California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate

SB 313 — Local government: zoning ordinances: school districts.

Last action — June 15 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed Assembly
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Summary

Existing law requires the governing board of a school district to make specified findings before commencing the acquisition of real property for a new schoolsite in an area designated in a city, county, or city and county general plan for agricultural use and zoned for agricultural production, including a finding that the school district has notified and consulted with the city, county, or city and county within which the prospective schoolsite is to be located and that the school district will attempt to minimize any public health and safety issues resulting from the neighboring agricultural uses that may affect the pupils and employees at the schoolsite. This bill would require the school district to include within its findings that it has notified and consulted with the city, county, or city and county, including, but not limited to, the county agricultural commissioner. The bill would additionally require the school district to make a finding that the school district will attempt to minimize any land use incompatibilities that may arise when using a portion of land in an area zoned for agricultural production for a purpose other than agricultural use. Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district, by a 23 vote of its members, to render a city or county zoning ordinance inapplicable to a proposed use of school district property, except if the proposed use is for nonclassroom facilities. This bill would additionally condition this authorization upon compliance with a notice requirement regarding a schoolsite on agricultural land, and would require the governing board to notify the city or county, in writing, of the reason the governing board intends to take that vote at least 30 days prior to the vote. The bill would also require that vote to be based upon written findings that a zoning ordinance fails to accommodate the need to renovate and expand an existing public school or locate a new public school within the city or county.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. June 15 set for first hearing canceled at the request of author.

  2. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on ED.

  3. Referred to Coms. on ED. and L. GOV.

  4. In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.

  5. Read third time. Passed. (Ayes 29. Noes 3. Page 2944.) Ordered to the Assembly.

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. Read second time and amended. Ordered to second reading.

  8. Ordered to second reading.

  9. From inactive file.

  10. Ordered to inactive file on request of Senator Galgiani.

  11. Read second time and amended. Ordered to third reading.

  12. From committee: Do pass as amended. (Ayes 7. Noes 0. Page 919.) (May 6).

  13. Set for hearing May 6.

  14. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.

  15. From committee: Do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on GOV. & F. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 722.) (April 22).

  16. Set for hearing April 22.

  17. Re-referred to Coms. on ED. and GOV. & F.

  18. From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on RLS.

  19. Referred to Com. on RLS.

  20. From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.

  21. Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.

Sponsors

  • Galgiani · Cosponsor
  • Monning · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on

Sponsors (1)

  • Monning

Co-sponsors (1)

  • Galgiani

Not signed on (120)

120 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 120 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

3rd Reading

Passed 29 Yea · 3 Nay · 8 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 26308
Democratic 3000
Total 29308
% of votes cast 73%8%0%20%
How each member voted (40)
Member Party Vote
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Not Voting
Hill — Yea
Lara — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Monning — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Pan — Yea
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Leno — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Runner — Not Voting
Hancock — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Beall — Yea
Block — Yea
Hueso — Not Voting
Huff — Nay
Liu — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Nielsen — Not Voting
Wieckowski — Yea
Fuller — Not Voting
Glazer — Yea
Hall — Yea
Beth Gaines — Not Voting
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Not Voting
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass as amended

Passed 7 Yea · 0 Nay
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 6000
Democratic 1000
Total 7000
% of votes cast 100%0%0%0%
How each member voted (7)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Pavley — Yea
Hertzberg — Yea
Lara — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does SB 313 do?
Existing law requires the governing board of a school district to make specified findings before commencing the acquisition of real property for a new schoolsite in an area designated in a city, county, or city and county general plan for agricultural use and zoned for agricultural production, including a finding that the school district has notified and consulted with the city, county, or city and county within which the prospective schoolsite is to be located and that the school district will attempt to minimize any public health and safety issues resulting from the neighboring agricultural uses that may affect the pupils and employees at the schoolsite. This bill would require the school district to include within its findings that it has notified and consulted with the city, county, or city and county, including, but not limited to, the county agricultural commissioner. The bill would additionally require the school district to make a finding that the school district will attempt to minimize any land use incompatibilities that may arise when using a portion of land in an area zoned for agricultural production for a purpose other than agricultural use. Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district, by a 23 vote of its members, to render a city or county zoning ordinance inapplicable to a proposed use of school district property, except if the proposed use is for nonclassroom facilities. This bill would additionally condition this authorization upon compliance with a notice requirement regarding a schoolsite on agricultural land, and would require the governing board to notify the city or county, in writing, of the reason the governing board intends to take that vote at least 30 days prior to the vote. The bill would also require that vote to be based upon written findings that a zoning ordinance fails to accommodate the need to renovate and expand an existing public school or locate a new public school within the city or county.
Who sponsors SB 313?
SB 313 is sponsored by Galgiani and Monning.
What is the current status of SB 313?
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 313?
Track SB 313 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 313

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 313

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →