Local agency design-build projects: transit districts.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 374 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 374.
You're tracking SB 374
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 374 — Local agency design-build projects: transit districts.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 715, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
2 sponsors
1 primary, 1 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law authorizes local agencies to use the design-build method of project delivery for specified projects, except for projects on the state highway system. Existing law defines "local agency" for purposes of these provisions as cities and counties, certain special districts relating to wastewater, solid waste, water recycling, and fire protection facilities, joint powers authorities formed to provide transit service, and specified types of local public entities responsible for the construction of transit projects. These provisions further define "project" specifically for each category of local agency. Existing law requires specified information submitted by a design-build entity, as defined, in the design-build procurement process to be certified under penalty of perjury. This bill would specify that the definition of a local agency authorized to use the design-build method of project delivery includes the San Diego Association of Governments. The bill would define projects, as it pertains to the San Diego Association of Governments, to include development projects adjacent, or physically or functionally related, to transit facilities developed by the association. By expanding the design-build authorization of the San Diego Association of Governments to additional development projects, the bill would expand the scope of crime of perjury and would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill also makes a technical correction to a cross-reference. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the San Diego Association of Governments. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 10/09/15 - Chaptered Current pdf October 09, 2015
- Enrolled 09/15/15 - Enrolled pdf September 15, 2015
- Amended 09/04/15 - Amended Assembly pdf September 04, 2015
- Introduced 02/24/15 - Introduced pdf February 24, 2015
- SB374 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 715, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:45 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 40. Noes 0. Page 2763.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
From committee: That the Assembly amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 2787.)
-
Set for hearing September 11.
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on T. & H. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d). (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) Re-referred to Com. on T. & H.
-
Re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(d).
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 80. Noes 0. Page 3088.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 9. Noes 0.) (September 8).
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV. pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.2.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
From inactive file.
-
Notice of intention to remove from inactive file given by Assembly Member Holden.
-
Ordered to inactive file on request of Assembly Member Holden.
-
From consent calendar.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (July 15).
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 35. Noes 0. Page 883.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 796.) (April 28).
-
Set for hearing April 28.
-
Referred to Com. on G.O.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 27.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Atkins · Cosponsor
- Hueso · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hueso
Co-sponsors (1)
- Atkins
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 37 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 40 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 71 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 80 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 17 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (21)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Not Voting |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 32 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 35 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Not Voting |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 64% | 0% | 0% | 36% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Not Voting |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Not Voting |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 374 do?
- Existing law authorizes local agencies to use the design-build method of project delivery for specified projects, except for projects on the state highway system. Existing law defines "local agency" for purposes of these provisions as cities and counties, certain special districts relating to wastewater, solid waste, water recycling, and fire protection facilities, joint powers authorities formed to provide transit service, and specified types of local public entities responsible for the construction of transit projects. These provisions further define "project" specifically for each category of local agency. Existing law requires specified information submitted by a design-build entity, as defined, in the design-build procurement process to be certified under penalty of perjury. This bill would specify that the definition of a local agency authorized to use the design-build method of project delivery includes the San Diego Association of Governments. The bill would define projects, as it pertains to the San Diego Association of Governments, to include development projects adjacent, or physically or functionally related, to transit facilities developed by the association. By expanding the design-build authorization of the San Diego Association of Governments to additional development projects, the bill would expand the scope of crime of perjury and would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill also makes a technical correction to a cross-reference. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the San Diego Association of Governments. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors SB 374?
- SB 374 is sponsored by Atkins and Hueso.
- What is the current status of SB 374?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 24, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 374?
- Track SB 374 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 374
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 374
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →