Connecticut 2023 Regular Session Status: In Committee Bipartisan · 18 D · 2 R cosponsors

HJ 34 — RESOLUTION CONCERNING CERTAIN WITCHCRAFT CONVICTIONS IN COLONIAL CONNECTICUT.

Last action — IN CONCURRENCE

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. 2
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed House
  4. 4
    Passed Senate
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there are no live odds of enactment. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

74 added · 60 removed

74 line(s) added, 60 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
House of Representatives General Assembly File No.
House of Representatives File No.
548 January Session, 2023 House Joint Resolution No.
782 General Assembly January Session, 2023(Reprint of File No.
34 House of Representatives, April 12, 2023 The Committee on Judiciary reported through REP.
548) House Joint Resolution No.
STAFSTROM of the 129th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the House, that the joint resolution ought to be adopted.
34 As Amended by House Amendment Schedule "A" Approved by the Legislative Commissioner May 12, 2023 RESOLUTION CONCERNING CERTAIN WITCHCRAFT CONVICTIONS IN COLONIAL CONNECTICUT.
RESOLUTION CONCERNING CERTAIN WITCHCRAFT CONVICTIONS IN COLONIAL CONNECTICUT.
WHEREAS, the courts in the early colonies of Connecticut and New Haven indicted at least thirty-four women and men for the alleged crime of witchcraft and convicted twelve of them, executing eleven, and it is now accepted by the historical profession and society as a whole that all the accused were innocent of such charges, and WHEREAS, legal procedures differed at the time and many practices of the court would no longer meet modern standards of proof, so that the miscarriage of justice was facilitated by such procedures, and WHEREAS, the status of women was radically different than it is today, and misogyny played a large part in the trials and in denying defendants their rights and dignity, and WHEREAS, community strife and panic combined with overwhelming fear and superstition led to these accusations of alleged witchcraft and the subsequent suffering of those accused.
WHEREAS, thecourtsintheearly British coloniesofConnecticut and New Haven indicted at least thirty-four women and men for the alleged crimes of witchcraft and familiarities with the devil and convicted twelveofthem,executingeleven,anditisnowacceptedbythehistorical profession and society as a whole that all the accused were innocent of such charges, and WHEREAS, legal procedures differed at the time and many practices of the Colonial courts would not meet modern American standards of proof, so that the miscarriage of justice was facilitated by such procedures, and WHEREAS, the status of women was radically different than it is today, and misogyny played a large part in the trials and in denying defendants their rights and dignity, and HJ34 / File No.
HJ34 / File No.
782 HJ34 File No.
548 1 HJ34 File No.
782 WHEREAS, community strife and panic combined with overwhelming fear and superstition led to these accusations of alleged witchcraft and the subsequent suffering of those accused.
548 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that all of the formally convicted and executed are exonerated of all alleged crimes relating to the charges of witchcraft.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that all of the formally convicted and executed are absolved of all crimes of witchcraft and familiarities with the devil.
The legislature proclaims the innocence of the following convicted and executed people:
The legislature specifically absolves the following people believed to have been convicted and executed for the crimes of witchcraft and familiarities with the devil:
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that those who were indicted, forced to flee, banished or even acquitted continued to live with their reputations destroyed and their family names tarnished, will have their reputations restored and no longer have disgrace attached to their names, now, being in good standing in Connecticut.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that those who were indicted for the crimes of witchcraft and familiarities with the devil, forced to flee, banished or even acquitted continued to live with their reputations destroyed and their family names tarnished, will have their reputations restored and no longer have disgrace attached to their names, now, being in good standing in the state of Connecticut.
The following indicted who were not convicted but still suffered greatly after indictments were:
The following indicted for the crimes of witchcraft and familiarities with the devil who were not convicted but still suffered greatly after indictments were:
Goodwife Bailey in 1655, Nicholas Bailey in 1655, Elizabeth Godman in 1655, Elizabeth Garlick in 1658, Unknown person in Saybrook in 1659, Margaret Jennings in 1661, Nicholas Jennings in 1661, Judith Varlet in 1662, Andrew Sanford in 1662, William Ayers in 1662, Judith Ayers in 1662, James Wakely in 1662, Katherine Harrison in 1668 and 1669, William Graves in 1667, Elizabeth Clawson in 1692, Hugh Crosia in 1692, Mercy Disborough in 1692, Mary Harvey in 1692, HannahHarveyin1692,MaryStaplesin1692,WinifredBenhamin1697, and Winifred Benham Jr.
Goodwife Bailey in 1655, Nicholas Bailey in 1655, Elizabeth Godman in 1655, Elizabeth Garlick in 1658, Margaret Jennings in 1661, Nicholas Jenningsin1661, JudithVarletin1662,AndrewSanfordin1662,William Ayers in 1662, Judith Ayers in 1662, James Wakely in 1662, Katherine Harrison in 1668 and 1669, William Graves in 1667, Elizabeth Clawson in 1692, Hugh Crosia in 1692, Mercy Disborough in 1692, Mary Harvey in1692,HannahHarveyin1692,MaryStaplesin1692,WinifredBenham in 1697, and Winifred Benham Jr.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the State of Connecticut apologizes to the descendants of all those who were indicted, convicted and executed and for the harm done to the accused persons' posterity to the present day, and acknowledges the trauma and shame that wrongfully continued to affect the families of the accused.
BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that the State of Connecticut apologizes to the descendants of all those who were indicted for the crimes of witchcraft and familiarities with the devil, convicted and executed and for the harm done to the accused persons' posterity to the HJ34 / File No.
JUD Joint Favorable HJ34 / File No.
782 HJ34 File No.
548 2 HJ34 File No.
782 present day, and acknowledges the trauma and shame that wrongfully continued to affect the families of the accused.
548 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
HJ34 / File No.
782 3 HJ34 File No.
782 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
None Explanation This resolution expresses contrition for colonial action as such it does not result in a fiscal impact.
None Explanation This resolution expresses contrition for colonial action as such it does not result in a fiscal impact to the state or municipalities.
None HJ34 / File No.
None The preceding Fiscal Impact statement is prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for the purposes of information, summarization and explanation and does not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
548 3 HJ34 File No.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
548 OLR Bill Analysis HJ 34 RESOLUTION CONCERNING CERTAIN WITCHCRAFT CONVICTIONS IN COLONIAL CONNECTICUT.
HJ34 / File No.
782 4 HJ34 File No.
782 OLR Bill Analysis HJ 34 (as amended by House "A") RESOLUTION CONCERNING CERTAIN WITCHCRAFT CONVICTIONS IN COLONIAL CONNECTICUT.
548 4
782 5
View plain text versions (4)

Action History

  1. IN CONCURRENCE

  2. ADOPTED SEN. AS AMENDED BY HO. A

  3. SEN. ADOPTED HO. AMEND. SCH. A

  4. FILE NO. 782

  5. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 507

  6. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  7. ADOPTED HOUSE AS AMENDED BY HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  8. HOUSE ADOPTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH. A

  9. FILE NO. 548

  10. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 343

  11. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  12. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  13. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/11/23

  14. FILED WITH LCO

  15. Joint Favorable

  16. PUBLIC HEARING 0301

  17. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Judiciary

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

26 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 161 not signed on

Sponsors (26)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (161)

161 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 161 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors HJ 34?
HJ 34 is sponsored by Eleni Kavros DeGraw (Democratic), Mary Welander (Democratic), Travis Simms (Democratic), Saud Anwar (Democratic), Mary M. Mushinsky (Democratic), Steven J. Stafstrom (Democratic), Aimee Berger-Girvalo (Democratic), Arnone, Tom, John A. Kissel (Republican), Josh Elliott (Democratic), Maher, Ceci, Patricia A. Dillon (Democratic), Derek Slap (Democratic), Jason Rojas (Democratic), Rahman, Md, Michael D. Quinn (Democratic), Mitch Bolinsky (Republican), Hochadel, Jan, Kate Farrar (Democratic), Lesser, Matthew L., Norman Needleman (Democratic), Jane M. Garibay (Democratic), Frank Smith (Democratic), Michel, David, Dominique Johnson (Democratic), and Aundre Bumgardner (Democratic).
What is the current status of HJ 34?
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “In Committee” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track HJ 34?
Track HJ 34 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on HJ 34

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of HJ 34

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →