State parks: operating agreements.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 1111 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 1111.
You're tracking SB 1111
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 1111 — State parks: operating agreements.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 540, Statutes of 2016.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2016. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 7 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law vests control of the state park system with the Department of Parks and Recreation and authorizes the department to enter into an operating agreement with a qualified nonprofit organization for the development, improvement, restoration, care, maintenance, administration, or operation of a unit or units, or portion of a unit, of the state park system, subject to certain conditions and requirements. This bill would repeal those provisions on January 1, 2025. The bill would also provide that an operating agreement may not eliminate jobs maintained under a memorandum of understanding. This bill would authorize the department to enter into a statewide agreement with a park support organization, as defined, to facilitate the implementation of reforms recommended by the Parks Forward Commission and to develop and secure expertise, services, resources, and projects that are not readily available to the state park system for specified purposes relating to the funding, visitation, use, facilities, and staffing of state parks, as provided. The bill would require the department to take specified actions relating to the development and implementation of such an agreement and would authorize the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Director of Finance, or their designees, to serve as ex officio, nonvoting members of the park support organization's board of directors. The bill would require the department, if it enters into an agreement with a park support organization, to collaborate with the park support organization to develop an annual list of strategic initiatives and projects that are statewide priorities for the state park system and the park support organization and that the park support organization will undertake in partnership with the department. The bill would authorize the department to enter into supplementary agreements and leases, as provided, with the park support organization and receive donations of projects, services, and funds to be used for the support of the state park system, subject to the review and approval of the statewide agreement or substantial amendment of such an agreement by the Director of Finance. Existing law authorizes the department to lease, for any use, all or any portion of any parcel of real property acquired for state park system purposes, if the director finds that the use would be compatible with the use of the real property as a unit or part of a unit and with the sound management and conservation of resources within the unit, but prohibits the department from entering into a lease that extends beyond 10 years unless certain conditions for the review and approval of a proposed lease as part of the annual budget process are met. Existing law imposes similar review and approval requirements of operating leases or agreements that are expected to generate over $500,000 in annual gross revenues. This bill would revise certain of those conditions for the review and approval of a proposed lease or operating lease or agreement by the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, as specified. The bill would make those conditions applicable only to operating leases or agreements that are expected to generate over $1,000,000 in annual gross revenues.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/23/16 - Chaptered Current pdf September 23, 2016
- Enrolled 08/30/16 - Enrolled pdf August 30, 2016
- Amended 08/19/16 - Amended Assembly pdf August 19, 2016
- Amended 08/17/16 - Amended Assembly pdf August 17, 2016
- Amended 06/29/16 - Amended Assembly pdf June 29, 2016
- Amended 06/23/16 - Amended Assembly pdf June 23, 2016
- Introduced 02/17/16 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2016
- SB1111 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 540, Statutes of 2016.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 27. Noes 12. Page 5449.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 55. Noes 24. Page 6239.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. (Ayes 73. Noes 0. Page 5972.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (August 11).
-
August 3 set for first hearing. Placed on APPR. suspense file.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 15. Noes 0.) (June 28).
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
-
Referred to Com. on W., P., & W.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 36. Noes 0. Page 3805.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
Set for hearing May 2.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 3313.) (March 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing March 29.
-
Referred to Com. on N.R. & W.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 19.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Pavley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 10 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Pavley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 25 | 11 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 27 | 12 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 31% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Nay |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Nay |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Nay |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Nay |
| Morrell | — | Nay |
| Nielsen | — | Nay |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Nay |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Nay |
| Mark Stone | — | Nay |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 49 | 20 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 4 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 55 | 24 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 69% | 30% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 63 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 73 | 0 | 0 | 7 |
| % of votes cast | 91% | 0% | 0% | 9% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Kim | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Not Voting |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Not Voting |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 13 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 0% | 0% | 25% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 14 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 15 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (15)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 33 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 36 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 90% | 0% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Not Voting |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Not Voting |
| Beall | — | Not Voting |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 1111 do?
- Existing law vests control of the state park system with the Department of Parks and Recreation and authorizes the department to enter into an operating agreement with a qualified nonprofit organization for the development, improvement, restoration, care, maintenance, administration, or operation of a unit or units, or portion of a unit, of the state park system, subject to certain conditions and requirements. This bill would repeal those provisions on January 1, 2025. The bill would also provide that an operating agreement may not eliminate jobs maintained under a memorandum of understanding. This bill would authorize the department to enter into a statewide agreement with a park support organization, as defined, to facilitate the implementation of reforms recommended by the Parks Forward Commission and to develop and secure expertise, services, resources, and projects that are not readily available to the state park system for specified purposes relating to the funding, visitation, use, facilities, and staffing of state parks, as provided. The bill would require the department to take specified actions relating to the development and implementation of such an agreement and would authorize the Director of Parks and Recreation and the Director of Finance, or their designees, to serve as ex officio, nonvoting members of the park support organization's board of directors. The bill would require the department, if it enters into an agreement with a park support organization, to collaborate with the park support organization to develop an annual list of strategic initiatives and projects that are statewide priorities for the state park system and the park support organization and that the park support organization will undertake in partnership with the department. The bill would authorize the department to enter into supplementary agreements and leases, as provided, with the park support organization and receive donations of projects, services, and funds to be used for the support of the state park system, subject to the review and approval of the statewide agreement or substantial amendment of such an agreement by the Director of Finance. Existing law authorizes the department to lease, for any use, all or any portion of any parcel of real property acquired for state park system purposes, if the director finds that the use would be compatible with the use of the real property as a unit or part of a unit and with the sound management and conservation of resources within the unit, but prohibits the department from entering into a lease that extends beyond 10 years unless certain conditions for the review and approval of a proposed lease as part of the annual budget process are met. Existing law imposes similar review and approval requirements of operating leases or agreements that are expected to generate over $500,000 in annual gross revenues. This bill would revise certain of those conditions for the review and approval of a proposed lease or operating lease or agreement by the Joint Legislative Budget Committee, as specified. The bill would make those conditions applicable only to operating leases or agreements that are expected to generate over $1,000,000 in annual gross revenues.
- Who sponsors SB 1111?
- SB 1111 is sponsored by Pavley.
- What is the current status of SB 1111?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 17, 2016. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 1111?
- Track SB 1111 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 1111
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 1111
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →