Connecticut 2023 Regular Session Status: Passed Senate 3 D cosponsors

SB 810 — AN ACT CONCERNING THE RENTING OR LEASING OF PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLES.

Last action — BILL PASSED TEMPORARILY

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. 3
    Passed Senate
  4. 4
    Passed House
  5. 5
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.

This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.

Bill Text

What changed in the latest version

14 added · 113 removed

14 line(s) added, 113 removed.

→
Previous
Latest
Senate General Assembly File No.
General Assembly Substitute Bill No.
424 January Session, 2023 Substitute Senate Bill No.
810 January Session, 2023 AN ACT CONCERNING THE RENTING OR LEASING OF PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLES.
810 Senate, April 4, 2023 The Committee on Transportation reported through SEN.
COHEN of the 12th Dist., Chairperson of the Committee on the part of the Senate, that the substitute bill ought to pass.
AN ACT CONCERNING THE RENTING OR LEASING OF PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLES.
(b) No person, firm or corporation engaged in the business of renting sSB810 / File No.
(b) No person, firm or corporation engaged in the business of renting or leasing passenger motor vehicles without drivers, for periods of thirty days or less, shall require an additional driver of any customer to show proof that the additional driver holds a credit card as a condition totherentalofapassengermotorvehicletothecustomer,provided such additional driver shows proof of a valid motor vehicle operator's license LCO \\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00810-R01 of 3 SB.docx Substitute Bill No.
424 1 sSB810 File No.
810 and the customer shows proof that the customer holds a credit card.
424 or leasing passenger motor vehicles without drivers, for periods of thirty days or less, shall require an additional driver of any customer to show proof that the additional driver holds a credit card as a condition totherentalofapassengermotorvehicletothecustomer,providedsuch additional driver shows proof of a valid motor vehicle operator's license and the customer shows proof that the customer holds a credit card.
Make any false or misleading statements either orally or in writing, in connection with the sale, offer to sell, or sSB810 / File No.
Make any false or misleading statements either orally or in writing, in connection with the sale, offer to sell, or advertisement of a collision damage waiver;
424 2 sSB810 File No.
424 advertisement of a collision damage waiver;
(d) Any motor vehicle rental contract incorporating a provision whereby the lessor of rental motor vehicles is able to recover for the loss of use of a rental motor vehicle because of any damage to such motor vehicle incurred during the term of such contract may permit the lessor to collect no more than sixty per cent of the daily rental fee stated in the contract for each day thelessor isdeprivedthe use of suchmotor vehicle for a periodnot to exceed seven days.
LCO {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-008102 of 3 R03-SB.docx } Substitute Bill No.
810 (d) Any motor vehicle rental contract incorporating a provision whereby the lessor of rental motor vehicles is able to recover for the loss of use of a rental motor vehicle because of any damage to such motor vehicle incurred during the term of such contract may permit the lessor to collect no more than sixty per cent of the daily rental fee stated in the contract for eachday thelessor isdeprivedthe use of suchmotor vehicle for a periodnot to exceed seven days.
July 1, 2023 Section 1 14-153b Sec.
Section 1 July 1, 2023 14-153b Sec.
sSB810 / File No.
JUD Joint Favorable LCO {\\PRDFS1\SCOUSERS\FORZANOF\WS\2023SB-00810- 3 of 3 R03-SB.docx }
424 3 sSB810 File No.
424 The following Fiscal Impact Statement and Bill Analysis are prepared for the benefit of the members of the General Assembly, solely for purposes of information, summarization and explanation and do not represent the intent of the General Assembly or either chamber thereof for any purpose.
In general, fiscal impacts are based upon a variety of informational sources, including the analyst’s professional knowledge.
Whenever applicable, agency data is consulted as part of the analysis, however final products do not necessarily reflect an assessment from any specific department.
OFA Fiscal Note State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None Explanation The bill makes various changes regarding renting or leasing of motor vehicles including adding a section to the current unfair trade practice violations resulting in no fiscal impact to the state as the Department of Consumer Protection has the resources to meet the requirements of the bill.
The Out Years State Impact:
None Municipal Impact:
None sSB810 / File No.
424 4 sSB810 File No.
424 OLR Bill Analysis sSB 810 AN ACT CONCERNING THE RENTING OR LEASING OF PASSENGER MOTOR VEHICLES.
SUMMARY This bill limits the amount that lessors of rental motor vehicles (see BACKGROUND) may collect through loss of use clauses (i.e., provisions in motor vehicle rental contracts allowing recovery for the “loss of use” of a rental motor vehicle due to damage it incurred during the contract’s term).
The bill defines loss of use as the deprivation of the lessor’s use of a rental motor vehicle during the period reasonably required to repair or replace the vehicle.
In practice, companies offering rental cars may include loss of use clauses in rental contracts allowing them to collect a fee from the renter for the period the vehicle cannot be rented to another person, but they will typically offer to waive their rights to recover the fee if the renter pays for a collision damage waiver or separate loss of use waiver.
Under the bill, any motor vehicle rental contract with a loss of use clause may allow the lessor to collect up to 60% of the daily rental fee stated in the contract for each day the lessor cannot use the vehicle, up to seven days.
When a rental contract is executed with a loss of use clause, the bill requires the lessor to explain the provision to the lessee orally, in plain language.
The bill makes violations of its loss of use clause provisions unfair trade practices under the Connecticut Unfair Trade Practices Act (CUTPA, see BACKGROUND).
The bill also prohibits short-term car rental companies (i.e., those renting passenger motor vehicles without drivers for periods of 30 days or less) from requiring a credit card from an additional driver under sSB810 / File No.
424 5 sSB810 File No.
424 certain circumstances.
Existing law prohibits these companies from requiring a customer to show proof of credit card as a condition for renting a vehicle, but they may require customers seeking to rent with cash to apply for advanced approval and leave a reasonable deposit.
If the customer shows proof of a credit card, the bill additionally prohibits car rental companies from requiring a customer’s additional driver to also prove that he or she holds a credit card, as long as the additional driver shows proof of a valid driver’s license.
EFFECTIVE DATE:
July 1, 2023, and the loss of use clause provision is applicable to contracts entered into on and after that date.
Show all 59 changed rows (19 more)
Previous
Latest
BACKGROUND Rental Motor Vehicle By law, a “rental motor vehicle” is a private passenger motor vehicle, as defined under insurance law, that is not the subject of a lease with the option to purchase where the lessee has the right to possession.
A “private passenger motor vehicle” is a (1) private passenger-type automobile;
(2) station wagon-type automobile;
(3) camper-type motor vehicle;
(4) high-mileage-type motor vehicle;
(5) truck-type motor vehicle with a load capacity of 1,500 pounds or less, registered as a passenger motor vehicle or passenger and commercial (combination) motor vehicle, or used for farming;
and (6) vehicle with a commercial registration.
It excludes a motorcycle or motor vehicle used as a public or livery conveyance (CGS § 38a-363(e)).
CUTPA The law prohibits businesses from engaging in unfair and deceptive acts or practices.
CUTPA allows the consumer protection commissioner to issue regulations defining what constitutes an unfair trade practice, investigate complaints, issue cease and desist orders, order restitution in cases involving less than $10,000, enter into consent agreements, ask the attorney general to seek injunctive relief, and accept voluntary statements of compliance.
It also allows individuals to sue.
Courts may issue restraining orders;
award actual and punitive damages, costs, and reasonable attorney’s fees;
and impose civil penalties of up to $5,000 for sSB810 / File No.
424 6 sSB810 File No.
424 willful violations and $25,000 for violation of a restraining order (CGS § 42-110a et seq.).
Related Bill sHB 6858, favorably reported by the Insurance and Real Estate Committee, generally prohibits car rental companies from collecting loss of use damages from a customer or the customer’s insurer.
COMMITTEE ACTION Transportation Committee Joint Favorable Substitute Yea 24 Nay 12 (03/17/2023) sSB810 / File No.
424 7
View plain text versions (5)

Action History

  1. BILL PASSED TEMPORARILY

  2. HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBER 579

  3. FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDAR

  4. SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH. A

  5. SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH. A

  6. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  7. NO NEW FILE BY COMM. ON Judiciary

  8. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  9. FILED WITH LCO

  10. Joint Favorable

  11. REF. BY SEN. TO COMM. ON Judiciary

  12. FILE NO. 424

  13. SENATE CALENDAR NUMBER 237

  14. FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.

  15. RPTD. OUT OF LCO

  16. REFERRED TO Office of Legislative Research AND Office of Fiscal Analysis 04/03/23

  17. FILED WITH LCO

  18. Joint Favorable Substitute

  19. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Transportation

  20. DRAFTED BY COMMITTEE

  21. Vote to Draft

  22. PUBLIC HEARING 0215

  23. Reserved for Subject Matter Public Hearing

  24. REF. TO JOINT COMM. ON Transportation

Sponsors

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

3 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 184 not signed on

Sponsors (3)

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (184)

184 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 184 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

Who sponsors SB 810?
SB 810 is sponsored by Patricia Billie Miller (Democratic), Susan M. Johnson (Democratic), and Anthony L. Nolan (Democratic).
What is the current status of SB 810?
This bill died with 2023 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Senate” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
Where can I track SB 810?
Track SB 810 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on SB 810

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of SB 810

Last checked for changes 2 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →