Net energy metering: Imperial Irrigation District.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 2163 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 2163.
You're tracking AB 2163
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 2163 — Net energy metering: Imperial Irrigation District.
Last action — In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires every electric utility, defined to include an electrical corporation, local publicly owned electric utility, or an electrical cooperative, to develop a standard contract or tariff providing for net energy metering, as defined, and to make this contract or tariff available to eligible customer-generators upon request for generation by a renewable electrical generation facility. An electric utility, upon request, is required to make available to eligible customer-generators contracts or tariffs for net energy metering, on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer-generators exceeds 5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. Existing law provides that an electric utility that is not a large electrical corporation is not obligated to provide net energy metering to customers in its service area once the above level is reached. The bill would require the Imperial Irrigation District to provide net metering service to eligible customer-generators that meet certain requirements, as specified. Because this bill would increase the level of service provided by a local publicly owned utility, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Imperial Irrigation District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
Bill Text
- Amended 08/19/16 - Amended Senate Current pdf August 19, 2016
- Amended 06/22/16 - Amended Senate pdf June 22, 2016
- Introduced 02/17/16 - Introduced pdf February 17, 2016
- AB2163 View text html
Action History
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
Re-referred to Com. on E., U., & C.
-
Joint Rules 61 and 62(a) suspended. (Ayes 27. Noes 12. Page 5511.)
-
From committee: Be re-referred to Com. on RLS. pursuant to Senate Rule 29.10(c). Re-referred to Com. on RLS.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
Read third time and amended. Ordered to second reading.
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Be placed on second reading file pursuant to Senate Rule 28.8.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 8. Noes 1.) (June 29). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to committee. Read second time, amended, and re-referred to Com. on ED.
-
In committee: Hearing postponed by committee.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Testimony taken. Further hearing to be set.
-
Referred to Com. on ED.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 27. Page 5141.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 13. Noes 6.) (May 27).
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Referred to APPR. suspense file.
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on APPR. (Ayes 7. Noes 5.) (April 12). Re-referred to Com. on APPR.
-
Referred to Com. on HIGHER ED.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 19.
-
Read first time. To print.
Sponsors
- Williams · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 7 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Williams
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 8 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 89% | 11% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Block | — | Yea |
| Huff | — | Nay |
| Leyva | — | Yea |
| Mendoza | — | Yea |
| Vidak | — | Yea |
| Liu | — | Yea |
| Monning | — | Yea |
| Pan | — | Yea |
| Hancock | — | Yea |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 44 | 22 | 0 | 4 |
| Democratic | 5 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 27 | 0 | 4 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 34% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Gordon | — | Yea |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Kim | — | Nay |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chu | — | Not Voting |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Not Voting |
| Maienschein | — | Not Voting |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Melendez | — | Nay |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Not Voting |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Jim Patterson | — | Nay |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Yea |
| Arambula, Joaquin | Democratic | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 11 | 4 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 13 | 6 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 65% | 30% | 0% | 5% |
How each member voted (20)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Daly | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Lorena Gonzalez | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 6 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| Democratic | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 5 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 54% | 38% | 0% | 8% |
How each member voted (13)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Nay |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Not Voting |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Williams | — | Nay |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 2163 do?
- Existing law requires every electric utility, defined to include an electrical corporation, local publicly owned electric utility, or an electrical cooperative, to develop a standard contract or tariff providing for net energy metering, as defined, and to make this contract or tariff available to eligible customer-generators upon request for generation by a renewable electrical generation facility. An electric utility, upon request, is required to make available to eligible customer-generators contracts or tariffs for net energy metering, on a first-come-first-served basis until the time that the total rated generating capacity used by eligible customer-generators exceeds 5% of the electric utility's aggregate customer peak demand. Existing law provides that an electric utility that is not a large electrical corporation is not obligated to provide net energy metering to customers in its service area once the above level is reached. The bill would require the Imperial Irrigation District to provide net metering service to eligible customer-generators that meet certain requirements, as specified. Because this bill would increase the level of service provided by a local publicly owned utility, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the Imperial Irrigation District. The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement. This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason. This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.
- Who sponsors AB 2163?
- AB 2163 is sponsored by Williams.
- What is the current status of AB 2163?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 2163?
- Track AB 2163 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 2163
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 2163
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →