HJ 34 — RESOLUTION CONCERNING CERTAIN WITCHCRAFT CONVICTIONS IN COLONIAL CONNECTICUT.
Last action — IN CONCURRENCE
-
✓Introduced
-
2In Committee
-
3Passed House
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Bill Text
What changed in the latest version
74 added · 60 removed74 line(s) added, 60 removed.
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
548782 General Assembly January Session, 20232023(Reprint Houseof JointFile Resolution No.
34548) House ofJoint Representatives,Resolution AprilNo. 12, 2023 The Committee on Judiciary reported through REP.
STAFSTROM34 ofAs theAmended 129thby Dist.,House ChairpersonAmendment ofSchedule the"A" CommitteeApproved onby the partLegislative ofCommissioner theMay House,12, that2023 theRESOLUTION jointCONCERNING resolutionCERTAIN oughtWITCHCRAFT toCONVICTIONS beIN adopted.COLONIAL CONNECTICUT.
RESOLUTION CONCERNING CERTAIN WITCHCRAFT CONVICTIONS IN COLONIAL CONNECTICUT.
WHEREAS, thethecourtsintheearly courtsBritish incoloniesofConnecticut the early colonies of Connecticut and New Haven indicted at least thirty-four women and men for the alleged crimecrimes of witchcraft and convictedfamiliarities twelvewith ofthe them,devil executing eleven, and itconvicted istwelveofthem,executingeleven,anditisnowacceptedbythehistorical now accepted by the historical profession and society as a whole that all the accused were innocent of such charges, and WHEREAS, legal procedures differed at the time and many practices of the courtColonial courts would nonot longer meet modern American standards of proof, so that the miscarriage of justice was facilitated by such procedures, and WHEREAS, the status of women was radically different than it is today, and misogyny played a large part in the trials and in denying defendants their rights and dignity, and WHEREAS,HJ34 community/ strifeFile andNo. panic combined with overwhelming fear and superstition led to these accusations of alleged witchcraft and the subsequent suffering of those accused.
HJ34782 /HJ34 File No.
548782 1WHEREAS, HJ34community Filestrife No.and panic combined with overwhelming fear and superstition led to these accusations of alleged witchcraft and the subsequent suffering of those accused.
548 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that all of the formally convicted and executed are exoneratedabsolved of all alleged crimes relatingof towitchcraft theand chargesfamiliarities ofwith witchcraft.the devil.
The legislature proclaimsspecifically absolves the innocencefollowing ofpeople thebelieved followingto have been convicted and executed people:for the crimes of witchcraft and familiarities with the devil:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that those who were indicted,indicted for the crimes of witchcraft and familiarities with the devil, forced to flee, banished or even acquitted continued to live with their reputations destroyed and their family names tarnished, will have their reputations restored and no longer have disgrace attached to their names, now, being in good standing in the state of Connecticut.
The following indicted for the crimes of witchcraft and familiarities with the devil who were not convicted but still suffered greatly after indictments were:
Goodwife Bailey in 1655, Nicholas Bailey in 1655, Elizabeth Godman in 1655, Elizabeth Garlick in 1658, Unknown person in Saybrook in 1659, Margaret Jennings in 1661, Nicholas JenningsJenningsin1661, inJudithVarletin1662,AndrewSanfordin1662,William 1661, Judith Varlet in 1662, Andrew Sanford in 1662, William Ayers in 1662, Judith Ayers in 1662, James Wakely in 1662, Katherine Harrison in 1668 and 1669, William Graves in 1667, Elizabeth Clawson in 1692, Hugh Crosia in 1692, Mercy Disborough in 1692, Mary Harvey in1692,HannahHarveyin1692,MaryStaplesin1692,WinifredBenham in 1692,1697, HannahHarveyin1692,MaryStaplesin1692,WinifredBenhamin1697, and Winifred Benham Jr.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the State of Connecticut apologizes to the descendants of all those who were indicted,indicted for the crimes of witchcraft and familiarities with the devil, convicted and executed and for the harm done to the accused persons' posterity to the presentHJ34 day,/ andFile acknowledgesNo. the trauma and shame that wrongfully continued to affect the families of the accused.
JUD782 Joint Favorable HJ34 / File No.
548782 2present HJ34day, Fileand No.acknowledges the trauma and shame that wrongfully continued to affect the families of the accused.
548HJ34 The/ followingFile FiscalNo. Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
782 3 HJ34 File No.
782 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
None Explanation This resolution expresses contrition for colonial action as such it does not result in a fiscal impact.impact to the state or municipalities.
None HJ34The /preceding FileFiscal No.Impact statement is prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for the purposes of information, summarization and explanation and does not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
548In 3general, HJ34fiscal Fileimpacts No.are based upon a variety of consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
548HJ34 OLR/ BillFile AnalysisNo. HJ 34 RESOLUTION CONCERNING CERTAIN WITCHCRAFT CONVICTIONS IN COLONIAL CONNECTICUT.
782 4 HJ34 File No.
782 OLR Bill Analysis HJ 34 (as amended by House "A") RESOLUTION CONCERNING CERTAIN WITCHCRAFT CONVICTIONS IN COLONIAL CONNECTICUT.
548782 45
Action History
-
IN CONCURRENCE
-
ADOPTED SEN. AS AMENDED BY HO. A
-
SEN. ADOPTED HO. AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 782
-
SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 507
-
FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.
-
ADOPTED HOUSE AS AMENDED BY HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A
-
FILE NO. 548
-
HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 343
-
FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR
-
RPTD. OUT OF LCO
-
REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/11/23
-
FILED WITH LCO
-
Joint Favorable
-
PUBLIC HEARING 0301
-
REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary
Sponsors
- Eleni Kavros DeGraw · Primary
- Mary Welander · Primary
- Travis Simms · Primary
- Saud Anwar · Primary
- Mary M. Mushinsky · Primary
- Steven J. Stafstrom · Primary
- Aimee Berger-Girvalo · Primary
- Tom Arnone · Primary
- John A. Kissel · Primary
- Josh Elliott · Primary
- Ceci Maher · Primary
- Patricia A. Dillon · Primary
- Derek Slap · Primary
- Jason Rojas · Primary
- Md Rahman · Primary
- Michael D. Quinn · Primary
- Mitch Bolinsky · Primary
- Jan Hochadel · Primary
- Kate Farrar · Primary
- Matthew L. Lesser · Primary
- Norman Needleman · Primary
- Jane M. Garibay · Primary
- Frank Smith · Primary
- David Michel · Primary
- Dominique Johnson · Primary
- Aundre Bumgardner · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →26 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 161 not signed on
Sponsors (26)
- Eleni Kavros DeGraw Democratic
- Mary Welander Democratic
- Travis Simms Democratic
- Saud Anwar Democratic
- Mary M. Mushinsky Democratic
- Steven J. Stafstrom Democratic
- Aimee Berger-Girvalo Democratic
- Arnone, Tom
- John A. Kissel Republican
- Josh Elliott Democratic
- Maher, Ceci
- Patricia A. Dillon Democratic
- Derek Slap Democratic
- Jason Rojas Democratic
- Rahman, Md
- Michael D. Quinn Democratic
- Mitch Bolinsky Republican
- Hochadel, Jan
- Kate Farrar Democratic
- Lesser, Matthew L.
- Norman Needleman Democratic
- Jane M. Garibay Democratic
- Frank Smith Democratic
- Michel, David
- Dominique Johnson Democratic
- Aundre Bumgardner Democratic
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (161)
161 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 161 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- Who sponsors HJ 34?
- HJ 34 is sponsored by Eleni Kavros DeGraw (Democratic), Mary Welander (Democratic), Travis Simms (Democratic), Saud Anwar (Democratic), Mary M. Mushinsky (Democratic), Steven J. Stafstrom (Democratic), Aimee Berger-Girvalo (Democratic), Arnone, Tom, John A. Kissel (Republican), Josh Elliott (Democratic), Maher, Ceci, Patricia A. Dillon (Democratic), Derek Slap (Democratic), Jason Rojas (Democratic), Rahman, Md, Michael D. Quinn (Democratic), Mitch Bolinsky (Republican), Hochadel, Jan, Kate Farrar (Democratic), Lesser, Matthew L., Norman Needleman (Democratic), Jane M. Garibay (Democratic), Frank Smith (Democratic), Michel, David, Dominique Johnson (Democratic), and Aundre Bumgardner (Democratic).
- What is the current status of HJ 34?
- This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track HJ 34?
- Track HJ 34 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on HJ 34
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of HJ 34
Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →