Connecticut 2023 Regular Session Status: Passed House

HJ 101 — RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER ORDERING IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF AN AWARD OF THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS TO CONSTANTINOS ANTONARAS IN HIS CLAIM AGAINST THE STATE.

Last action — ON CONSENT CALENDAR /IN CONCURRENCE

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

42 added · 8 removed

42 line(s) added, 8 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
General Assembly House Joint Resolution No.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
101 January Session, 2023 LCO No.
660 January Session, 2023 House Joint Resolution No.
5105 Referred to Committee on JUDICIARY Introduced by:
101 House of Representatives, April 18, 2023 The Committee on Judiciary reported through REP.
(JUD) RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER ORDERING IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF AN AWARD OF THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS TO CONSTANTINOS ANTONARAS IN HIS CLAIM AGAINST THE STATE.
STAFSTROM of the 129th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the joint resolution ought to be adopted.
RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER ORDERING IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF AN AWARD OF THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS TO CONSTANTINOS ANTONARAS IN HIS CLAIM AGAINST THE STATE.
JUD Joint Favorable LCO 5105 \\PRDFS1\HCOUSERS\BARRYJN\WS\2023HJ-00101-R011 of 1 HB.docx
JUD Joint Favorable HJ101 / File No.
660 1 HJ101 File No.
660 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
Agency Affected Fund-Effect FY 23 $ Comptroller - Adjudicated Claims Account GF - Cost 3,000 Note:
GF=General Fund Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The resolution, which requires the immediate payment to resolve a claim against the state, will result in a cost of $3,000 in FY 23.
The Out Years The claim requires an immediate one-time payment and has no fiscal impact in the out years.
HJ101 / File No.
660 2 HJ101 File No.
660 OLR Bill Analysis HJ 101 RESOLUTION CONFIRMING THE DECISION OF THE CLAIMS COMMISSIONER ORDERING IMMEDIATE PAYMENT OF AN AWARD OF THREE THOUSAND DOLLARS TO CONSTANTINOS ANTONARAS IN HIS CLAIM AGAINST THE STATE.
SUMMARY The Office of Legislative Research does not analyze Resolutions.
COMMITTEE ACTION Judiciary Committee Joint Favorable Yea 37 Nay 0 (03/31/2023) HJ101 / File No.
660 3
⬇ Download PDF
View plain text versions (3)

Action History

  1. ON CONSENT CALENDAR /IN CONCURRENCE

  2. ADOPTED, SENATE

  3. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 456

  4. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  5. ON CONSENT CALENDAR

  6. ADOPTED, HOUSE

  7. FILE NO. 660

  8. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 427

  9. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  10. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  11. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/17/23

  12. FILED WITH LCO

  13. Joint Favorable

  14. PUBLIC HEARING 0317

  15. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

Sponsors

  • Judiciary Committee · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 186 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Judiciary Committee

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (186)

186 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 186 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

finance
Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HJ 101?
HJ 101 is sponsored by Judiciary Committee.
What is the current status of HJ 101?
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed House” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HJ 101?
Track HJ 101 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HJ 101

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Find my representatives → Run a campaign

Stay ahead of HJ 101

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →