California 2015-2016 Regular Session Status: Enacted

AB 2228 — Code enforcement officers.

Last action — Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 246, Statutes of 2016.

Track this bill free

No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.

  1. ✓
    Introduced
  2. ✓
    In Committee
  3. ✓
    Passed Assembly
  4. ✓
    Passed Senate
  5. ✓
    To Executive
  6. 6
    Enacted

This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2016. Enacted.

Prognosis

Likely to advance 70% · moderate confidence

Where this bill stands today.

Odds of enactment

High

How often bills like it became law.

  • Enacted

    Current position in the legislative process.

  • 1 sponsor

    1 primary, 0 co-sponsors signed on.

  • Cleared a recorded vote

    Passed 6 recorded votes so far.

Prognosis reads this bill's own signals — stage, sponsorship breadth, committee status, recorded votes and cross-state momentum. Odds come from a model trained on which bills have become law.

Summary

Existing law defines the term "code enforcement officer" as a person who is not a peace officer, who has enforcement authority for health, safety, and welfare requirements, and who is authorized to issue citations or file formal complaints, as specified. This bill would require the Board of Directors of the California Association of Code Enforcement Officers (CACEO) to develop and maintain standards for the designation of Certified Code Enforcement Officers or CCEOs. The bill would require the board to designate minimum training, qualifications, and experience requirements for applicants to qualify for the CCEO designation. The bill would also require the board to qualify cities, counties, cities and counties, and accredited educational institutions as Certified Code Enforcement Officer Education Program Providers, and would require all students, participants, or employees who successfully pass the minimum education and certification requirements to be granted CCEO status in an equivalent manner as applicants who attain certification through the CACEO. The bill would require the board to set annual fees in amounts that are reasonably related and necessary to cover the costs of administering these provisions, to maintain a register of applications for certification, and adopt procedures for discipline, revocation, and sanctions against applicants, registrants, and certificants. The bill would allow all orders of the board resulting in revocation, suspension, or other action to be appealed by a writ of mandate or petition for judicial review to the superior court.

Bill Text

Action History

  1. Chaptered by Secretary of State - Chapter 246, Statutes of 2016.

  2. Approved by the Governor.

  3. Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.

  4. In Assembly. Ordered to Engrossing and Enrolling.

  5. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 31. Noes 6. Page 4963.).

  6. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  7. From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.

  8. In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.

  9. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (June 14). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  10. Referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  11. In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.

  12. Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 68. Noes 10. Page 4768.)

  13. Read third time and amended. Ordered to third reading. (Page 4719.)

  14. Read second time. Ordered to third reading.

  15. From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 18. Noes 1.) (April 27).

  16. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (April 13). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.

  17. From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. (Ayes 6. Noes 1.) (April 5). Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.

  18. Re-referred to Com. on PUB. S.

  19. From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on PUB. S. Read second time and amended.

  20. Referred to Coms. on PUB. S. and L. GOV.

  21. From printer. May be heard in committee March 20.

  22. Read first time. To print.

Sponsors

  • Cooley · Primary

Sponsorship breakdown

Export CSV (upgrade) →

1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 5 voted No

Sponsors (1)

  • Cooley

Co-sponsors (0)

None.

Not signed on (121)

121 members have not signed on to this bill.

Show all 121 →

"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.

Whip count is in markup. Polling the chamber and every recorded vote this session. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Calling the roll · Tallying · Engrossing

Votes

Passed 31 Yea · 6 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 29502
Democratic 2100
Total 31602
% of votes cast 79%15%0%5%
How each member voted (39)
Member Party Vote
Beall — Yea
Hertzberg — Not Voting
Lara — Yea
Mendoza — Yea
Moorlach — Yea
Morrell — Nay
Pavley — Yea
Fuller — Yea
Galgiani — Yea
Glazer — Yea
Cannella — Yea
Allen — Yea
Mitchell — Yea
De León — Yea
Hernandez — Yea
Block — Yea
Hill — Yea
Leno — Yea
Pan — Yea
Wolk — Yea
Hall — Yea
Hancock — Yea
Hueso — Yea
Huff — Yea
Leyva — Yea
Liu — Yea
Anderson — Nay
Bates — Nay
Monning — Yea
Nielsen — Nay
Roth — Yea
Vidak — Yea
Wieckowski — Yea
Beth Gaines — Nay
Bill Berryhill — Not Voting
Mark Stone — Yea
Jackson, Corey A. Democratic Yea
McGuire, Mike Democratic Yea
Nguyen, Stephanie Democratic Nay

Official roll call →

Passed 68 Yea · 10 Nay · 2 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 60802
Democratic 5000
Republican 3200
Total 681002
% of votes cast 85%13%0%3%
How each member voted (80)
Member Party Vote
Achadjian — Yea
Alejo — Yea
Bloom — Yea
Brown — Yea
Maienschein — Yea
Mathis — Nay
Nazarian — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Steinorth — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Waldron — Yea
Williams — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Campos — Yea
Gatto — Yea
Gomez — Yea
Salas — Yea
Chiu — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Holden — Yea
Gray — Yea
Low — Yea
Lopez — Yea
Mayes — Yea
McCarty — Yea
Medina — Yea
Mullin — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Cooley — Yea
Cooper — Yea
Dababneh — Yea
Daly — Yea
Dodd — Yea
O'Donnell — Yea
Olsen — Yea
Rendon — Yea
Ridley-Thomas — Yea
Wilk — Yea
Burke — Not Voting
Atkins — Yea
Gordon — Yea
Harper — Nay
Chang — Yea
Chau — Yea
Chu — Yea
Chávez — Nay
Jones-Sawyer — Not Voting
Kim — Yea
Levine — Yea
Linder — Yea
Baker — Yea
Brough — Nay
Melendez — Nay
Rodriguez — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Thurmond — Yea
Ting — Yea
Weber — Yea
Wood — Yea
Frazier — Yea
Hadley — Nay
Beth Gaines — Nay
Cristina Garcia — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Jim Patterson — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Mark Stone — Yea
Roger Hernández — Yea
Travis Allen — Nay
Arambula, Joaquin Democratic Yea
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gipson, Mike A. Democratic Yea
Irwin, Jacqui Democratic Yea
Dahle, Megan Republican Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Grove, Shannon Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea
Lackey, Tom Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Do pass.

Passed 18 Yea · 1 Nay · 1 Other
Party YeaNayPresentNot Voting
Unaffiliated 15001
Democratic 2000
Republican 1100
Total 18101
% of votes cast 90%5%0%5%
How each member voted (20)
Member Party Vote
Bloom — Yea
Holden — Yea
Obernolte — Yea
Quirk — Yea
Santiago — Yea
Wagner — Yea
Wood — Yea
Eggman — Yea
Bonilla — Yea
Bigelow — Yea
Chang — Yea
Daly — Yea
Weber — Yea
Eduardo Garcia — Yea
Lorena Gonzalez — Yea
Roger Hernández — Not Voting
Bonta, Mia Democratic Yea
Calderon, Lisa Democratic Yea
Gallagher, James Republican Nay
Jones, Brian W. Republican Yea

Official roll call →

Subjects

Cross-referencing the record. Reading this bill against every other bill in the corpus by meaning, not keywords. Only the first open is slow. It’s instant for you after this. Matching · Ranking · Engrossing

Frequently asked questions

What does AB 2228 do?
Existing law defines the term "code enforcement officer" as a person who is not a peace officer, who has enforcement authority for health, safety, and welfare requirements, and who is authorized to issue citations or file formal complaints, as specified. This bill would require the Board of Directors of the California Association of Code Enforcement Officers (CACEO) to develop and maintain standards for the designation of Certified Code Enforcement Officers or CCEOs. The bill would require the board to designate minimum training, qualifications, and experience requirements for applicants to qualify for the CCEO designation. The bill would also require the board to qualify cities, counties, cities and counties, and accredited educational institutions as Certified Code Enforcement Officer Education Program Providers, and would require all students, participants, or employees who successfully pass the minimum education and certification requirements to be granted CCEO status in an equivalent manner as applicants who attain certification through the CACEO. The bill would require the board to set annual fees in amounts that are reasonably related and necessary to cover the costs of administering these provisions, to maintain a register of applications for certification, and adopt procedures for discipline, revocation, and sanctions against applicants, registrants, and certificants. The bill would allow all orders of the board resulting in revocation, suspension, or other action to be appealed by a writ of mandate or petition for judicial review to the superior court.
Who sponsors AB 2228?
AB 2228 is sponsored by Cooley.
What is the current status of AB 2228?
This bill has been enacted into law. Introduced February 18, 2016. Enacted.
Where can I track AB 2228?
Track AB 2228 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.

Make your voice heard on AB 2228

Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.

Stay ahead of AB 2228

Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously

One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.

Track this bill →