Foster youth: transition to independent living: health insurance coverage.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1849 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1849.
You're tracking AB 1849
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1849 — Foster youth: transition to independent living: health insurance coverage.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 609, Statutes of 2016.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 09, 2016. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Single-party support
Sponsorship is currently within one party (1 D).
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which is permitted to adjudge certain children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, and prescribes various hearings and other procedures for these purposes. Existing law extends certain foster care benefits to youth up to 21 years of age, known as nonminor dependents, if specified conditions are met. Existing law requires a county social worker to develop a case plan for a minor or nonminor dependent that includes, among other things, when appropriate, for a child who is 16 years of age or older and for a nonminor dependent, a transitional independent living plan. During the 90-day period prior to the participant attaining 18 years of age or older, existing law requires a case worker or appropriate agency staff or probation officer and other representatives of the participant, as appropriate, to provide the youth or nonminor dependent with assistance and support in developing the written 90-day transition plan that is personalized at the direction of the child, and requires the plan to include, among other things, options regarding health insurance. This bill would require, for purposes of the 90-day transition plan, information provided regarding health insurance options to include verification that the eligible youth or nonminor is enrolled in Medi-Cal and a description of the steps that have been or will be taken by the youth's social worker or probation officer to ensure that the eligible youth or nonminor is transitioned into the Medi-Cal program upon case closure, as specified. Existing law prohibits the court from terminating dependency jurisdiction over a nonminor who has attained 18 years of age until a hearing is conducted and the county welfare department has submitted a report verifying that specified information, documents, and services have been provided to the nonminor, including the written 90-day transition plan, assistance in completing an application for Medi-Cal or assistance in obtaining other health insurance, and a letter prepared by the county welfare department that includes specified information. The bill would revise the list of information, services, and documents that are required to be provided to the nonminor to include, among other things, a Medi-Cal Benefits Identification Card and continued and uninterrupted enrollment in Medi-Cal for eligible nonminors up to 26 years of age pursuant to specified provisions of law. By expanding the duties of counties relating to the transition of foster youth from foster care to independent living, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 16501.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1067 and AB 1997, that would become operative only if this bill and either or both of those bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/25/16 - Chaptered Current pdf September 25, 2016
- Enrolled 08/29/16 - Enrolled pdf August 29, 2016
- Amended 08/17/16 - Amended Senate pdf August 17, 2016
- Amended 06/16/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 16, 2016
- Amended 03/28/16 - Amended Assembly pdf March 28, 2016
- Introduced 02/09/16 - Introduced pdf February 09, 2016
- AB1849 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 609, Statutes of 2016.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 12 p.m.
-
Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 6279.).
-
In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 5253.).
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (August 1).
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 4. Noes 0.) (June 14).
-
Referred to Com. on HUMAN S.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 4462.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to Consent Calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 20. Noes 0.) (April 13).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To Consent Calendar. (Ayes 6. Noes 0.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Re-referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on HUM. S. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Com. on HUM. S.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 11.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Mike A. Gipson · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Gipson, Mike A. Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Not Voting |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 80% | 0% | 0% | 20% |
How each member voted (5)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Not Voting |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 20 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 6 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 86% | 0% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Not Voting |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1849 do?
- Existing law establishes the jurisdiction of the juvenile court, which is permitted to adjudge certain children to be dependents of the court under certain circumstances, and prescribes various hearings and other procedures for these purposes. Existing law extends certain foster care benefits to youth up to 21 years of age, known as nonminor dependents, if specified conditions are met. Existing law requires a county social worker to develop a case plan for a minor or nonminor dependent that includes, among other things, when appropriate, for a child who is 16 years of age or older and for a nonminor dependent, a transitional independent living plan. During the 90-day period prior to the participant attaining 18 years of age or older, existing law requires a case worker or appropriate agency staff or probation officer and other representatives of the participant, as appropriate, to provide the youth or nonminor dependent with assistance and support in developing the written 90-day transition plan that is personalized at the direction of the child, and requires the plan to include, among other things, options regarding health insurance. This bill would require, for purposes of the 90-day transition plan, information provided regarding health insurance options to include verification that the eligible youth or nonminor is enrolled in Medi-Cal and a description of the steps that have been or will be taken by the youth's social worker or probation officer to ensure that the eligible youth or nonminor is transitioned into the Medi-Cal program upon case closure, as specified. Existing law prohibits the court from terminating dependency jurisdiction over a nonminor who has attained 18 years of age until a hearing is conducted and the county welfare department has submitted a report verifying that specified information, documents, and services have been provided to the nonminor, including the written 90-day transition plan, assistance in completing an application for Medi-Cal or assistance in obtaining other health insurance, and a letter prepared by the county welfare department that includes specified information. The bill would revise the list of information, services, and documents that are required to be provided to the nonminor to include, among other things, a Medi-Cal Benefits Identification Card and continued and uninterrupted enrollment in Medi-Cal for eligible nonminors up to 26 years of age pursuant to specified provisions of law. By expanding the duties of counties relating to the transition of foster youth from foster care to independent living, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 16501.1 of the Welfare and Institutions Code proposed by AB 1067 and AB 1997, that would become operative only if this bill and either or both of those bills are chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2017, and this bill is chaptered last. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
- Who sponsors AB 1849?
- AB 1849 is sponsored by Gipson, Mike A. (Democratic).
- What is the current status of AB 1849?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 09, 2016. Enacted.
- Where can I track AB 1849?
- Track AB 1849 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1849
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1849
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →