Medi-Cal: provider enrollment.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when SB 299 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on SB 299.
You're tracking SB 299
We'll email you the moment it moves.
SB 299 — Medi-Cal: provider enrollment.
Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 271, Statutes of 2015.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
✓Passed Senate
-
✓Passed Assembly
-
✓To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2015. Enacted.
Prognosis
Where this bill stands today.
Odds of enactment
HighHow often bills like it became law.
-
Enacted
Current position in the legislative process.
-
1 sponsor
1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.
-
Cleared a recorded vote
Passed 6 recorded votes so far.
Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.
Summary
Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires an applicant or provider, as defined, to submit a complete application package for enrollment, continued enrollment, or enrollment at a new location or a change in location, and generally requires the application package for enrollment, the provider agreement, and all attachments or changes to either that are submitted by specified applicants or providers to be notarized. Existing law requires the department to collect an application fee for enrollment, including enrollment at a new location or a change in location. This bill would exempt from these notarization requirements any provider that chooses to enroll electronically. The bill would clarify that the department is also required to collect an application fee for continued enrollment. Existing law authorizes the department to implement a 180-day moratorium on the enrollment of providers in a specified provider of services category, as specified. Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services to screen Medi-Cal providers and designate each provider or applicant as "limited," "moderate," or "high" categorical risk. Existing law requires the department to designate a provider or applicant as a "high" categorical risk if specified circumstances occur, including if the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services lifted a temporary moratorium within the previous 6 months for the particular provider type submitting the application, as specified. This bill would also require the department to designate a provider or applicant as a "high" categorical risk if the department lifted a temporary moratorium within the previous 6 months for the particular provider type submitting the application. This bill would also delete various obsolete provisions of law. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Chaptered 09/04/15 - Chaptered Current pdf September 04, 2015
- Enrolled 08/24/15 - Enrolled pdf August 24, 2015
- Amended 05/18/15 - Amended Assembly pdf May 18, 2015
- Introduced 02/23/15 - Introduced pdf February 23, 2015
- SB299 View text html
Action History
-
Chaptered by Secretary of State. Chapter 271, Statutes of 2015.
-
Approved by the Governor.
-
Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4:30 p.m.
-
Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 38. Noes 0.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
-
Ordered to special consent calendar.
-
In Senate. Concurrence in Assembly amendments pending.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 79. Noes 0. Page 2432.) Ordered to the Senate.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Do pass. Ordered to consent calendar. (Ayes 14. Noes 0.) (July 8).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 18. Noes 0.) (June 30). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee with author's amendments. Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
In Assembly. Read first time. Held at Desk.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 746.) Ordered to the Assembly.
-
Read second time. Ordered to consent calendar.
-
From committee: Be ordered to second reading pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8 and ordered to consent calendar.
-
Set for hearing April 20.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. with recommendation: To consent calendar. (Ayes 9. Noes 0. Page 545.) (April 8). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Set for hearing April 8.
-
Referred to Com. on HEALTH.
-
From printer. May be acted upon on or after March 26.
-
Introduced. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment. To print.
Sponsors
- Monning · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on
Sponsors (1)
- Monning
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 36 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 38 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (40)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Glazer | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Not Voting |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 69 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 79 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 99% | 0% | 0% | 1% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 10 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 14 | 0 | 0 | 3 |
| % of votes cast | 82% | 0% | 0% | 18% |
How each member voted (17)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Not Voting |
| Chang | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 15 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 18 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (19)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Yea |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 34 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Democratic | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 37 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| % of votes cast | 95% | 0% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (39)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Anderson | — | Yea |
| Block | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Wieckowski | — | Yea |
| Cannella | — | Not Voting |
| Galgiani | — | Yea |
| Allen | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| De León | — | Yea |
| Runner | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Hueso | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Yea |
| Leno | — | Yea |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Morrell | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Fuller | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Yea |
| Bill Berryhill | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Not Voting |
| Jackson, Corey A. | Democratic | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 9 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Wolk | — | Yea |
| Mitchell | — | Yea |
| Hall | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| Roth | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does SB 299 do?
- Existing law provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, under which qualified low-income individuals receive health care services. The Medi-Cal program is, in part, governed and funded by federal Medicaid Program provisions. Existing law requires an applicant or provider, as defined, to submit a complete application package for enrollment, continued enrollment, or enrollment at a new location or a change in location, and generally requires the application package for enrollment, the provider agreement, and all attachments or changes to either that are submitted by specified applicants or providers to be notarized. Existing law requires the department to collect an application fee for enrollment, including enrollment at a new location or a change in location. This bill would exempt from these notarization requirements any provider that chooses to enroll electronically. The bill would clarify that the department is also required to collect an application fee for continued enrollment. Existing law authorizes the department to implement a 180-day moratorium on the enrollment of providers in a specified provider of services category, as specified. Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services to screen Medi-Cal providers and designate each provider or applicant as "limited," "moderate," or "high" categorical risk. Existing law requires the department to designate a provider or applicant as a "high" categorical risk if specified circumstances occur, including if the federal Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services lifted a temporary moratorium within the previous 6 months for the particular provider type submitting the application, as specified. This bill would also require the department to designate a provider or applicant as a "high" categorical risk if the department lifted a temporary moratorium within the previous 6 months for the particular provider type submitting the application. This bill would also delete various obsolete provisions of law. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors SB 299?
- SB 299 is sponsored by Monning.
- What is the current status of SB 299?
- This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 23, 2015. Enacted.
- Where can I track SB 299?
- Track SB 299 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on SB 299
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of SB 299
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →