Medical cannabis: taxation: cannabis production and environment mitigation.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2243 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2243.
You're tracking AB 2243
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2243 — Medical cannabis: taxation: cannabis production and environment mitigation.
Last action — In committee: Held under submission.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
The Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act, administered by the director of the Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation, provides for the licensure of persons engaged in specified activities relating to medical cannabis, including cultivation and distribution. The Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, provides procedures for the collection of certain fees and surcharges. This bill would, for the privilege of doing business as a distributor in this state, impose a tax in specified amounts on every distributor upon all medical cannabis and medical cannabis products distributed to a dispensary in this state, as specified. The bill would require the State Board of Equalization to administer and collect the tax pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Fee Collection Procedures Law. The bill would require a distributor to register for a permit with the board and would allow the board to suspend or revoke a permit. The bill would authorize the board to prescribe by regulation a method and manner for payment of the tax that utilizes tax stamps or state-issued product bags. The bill would require all moneys, less refunds and costs of administration, to be deposited into the Cannabis Production and Environment Mitigation Fund, which this bill would establish in the State Treasury. This bill would continuously appropriate the moneys in that fund in specified percentages to, among other things, fund competitive grants for local law enforcement-related activities pertaining to illegal cannabis cultivation; to fund environmental cleanup restoration and protection of public and private lands that have been damaged by illegal cannabis cultivation; to address the environmental impacts of cannabis cultivation on public and private lands in California and fund other state enforcement-related activities pertaining to illegal cannabis cultivation; and to fund Regional Marijuana Enforcement Officers. This bill, except as provided, would become inoperative on January 1, 2018, if Proposition 64, also known as the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act, is approved by the voters at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election and takes effect. This bill would repeal all of its provisions as of January 1, 2025. By expanding the application of the Fee Collection Procedures Law, which imposes criminal penalties for various acts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/01/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 01, 2016
- Amended 06/29/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 29, 2016
- Amended 06/15/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 15, 2016
- Amended 06/02/16 - Amended Assembly pdf June 02, 2016
- Amended 05/31/16 - Amended Assembly pdf May 31, 2016
- Amended 05/03/16 - Amended Assembly pdf May 03, 2016
- Amended 04/26/16 - Amended Assembly pdf April 26, 2016
- Introduced 02/18/16 - Introduced pdf February 18, 2016
- AB2243 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Held under submission.
-
Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended. Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 1.) (June 22).
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
Referred to Com. on GOV. & F.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Urgency clause adopted. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 60. Noes 12. Page 5238.).
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 5237.)
-
Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 5220.)
-
Assembly Rule 69 suspended. (Page 5220.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read second time and amended. Ordered returned to second reading.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended. (Ayes 13. Noes 1.) (May 27).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on APPR. Read second time and amended.
-
Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Read second time and amended.
-
From committee: Amend, and do pass as amended and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 5. Noes 0.) (April 21).
-
In committee: Reconsideration granted.
-
Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Page 4448.)
-
In committee: Set, second hearing. Failed passage.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to suspense file.
-
Referred to Com. on REV. & TAX.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Runner · Cosponsor
- Wood · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 1 co-sponsors · 120 not signed on · 5 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Wood
Co-sponsors (1)
- Runner
Not signed on (120)
120 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 120 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 100% | 0% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bates | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Hill | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Nielsen | — | Yea |
| McGuire, Mike | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Democratic | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 71% | 14% | 0% | 14% |
How each member voted (7)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Hernandez | — | Yea |
| Hertzberg | — | Yea |
| Beall | — | Yea |
| Lara | — | Not Voting |
| Moorlach | — | Yea |
| Pavley | — | Yea |
| Nguyen, Stephanie | Democratic | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 53 | 10 | 0 | 7 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 2 | 2 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 60 | 12 | 0 | 8 |
| % of votes cast | 75% | 15% | 0% | 10% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Yea |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Olsen | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Not Voting |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Yea |
| Beth Gaines | — | Not Voting |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Yea |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 1 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Total | 13 | 1 | 0 | 6 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 5% | 0% | 30% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Obernolte | — | Not Voting |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Bigelow | — | Not Voting |
| Chang | — | Not Voting |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Not Voting |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Not Voting |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 0 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 0% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Not Voting |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 4 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 5 | 0 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 0% | 0% | 44% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Not Voting |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Quirk | — | Not Voting |
| Wagner | — | Not Voting |
| Jim Patterson | — | Not Voting |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 3 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 4 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 44% | 56% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Brough | — | Nay |
| O'Donnell | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Nay |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2243 do?
- The Medical Cannabis Regulation and Safety Act, administered by the director of the Bureau of Medical Cannabis Regulation, provides for the licensure of persons engaged in specified activities relating to medical cannabis, including cultivation and distribution. The Fee Collection Procedures Law, the violation of which is a crime, provides procedures for the collection of certain fees and surcharges. This bill would, for the privilege of doing business as a distributor in this state, impose a tax in specified amounts on every distributor upon all medical cannabis and medical cannabis products distributed to a dispensary in this state, as specified. The bill would require the State Board of Equalization to administer and collect the tax pursuant to the procedures set forth in the Fee Collection Procedures Law. The bill would require a distributor to register for a permit with the board and would allow the board to suspend or revoke a permit. The bill would authorize the board to prescribe by regulation a method and manner for payment of the tax that utilizes tax stamps or state-issued product bags. The bill would require all moneys, less refunds and costs of administration, to be deposited into the Cannabis Production and Environment Mitigation Fund, which this bill would establish in the State Treasury. This bill would continuously appropriate the moneys in that fund in specified percentages to, among other things, fund competitive grants for local law enforcement-related activities pertaining to illegal cannabis cultivation; to fund environmental cleanup restoration and protection of public and private lands that have been damaged by illegal cannabis cultivation; to address the environmental impacts of cannabis cultivation on public and private lands in California and fund other state enforcement-related activities pertaining to illegal cannabis cultivation; and to fund Regional Marijuana Enforcement Officers. This bill, except as provided, would become inoperative on January 1, 2018, if Proposition 64, also known as the Control, Regulate and Tax Adult Use of Marijuana Act, is approved by the voters at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election and takes effect. This bill would repeal all of its provisions as of January 1, 2025. By expanding the application of the Fee Collection Procedures Law, which imposes criminal penalties for various acts, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 2243?
- AB 2243 is sponsored by Runner and Wood.
- What is the current status of AB 2243?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2243?
- Track AB 2243 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2243
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2243
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →