as specified. Because the bill would expand the application of the procurement process to additional design-build entities, the bill would expand the crime of perjury, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Beach Cities Health District and the Peninsula Health Care District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Assembly Rule 97.

  2. Ordered to third reading.

  3. Read third time and amended.

  4. Ordered to third reading.

  5. From inactive file.

  6. Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Calderon.

  7. Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Holden.

  8. Ordered to third reading.

  9. Read third time and amended. (Ayes 52. Noes 27. Page 2854.)

  10. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  11. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 12. Noes 5.) (August 27).

  13. August 19 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  14. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 3.) (July 7).

  16. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P.

  17. Referred to Com. on B. & P.

  18. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  19. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 28. Noes 7. Page 1254.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  20. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  21. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1154.) (May 28).

  22. Set for hearing May 28.

  23. May 11 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  24. Set for hearing May 11.

  25. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  26. Withdrawn from committee.

  27. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 8. Noes 0. Page 794.) (April 27). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.

  28. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on B., P. & E.D.

  29. Set for hearing April 27.

  30. Referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and JUD.

  31. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 28.

  32. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Hadley · Cosponsor
  • Hill · Cosponsor
  • Mullin · Cosponsor
  • Benjamin Allen · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 3 co-sponsors · 118 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (3)

  • Hadley
  • Hill
  • Mullin

Not signed on (118)

118 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 118 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

SB 468 Hill Senate Third Reading By BONILLA Amend By BONILLA Set #1

Passed 52 Yea · 27 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 482201
Democratic 4000
Republican 0500
Total 522701
% of votes cast 65%34%0%1%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Levine — Yea
Low — Yea
Maienschein — Nay
Mathis — Nay
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Steinorth — Nay
Wagner — Nay
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chu — Yea
Daly — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Salas — Yea
Medina — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gomez — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Gray — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Lopez — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Campos — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Hadley — Nay
Harper — Nay
Holden — Yea
Burke — Yea
Kim — Nay
Chang — Nay
Baker — Nay
Chau — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Cooley — Yea
Linder — Not Voting
Mayes — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Obernolte — Nay
Olsen — Nay
Quirk — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Waldron — Nay
Weber — Yea
Wilk — Nay
Wood — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Nay
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Nay
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay
Lackey, Tom Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 12 Yea · 5 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10300
Democratic 2000
Republican 0200
Total 12500
% of votes cast 71%29%0%0%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Nay
Bloom — Yea
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Holden — Yea
Chang — Nay
Rendon — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 28 Yea · 7 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26704
Democratic 2001
Total 28705
% of votes cast 70%18%0%13%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Not Voting
Hernandez — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Hill — Yea
Allen — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Runner — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Cannella — Not Voting
Hall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Huff — Nay
Liu — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Nielsen — Yea

Official roll call →

Placed on suspense file

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Lara — Yea
Hill — Yea
Beall — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

public-safety healthcare
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 468 do?
Existing law authorizes certain health care districts to use the design-build process when contracting for the construction of a building or improvements directly related to construction of a hospital or health facility building in those districts, as specified. Existing law sets forth the procurement process for design-build projects, as specified, and requires specified information submitted by design-build entities to be certified under penalty of perjury. This bill would authorize, until January 1, 2022, the Beach Cities Health District and the Peninsula Health Care District to use the design-build process for the construction of facilities or other buildings in those districts, as specified. Because the bill would expand the application of the procurement process to additional design-build entities, the bill would expand the crime of perjury, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Beach Cities Health District and the Peninsula Health Care District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Who sponsors SB 468?
SB 468 is sponsored by Hadley, Hill, Mullin, and Allen, Benjamin (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 468?
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 468?
Track SB 468 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 468

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of SB 468

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →