California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted 1 D cosponsors

SB 643 — Medical marijuana.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 719, Statutes of 2015.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Senate
  4. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2015. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 72% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Single-party support

    Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 11 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

(1) Existing law, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, an initiative measure enacted by the approval of Proposition 215 at the November 6, 1996, statewide general election, authorizes the use of marijuana for medical purposes. Existing law enacted by the Legislature requires the establishment of a program for the issuance of identification cards to qualified patients so that they may lawfully use marijuana for medical purposes, and requires the establishment of guidelines for the lawful cultivation of marijuana grown for medical use. Existing law provides for the licensure of various professions by the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for the regulation of food, drugs, devices, and cosmetics, as specified. A violation of that law is a crime. This bill would, among other things, set forth standards for a physician and surgeon prescribing medical cannabis and require the Medical Board of California to prioritize its investigative and prosecutorial resources to identify and discipline physicians and surgeons that have repeatedly recommended excessive cannabis to patients for medical purposes or repeatedly recommended cannabis to patients for medical purposes without a good faith examination, as specified. The bill would require the Bureau of Medical Marijuana to require an applicant to furnish a full set of fingerprints for the purposes of conducting criminal history record checks. The bill would prohibit a physician and surgeon who recommends cannabis to a patient for a medical purpose from accepting, soliciting, or offering any form of remuneration from a facility licensed under the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act. The bill would make a violation of this prohibition a misdemeanor, and by creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the Governor, under the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act, to appoint, subject to confirmation by the Senate, a chief of the Bureau of Medical Marijuana Regulation. The act would require the Department of Consumer Affairs to have the sole authority to create, issue, renew, discipline, suspend, or revoke licenses for the transportation and storage, unrelated to manufacturing, of medical marijuana, and would authorize the department to collect fees for its regulatory activities and impose specified duties on this department in this regard. The act would require the Department of Food and Agriculture to administer the provisions of the act related to, and associated with, the cultivation, and transportation of, medical cannabis and would impose specified duties on this department in this regard. The act would require the State Department of Public Health to administer the provisions of the act related to, and associated with, the manufacturing and testing of medical cannabis and would impose specified duties on this department in this regard. This bill would authorize counties to impose a tax upon specified cannabis-related activity. This bill would require an applicant for a state license pursuant to the act to provide a statement signed by the applicant under penalty of perjury, thereby changing the scope of a crime and imposing a state-mandated local program. This bill would set forth standards for the licensed cultivation of medical cannabis, including, but not limited to, establishing duties relating to the environmental impact of cannabis and cannabis products. The bill would also establish state cultivator license types, as specified. (2) This bill would provide that its provisions are severable. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (4) Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meeting of public bodies or the writings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with finding demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. The bill would make legislative findings to that effect. (5) The bill would become operative only if AB 266 and AB 243 of the 2015–16 Regular Session are enacted and take effect on or before January 1, 2016.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 719, Statutes of 2015.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:45 p.m.

  4. Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 30. Noes 9. Page 2781.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.

  5. In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.

  6. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 58. Noes 13. Page 3191.) Ordered to the Senate.

  7. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  8. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (September 11).

  9. Assembly Rule 63 suspended.

  10. Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.

  11. Re-referred to Com. on B. & P. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.

  12. Ordered to third reading.

  13. Read third time and amended.

  14. Assembly Rule 69 suspended.

  15. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  16. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  17. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 11. Noes 0.) (August 27).

  18. Joint Rule 62(a) suspended.

  19. August 26 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  20. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  21. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  22. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 11. Noes 2.) (July 14).

  23. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on HEALTH. (Ayes 8. Noes 2.) (July 7). Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.

  24. Referred to Coms. on B. & P. and HEALTH.

  25. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  26. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 26. Noes 13. Page 1328.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  27. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  28. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 1157.) (May 28).

  29. Set for hearing May 28.

  30. May 18 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.

  31. Set for hearing May 18.

  32. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  33. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1. Page 816.) (April 29).

  34. Set for hearing April 29.

  35. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  36. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on RLS. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 699.) (April 20). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  37. Set for hearing April 20.

  38. Re-referred to Coms. on B., P. & E.D. and RLS.

  39. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  40. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  41. Read first time.

  42. From printer. May be acted upon on or after April 1.

  43. Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 9 voted No

Sponsors (1)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 30 Yea · 9 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 28801
Democratic 2100
Total 30901
% of votes cast 75%23%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hertzberg — Not Voting
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Wolk — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Allen — Yea
Hall — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Runner — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hill — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Block — Yea
Huff — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Liu — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Pan — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Vidak — Nay
Fuller — Nay
Galgiani — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Yea
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 58 Yea · 13 Nay · 9 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 521108
Democratic 4000
Republican 2201
Total 581309
% of votes cast 73%16%0%11%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Nay
Baker — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brough — Nay
Brown — Yea
Levine — Yea
Maienschein — Not Voting
Mathis — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Olsen — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Daly — Yea
Burke — Yea
Chang — Yea
Salas — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Gray — Yea
Gatto — Nay
Lopez — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Hadley — Yea
Harper — Nay
Holden — Yea
Jones-Sawyer — Yea
Chau — Yea
Atkins — Yea
Linder — Yea
Low — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bigelow — Nay
Chu — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Nay
Dababneh — Yea
Dodd — Yea
Mullin — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Perea — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Rodriguez — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Wagner — Nay
Waldron — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Campos — Not Voting
Chávez — Not Voting
Kim — Not Voting
Mayes — Not Voting
Nazarian — Not Voting
Ridley-Thomas — Not Voting
Williams — Not Voting
Gomez — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 8 Yea · 1 Nay · 5 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8104
Republican 0001
Total 8105
% of votes cast 57%7%0%36%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Baker — Yea
Bloom — Not Voting
Holden — Not Voting
Eggman — Yea
Campos — Not Voting
Chang — Not Voting
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Nay
Dodd — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Wood — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended.

Passed 11 Yea · 0 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 10003
Democratic 1001
Republican 0002
Total 11006
% of votes cast 65%0%0%35%
How each member voted (17)
Member Party Vote
Bigelow — Not Voting
Bloom — Yea
Holden — Yea
Wagner — Not Voting
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Chang — Not Voting
Nazarian — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Weber — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Not Voting
Gallagher, James Republican Not Voting
Jones, Brian W. Republican Not Voting

Official roll call →

Passed 11 Yea · 2 Nay · 6 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Democratic 1000
Unaffiliated 9106
Republican 1100
Total 11206
% of votes cast 58%11%0%32%
How each member voted (19)
Member Party Vote
Maienschein — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Burke — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Nazarian — Not Voting
Ridley-Thomas — Not Voting
Rodriguez — Not Voting
Santiago — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Waldron — Not Voting
Wood — Yea
Gonzalez — Not Voting
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea
Patterson, Joe Republican Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 8 Yea · 2 Nay · 4 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 8104
Republican 0100
Total 8204
% of votes cast 57%14%0%29%
How each member voted (14)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Ting — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Gatto — Nay
Campos — Not Voting
Holden — Not Voting
Baker — Not Voting
Chang — Not Voting
Dodd — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Jones, Brian W. Republican Nay

Official roll call →

3rd Reading

Passed 26 Yea · 13 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 241201
Democratic 2100
Total 261301
% of votes cast 65%33%0%3%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Hill — Yea
Liu — Yea
Galgiani — Not Voting
Fuller — Nay
Glazer — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Runner — Nay
Hall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Bates — Nay
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Huff — Nay
Lara — Yea
Leno — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Monning — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Nielsen — Nay
Pan — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Roth — Nay
Vidak — Nay
Wieckowski — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Nay
Mark Stone — Nay
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 5 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 5101
Total 5101
% of votes cast 71%14%0%14%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Bates — Not Voting
Beall — Yea

Official roll call →

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 7000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Bates — Yea
Lara — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Beall — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 643 do?
(1) Existing law, the Compassionate Use Act of 1996, an initiative measure enacted by the approval of Proposition 215 at the November 6, 1996, statewide general election, authorizes the use of marijuana for medical purposes. Existing law enacted by the Legislature requires the establishment of a program for the issuance of identification cards to qualified patients so that they may lawfully use marijuana for medical purposes, and requires the establishment of guidelines for the lawful cultivation of marijuana grown for medical use. Existing law provides for the licensure of various professions by the Department of Consumer Affairs. Existing law, the Sherman Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Law, provides for the regulation of food, drugs, devices, and cosmetics, as specified. A violation of that law is a crime. This bill would, among other things, set forth standards for a physician and surgeon prescribing medical cannabis and require the Medical Board of California to prioritize its investigative and prosecutorial resources to identify and discipline physicians and surgeons that have repeatedly recommended excessive cannabis to patients for medical purposes or repeatedly recommended cannabis to patients for medical purposes without a good faith examination, as specified. The bill would require the Bureau of Medical Marijuana to require an applicant to furnish a full set of fingerprints for the purposes of conducting criminal history record checks. The bill would prohibit a physician and surgeon who recommends cannabis to a patient for a medical purpose from accepting, soliciting, or offering any form of remuneration from a facility licensed under the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act. The bill would make a violation of this prohibition a misdemeanor, and by creating a new crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would require the Governor, under the Medical Marijuana Regulation and Safety Act, to appoint, subject to confirmation by the Senate, a chief of the Bureau of Medical Marijuana Regulation. The act would require the Department of Consumer Affairs to have the sole authority to create, issue, renew, discipline, suspend, or revoke licenses for the transportation and storage, unrelated to manufacturing, of medical marijuana, and would authorize the department to collect fees for its regulatory activities and impose specified duties on this department in this regard. The act would require the Department of Food and Agriculture to administer the provisions of the act related to, and associated with, the cultivation, and transportation of, medical cannabis and would impose specified duties on this department in this regard. The act would require the State Department of Public Health to administer the provisions of the act related to, and associated with, the manufacturing and testing of medical cannabis and would impose specified duties on this department in this regard. This bill would authorize counties to impose a tax upon specified cannabis-related activity. This bill would require an applicant for a state license pursuant to the act to provide a statement signed by the applicant under penalty of perjury, thereby changing the scope of a crime and imposing a state-mandated local program. This bill would set forth standards for the licensed cultivation of medical cannabis, including, but not limited to, establishing duties relating to the environmental impact of cannabis and cannabis products. The bill would also establish state cultivator license types, as specified. (2) This bill would provide that its provisions are severable. (3) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above. (4) Existing constitutional provisions require that a statute that limits the right of access to the meeting of public bodies or the writings of public bodies or the writings of public officials and agencies be adopted with finding demonstrating the interest protected by the limitation and the need for protecting that interest. The bill would make legislative findings to that effect. (5) The bill would become operative only if AB 266 and AB 243 of the 2015–16 Regular Session are enacted and take effect on or before January 1, 2016.
Who sponsors SB 643?
SB 643 is sponsored by McGuire, Mike (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 643?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 27, 2015. Enacted.
Where can I track SB 643?
Track SB 643 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 643

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 643

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →