SB 48 — Public Utilities Commission.
Last action — Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
(1) The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission, with jurisdiction over all public utilities. The Public Utilities Act provides that the office of the commission be in the City and County of San Francisco, that the office always be open, legal holidays and nonjudicial days excepted, that the commission hold its sessions at least once in each calendar month in the City and County of San Francisco, and authorizes the commission to also meet at those other times and places as may be expedient and necessary for the proper performance of its duties. This bill would require that the commission hold its sessions at least once in each calendar month in the City and County of San Francisco or the City of Sacramento and would require that the commission hold no less than 6 sessions each year in the City of Sacramento. (2) The California Constitution authorizes the commission to establish its own procedures, subject to statutory limitations or directions and constitutional requirements of due process. Existing law requires the commission to determine whether a proceeding requires a hearing and, if so, to determine whether the matter requires a quasi-legislative, an adjudication, or a ratesetting hearing. For these purposes, quasi-legislative cases are cases that establish policy rulemakings and investigations which may establish rules affecting an entire industry, adjudication cases are enforcement cases and complaints except those challenging the reasonableness of any rates or charges, and ratesetting cases are cases in which rates are established for a specific company, including general rate cases, performance-based ratemaking, and other ratesetting mechanisms. Existing law requires the commission to publish and maintain certain documents on the Internet, including a docket card that lists all documents filed and all decisions or rulings issued in those proceedings, as provided. This bill would make the Administrative Adjudication Code of Ethics applicable to administrative law judges of the commission. Except for in adjudication cases, the bill would require the commission, before instituting a proceeding on its own motion, where feasible and appropriate, to seek the views of those who are likely to be affected by a decision in the proceeding, including those who are likely to benefit from, and those who are potentially subject to, a decision in that proceeding. The bill would require the commission to include a docket card that lists the public versions of all prepared written testimony and advice letter filings, protests, and responses on its Internet Web site. The bill would require the commission to make additional information available on the Internet, including information on how members of the public and ratepayers can gain access to the commission's ratemaking process. (3) The Public Utilities Act requires the commission to develop, publish, and annually update an annual workplan that does all of the following: (A) describes in clear detail the scheduled ratemaking proceedings and other decisions that may be considered by the commission during the calendar year, (B) includes information on how members of the public and ratepayers can gain access to the commission's ratemaking process and information regarding the specific matters to be decided, (C) includes information on the operation of the office of the public adviser and identifies the names and telephone numbers of those contact persons responsible for specific cases and matters to be decided, and (D) includes a statement that specifies activities that the commission proposes to reduce the costs of, and rates for, energy, including electricity, and for improving the competitive opportunities for state agriculture and other rural energy consumers. The act requires the commission to submit the workplan to the Governor and Legislature by February 1 of each year. This bill would require the commission to develop, publish, and annually update a report that contains certain specified information, as provided, and would expand the requirement that the workplan, as part of that report, describe in clear detail the scheduled proceedings that may be considered by the commission during the calendar year to include all proceedings and not just ratemaking proceedings. The bill would additionally require that the report include performance criteria for the commission and executive director and evaluate the performance of the executive director during the previous year based on the criteria established in the prior year's workplan. The bill would require the president of the commission to present the annual report to the appropriate policy committees of the Senate and Assembly, and the commission to post the report in a conspicuous area of its Internet Web site and disseminate the information in the report, as provided. The bill would recast the report requirements and certain other requirements that the commission report information to an article in the Public Utilities Act pertaining to reports by the commission to the Legislature and make other conforming changes. (4) The Public Utilities Act requires the commission to create, and annually submit to the Governor and Legislature by February 1, a report on the number of cases where resolution exceeded the time periods prescribed in scoping memos and the days that commissioners presided in hearings. This bill would delete the requirement that the report include the number of cases where resolution exceeded the time periods prescribed in scoping memos and instead would require the commission to annually submit a report to the Legislature on the commission's timeliness in resolving cases and include information on the disposition of applications for rehearings. The bill would require that the report include the number of scoping memos issued in each proceeding and to include the number of orders issued extending the statutory deadlines for all adjudication, ratesetting, and quasi-legislative cases. (5) The California Constitution provides that the Legislature has plenary power to establish the manner and scope of review of commission action in a court of record. Existing law provides that only the Supreme Court and the court of appeal have jurisdiction to review, reverse, correct, or annul any order or decision of the commission or to suspend or delay the execution or operation thereof, or to enjoin, restrain, or interfere with the commission in the performance of its official duties. This bill would authorize an action to enforce the requirements of the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act or the California Public Records Act to be brought against the commission in the superior court. (6) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 311.5 of the Public Utilities Code, proposed by AB 825, to be operative only if AB 825 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2016, and this bill is chaptered last. (7) This bill would declare that Section 2 of this act shall not become operative if any section of any other act enacted by the Legislature during the 2015 calendar year and takes effect on or before January 1, 2016, amends, amends and renumbers, adds, repeals and adds, or repeals Section 306 of the Public Utilities Code.
Bill Text
- Enrolled 09/16/15 - Enrolled Current pdf September 16, 2015
- Amended 09/09/15 - Amended Assembly pdf September 09, 2015
- Amended 09/04/15 - Amended Assembly pdf September 04, 2015
- Amended 08/28/15 - Amended Assembly pdf August 28, 2015
- Amended 07/07/15 - Amended Assembly pdf July 07, 2015
- Amended 06/24/15 - Amended Assembly pdf June 24, 2015
- Amended 05/06/15 - Amended Senate pdf May 06, 2015
- Amended 04/14/15 - Amended Senate pdf April 14, 2015
- Introduced 12/18/14 - Introduced pdf December 18, 2014
- SB48 View text html
Action History
-
Last day to consider Governors veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
-
In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
-
Vetoed by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:45 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 1. Page 2769.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 3124.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 17. Noes 0.) (August 27).
-
July 15 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
Referred to Com. on U. & C.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 39. Noes 0. Page 1194.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 1146.) (May 28).
-
Set for hearing May 28.
-
May 18 hearing: Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Set for hearing May 18.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 795.) (April 27).
-
Set for hearing April 27.
-
April 21 hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Set for hearing April 21.
-
Referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after January 18.
-
Introduced. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Hill · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Hill
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 35 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 38 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 3% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Not Voting |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 70 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 17 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 12 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 93% | 0% | 0% | 7% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Not Voting |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 39 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 98% | 0% | 0% | 3% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Not Voting |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (11)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Not Voting |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 48 do?
- (1) The California Constitution establishes the Public Utilities Commission, with jurisdiction over all public utilities. The Public Utilities Act provides that the office of the commission be in the City and County of San Francisco, that the office always be open, legal holidays and nonjudicial days excepted, that the commission hold its sessions at least once in each calendar month in the City and County of San Francisco, and authorizes the commission to also meet at those other times and places as may be expedient and necessary for the proper performance of its duties. This bill would require that the commission hold its sessions at least once in each calendar month in the City and County of San Francisco or the City of Sacramento and would require that the commission hold no less than 6 sessions each year in the City of Sacramento. (2) The California Constitution authorizes the commission to establish its own procedures, subject to statutory limitations or directions and constitutional requirements of due process. Existing law requires the commission to determine whether a proceeding requires a hearing and, if so, to determine whether the matter requires a quasi-legislative, an adjudication, or a ratesetting hearing. For these purposes, quasi-legislative cases are cases that establish policy rulemakings and investigations which may establish rules affecting an entire industry, adjudication cases are enforcement cases and complaints except those challenging the reasonableness of any rates or charges, and ratesetting cases are cases in which rates are established for a specific company, including general rate cases, performance-based ratemaking, and other ratesetting mechanisms. Existing law requires the commission to publish and maintain certain documents on the Internet, including a docket card that lists all documents filed and all decisions or rulings issued in those proceedings, as provided. This bill would make the Administrative Adjudication Code of Ethics applicable to administrative law judges of the commission. Except for in adjudication cases, the bill would require the commission, before instituting a proceeding on its own motion, where feasible and appropriate, to seek the views of those who are likely to be affected by a decision in the proceeding, including those who are likely to benefit from, and those who are potentially subject to, a decision in that proceeding. The bill would require the commission to include a docket card that lists the public versions of all prepared written testimony and advice letter filings, protests, and responses on its Internet Web site. The bill would require the commission to make additional information available on the Internet, including information on how members of the public and ratepayers can gain access to the commission's ratemaking process. (3) The Public Utilities Act requires the commission to develop, publish, and annually update an annual workplan that does all of the following: (A) describes in clear detail the scheduled ratemaking proceedings and other decisions that may be considered by the commission during the calendar year, (B) includes information on how members of the public and ratepayers can gain access to the commission's ratemaking process and information regarding the specific matters to be decided, (C) includes information on the operation of the office of the public adviser and identifies the names and telephone numbers of those contact persons responsible for specific cases and matters to be decided, and (D) includes a statement that specifies activities that the commission proposes to reduce the costs of, and rates for, energy, including electricity, and for improving the competitive opportunities for state agriculture and other rural energy consumers. The act requires the commission to submit the workplan to the Governor and Legislature by February 1 of each year. This bill would require the commission to develop, publish, and annually update a report that contains certain specified information, as provided, and would expand the requirement that the workplan, as part of that report, describe in clear detail the scheduled proceedings that may be considered by the commission during the calendar year to include all proceedings and not just ratemaking proceedings. The bill would additionally require that the report include performance criteria for the commission and executive director and evaluate the performance of the executive director during the previous year based on the criteria established in the prior year's workplan. The bill would require the president of the commission to present the annual report to the appropriate policy committees of the Senate and Assembly, and the commission to post the report in a conspicuous area of its Internet Web site and disseminate the information in the report, as provided. The bill would recast the report requirements and certain other requirements that the commission report information to an article in the Public Utilities Act pertaining to reports by the commission to the Legislature and make other conforming changes. (4) The Public Utilities Act requires the commission to create, and annually submit to the Governor and Legislature by February 1, a report on the number of cases where resolution exceeded the time periods prescribed in scoping memos and the days that commissioners presided in hearings. This bill would delete the requirement that the report include the number of cases where resolution exceeded the time periods prescribed in scoping memos and instead would require the commission to annually submit a report to the Legislature on the commission's timeliness in resolving cases and include information on the disposition of applications for rehearings. The bill would require that the report include the number of scoping memos issued in each proceeding and to include the number of orders issued extending the statutory deadlines for all adjudication, ratesetting, and quasi-legislative cases. (5) The California Constitution provides that the Legislature has plenary power to establish the manner and scope of review of commission action in a court of record. Existing law provides that only the Supreme Court and the court of appeal have jurisdiction to review, reverse, correct, or annul any order or decision of the commission or to suspend or delay the execution or operation thereof, or to enjoin, restrain, or interfere with the commission in the performance of its official duties. This bill would authorize an action to enforce the requirements of the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act or the California Public Records Act to be brought against the commission in the superior court. (6) This bill would incorporate additional changes in Section 311.5 of the Public Utilities Code, proposed by AB 825, to be operative only if AB 825 and this bill are both chaptered and become effective on or before January 1, 2016, and this bill is chaptered last. (7) This bill would declare that Section 2 of this act shall not become operative if any section of any other act enacted by the Legislature during the 2015 calendar year and takes effect on or before January 1, 2016, amends, amends and renumbers, adds, repeals and adds, or repeals Section 306 of the Public Utilities Code.
- Who sponsors SB 48?
- SB 48 is sponsored by Hill.
- What is the current status of SB 48?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “To Executive” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track SB 48?
- Track SB 48 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 48
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 48
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →