Domestic and family violence: Sacramento County.
Do you support it?
Want to know if it passes?
We'll email you when AB 1127 moves — a committee vote, a floor vote, or a signature. Nothing else.
Free forever · unsubscribe in one click.
Your answer was recorded either way.
Which district are you in?
Your ZIP is all we need to match you to your own representatives — so we can tell you how they voted on AB 1127.
You're tracking AB 1127
We'll email you the moment it moves.
AB 1127 — Domestic and family violence: Sacramento County.
Last action — Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and JUD.
No card. One bill, free forever — alerts when it moves.
-
✓Introduced
-
✓In Committee
-
3Passed Assembly
-
4Passed Senate
-
5To Executive
-
6Enacted
This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
This bill is no longer active — its legislative session has ended, so there is no live prognosis. It would have to be reintroduced in the current session to move again.
Summary
Existing law requires the collection of fees for providing certified copies of vital records, including marriage certificates, birth certificates, fetal death records, and death records. Existing law provides for the establishment of county domestic violence program special funds for the purpose of funding local domestic violence programs. Certain fees payable at the time a marriage license or a certified copy of any of the above vital records is issued may be collected by the county clerks for deposit into these funds. This bill would, until January 1, 2021, authorize the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors, upon making certain findings and declarations, to authorize an increase in fees for certified copies of certain vital records, up to $4. This bill would further authorize the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors to make further increases in fees each year, as specified. This bill would require the fees to be allocated for purposes relating to domestic and family violence prevention, intervention, and prosecution. This bill would require the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors, by July 1, 2017, to submit a report on funds received and expended in connection with the fee increases, and the outcome of activities associated with the act, to the Legislature. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Sacramento.
Bill Text
- Amended 04/06/15 - Amended Assembly Current pdf April 06, 2015
- Introduced 02/27/15 - Introduced pdf February 27, 2015
- AB1127 View text html
Action History
-
Referred to Coms. on GOV. & F. and JUD.
-
In Senate. Read first time. To Com. on RLS. for assignment.
-
Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Senate. (Ayes 49. Noes 26. Page 1483.)
-
Read second time. Ordered to third reading.
-
From committee: Do pass. (Ayes 7. Noes 3.) (May 12).
-
From committee: Do pass and re-refer to Com. on JUD. (Ayes 5. Noes 3.) (May 6). Re-referred to Com. on JUD.
-
In committee: Set, first hearing. Hearing canceled at the request of author.
-
Re-referred to Com. on L. GOV.
-
From committee chair, with author's amendments: Amend, and re-refer to Com. on L. GOV. Read second time and amended.
-
Referred to Coms. on L. GOV. and JUD.
-
Read first time.
-
From printer. May be heard in committee March 31.
-
Introduced. To print.
Sponsors
- Cooley · Primary
Sponsorship breakdown
Export CSV (upgrade) →1 sponsors · 0 co-sponsors · 121 not signed on · 8 voted No
Sponsors (1)
- Cooley
Co-sponsors (0)
None.
Not signed on (121)
121 members have not signed on to this bill.
Show all 121 →"Not signed on" means a member has not sponsored or co-sponsored this bill — it does not imply opposition. Members flagged Voted No have a recorded No vote on this bill.
Votes
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 45 | 20 | 0 | 5 |
| Democratic | 4 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 6 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 49 | 26 | 0 | 5 |
| % of votes cast | 61% | 33% | 0% | 6% |
How each member voted (80)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Achadjian | — | Nay |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Baker | — | Nay |
| Bloom | — | Yea |
| Brough | — | Nay |
| Brown | — | Yea |
| Kim | — | Not Voting |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Mathis | — | Not Voting |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Rodriguez | — | Yea |
| Thurmond | — | Yea |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Williams | — | Yea |
| Eggman | — | Yea |
| Dababneh | — | Yea |
| Daly | — | Yea |
| Frazier | — | Yea |
| Campos | — | Yea |
| Cooper | — | Yea |
| Bonilla | — | Yea |
| Gatto | — | Yea |
| Gray | — | Yea |
| Jones-Sawyer | — | Yea |
| Lopez | — | Yea |
| Dodd | — | Yea |
| Low | — | Yea |
| Medina | — | Yea |
| Mullin | — | Yea |
| Nazarian | — | Yea |
| Perea | — | Yea |
| Rendon | — | Yea |
| Gomez | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Harper | — | Nay |
| Atkins | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Salas | — | Nay |
| Burke | — | Yea |
| Levine | — | Yea |
| Mayes | — | Nay |
| Chang | — | Nay |
| Bigelow | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Chu | — | Yea |
| Chávez | — | Nay |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| McCarty | — | Yea |
| Melendez | — | Not Voting |
| Obernolte | — | Nay |
| Olsen | — | Nay |
| Quirk | — | Yea |
| Ridley-Thomas | — | Yea |
| Santiago | — | Yea |
| Steinorth | — | Nay |
| Ting | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Weber | — | Yea |
| Wilk | — | Nay |
| Wood | — | Yea |
| Gonzalez | — | Not Voting |
| Hadley | — | Nay |
| Beth Gaines | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Eduardo Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Roger Hernández | — | Yea |
| Travis Allen | — | Nay |
| Bonta, Mia | Democratic | Yea |
| Calderon, Lisa | Democratic | Yea |
| Gipson, Mike A. | Democratic | Yea |
| Irwin, Jacqui | Democratic | Yea |
| Dahle, Megan | Republican | Nay |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Grove, Shannon | Republican | Nay |
| Jones, Brian W. | Republican | Nay |
| Lackey, Tom | Republican | Nay |
| Patterson, Joe | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 7 | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| Republican | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Total | 7 | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| % of votes cast | 70% | 30% | 0% | 0% |
How each member voted (10)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Chau | — | Yea |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Holden | — | Yea |
| O'Donnell | — | Yea |
| Wagner | — | Nay |
| Cristina Garcia | — | Yea |
| Mark Stone | — | Yea |
| Gallagher, James | Republican | Nay |
| Party | Yea | Nay | Present | Not Voting |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Unaffiliated | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| Total | 5 | 3 | 0 | 1 |
| % of votes cast | 56% | 33% | 0% | 11% |
How each member voted (9)
| Member | Party | Vote |
|---|---|---|
| Holden | — | Yea |
| Gordon | — | Not Voting |
| Chiu | — | Yea |
| Cooley | — | Yea |
| Alejo | — | Yea |
| Linder | — | Nay |
| Maienschein | — | Nay |
| Waldron | — | Nay |
| Gonzalez | — | Yea |
Subjects
Frequently asked questions
- What does AB 1127 do?
- Existing law requires the collection of fees for providing certified copies of vital records, including marriage certificates, birth certificates, fetal death records, and death records. Existing law provides for the establishment of county domestic violence program special funds for the purpose of funding local domestic violence programs. Certain fees payable at the time a marriage license or a certified copy of any of the above vital records is issued may be collected by the county clerks for deposit into these funds. This bill would, until January 1, 2021, authorize the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors, upon making certain findings and declarations, to authorize an increase in fees for certified copies of certain vital records, up to $4. This bill would further authorize the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors to make further increases in fees each year, as specified. This bill would require the fees to be allocated for purposes relating to domestic and family violence prevention, intervention, and prosecution. This bill would require the Sacramento County Board of Supervisors, by July 1, 2017, to submit a report on funds received and expended in connection with the fee increases, and the outcome of activities associated with the act, to the Legislature. This bill would make legislative findings and declarations as to the necessity of a special statute for the County of Sacramento.
- Who sponsors AB 1127?
- AB 1127 is sponsored by Cooley.
- What is the current status of AB 1127?
- This bill died with 2015-2016 Regular Session. It reached “Passed Assembly” and never advanced before the session ended, so it can no longer move — a new version would have to be reintroduced in the current session.
- Where can I track AB 1127?
- Track AB 1127 free on One Click Politics — get push/email alerts when it moves.
Make your voice heard on AB 1127
Find the representatives who decide this bill and tell them where you stand — for yourself, or mobilize your whole list in one click with One Click Politics advocacy software.
Stay ahead of AB 1127
Last checked for changes 3 months ago · updated continuously
One Click Politics tracks every bill in Congress and all 50 states.
Track this bill →